Visit Counter

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Even Paxil can't save his presidency




(If video won't load click post title)




Video 60

--------------------------------------------------------------------



The Daily Caller



A downbeat President Barack Obama repeatedly asked his worried supporters Monday night to help resurrect his spirits, following weeks of political disasters and personal humiliations caused by the cascading collapse of Obamacare. The distracted president railed against opponents and at one point appeared to forget the number of people in the Obamacare system during the rambling quarter-hour address.

“My main message is I’m going to need your help, your energy, your faith, your ability to reach out to neighbors, kids and friends [and] co-workers,” he told listeners to the Internet broadcast arranged by his grass-roots group, Organizing for Action.

But his worried followers would also benefit from proselytizing for Obama and Obamacare, Obama suggested.

“I’ve never lost faith in our ability to get this done… you guys have lifted me up, and lifted each other up at every step of the way, and I know you’re going to just keep on doing that,” he said during his 14-minute sermon.

‘We have experienced discouragement and setbacks and naysayers every step of the way, but you know when you’re on the right side of something, then it gives you energy, it gives you motivation,” he said.

“All the people out there who need help, everybody out there who is working hard but just finding that the system kinda feels rigged against him… that’s got to motivate us,” he said.

During his monologue, he made a mistake that illustrates the strain he’s facing while trying to save his Obamacare network.

“In the first month alone, we’ve seen more than 100 million Americans already successfully enroll in the new insurance plans,” he said, inaccurately referring to the 106,000 Americans who managed to pick a health-benefit plan via the cripple website.

The broadcast was audio-only, and conducted after the evening news. That media strategy will likely minimize TV coverage of his speech and despondent mood, while still allowing him to reach his political base.

After past political defeats, including the 2011 budget negotiations, Obama showed reduced energy.










Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

ObamaCare website now fully operational


Share/Bookmark

Obama... False hope...False Messiah




(If video won't load click post title)

 
Video 59








Share/Bookmark

Monday, November 11, 2013

Thank the Lord...I'm not a Lezbo anymore









Didn't see this coming. 

Bill de Blasio the incoming NYC mayor is a Sandinista socialist who married a lesbian and honeymooned in Cuba.





And I was worked up about Weiner winning!

-----------------------------------------------------------------



NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio's wife Chirlane McCray, a former lesbian, opens up about falling in love with a man


Bill de Blasio's wife opened up about falling in love with a man after years of identifying as a lesbian and their life as a "very conventional, unconventional couple" in a candid interview released Thursday.


Chirlane McCray, 58, said her relationship with de Blasio was made possible "by putting aside the assumptions I had about the form and package my love would come in."


The interview, with Essence magazine, comes 34 years after McCray penned a groundbreaking 1979 essay for Essence entitled, "I Am a Lesbian," about coming out as a gay black woman.







The deBlasio family...

Can a sitcom be far off?




Why...I believe..I hear a song coming on..











Share/Bookmark

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Another Stunning Reversal In President Obama’s Talking Points On Obamacare




There are only two scenarios here.


1. He's a liar.

2. He didn't even bother to read his own legislation which bears his name.

(I'll go with liar even though I doubt he read his own bill)

Nixon lied about Watergate, it was a stupid thing to do, but no one was hurt, and in the real scheme of things (Watergate vs Benghazi) not really that big of a deal. He was forced to resign. 

Clinton lied…"I never had sex with that woman" and faced impeachment but again no one beside the immediate participants suffered any pain. 

Barry promised Americans "You can keep your plan period" he lied and millions will lose their insurance. Many millions more will lose their insurance when the employer mandate kicks in. When you compare what he's done to the other two…well there is no comparison.

 Yes Democrats may take a hit in the midterms but what happens to Barry? 

Evidently not a damn thing.





--------------------------------------------------------------------





President Barack Obama delivers remarks on the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, at an Organizing for Action grassroots supporter event in Washington, November 4, 2013.


