Visit Counter

Monday, November 16, 2015

Still crazy after all these years



Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates in debate decline to use term 'radical Islam'



First Barry held a press conference shortly after the Paris attack and said, "he doesn’t want to speculate on what happened." Probably because Josh Earnest didn't decide yet if it was a video or workplace violence. Then the Democratic debate,  following in true liberal fashion, refused to say radical Islamic terrorists were responsible for the attack. Apparently the victims died from flying shrapnel and bullets from an unspecified source. 

Seriously folks, if radical Islamic dogs didn't kill them who the fuck did? 


How can you defeat an enemy you don't have the balls to call out by name?

-----------------------------------




Hillary Clinton and the other Democratic presidential candidates are being criticized for declining to use the words “radical Islam” during Saturday night’s debate, following the deadly terror attacks in Paris.

Clinton, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley declined to use the words after being asked during the CBS debate whether they would agree with GOP presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio saying, “We are at war with radical Islam.”

The front-running Clinton said using the term “radical Islam” would be “painting with too broad a brush.”

She also said the term was “not particularly helpful.” 

“I don’t think we’re at war with Islam,” continued Clinton, a former secretary of state. “I don’t think we’re at war with all Muslims. I think we’re at war with jihadists.”

That's the problem<> she doesn't think. 
Oh...and the jihadists are what.. Presbyterians?

However, Clinton said the world is indeed at war with “violent extremists” and those who use religion for “power” and “oppression.”

“violent extremists” + “power” + “oppression.” = Islam

Rubio said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press" that not saying "Islamic State" would "be like saying we weren't at war with Nazis, because we were afraid to offend some Germans who may have been members of the Nazi Party but weren't violent themselves." 

"I don't understand it," the Florida lawmaker continued. "We are at war with radical Islam."

GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee on Saturday night tweeted: “You’re all grown up now. You can do it. Three words. Ten syllables. Say it with me: ‘Radical Islamic terrorism.”

The Islamic State has taken credit for the three coordinated attacks in and around Paris that killed 129 people and wounded more than 350.

French President Francois Hollande called the attacks “an act of war” by the terror group.


I've heard this bravado before. This is the 6th time France has been attacked by Muslims this year. He'll follow suit just like the rest of the world. Remember when the Jordanian pilot was burned to death in a cage? There was a lot of bluster but the end result was King Abdullah donned his flight outfit.






...And that really was the end result.




During the debate at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, Sanders said he didn’t think the term “is what's important.”

He argued the real issue is groups such as ISIS and Al Qaeda, and their mistreatment of women and children, have become “a danger to modern society” and that “American leadership can and must come together to destroy them.”

His plan is to destroy them with a 90% tax rate.

O’Malley, like Clinton and Sanders, also took special consideration not to offend the entire Muslim community.

“I believe calling it what it is … radical jihadis,” he said. “Let's not fall into the trap of thinking that all of our Muslim-American neighbors in this country are somehow our enemies here. They are our first line of defense. … We need our Muslim-American neighbors to stand up and to be a part of this.”

"They are our first line of defense?" 

Are you kidding me! 

Since the Paris attack how many Muslims have you seen come forth to condemn it?





Now you know why O'Malley is the Jim Gilmore of the Democratic party.

GOP presidential candidate Jeb Bush tweeted on Saturday: “Yes, we are at war with radical Islamic terrorism.”

During the debate, Clinton also was asked about a December 2014 speech in which she said it’s important to show “respect even for one's enemy” and to try to “empathize with their perspective and point of view.”

Clinton responded: “It is important to try to understand your adversary in order to figure out how they are thinking, what they will be doing, how they will react.”

Why blame all of Japan just because of the "indiscretions" of a few of its pilots? This is the kind of head up your ass mentality that just got 132 people killed in Paris. 

3.8 million Muslim "unvetted refugees" just wandered their way into Europe which is bad in its own right. Not to mention... how many ISIS fighters were in the herd?

Clinton campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri told Yahoo News after the debate that she didn’t think Clinton was getting a lot of criticism for remarks.

“I think she was really clear that we don’t need to go to war,” Palmieri said. “We don’t need to go to war with Islam. We’re going to war with extremists.”

Don’t you just love the way liberals parse words:

Illegals are “undocumented immigrants”.

The Ft. Hood attack among others was deemed “workplace violence”.

Global Warming no longer worked and had to become “Climate Change” to account for sudden drops in temperature.

Sgt. Joshua Wheeler did not die in combat in Iraq he died in an “advise-and-assist mission.”

This list goes on and on. How much longer will Americans put up with this denial of reality? A lot longer I guess. Just got done watching Barry at the G20 Summit. After all that has transpired in the last few days he said, “ISIS is a handful of killers brutalizing local populations." Truly unbelievable! 



Then there's this. 

Obama describes Boston Marathon bombings as ‘two brothers and a crock pot’


From one crock pot to another.







Share/Bookmark

No comments :

Post a Comment