Visit Counter

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Onward Christian soldiers: US filmmaker, self-styled revolutionary trains faithful to fight ISIS





We've all seen it. 


Christians routinely rounded up like sheep, kneeling obediently, waiting to have their head cut off. 

Wouldn't it feel gratifying to read this headline:




Christians swarm Mosul killing Jhadi John and 162 ISIS's terrorists  


Well, finally this guy is trying to make it happen.

------------------------------------------------------------------










American training Iraqi army to fight ISIS speaks out

Just 12 miles north of the ISIS-controlled city of Mosul, an American filmmaker and self-styled revolutionary is running a boot camp for Christians willing and able to fight for their lives and faith against the murderous Islamic terror organization.

Matthew VanDyke, an award-winning documentary filmmaker who escaped a Libyan prison after going there to help overthrow Col. Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, is helping to train hundreds of long-persecuted Assyrian Christians in everything from firearms to close quarters combat. VanDyke, who founded the security contracting firm company Sons of Liberty (SOLI), is working with an unnamed U.S. military veteran to get the Christian conscripts who range in age from 18 to 60 or older, ready to take on the ominous black clad army that lies dug in to Iraq's second-largest city just over the horizon. Earlier this week, the first battalion of the Nineveh Plain Protection Units (NPU) graduated from the boot camp.
"They need to demonstrate that they can maintain and be responsible for their own security to encourage their people to stay – or else, within a couple of generations, there won’t be any Christians left in Iraq."

- Matthew VanDyke

“It’s designed to help local sectarian forces in local communities facing threats of terrorism, insurgency or oppressive regimes to be able to defend themselves,” VanDyke told FoxNews.com from a base in the Kurdish region of Northern Iraq, where he hopes to help train 2,000 men. “It’s the step where the international community has failed or is moving too slow.”

The Assyrians, sometimes called Syriac Christians, belong to a variety of Christian sects and are a stateless ethnic group. One of the oldest civilizations from ancient Mesopotamia, they have their own culture, language and heritage sharply distinct from that of Arabian or Kurdish people. They speak a near-extinct language connected to Aramaic, the language spoken by Jesus, and remain stateless – over the years enduring immense persecution and land expropriations.

While the Kurds have proven a worthy adversary of ISIS, with their battle-hardened Peshmerga pushing back the terrorist army in cities and villages throughout northern Iraq and Syria, the Christians and other religious minorities including the Yazidis have been slaughtered, starved and sent fleeing throughout the region since ISIS broke from Al Qaeda and began establishing a so-called caliphate in the region a year ago. Iraq's Christian population, which numbered 1.5 million in 2004, has dwindled in the face of the ISIS onslaught while, VanDyke charges, the world has stood by. 

“The international system has failed [Christian] communities around the world in recent years," said VanDyke, a 35-year-old Baltimore native who obtained a master's degree from Georgetown University's vaunted Walsh School of Foreign ServiCe before embarking on a mercurial career that has seen him film and fight throughout Northern Africa and the Middle East. "Christianity is about to be wiped out in Iraq.

“They are down to less than 400,000. Many of those who have left will never return," he continued. "They need to demonstrate that they can maintain and be responsible for their own security to encourage their people to stay – or else, within a couple of generations, there won’t be any Christians left in Iraq. This is their last chance.”

In December, the Assyrian Democratic Movement – the primary political party of Assyrians in Iraq – announced the development of the NPU, a militia made up mostly Christian volunteers. VanDyke said the Christians realized they had to fight for themselves when ISIS began a major assault on Christian-held areas of Iraq such as the Nineveh Plains last year and the Peshmerga withdrew without telling them.

“Some people woke up and looked outside and there was ISIS in their backyard, so they don’t trust anyone else but their own defense and nor should they,” VanDyke said. “They’ve had women kidnapped; their homes have been taken from them in the fight with ISIS.”