For the second time in as many months, President Barack Obama has dramatically changed his communications strategy for coping with the troubled rollout of his signature legislation.

In an interview Thursday with NBC's Chuck Todd, the President apologized for the fact that some people in the individual insurance market had found their health plans canceled under the new law, in violation of Obama's promise that "if you like your plan, you can keep it."

"Even though it's a small percentage of folks who may be disadvantaged, you know, it means a lot to them," Obama said Thursday. "And it's scary to them. And I am sorry that they, you know, are finding themselves in this situation, based on assurances they got from me." He also hinted that he would support efforts, possibly through legislation, to address the problem.


The statement came after more than a week of attempts by the administration to obfuscate the hardship faced by some people who were being forced under the law to pay more for new insurance plans they did not choose. On Oct. 30, during a speech in Boston, Obama claimed falsely that anyone bought insurance as an individual would "be getting a better deal" under the Affordable Care Act. "So anyone peddling the notion that insurers are canceling peoples' plan without mentioning that almost all the insurers are encouraging people to join better plans with the same carrier and stronger benefits and stronger protections while others will be able to get better plans with new carriers through the marketplace, and that many will get new help to pay for these better plans and make them actually cheaper—if you leave that stuff out, you're being grossly misleading, to say the least," Obama said.

Just a few weeks earlier, Obama had appeared in the Rose Garden to announce a similarly stunning reversal in messaging, this time about the state of the website designed to allow people to sign up for the plan. "No one is more frustrated than I am," he said on October 21 of the technical problems that had rendered the website for the Affordable Care Act inoperable. For the three weeks prior, Obama had dismissed the plague of technical issues as mere "glitches," and complained that Republicans were "rooting for failure" when they were discussed.

Complicating matters for the administration is that they knew about both issues before the public faced them, but plowed on with the implementation—and their initial message—despite it. The warning flags were clear for the website in August, if not earlier, when security reviews found issues with the site's coding. Obama's "you can keep it" line and accompanying policy has been flagged as misleading by fact-checkers for years, even before it was signed into law.

The shift comes as the Jan. 1 beginning of the individual mandate nears, though individuals have until the end of March to enroll in a plan before they are assessed a fine. Behind the scenes Congressional Democrats are livid with the White House, and vulnerable incumbents are already publicly throwing barbs over Obama's handling of the law's implementation.





Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Just not the right fit for NYC



The Contenders


Anthony Weiner 


Sexual pervert




Elliot Spitzer


Sexual pervert extraordinaire




Christine Quinn


Lesbian




Bill deBlasio


Sandinista Socialist



 Joe Ihota


Republican




And the winner is...



Bill deBlasio



The Sandinista Socialist




Video 58

Campaign ad... wealth redistribution is the first thing out of his son's mouth.  Tax and spend...what a novel idea for liberals. Isn't NYC one of the most expensive to live in and heavily taxed in the country already? Are they insane? Evidently so.



Even in this field the Republican never stood a chance.




Share/Bookmark

A Public Service Announcement



On a tip from Senior International Correspondent
Ed Kilbane














Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Hitler finds out about ObamaCare rollout problems



(If video won't load click post title)


Video 57












Share/Bookmark

Monday, November 4, 2013

For consumers whose health premiums will go up under new law, sticker shock leads to anger





When the opponents of ObamaCare (Palin among others) warned of the appending storm of millions of Americans loosing their current insurance Barry scoffed ..."don't listen to them" another favorite catch phrase was, "despite what you may have heard." The MSM was only to happy to go along with the charade writing them off as... "right wing TeaParty wacko's."

Although the opponents are now proven right, and the Supremes said it's constitutional, the train has long since left the station and the rest of America is just now catching on to what habitual liar Barry is



(Believe me...this cartoon doesn't even scratch the surface)




I don't care how you dice it, slice it, sugarcoat this statement:

 "No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people. If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what."

It is what it is an out and out lie and he can't spin his way out of it!




