Visit Counter

Thursday, December 30, 2021

Ghislaine Maxwell: What next after guilty verdict?



What's next? The wheels are already turning...





----------------------------------------





Ghislaine Maxwell, pictured in 2013, still faces another trial on two counts of perjury


Ghislaine Maxwell has been found guilty of recruiting and trafficking young girls to be sexually abused by the late American financier Jeffrey Epstein.

A US jury convicted her of five out of six charges, but the legal process is not over for Maxwell, 60, who is yet to be sentenced and faces a separate trial for perjury.

She faces decades behind bars

All up, Maxwell is facing 65 years in jail.

She was found guilty of the most serious charge against her - that of sex trafficking, which alone carries a maximum sentence of 40 years.

Her jail term will be decided by US District Judge Alison Nathan, who has not yet set a sentencing date. 

For the moment, Judge Nathan will be waiting to receive a pre-sentence report. This will be compiled by an impartial investigator who will look into things like Maxwell's background, family, education and employment history to determine if any of these should influence the severity or leniency of the sentence.

Sarah Krissoff, a former prosecutor with the Southern District of New York, told the BBC she expected a "very significant prison sentence" for Maxwell.

"Given the involvement of minors, the judge has really great discretion to impose a significant sentence, and based on the evidence that was presented at trial, frankly, I expect the judge to impose a very severe sentence upon her," she said.

While Maxwell awaits sentencing, she will be held in Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, where she has been kept in isolation since July 2020, and has previously complained about the conditions.


The $64,000 question. Is it possible a Clinton could go to jail?

 The same likelihood as me winning the lottery tomorrow.










Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, December 29, 2021

Harry Reid... DEAD



Certainly the most despicable, vile, corrupt, member to ever walk the halls of Congress!


Good riddance you SOB!!!


Reid's exploits... a legacy of lies and deceit. Here are just a few and this ain't the half of it:


(Reid was a criminal... there's no two ways about it)

This time he may go down--maybe not


What a surprise...


Harry Reid Wants Marco Rubio to Resign


Remembering Reid: Senate's political punch-thrower says farewell, leaves trail of gaffes


Anyone get the feeling Reid is still in charge of the Senate?


Mr. Scum

(He admits he lied about Romney)


The Dream Act


Midterm 2014...Haven't felt this good since 2010


Yes. If you're a Democrat you can have it both ways




Hypocrite POS Harry Reid in 1993: "No Sane Country" Would Permit Birthright Citizenship


Video 655

This was before this POS and the rest of the Democrats discovered illegals are an untapped voting block. Like I said million times... a Democrat would sell his mother to a whorehouse if they thought they could get a vote out of it.

Think about it. How were illegals in 1993 a detriment to the country, but in 2021 under the exact same legal code and statutes, they are now the gold standard? The reason they welcome illegals into the country, and release criminals back onto the streets...those are their constituents!

-----------------------

Speaking of scum...

Just what you would expect from him:



(Only a few months earlier...)

4-8-2021


Proving once again politicians are the lowest form of life on Earth!





Share/Bookmark

Saturday, December 25, 2021

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

 










Share/Bookmark

Friday, December 24, 2021

Turning a sinner into a saint...The saga of Daunte Wright

 


Kim Potter who did the world a favor guilty of manslaughter



Well another canonization has taken place. To anyone who has seen the video it clearly indicates, which we have seen time and time again, he was resisting arrest and tried to escape. 

Had he just complied with the police officers he will still be alive today but no one takes that into account. The mentality is go after the cops at all cost. So if this was a different town, a different cop, no taser was involved and he got shot resisting arrest what would they say then? What were they supposed to do let him drive away with a warrant out for his arrest? What really pisses me off more than anything this worthless waste of skin's family is going to wind up getting millions! 


MSM depiction of Trayvon Mar... I mean Daunte Wright.



Surprised they didn't Photoshop a rosary around his neck.


The real deal:



Mug shot from a previous crime.



(Have you seen any of these photos on CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, etc?)


This is the kind of thing more often than not the MSM fails to disclose: 



Listening to Keith Ellison laying accolades on Wright made me want to puke. To listen to him you would've thought Wright was going to get the Medal of Freedom Award, the Nobel Peace Prize, and Boy Scout of the year award, rolled into one!




What a crock of shit!





Share/Bookmark

Thursday, December 23, 2021

Bribem says he will run for re-election in 2024 if he remains in good health




Biden says a rematch against his 2020 rival, Trump, would make him more likely to run

The current 'condition' of his presidency.


Somehow I don't see it.

The final destination of his presidency has a lot in common with TWA flight 800.

----------------------------------------


President Biden said he would run for re-election if he was “in good health” and that he believed “fate” would help bring him a second term.