However, bringing this Christian group together and training them to take up arms has been something of a political challenge. VanDyke said that the minority faction was persistently denied requests by the Iraqi Central Government and Peshmerga to form their own force, so they began training covertly. With a nascent force now established and ready to fight the common enemy, any opposition from the Iraqi or Kurdish governments has dropped.

Klado Ramzi, an Iraqi Christian who serves on the NPU Leadership Committee, told FoxNews.com that the group's goals go beyond just protecting its people and territory from ISIS, but include acquiring the long-term capability of defending itself.

“We have had roots in Iraq for thousands and thousands of years," Ramzi said. "It is very important that we protect our language, our being. We respect all people in Iraq, but we refuse to be part of the fighting between Kurds and Arabs. We want to be independent and we need our own system of security for the NPU area.”

The Assyrian fighters supply their own weapons at the camp, which VanDyke began covertly in December. In addition to basic military training, VanDyke and his associates are helping leaders within the Christian communities forge international diplomatic connections, including with the U.S. State Department. Sons of Liberty bills itself as a full-service military training, consulting, support and security firm that seeks to “enable those abandoned by the international community to take action in defense of themselves and their people.”

In 2013, VanDyke released his first documentary, entitled “Not Anymore: A Story of Revolution” with his own money and the goal of encouraging international support for Syrian rebels in the ongoing civil war. The film won more than 50 awards and has been shown at educational institutions and events around the world sponsored by organizations such as Amnesty International. His second documentary, “Point and Shoot,” which used footage VanDyke shot from 2007-2011, while motorcycling around the Middle East and North Africa as well as while in Libya.

His latest project, Sons of Liberty, relies on donations to provide training and aid, one reason he is no longer conducting the camp in secret. VanDyke said his goal is to redefine the security contracting industry "by challenging the mercenary model that has dominated it throughout history, by providing services and assistance for free to those in the greatest need of them." In addition to funding, he seeks skilled ex-military operators and security contractors who can donate their skills to help train the Assyrians.

In its violent quest to take over cities and land, ISIS has intentionally persecuted religious minorities – kidnapping, murdering, raping, enslaving and torturing Christians. Just this week, Syrian activists said as many as 200 Christians had been abducted, including women and the elderly, from Assyrian Christian villages in northeastern Syria. The U.S. State Department condemned the attacks, and stated that hundreds more are trapped in villages besieged by ISIS operatives.

For now, VanDyke – who fought alongside rebels in Syrian more than a year ago, believes going into Syria is just too dangerous.

“The problem there is the level of betrayal,” he said. “There is a very high likelihood for anyone who goes there of being sold to militants by the very people you’re there to help and protect.”






Share/Bookmark

Friday, February 27, 2015

I'm no De Niro fan...but






Robert De Niro pays IRS $6.4 million after he's slapped with massive tax lien and says the government's been billing the WRONG ADDRESS







Legendary actor says delinquency notices regarding his 2013 taxes were sent to the wrong address

His reps said Thursday 'he had a check for the full amount [$6,410,449.20] hand delivered to the IRS this morning'

A lien from the IRS serves as a notice to creditors that the U.S. government has a right to you property 

By Josh Gardner For Dailymail.com

Published: 21:18 EST, 26 February 2015 | Updated: 21:27 EST, 26 February 2015



Hollywood living legend Robet De Niro made headlines Thursday with the news he owed the IRS an astounding $6.4 million in back taxes.

However, the news appear to have come as a surprise to De Niro--who's worth a reported $200 million--as much as to his fans.

According to the 71-year-old's reps, he never saw the notices sent to him by Uncle Sam.



De Niro's reps said Thursday 'he had a check for the full amount [$6,410,449.20] hand delivered to the IRS this morning' after news broke that he'd 

The delinquency notices were 'sent to an old address,' De Niro's people told the Smoking Gun, 'he had a check for the full amount hand delivered to the IRS this morning.'