BTW...This latest fiasco does make one wonder why those college transcripts are under lock and key?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Source Washington Post



Americans who face higher ­insurance costs under President Obama's health-care law are angrily complaining about "sticker shock,"




 threatening to become a new political force opposing the law even as the White House struggles to convince other consumers that they will benefit from it. 

The growing backlash involves people whose plans are being discontinued because the policies don't meet the law's more-stringent standards. They're finding that many alternative policies come with higher premiums and deductibles.

After receiving a letter from her insurer that her plan was being discontinued, Deborah Persico, a 58-year-old lawyer in the District, found a comparable plan on the city's new health insurance exchange. But her monthly premium, now $297, would be $165 higher, and her maximum out-of-pocket costs would double.

That means she could end up paying at least $5,000 more a year than she does now. "That's just not fair," said Persico, who represents indigent criminal defendants. "This is ridiculous."

If the poor, sick and uninsured are the winners under the Affordable Care Act, the losers appear to include some relatively healthy middle-income small-business owners, consultants, lawyers and other self-employed workers who buy their own insurance. Many make too much to qualify for new federal subsidies provided by the law but not enough to absorb the rising costs without hardship. Some are too old to go without insurance because they have children or have minor health issues, but they are too young for Medicare.

Others are upset because they don't want coverage for services they'll never need or their doctors don't participate in any of their new insurance options.

"There are definitely winners and losers," said Sabrina Corlette, a senior research fellow at Georgetown University's Center on Health Insurance Reforms. "The problem is that even if the majority are winners . . . they're not the ones writing to their congressmen."

The administration says that about 12 million Americans, or 5 percent of the population, buy individual polices — they don't get coverage through their employers or programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Millions of them will be required to get new policies, but many will qualify for federal aid to pay for the premiums. Thus, they will end up with better coverage at lower costs, officials say. If they are sick, they won't be denied coverage or charged more.

But conveying such information is difficult because of the "calamitous" launch of HealthCare.gov, former White House senior adviser David Axelrod said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." He said that "many of the people who have to transition are going to get better insurance for less money, but they just can't tell that right now because they can't get on the Web site."

Republicans have showed little sympathy. Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, appearing on the same program, attacked Obama for his often-repeated pledge that people would be able to keep their health plans if they liked them. Romney said that Obama has engaged in "fundamental dishonesty" that has "undermined the foundation of his second term."

The disruptions being caused by the new law have been especially jolting for those who support the ideals of the health-care overhaul. 

Marlys Dietrick, a 60-year-old artist from San Antonio, said she had high hopes that the new law would help many of her friends who are chefs, actors or photographers get insured. But she said they have been turned off by high premiums and deductibles and would rather pay the fine. 

"I am one of those Democrats who wanted it to be better than this," she said.

Her insurer, Humana, informed her that her plan was being canceled and that the rate for herself and her 21-year-old son for a plan compliant with the new law would rise from $300 to $705. On the federal Web site, she found a comparable plan for $623 a month. Because her annual income is about $80,000, she doesn't qualify for subsidies.

A cheaper alternative on the federal exchange, she said, had a premium of $490 a month — but it was an HMO plan rather than the PPO plan she currently has. "I wouldn't be able to go to the doctor I've been going to for years," she said. "That is not a deal."

And both the HMO and PPO exchange plans she examined had family deductibles of $12,700, compared with her current $7,000.

Robert Laszewski, an industry consultant, said he thinks the rise in rates was inevitable. The new law, he said, has resulted in an estimated 30 to 50 percent increase in baseline costs for insurers.

"We've got increased access for sick people and an increase in the span of benefits, so something's got to give," he said.

Beginning Jan. 1, the new plans must cover 10 essential benefits including pediatric care, prescription drugs, mental-health services and maternity care. In general, policies that don't offer those can't be sold after 2013. (Plans that were in place before March 2010 and essentially ­haven't changed are "grandfathered" and allowed to continue.) Critics, such as Obama, say that the discontinued policies are too skimpy to offer real protections, but some consumers contend the plans meet their needs.