Biden, 79, made the commitment in an interview with ABC News Wednesday, telling “World News Tonight” anchor David Muir he would welcome a rematch with former President Donald Trump.

“If I’m in the health I’m in now — I’m in good health — then, in fact, I would run again,” Biden said.

“I’m a great respecter of fate. Fate has intervened in my life many, many times.”

Biden said a rematch against his 2020 rival would add to the appeal of a run for re-election.

“You’re trying to tempt me now. Sure. Why would I not run against Donald Trump if he were the nominee? That would increase the prospect of running,” the Democrat said.

Trump, who is 75, would also be in his 80s in the White House if he won a second, nonconsecutive term.

Biden was grilled by Muir over a reported scarcity of availability of tests in the days before Christmas, a year into his presidency and two years into the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Nothing’s been good enough,” Biden allowed. “But look — look where we are, when last Christmas we were in a situation where we had significantly fewer vaccinated — people vaccinated, emergency rooms were filled. You had serious backups in hospitals that were causing great difficulties.”

Biden said the U.S. response to a surge in infections by the omicron variant of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 was not a “failure,” but he conceded that he regretted not ordering millions of free rapid tests for Americans “two months ago.”

Biden, who announced plans Tuesday to purchase 500 million at-home tests and give them out for free next month, said the administration should have been better prepared to combat the highly transmissible variant and the long lines at testing centers and unavailability of tests on many pharmacy shelves.

“I wish I had thought about ordering” the tests “two months ago,” he told Muir.

“I don’t think it’s a failure,” Biden said of the response. “I think it’s — you could argue that we should have known a year ago, six months ago, two months ago, a month ago.”

The president touted crossing the benchmark of 200 million fully vaccinated Americans and said inoculations and booster shots remained the best defense against omicron. Nevertheless, he told the network he would not federally require airline passengers to get vaccinated as millions hit the airport for Christmas.

“It’s been considered, but the recommendation I’ve gotten [is that] it’s not necessary,” Biden said. “Even with omicron, that’s the recommendation I got so far from the team.”







Share/Bookmark

U.S. Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon aka "defund the police" carjacked



Democratic congresswoman who sponsored police 'reform' bill carjacked in crime-surging Philadelphia

Scanlon was the second elected Democrat to be carjacked in a major city in 24 hours



U.S. Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, D-Pa., was carjacked at gunpoint in Philadelphia on Wednesday as crime continues to surge in major cities across the country.


"Wednesday afternoon, at around 2:45 p.m., Congresswoman Scanlon was carjacked at gunpoint in FDR Park following a meeting at that location," Scanlon’s office said in a statement. "The Congresswoman was physically unharmed. She thanks the Philadelphia Police Department for their swift response, and appreciates the efforts of both the Sergeant at Arms in D.C. and her local police department for coordinating with Philly PD to ensure her continued safety."

Scanlon's phone and purse were stolen by the attacker, according to WPVI-TVof Philadelphia.

Police say Scanlon was approached by two Black males, aged approximately 20-30,


OMG they were Black! 
(Rarely mentioned by the MSM)

as she walked to her vehicle before they demanded she hand them the keys. Scanlon handed over the keys to her blue 2017 Acura MDX and one of the suspects drove away in it while the other drove away in a dark-colored SUV. 

Scanlon represents Pennsylvania's 5th Congressional District, which includes part of South Philadelphia.

So far in 2021, the Philadelphia Police Department has reported 521 homicides, which is a 13% increase compared to 2020 and the city's highest number of killings since at least 2007. Incidents involving a shooting have also increased by 4.4%, and the number of people who are victims of a shooting has risen by almost 3% over the past year.

The City of Philadelphia is seeing at least an 80% increase in carjackings in 2021, compared to the total number in 2020, police told FOX 29 earlier this month.


Scanlon was not the first prominent Democratic official to be carjacked in a crime-ridden city in the last 24 hours. On Tuesday night, Illinois’ Democratic state Senate Majority Leader Kimberly Lightford and her husband were carjackedin Broadview, Illinois, in the Chicago area, where crime has been surging.



"First and foremost, I am thankful that my husband and I are alive and physically unharmed," Lightford said in a statement. "I am trying to process the trauma of what happened. I want to thank everyone who has offered their love and support." 



Concerned police officers 


Both Scanlon and Lightford have been staunch supporters of police reforms in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis in May 2020. 

"We have seen too many lives taken and communities devastated by police brutality and racial profiling," Scanlon tweeted shortly after Floyd's death. "Action is long overdue. @HouseDemocrats are fighting for REAL reform in our country’s police departments. #JusticeInPolicing."

