2008 Hillary campaign ad could be put to good use in 2016 by Republicans

(If video won't load click post title)

Video 91

And who was on the other end of that 3AM phone call?

Chris Stevens.

2008 Hillary campaign ad could be put to good use in 2016 by Republicans

Blind justice?

Maybe not. 

To use Barry's vernacular...  tell me there is not a "smidgen of corruption" in this case.

----------------------------------------------------------

Dinesh D’Souza Criminally Sentenced While John Edwards and Other Liberals Skated 

Btw...

Compare D’ Souza to Corzine. Another case of out-and-out willful violation of the law. Corzine a Democrat, CEO of MF Global Inc., “just lost" $1.6 billion (that's B as in BILLION) of customer money and resigned from the company, which is now bankrupt, in November 2011 never spending a minute in jail. Today he has a net worth of $400 million.

By

Rachel Alexander | Sep 29, 2014

Conservative author Dinesh D’Souza, one of the most brilliant conservative political writers of the modern era, was sentenced by a judge last week to eight months in a halfway house and probation. He was also ordered to pay a $30,000 fine within 45 days. His alleged crime? He made two contributions to a losing political campaign under the names of friends. D’Souza accepted a plea agreement admitting he used straw donors to donate $20,000 to the U.S. Senate campaign of Wendy Long, a friend of his. Federal campaign law limits contributors to U.S. Senate campaigns to $5,000 each. 

At first glance one is inclined to think, “you commit a crime, you deserve the punishment.” But a closer look reveals that he is not being punished equally compared to others who did the same thing - in fact he is being punished much more severely than Democrats who did much worse. There are myriads of campaign laws the average person has no idea exist. The laws have become so complex, vast - and there are multiple layers: federal, state, local laws and regulations. Many conservative intellectuals like D’Souza are vastly experienced with policy - but not campaigns/elections, which are a completely different world. 

This incident reminds me of one of my favorite books, Three Felonies a Day, written by Harvey Silverglate, a criminal defense attorney, who explains how the average American unknowingly commits three felonies a day. As bright as D’Souza is, I guarantee you he did not realize there was a severe penalty for merely giving money to two friends, who then donated it to an obviously losing political campaign. 

Many campaign laws today make little sense, because they were passed into law due to the influence of powerful special interests. The “campaign finance reform” laws that Sen. John McCain got passed into law ended up hurting many conservatives, including former House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, who has been fighting prosecution over alleged violations for many years now. If D’Souza had simply created a Super PAC to help Long, he would have been fine, and could have even contributed an unlimited amount of money independently to assist Long. I highly doubt D’Souza knew of this slight, technical distinction, or he would have gone that route. I am a former elections attorney, and I didn’t even fully understand the difference until I just now researched it. 

Let’s contrast this with what happened to former Democratic candidate for president, John Edwards, who reportedly used nearly $1 million in campaign funds to hide an extramarital affair. If convicted, he would have faced up to 30 years in prison, a much more severe penalty than the three to 10 years D’Souza was facing. According to prosecutors, Edwards accepted $725,000 from an elderly lady, other donations from a wealthy Texas attorney, and filed a false campaign report in order to funnel roughly $1 million from those sources to his mistress, Rielle Hunter, ostensibly to keep her quiet, and an aide, Andrew Young, who pretended to be the father of Hunter’s child with Edwards. Young, who was married, later came out and denounced Edwards in a book for putting him in that position. Edwards, for his knowing and immoral shenanigans, served ZERO time - not a day in a halfway house, jail or prison.

Edwards’ two attorneys, who include Geoffrey Fieger, the notorious attorney for euthanasia doctor Jack Kevorkian, were also acquitted of any wrongdoing. They had been indicted for allegedly causing more than 60 straw donors to contribute over $125,000 in illegal campaign contributions to Edwards’ 2004 presidential campaign. That’s right, more than 60 straw donors, not just two like D’Souza allegedly recruited. It was easy for prosecutors to show the 60 were straw donors, because they were virtually all employees of Edwards’ attorney’s law firm Fieger Law, family members of the firm’s employees or third-party vendors of the firm. 

The indictment of Edwards’ attorneys stated that Fieger “tried to obstruct and impede the grand jury's investigation of the illegal campaign contributions...attempted to shift responsibility for the illegal contributions to a deceased officer of the Fieger firm, attempted to mislead the grand jury by telling witnesses false information with the intent that the witnesses would repeat that false information to law enforcement authorities, and attempted to conceal an incriminating document from the grand jury.”

This grossly unfair treatment of Edwards and his attorneys vs. D’Souza comes down to the leftists who control the judiciary and the legal system. The judge who imposed the sentence on D’Souza, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Berman, is a liberal who was appointed to the court by former president Bill Clinton. Berman is a former executive director of the New York Alliance to Save Energy, which states that part of its goals are to “lessen greenhouse gasemissions and their impact on the global climate.” He has a masters in social work, and is known for rulings such as approving a settlement requiring Islamic inmates to be served a diet that follows their religion. 

The prosecutors handling the trial against D’Souza are also liberals. Under Obama, the Justice Department takes its orders from the top. The prosecutor who went after D’Souza demanding prison time, Assistant U.S. Attorney Carrie Cohen, is the vice president of the New York City Bar, which is an indication she is an activist on the left, since most busybodies who run Bar associations are. She declared that D’Souza’s “actions were premeditated” and “a prison sentence is sufficient.” 

The unequal treatment under the law of conservatives vs. liberals continues to worsen as liberals become more brazen, complacently used to having control over the legal system.

Stedman’s simply picking up where the IRS left off!

 

 We’ve seen the worst abuses ever in recent years by the so-called justice system, as leftist agitator Eric Holder used his position as head of the U.S. Department of Justice to sue conservative states over illegal immigration laws. 