The IRS lodged the complaint against the actor three months ago, according to Smoking Gun.

The lien was first noticed by the folks at FamousTaxLiens.com.

It lists De Niro's residence as a Tribeca condominium he helped develop along with his partners.

However, lending some believability to his claim, De Niro has many residences including a $125,000 per month rental--one of New York's priciest--overlooking Central Park. 





Share/Bookmark

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Obama Vetoes Keystone XL Pipeline Bill




Why buy oil from Canada when we can buy it from our Muslim "friends" in Saudi Arabia? 

If they're so concerned about carbon emissions wouldn't oil contained in a pipe be a better solution than trucks and trains hauling the oil through the United States?





We need 67 votes to override the veto. 

Perhaps if Republicans vow they'll get Edward Snowden to check for leaks it'll pass.   








President Barack Obama on Tuesday swiftly delivered on his vow to veto a Republican bill approving the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada, leaving the long-debated project in limbo for another indefinite period.

The Senate received Obama's veto message and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell immediately countered by announcing the Republican-led chamber would attempt to overturn the veto by March 3.

Obama rejected the bill hours after it was sent to the White House. Republicans passed the bill to increase pressure on Obama to approve the pipeline, a move the president said would bypass a State Department process that will determine whether the project is in the U.S. national interest.

"Through this bill, the United States Congress attempts to circumvent longstanding and proven processes for determining whether or not building and operating a cross-border pipeline serves the national interest," Obama wrote in his veto message.

Republicans, who support the project because of its job-creation potential, made passing a bill a top priority after gaining control of the U.S. Senate and strengthening their majority in the House of Representatives in November elections.

The bill passed by 270-152 in the House earlier this month and cleared the Senate in January. Despite their majority in the Senate, Republicans are four votes short of being able to override Obama's veto.

They have vowed to attach language approving the pipeline in a spending bill or other legislation later in the year that the president would find difficult to reject.

Obama has played down Keystone XL's ability to create jobs and raised questions about its effects on climate change. Environmentalists, who made up part of the coalition that elected the president in 2008 and 2012, oppose the project because of the carbon emissions involved in getting the oil it would carry out of Canadian tar sands.

TransCanada Corp's pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels a day of mostly Canadian oil sands petroleum to Nebraska en route to refineries and ports along the U.S. Gulf. It has been pending for more than six years.












Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Ruhollah Khomeini would have received a better reception





Obama Aide Calls Netanyahu's Planned Visit 'Destructive' to U.S.-Israel Ties



What to know what is "destructive"?
Susan Rice... a liar without a shred of credibility. She lied about the Benghazi video and then this...


Video 104

Bergdhal captured on the battlefield?


-----------------------------------------------------------------------







Susan E. Rice, President Obama's national security adviser. Credit Alex Wong/Getty Images 






WASHINGTON — Susan E. Rice, President Obama's national security adviser, sharply criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel on Tuesday over his plans to address a joint meeting of Congress next week, saying his actions had hurt his nation's relationship with the United States.

Mr. Netanyahu's decision to travel to Washington to deliver the speech two weeks before the Israeli elections has "injected a degree of partisanship, which is not only unfortunate, I think it's destructive of the fabric of the relationship," Ms. Rice said in an interview on the PBS television program "Charlie Rose."

Her comments marked the strongest public rebuke to date by the Obama administration since Mr. Netanyahu accepted an invitation from Speaker John A. Boehner to make his case to Congress against a nuclear deal with Iran, which is a priority of Mr. Obama's. It is also the frankest acknowledgment yet by a top American official of the degree to which the controversy has damaged United States-Israeli relations.

The speech, scheduled for March 3, was arranged by Mr. Boehner and the Israeli ambassador without consulting the White House — a move that Mr. Obama's team has called a breach of protocol.

The president has said he will not meet with Mr. Netanyahu during his visit to avoid any appearance that he is trying to influence the Israeli elections that are scheduled for mid-March.