David Prestin, 48, who operates a gas station and diner at a truck stop in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, was unhappy to learn recently that his premiums are slated to rise from $923 to $1,283 next year under Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. The insurer said it needed to add maternity care to comply with the Affordable Care Act.

The issue of maternity coverage is a sensitive one for Prestin and his wife, Kathie. They had one child seven years ago, but after she had five miscarriages, they discovered she had an immune issue that prevented her from successfully completing a pregnancy.

At the same time, Prestin said, the new plan would reduce coverage for things he and Kathie need, such as free annual checkups.

The Prestins explored HealthCare.gov. They are not eligible for subsidies, but they found a cheaper plan than the one being offered by their insurer. However, there was another problem: It would have required the couple to switch from the doctors they have seen for more than 16 years and travel more than 100 miles from their home to the nearest major hospital center for treatment — in Green Bay, Wis.

"I pay my taxes. I'm assistant chief of the volunteer fire department here in Cedar River and a first responder for Mid-County Rescue," Prestin said. "You try to be personally accountable and play by the rules, but the more you play by the rules, the more you get beat up on."





Share/Bookmark

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Point the finger or give it?




If there is someone to blame...if there was a man who could have put a stop to ObamaCare...it was John Roberts. A Bush appointee no less. His vote was the deciding vote on the Supreme Court which ruled ObamaCare constitutional.


I wonder how he feels now after Barry promised emphatically, up and own, inside out, you can keep your doctor and health plan? A promise made knowing full well it was an unadulterated lie. One of the leading assertions of ObamaCare was based on a lie to trick millions of Americans into falling for this scam. 


I'm not a lawyer but I found this on another website. 
 “Fraud in the Inducement.” 
 Here’s the definition from a legal dictionary: “the use of deceit or trick to cause someone to act to his/her disadvantage, such as signing an agreement or deeding away real property. The heart of this type of fraud is misleading the other party as to the facts upon which he/she will base his/her decision to act.


If the law itself is based on a lie the obvious question is should it not be overturned? 

When did lying become constitutional?





Yeah you.
He's a major player as to why millions of Americans will receive a cancellation notice from their insurance company.

Maybe you should read the Constitution John. It does not grant the federal government the power to force private commercial transactions.






Share/Bookmark

Friday, November 1, 2013

Sexual predator honored with U.S. postage stamp





First a Muslim stamp and now this.

 2014 stamp to honor Barney Fwaank. 



Wonder how long it'll be before Sandusky gets his?

-------------------------------------------------------




WND


Benjamin Franklin famously quipped, "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes."

Franklin evidently failed to envisage today's postmodern left. For the conservative, there exists at least one other certainty, and it is this: The degree to which "progressives" attack you corresponds precisely to the degree with which you challenge any among their assorted, distorted and sordid sacred cows.

What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys? (No, not Jerry Sandusky.)

What would you call a man of whom, as regards sexual preference, his own friend and biographer confessed, "Harvey always had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems"?

In a recent interview with OneNewsNow.com, I called this man "demonstrably, categorically an evil man based on his [statutory] rape of teenage boys."

But you can call him Harvey Milk.

Harvey Milk's only claim to fame is that he was the first openly homosexual candidate to be elected to public office (San Francisco city commissioner). His chief cause was to do away with the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. In 1978 Milk was murdered over a non-related political dispute by fellow Democrat Dan White.

And a "progressive" martyr was born.

Merriam Webster defines "pederast" as "one who practices anal intercourse especially with a boy." It defines "statutory rape" as "the crime of having sex with someone who is younger than an age that is specified by law."

Harvey Milk was both a pederast and, by extension, a statutory rapist. After I publicly addressed this objective reality in the above-mentioned interview, the liberal blogosphere reacted in, shall we say, an informatively defensive manner.

