Visit Counter

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Gun Free Zones





"Makes a lot of sense, but shouldn't this be a government sponsored thing rather than a private (profit making) venture?" 
Barbie Boxer


"Solves the problem short term, but we really need to get rid of all the guns."
Princess Nancy Pelosi


"We have it posted on the front gate of our mansion and so far its worked out fine."
Barbara  Streisand


Video 161










Share/Bookmark

Lemony Snicker and his wife pledge $1 million to Planned Parenthood



Why not ISIS?

The philanthropic duo had this to say,  "We've been very fortunate" adding: “good fortune should be shared with noble causes.” 


I get it. 
Why give the money to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital to save children when you could give it to the "rusty coat hanger" so they can kill them and sell their body parts. A far more noble cause.

-----------------------------------------------------








The author of A Series of Unfortunate Events announced a $1 million donation to Planned Parenthood on Tuesday via Twitter

Daniel Handler, who writes children’s books under name Lemony Snicket, tweeted that he and his wife and illustrator, Lisa Brown, had “been very fortunate,” adding: “good fortune should be shared with noble causes.” 

Brown told BuzzFeed that she and her husband have supported Planned Parenthood for years, “for obvious reasons: It’s a great organization that has provided top-quality healthcare for countless women and families in our lives.” 

“This year, Planned Parenthood has gone through a series of unfortunate events, and it felt right to make our support more public and more dramatic,” she said. 

Handler and Brown have donated substantial sums to the women’s health organization in the past. “If your salary equaled the amount of money my wife and I gave Planned Parenthood one year, you’d be in the richest 1 percent in the world,” Handler wrote in 2007 for the New York Times. 

Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards appeared in Congress on Tuesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to defend her organization against allegations of that it illegally profits by selling fetal tissue. 

Republican lawmakers rapidly assailed Richards with accusations over her salary, Planned Parenthood’s travel expenses, and the activities of the group’s political action committee. 

Throughout the contentious hearing, Richards defended the women’s health organization as a critical provider of STD testing and contraceptive care for millions of Americans, while noting that the majority of its federal funding arrives in the form of Medicaid reimbursements for legitimate medical care.







Share/Bookmark

Do what I say not what I do




Barry loves gun control and gun free zones…


except when it comes to his nice cozy family.

 Easy to say when you have armed guards watching your kids every move.






Share/Bookmark

Monday, October 5, 2015

Our government is riddled with corruption






It's hard to tell the good guys from the bad anymore. You name the agency and I bet there are more people working there who are corrupt then not. The IRS scandal. What was the end result? Nothing. The FBI investigating the IRS scandal? Ditto. Now Chaffetz was targeted by the SS. Will Clancy get fired? You can bet the house he won't. The most you could hope for is… he wants to spend more time with his family.. and even that looks improbable.

This is the trickle down leadership coming from an unscrupulous WH. 
In charge of everything responsible for nothing.

---------------------------------------------------

Secret Service chief knew about Jason Chaffetz leak earlier than initially reported




(CNN)The director of the Secret Service said Friday he first heard rumors about employees of his agency circulating unflattering information about a top Republican lawmaker earlier than he initially reported.

Director Joe Clancy said in a statement he was first aware of the "speculative rumor" of members of his agency discussing Rep. Jason Chaffetz's records on March 25. Previously, Clancy said he first heard about the information from the media April 1.

Clancy said when he first heard the information it was "not credible and was not attributed to a source of information or indicative of any action." 


An investigation released Wednesday by the Department of Homeland Security found that a top official at the agency encouraged colleagues via email to release records on Chaffetz contained "some information that he might find embarrassing needs to get out."

The Daily Beast shortly thereafter reported that Chaffetz had been rejected in 2003 by the agency he now oversees as a committee chairman.

Clancy said he didn't learn until later that Secret Service employees had accessed the private records of Chaffetz, and leaked that he applied unsuccessfully for a job at the agency.

"I feel it is extremely important to be as accurate as possible regarding my knowledge of this matter and I have personally spoken to Chairman Chaffetz to advise him of the additional information that I provided to the Inspector General," Clancy said.






Share/Bookmark

A personal assessment of Donald Trump





On a tip from Phil McCafferty





By Stephen Meister 9/27/15



Despite Donald Trump's meteoric rise to the top of
the Republican presidential polls, the GOP
establishment continues to bash its leading candidate.
Apparently "party-cide" is contagious: The Democratic
establishment continues to ride the sinking Clinton
campaign like the string quartet on the deck of the
Titanic — the majority of Americans know she's a liar
and don't trust her. It's a fight to the death all
right, only each party's pointing a gun at its own
head.


GOP establishment favorite Jeb Bush is hemorrhaging
voters too. CBS News/YouGov shows Bush coming in a
pathetic eighth place in New Hampshire and doing only
marginally better in Iowa, where he now places fifth.


As an attorney who's worked for Trump (I have not
represented him for the past year and a half) — and
many years ago, against him — his success on the
campaign trail comes as no surprise: Trump's a man of
exceptional tenacity and guts, insightful intuitions,
clear purposes, an intelligence that's expressed
forcefully and directly, always without regard to
political correctness, and a world class negotiator.
Trump intuitively understands what troubles Americans
and boldly states their concerns; I guarantee he'll
never be an appeaser of foreign governments; there'll
be no Neville Chamberlains or hapless apprentices for
domestic or foreign policy, in his administration — if
you're not doing your job, you'll be fired.


Coming off President Obama's massive failures, most
recently his hugely dangerous appeasement of Iran (and
funding of the terrorist regime), Americans hunger for
Trump's common sense approach, especially when coupled
with his incorruptibility: Trump doesn't need donors
(let alone a foundation to function as money
generating, influence-peddling machine), and when he
says politicians are forever hitting him up for money,
I can tell you he's not exaggerating.


All this has allowed Trump to tap into a geyser of
American distrust and disgust over liberal policies,
including out-of-control spending, immigration
amnesty, and national defense (or better said the lack
thereof), and over establishment Republicans who,
despite being in control of the House of
Representatives, have done nothing to stop America's
fall. The voters see the wreckage Europe has suffered
from decades of socialist policies and porous borders
and they don't want that to happen to America.


With an anchor baby born every 93 seconds, the
Heartland isn't content to allow America to suffer the
fate of Europe by granting millions of illegals
amnesty; Americans signed onto a melting pot, not pot
luck — and believe we're supposed to live alongside
the immigrants we let in, not those who break in.


Pundits on both sides of the aisle are panicking over
Trump. First, they said he'd never declare he's
running, that it was all a publicity stunt; then, when
Trump did declare, they said he'd never file the
financial disclosures; then, after he filed, they said
his remarks on immigration would be his undoing (yet
those remarks only galvanized his base); and then they
said he'd get crushed in the polls after the first
debate. That's 0 for 5.


Doubling down on their badly wrong predictions, and
realizing the debates won't bring him down, panicking
neo-con pundits now claim Trump's unfavorability
ratings will be his undoing. But polls show that's
Hillary's problem, not Donald's.


And, according to Survey USA, Trump is garnering
substantial portions of the black and Latino votes,
25-31 percent. That's something neither Romney nor any
other Republican nominee in recent memory has been
able to do.


Here's some free advice, Donald (your favorite kind):
Instead of the GOP asking you to pledge to support the
eventual GOP nominee, you should demand that the GOP
pledge to support you if you become that nominee.


In a match up against Sanders, Clinton or Biden, the
GOP is better off with Trump, whose business
experience, successes and star power can overpower an
aging socialist, a corrupt dynastic politician, or the
vice president of the most pathetic administration in
modern history.






Share/Bookmark