The episode is a low point in the tense relationship between Mr. Obama and Mr. Netanyahu and has touched off weeks of mostly anonymous sniping and finger-pointing.

Top administration officials have hinted more openly of their displeasure in recent days.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who as president of the Senate would be expected to attend, has said he will be traveling abroad. Secretary of State John Kerry said Tuesday that he would be in Switzerland negotiating with the Iranians. The White House has also not committed to sending a representative next week to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's conference, where Mr. Netanyahu is also scheduled to appear.

The Israeli prime minister himself has turned down a request by Democratic senators for a private meeting, Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, said Tuesday.

"We offered the prime minister an opportunity to balance the politically divisive invitation from Speaker Boehner with a private meeting with Democrats who are committed to keeping the bipartisan support of Israel strong," Mr. Durbin said in a statement. "His refusal to meet is disappointing to those of us who have stood by Israel for decades."

In a letter released by Mr. Durbin's office, Mr. Netanyahu said such a meeting "could compound the misperception of partisanship regarding my upcoming visit."

Mr. Netanyahu said Tuesday that he was making the trip because it was his obligation to "do everything I can to prevent" a nuclear agreement with Iran.

"Therefore, I will go to Washington to address the American Congress, because the American Congress is likely to be the final brake before the agreement between the major powers and Iran," he said as he toured a military base in southern Israel.

Ms. Rice demurred when asked whether she believed Mr. Netanyahu was making the speech to gain political favor.

"I'm not going to ascribe motives to the prime minister," she told Mr. Rose. "The point is, we want the relationship between the United States and Israel to be unquestionably strong, immutable, regardless of political seasons in either country, regardless of which party may be in charge in either country.

"We've worked very hard to have that," she said, "and we will work very hard to maintain that."





Share/Bookmark

Saturday, February 21, 2015

What's another word for New York?



DEMOCRATS. 

So when they turn on Barry I guess the party's over.



New York Post Cover Ridicule’s Obama’s Non-View Of ‘Islamic Terrorism’


It’s not the first time the New York Post has framed President Obama on their cover in an unflattering way, but today’s latest New York Post Obama cover featuring the President wearing a blindfold and asking, “Islamic terror? I just don’t see it”, definitely ranks among the paper’s most openly mocking.




February 19, 2015 New York Post cover mocking President Obama’s refusal to associate Islam with terrorism.



The blindfolded Obama New York Post cover conveniently arrives during the President Obama White House launching of a summit aimed at understanding and attempting to deal with terrorism and violent extremists, reports the Washington Post.

The Obama-ridiculing New York Post cover also follows President Obama’s speech on Wednesday where he declared, “We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam.”

Along with the New York Post, many constituents from both the right and left have been questioning President Obama’s refusal to label the Islamic State – also known as ISIS and ISIL – as Islamic terrorists, or to associate the jihadist group with “Islamic terror”.

At the same time, President Obama has explained his feelings on the matter, saying that associating ISIS with Islam would give them a legitimacy they don’t deserve.


“They try to portray themselves as religious leaders, holy warriors in defense of Islam. We must never accept the premise that they put forward because it is a lie. Nor should we grant these terrorists the religious legitimacy that they seek. They are not religious leaders. They are terrorists.”

This explanation by President Obama doesn’t seem to appease the New York Post, however, the paper being highly critical of President Obama’s speech in the story accompanying the Obama-blindfold cover.


“They’re (ISIS) burning and beheading victims in the name of Islam,” begins the New York Post story. “But President Obama delivered a major speech Wednesday on combating violent extremism — while refusing to use the words ‘Muslim terrorists.'”

The New York Post story moves on to further criticize President Obama’s refusal to use terms like “Islamic terror,” the President instead focusing on things like the positive role that Islam and the Muslim culture has played in America and around the world.






Share/Bookmark