As I wrote previously about this case, D’Souza is being targeted because he is a highly influential and brilliant figure on the right. The scales of justice are not balanced any longer, sadly, in the U.S. Those of color on the right - D’Souza is a dark-skinned immigrant from India - are targeted more viciously by the left than other conservatives, because they defeat the left’s false argument that the right is composed of only white people. It is going to get worse unless far more Americans start speaking out about the horrendous abuses of the legal system against conservatives. 

Once our laws morphed off their ethical and moral foundations, right and wrong have been handed off to liberal, activist lawyers and judges, whose only “right” has now become the promotion of their leftist political agenda.

Blind justice?

He 'doesn't want to miss breaking stories'

'It's an easy thing to do without': NBC news anchor Brian Williams reveals he never drinks because he 'doesn't want to miss breaking stories'

He wouldn't know a story if it bit him on the ass!

 Certainly there is no shortage of stories (aka scandals ) emanating from The Scandaldome. Take the IRS... the biggest blockbuster story of government corruption since Watergate which he and his network obediently turned a blind eye to. Sorry Williams, drinking has nothing to do with it. It has to do with "journalistic condoms" when it cums to reporting on Barry. 

-----------------------------------------------------

• He revealed that he avoids alcoholic beverages in order to 'think straight' 

• NBC journalist also admitted that he never really 'loved' drinking anyway

• Hurricane Katrina in 2005 is the story that has 'stuck with' him the most

⬇️

(Since he doesn't drink was he on crystal meth throughout Tuesday, September 11, 2001?) 

By Sophie Jane Evans for MailOnline

Full story if you can stomach it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2779485/It-s-easy-thing-without-NBC-news-anchor-Brian-Williams-reveals-never-drinks-doesn-t-want-miss-breaking-stories.html

Published: 08:18 EST, 3 October 2014 | Updated: 11:43 EST, 3 October 2014

As the anchor of a major American news program, he needs to be ready when big stories break.

So, in order to be able to 'think straight' at short notice, Brian Williams no longer drinks alcohol.

The NBC 'Nightly News' journalist revealed that he avoids alcoholic beverages during a question and answer session with viewers and fans on Facebook.

He also admitted that he never really 'loved' drinking anyway and some relatives 'have had a rough time' with it in the past, so it was 'easy' to give it up.

He 'doesn't want to miss breaking stories'

Prophetic Words: Bush Predicted Terror, Death and Chaos of Iraq Pullout

Which one is the Moron and Liar In Chief now?

Bush in 2007 delivered eerily accurate warning about Iraq unrest:

(If video won't load click post title)

Video 89

A prophetic warning from then-President George W. Bush before he left office about what would happen if the U.S. withdrew troops from Iraq too soon is getting new attention in light of the Islamic State’s gains, as each of his predictions appears to be coming true.

Now the community organizer in action:

 Check out Barry's boastful arrogance, and naiveté, on the Iraqi situation. He sacrificed what was right for the country for what his political base wanted to hear. 

This will go down in history with "You can keep your insurance period".

 Check out the last (lie) I mean line. He is never held accountable for anything with the blessing of the MSM.

(If video won't load click post title)

Video 90

 It wasn't his decision... so who superseded Barry?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A prophetic warning from then-President George W. Bush before he left office about what would happen if the U.S. withdrew troops from Iraq too soon is getting new attention in light of the Islamic State’s gains, as each of his predictions appears to be coming true.

Bush, as discussed on "The Kelly File," made the remarks in the White House briefing room on July 12, 2007, as he argued against those who sought an immediate troop withdrawal. 

“To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States,” Bush cautioned.

He then ticked off a string of predictions about what would happen if the U.S. left too early.

“It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to Al Qaeda.

“It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale.

“It would mean we allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. 

“It would mean we’d be increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.”

Bush speechwriter Marc Thiessen says all these predictions have come true.

“Every single thing that President Bush said there in that statement is happening today,” he told Fox News.

To Bush’s first warning, the Islamic State terror group is effectively the successor to Al Qaeda in Iraq – and they’ve overrun several major cities in Iraq’s north while claiming broad swaths of territory in Syria. Further, the group has been behind mass killings of Iraqi civilians as well as the recent execution by beheading of two American journalists.

The Obama administration has warned that the group’s violence threatens to approach genocide levels.

Though President Obama says combat troops will not be returning to fight in Iraq, American troops are nevertheless returning in some capacity. The president on Wednesday announced an expanded airstrike campaign against the group in Iraq and Syria, and is sending hundreds more U.S. military personnel into Iraq.

Some lawmakers and analysts say this could have been avoided if the Obama administration had left a residual force in Iraq, or at least had responded sooner to ISIS’ gains in northern Iraq over the past year.

Bush, before he left office, signed an agreement setting the stage for U.S. troops to withdraw by December 2011.

Obama, though, was urged by military advisers to keep thousands of service members after that deadline to help the shaky Iraqi government. But when Washington and Baghdad were unable to reach a renewed agreement governing the presence of U.S. forces in the country, the Obama administration withdrew virtually all troops at the end of 2011.

“We needed to leave a stabilizing force behind, and we didn't. And of course, we know the rest is history,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told Fox News.

Prophetic Words: Bush Predicted Terror, Death and Chaos of Iraq Pullout

Democrats Must Keep Black Americans Poor To Stay In Power

Please watch this video to the very end. Keep in mind Sen. Elbert Guillory formerly was a Democrat. His verbal assassination of Mary Landrieu is spot on and fairly rips apart what the entire Democratic ideology is based upon and could change the thinking of the "flock". 

Although I suspect the last component may be wishful thinking on my part.

(If video won't load click post title)

Video 88

Democrats Must Keep Black Americans Poor To Stay In Power