A Huffington Post headline screamed: "Harvey Milk Was An 'Evil Man' Who Raped Teenage Boys, Unworthy of Postage Stamp: Matt Barber."

The always-amusing Right Wing Watch blog breathlessly posted my comments with the header: "Barber: 'Harvey Milk Was Demonstrably, Categorically an Evil Man.'"

And so on.

Here's what's especially telling about their reaction. Not one of the dozen-or-more publications that reported on my comments even challenged their veracity. Not one attempted to refute or deny that Harvey Milk was, in fact, a pederast and a sexual predator.

That's because they can't.

One of Milk's victims was a 16-year-old runaway from Maryland named Jack Galen McKinley. As previously mentioned, Milk had a soft spot in his, um, heart for teenage runaways. Motivated by an apparent quid pro quo of prurience, Milk plucked McKinley from the street.

Randy Shilts was a San Francisco Chronicle reporter and close friend to Harvey Milk. Though Shilts died of AIDS in 1994, he remains, even today, one of the most beloved journalists in the "LGBT" community.

Shilts was also Harvey Milk's biographer. In his glowing book "The Mayor of Castro Street," he wrote of Milk's "relationship" with the McKinley boy: " … Sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure. … At 33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him."

In a sane world, of course, the only direction his "new lover" should have pulled him was toward San Quentin. But, alas, today's America – a burgeoning relativist land of make-believe – is anything but sane.

Randy Thomasson, child advocate and founder of SaveCalifornia.com, is one of the nation's foremost experts on Harvey Milk. Of the Shilts biography, Thomasson notes, "Explaining Milk's many flings and affairs with teenagers and young men, Randy Shilts writes how Milk told one 'lover' why it was OK for him to also have multiple relationships simultaneously: 'As homosexuals, we can't depend on the heterosexual model. … We grow up with the heterosexual model, but we don't have to follow it. We should be developing our own lifestyle. There's no reason why you can't love more than one person at a time.'"

Whereas McKinley, a disturbed runaway boy, desperately sought a "father figure" to provide empathy, compassion, wisdom and direction, he instead found Harvey Milk: a promiscuous sexual predator who found, in McKinley, an opportunity to satisfy a perverse lust for underage flesh.

Years later McKinley committed suicide.

Another teen who crossed paths with Harvey Milk was Christian convert and former homosexual Gerard Dols. In a 2008 radio interview with Concerned Women for America, Dols shared of how – as a physically disabled teen – the "very nice" Harvey Milk had encouraged him in 1977 to run away from his Minnesota home and come to San Francisco.

According to Dols, Milk told him, "Don't tell your parents," and later sent him a letter with instructions. Thankfully, the letter was intercepted by Dols' parents who then filed a complaint with the Minnesota attorney general's office.

The incident was evidently swept under the rug.

So what does a man like Harvey Milk get for his apparent crimes? While most sexual predators get time in prison and a dishonorable mention on the registry of sex offenders, Harvey Milk got his own California state holiday ("Harvey Milk Day") and, more recently, his own commemorative postage stamp, awarded by the Obama administration's USPS.

God bless America?

As troubling as the postage stamp may be, to me – the father of a soon-to-be-teenage boy – the specter of having a "Harvey Milk Day" forced upon millions of California children, parents and educators is even more troubling. Especially in light of Milk's own sordid history with minors.

Even so, and quite obviously, not everyone agrees. Some have said that my reality-based assessment of Harvey Milk is "uncivil." Our historical revisionist friends on the left tend to get a bit snooty when you publicly deconstruct one of their meticulously fabricated mythical martyrs.

I find that odd.

To me, even the mere notion of elevating, to hero status, a man who statutorily raped teenage boys, is what's uncivil.









Share/Bookmark

Thursday, October 31, 2013

BARACK H. (habitual liar) OBAMA



Then

Barry's remarks marked a striking departure from his vow stretching back to 2009:

 "No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people. If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what."


