Visit Counter

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

This was totally preventable

Manuel Contreras-Galdean

Manuel Contreras-Galdean

I wrote about this so many times that I'm sick of it. How many people have to die before we get rid of these illegals? This bastard while driving drunk killed a 16 year old girl named Kelly Tracy. Only 16 years old! Her young life snuffed out. Why does this continually happen? I just can't understand it! Does anyone in ICE or other branches of law enforcement give a damn? Apparently not:

According to police records, Contreras-Galdean was arrested in July 2000 in Salt Lake City on suspicion of interfering with a police officer. He served 10 days in jail. And was set free.

In April 2001, he was arrested in West Jordan, Utah, on suspicion of giving false information to police. He served 10 days in jail. And was set free.

In May 2001, the Utah Highway Patrol arrested him on suspicion of DUI. And set him free.

In 2003, he was stopped by a New Mexico cop who called the Border Patrol. Contreras-Galdean accepted a voluntary return to Mexico.

In January 2007, he was arrested in Tempe on suspicion of extreme DUI. He pleaded guilty to DUI and served 24 hours in April 2007. And was set free.

Why wasn't he deported? This is so ludicrous I can't even comphrend it. But I can tell you one thing. The complete break down of law enforcement is why Kelly Tracy is dead. How many more Kelly Tracy's have to die before we do something?



Saturday, November 15, 2008

Why we are...Where we are

As I write this please bear in mind I respect the man and his service to our country.

Definition of John McCain

Why we are.... where we are!

In a nutshell both of these definitions apply to John McCain.


1. An unbranded range animal, especially a calf that has become separated from its mother (The Republican Party.) Traditionally considered the property of the first person who brands it. (The Democratic Party)

2. One that refuses to abide by the dictates of or resists adherence to a group; a dissenter.

Documented Facts:

CO-Sponsor of the "Shamesty Bill" with Ted Kennedy! (Need I say more?)

Votes with the like's of Hillary Clinton, Obama, Kennedy, and Kerry to give illegals Social Security
benefits. (Unbelievable!)

He twice opposed the Bush tax cuts. Then advocates extending the Bush tax cuts that he twice voted

This went over real big when he said: "I don't know as much about the economy as I should."

He said the economy was rock solid. About 4 days later Paulson announces a 700 billion dollar
emergency bailout!

He doesn't know how many house's he has?

Add all this up, with the MSM in the tank for Obama, and we saw the end result.

According to some blogs I have read we have become a party of stodgy old men. This has got to change. We need fresh blood. New ideas. We need new leadership.
Maybe you have seen Michael Steele on FOX.
When asked by FOX News as an African-American how he felt when Obama won he said. "As an African-American I feel proud. Too bad it had to be a Democrat."

I understand Michael Steele is going to run to become Chairman of the RNC. Excellent choice. When your team ends the season 3-11. You got to do something. So you might as well start at the top.


Thursday, November 13, 2008

AIG at it again.... repeat 2nd time!

Yesterday the federal government agreed to increase the bail out money to AIG.

CEO Edward Liddy referred to the influx of money as "an arrangement with the federal government." All this time I thought it was a bail out. Isn't spin a wonderful thing?

Anyway they got caught sending financial planners (if you think about it, that in itself
is a joke.) to a posh luxury resort complete with cocktails parties, limousines, and dinner at top restaurants. This new fiasco cost. Get ready. $343,000.00.

Wait it gets better. This is killer. AIG instructed the hotel to keep their visit a secret. No signs allowed. When CEO Liddy was asked why was it a secret with no signs, he said the lack of signage was a result of cost cutting measures!

"We are really cutting corners. We're doing the same thing the American taxpayer is doing," Liddy said. "We are tightening our belts. We didn't use any signage."

PS: It's funny but in a way it's not. How in the hell are you going to control $700 billion? What percent of this money is going up in smoke? What branch of the government is checking how this money is being spent? I wonder if they thought this through before rushing it through Congress!


Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Fairness Doctrine
Chucky Boy

Allow me start off by saying this is something all of us should be very concerned about.
As you know the vast majority of the mainstream media is in the tank for Obama. They openly supported his candidacy. As you have in football, Obama has his own built in cheerleaders.....the media.
The prominent people on the right are Cavuto, O'reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Dennis Prager, Michelle Malkin, to name a few....there are others.....but they fail in comparison to the avalanche in the print media, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC. Not to mention Hollywood! Lets face it. The list is endless!
So why am I telling you something you already know?
I'll try to put it in a nutshell. The liberals want to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. Even the name is a misnomer. This was passed during the Democratic Truman administration. January 5th 1949 Truman delivered the State of the Union message asking for strengthened liberal program characterized as the "Fair Deal."

A quick summary:


U.S. Broadcasting Policy The policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission that became known as the "Fairness Doctrine" is an attempt to ensure that all coverage of controversial issues by a broadcast station be balanced and fair. The FCC took the view, in 1949, that station licensees were "public trustees," and as such had an obligation to afford reasonable opportunity for discussion of contrasting points of view on controversial issues of public importance. The Commission later held that stations were also obligated to actively seek out issues of importance to their community and air programming that addressed those issues. With the deregulation sweep of the Reagan Administration during the 1980s, the Commission dissolved the fairness doctrine.

On the surface the Fairness Doctrine seems.....well fair.
The truth is it is far from it:
This is why liberals want to reinstate it and why conservatives are against it:


The Fairness Doctrine has been strongly opposed by prominent libertarians and conservatives who view it as an attempt to regulate or mandate certain types of speech on the airwaves. Editorials in The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Times have said that Democratic attempts to bring back the Fairness Doctrine have been made largely in response to and contempt for the successes of conservative talk radio. 

What's next FOX News?
Isn't freedom of speech a right under the 1st Amendment?
This is nothing more then a blatant attempt by Schumer and is band of bastards trying to suppress what little is left of the conservative media.
He told Megyn Kelly (in a snide way, with a shit eating grin on his face) he supports reinstating the Fairness Doctrine because he wants... "all of the media to be like FOX...fair and balanced."
Want the Fairness Doctrine Schumer? Apply it to Obama Headquaters aka MSNBC and the rest of the main stream media! 


Edward's back in the news

Edward's has broken 3 months of silence to speak at Indiana University. This speech was arranged before the affair became public. He was supposed to get a fee of $50,000 but the university cut it to $35,000 because he had an extra-marital affair. (If you're going to use those guidelines, the truth be known, he should have to pay the university to speak.)

No cameras were allowed in the auditorium. No TV crews. Students had to submit written questions before the speech. Then Edwards picked the one's he chose to answer. For some inexplicable reason his prior infidelity never came up during the entire speech.

The students and the university got nothing out of it that I could see. Edwards got enough money to pay Rielle Hunter for another two months to keep her mouth shut and prevent her from getting a paternity test. There is no father listed on the birth certificate.

See. I guess some good comes out of everything.