Video 56



When he says you can keep you doctor and health care plan period that's pretty emphatic. Certainly no one could say he was taken out of context not once... but dozens of times... after guaranteeing, assuring, this would never happen!





Now



Barry in Boston yesterday...


"So if you're getting one of these letters (cancelation), just shop around in the new marketplace. That's what it's for," Obama said. He added, "Don’t worry about it, these are bad apple insurers. You can do away with those policies. We can get you new ones. You can go into your exchanges and get a new policy."
  I'm surprised he didn't say, "what difference does it make." 
He also called the plans that are being cancelled "substandard".

According to Barry you're not losing your insurance you are "transitioning"  into a new plan.


Is this f-----the president or a used car salesman?!?! 

His word is his bond is total BS when it comes to Barry.

Excerpt from the WSJ:
Questioned about this on Monday, White House spokesman Jay Carney said "Well, let's just be clear," which is how he and his boss announce they're about to turn on the fog machine. "What the President said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act that create minimum standards of coverage."

Even theWashington Post (usually one of Barry's trusted ass kissers) gave him 4 Pinocchio's after his Boston speech yesterday.

  



Now that Health and Human Services has confirmed the suspicions of Obamacare opponents (Palin among others) were justified, Barry and his crew are trying to spin their way out of this directing the blame elsewhere which has always been their go to tactic because now everyone is finding out "what's in it."  

---------------------------------------------------------------


The worse president (before Barry) in my lifetime was  Jimmy Carter. He was incompetent but he wasn't a liar. Barry is both. Can he airbrush this away like everything else he has lied about? If its up to the MSM... damn right he can!





Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

ObamaCare...it's not for everyone




Dem’s created ObamaCare, they voted for it, rammed a bill of this magnitude down our throats without one Republican vote, and the Supremes said it was constitutional. Remember when Barry vehemently asserted it was not a tax and the Supremes said it was? You know, in the same vein as you can keep your doctor and health plan, and of course we all watched it on C-Span just like Barry said we would. 

Presently the Dem’s and the Supreme Court have decreed ObamaCare is not good enough for them. It’s only good for the “serfs" in their kingdom. How Americans, even with the help of the MSM siding with Barry fall for this crap is beyond me. 













Share/Bookmark

Obamopoly







                 
     No, it's not just you … this isn't supposed to be funny.
(Click to make larger)

  

The object of the game is to destroy American capitalism
By having the government take over everything!
Want to play?
No?
Too bad, you're already playing and just don't know it!

By the way ...You're not winning!







Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Girl on ObamaCare website debacle






When she first went online











After the debacle...

















Share/Bookmark

White House knew as early as 2010 millions would lose health plans under ObamaCare




If video won't load click post title


Video 55


PROOF

So how many times did he say (at least a dozen???)... "you can keep your current plan and doctor"...knowing it was an out and out lie.
I’m shocked!









Conservative commentator Marc Thiessen accused President Obama of a “bold-faced lie” Monday after Fox News confirmed the White House knew as early as 2010 that over 10 million people would lose their current doctor under ObamaCare.

Megyn Kelly reported Monday on “The Kelly File” that an IRS regulation pushed by the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 estimated that millions would be unable to keep their health insurance plan under the Affordable Care Act.

Thiessen told Kelly he believes the Obama administration intended for people to lose their current health insurance, despite Obama’s repeated claims that “if you like your plan, you can keep it.”

“The smoking gun is there in your hand," he said, referring to Kelly’s copy of the IRS form. "Look, they knew."

He claimed the administration needs these Americans to move into the ObamaCare exchanges to subsidize the law for those who cannot afford health insurance.

However, Thiessen said the White House did not prepare for the issues with the law’s website, which are creating a situation where not only will Americans get dumped from their health insurance plan, they will be unable to buy a new one.

“What the unanticipated consequence of this they’re pushing all these millions of people out of the health care that they liked into ObamaCare, except the people can’t get into ObamaCare,” he said.




Share/Bookmark