Scanlon is one of 125 co-sponsors of the Mental Health Justice Act, which aimed to place some police officers as first responders with mental health specialists. All of the bill's sponsors are Democrats. The bill's text says its purpose is "To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to States and political subdivisions of States to hire, employ, train, and dispatch mental health professionals to respond in lieu of law enforcement officers in emergencies involving one or more persons with a mental illness or an intellectual or developmental disability, and for other purposes."

At the time the Mental Health Justice Act was introduced in February 2021, with Scanlon on board as one of its original co-sponsors, The Hill reported, "Congress wants to make it easier for state and local governments to defund the police by instead funding mental health services and empowering them to respond to emergency calls instead of armed officers."



Share/Bookmark

Friday, December 17, 2021

Probably the reason I don't own any Bitcoin



 On a tip from Ed Kilbane


Video 654





Share/Bookmark

Nancy Pelosi DEFENDS members of Congress trading stocks after report said 49 have violated conflict of interest law and with her husband Paul buying thousands of shares


Let's be honest here. Does anyone honestly believe she didn't use her  position and influence in Congress to make them rich? 

BTW... She always knocked Capitalism but now she's worth millions defends "The Free-market economy".


Paul Pelosi bought 4,000 shares of Google parent Alphabet in June, with an initial gain of $4.8 million



House Speaker Nancy Pelosi defended rules that allow members of Congress to own individual stocks, batting down concerns about lawmakers using insider information to juice their portfolios.

The liberal congresswoman from San Francisco said lawmakers should be able to own stocks because the US is a “free-market economy.”

Her comments Wednesday came amid rampant apparent violations of the STOCK Act, which is supposed to reign in lawmakers’ trades. 

When asked whether the opportunity to profit on trades could create a conflict of interest, the speaker flatly said “no” to the idea of supporting a ban on trading individual stocks.

“We’re a free-market economy,” Pelosi told reporters. “They [members of Congress] should be able to participate in that.”

The speaker conceded that lawmakers needed to follow rules on public disclosure of the trades.

“If people aren’t reporting [stock trades], they should be,” she said.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that lawmakers should be allowed to take part in stock dealings as long as they follow the federal rules. 
Lenin Nolly/Sipa USA



Still, Pelosi’s reaction was seen as flippant by some given the rash of apparent stock trade violations. 

Pelosi’s most recent financial disclosure shows her husband has millions of dollars worth of holdings. That includes stock in Amazon and Apple that are each worth between $5 million and $25 million. Other assets she reported include stock options held in Google’s parent company worth between $1 million and $5 million, Comcast stock worth between $1 million and $5 million and stock in Visa worth between $5 million and $25 million.

Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, is a businessman who runs a venture capital and investment firm Financial Leasing Services Inc. Over the years he’s made countless bets on high-profile companies his wife is supposed to regulate, like Amazon, Apple and Google.

Pelosi has long said she has no involvement in or prior knowledge of her husband’s trading decisions and does not own any stock herself.

Critics slammed Nancy Pelosi’s response saying that it was flippant given the number of violations. 
AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File


Speaker Nancy Pelosi defended lawmakers saying that the US is a “Free-market economy” and lawmakers should be allowed to buy stocks even though there has been a surge in STOCK Act violations. 
Lenin Nolly/Sipa USA



Pelosi’s position contradicts sharply with the position of most liberals, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. 

In the past month both lawmakers have slammed the idea of members of Congress trading stocks as “brazen” and “ludicrous.” 

The issue of congressional stock trading has taken on new urgency since the beginning of the pandemic, when suspiciously timed stock trades by lawmakers in both parties provoked outrage and led to multiple investigations.

To date, no one has been charged in connection with stock trading investigations undertaken by the Justice Department and the Securities Exchange Commission.

But the often lucrative trades nonetheless shine a spotlight on the inadequacies of a 2012 law called the Stock Act, which bars members from using inside information to make investment decisions and requires that all stock trades be reported to Congress within 45 days.

The 2012 law was passed with bipartisan support in the wake of a stock trading scandal. Yet in the nearly 10 years since it was enacted, no one has been prosecuted under it even as many members continue to conspicuously trade.

In some recent cases, lawmakers have failed to report their trades altogether, as required by the law.



Share/Bookmark

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Just another fine example of how stupid he is...



So he goes to Kentucky where 74 people were killed (including seven children on one street) by a devastating tornado undoubtedly the worst in history, supposedly to support the people of Mayfield and give them comfort, total destruction is all around him, and what does the asshole do???


Breaks out into a speech about voting rights!!!


'There's nothing more important, domestically, than voting rights. It's the single biggest thing,' President Joe Biden said Wednesday as Democrats feverishly sought to negotiate a rules change to allow legislation to move


(He said this after people lost family, friends, and their home right before Christmas)


Think this woman right here typifies what most people were thinking!









Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

Biden admin, House GOP scrutinize Ilhan Omar's Islamophobia bill



Islamophobia bill?


Yes my friends... this was a figment of our imagination. 


911 aka..."The day some people did something."





Perhaps she may be a little jealous and is trying to draw more attention towards Islam because currently BLM is doing a better job of destroying America than the Muslims. Americans will NEVER look at Islam in the same light as they do Catholics, Methodists, Protestants, Lutherans, etc... and for damn good reason.


PS:
To bad we can't sell Minnesota to Canada. We would all be better off.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Biden administration has outlined several issues it has with Omar's bill

Sam Dorman14 hours ago

Rep. Boebert: Rep Omar wants public humiliation, not a public apology

Rep. Lauren Boebert speaks exclusively to Laura Ingraham amid feud with Rep. Ilhan Omar.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., is pushing a controversial Islamophobia bill, but not everyone – including the Biden administration – seems completely onboard with the proposal.

The Combating International Islamophobia Act directs the State Department to create a special envoy and office on the issue. Under the bill, those entities would monitor and combat Islamophobia around the world. 

Additionally, the legislation would update current law regarding how the department reports on human rights and international religious liberty.

According to a House aide, the State Department sent congressional staff a series of concerns it had with Omar's bill.

"While we share the sentiments of the bill, in order to preserve the Secretary’s flexibility to manage the Department, revisions would be appropriate to make mandates and prescriptive provisions into permissive authorities, such that the Secretary would be authorized to set up the office and envoy," the department said in a message last week.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks during a photo opportunity on Nov. 8, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, Pool).


"Similarly, the longstanding preference is not to amend the human rights annual report authority to add in specific topics, as reporting would capture such activities already, and the specification of narrow reporting topics can give the impression of a less than comprehensive scope. It would seem in keeping with the timeliness of the topic, to instead provide for an annual report on the specific topic for a stated period of time, such as [three] years. We note that in several places the bill refers to the 'right to religious freedom' which is formulated under international law as ‘the right to freedom of religion or belief.’" 

The House Foreign Affairs committee approved the legislation along party lines last week and encountered fierce opposition from Republicans. The bill is expected to reach the House floor for consideration on Tuesday.

Mitch Hailstone, communications director for the Republican Study Committee, argued on Tuesday that multiple State Department positions were already tasked with combating anti-Muslim bigotry.

In addition, House Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking Member Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told Fox News Tuesday, "The U.S. State Department has requested multiple, substantive changes to this legislation before the House passes it."

"One of their requested changes is to not mandate the creation of the Special Envoy. This indicates the State Department has fundamental concerns with even establishing this office." 

Omar's office and the State Department did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment.

On Tuesday, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) expressed support for the bill, but indicated it sought additional flexibility on creating the special envoy and office provided under the bill.

OMB's statement read: "The Administration supports passage of H.R. 5665, the Combating International Islamophobia Act. Religious freedom is a fundamental human right. This freedom is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is also part of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution."

"The Administration looks forward to working with Congress to ensure the Secretary of State has the necessary flexibility and permissive authority to designate such an office and special envoy and to provide for an annual report monitoring concerning acts of Islamophobia in foreign countries."

The White House and OMB did not immediately respond to Fox News' requests for clarification on where the administration now stands on the bill.




Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Kamala Harris and the cream of woke America are slammed for their deafening silence after Jussie Smollett's conviction having first branded it a 'modern day lynching'




https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10289921/How-Jussie-Smolletts-lies-impacted-America.html



 The Democratic Candidate had previously written: 'Jussie Smollett is one of the kindest, most gently human beings I know.  I’m praying for his quick recovery. This was an attempted modern day lynching. No one should have to fear for their life because of their sexuality or color of their skin. We must confront this hate'





Share/Bookmark

Good riddance and take Geraldo with you...

 

He's going to where he should've been all along!



Chris Wallace leaving Fox News for ‘new adventure’ at CNN streaming service



Wallace as a reporter for WBBM-TV, 1975


Fox News anchor Chris Wallace is leaving the network for a “new adventure” at CNN’s streaming service, he announced Sunday.

“After 18 years, this is my final ‘FOX News Sunday.’ It is the last time — and I say this with real sadness — we will meet like this,” he said at the end of Fox News Sunday, which Wallace has anchored for 18 years. “I have decided to leave Fox. I want to try something new to go beyond politics to all the things I’m interested in.

“I’m ready for a new adventure, and I hope you’ll check it out,” he added. “And so, for the last time, dear friends, that’s it for today, have a great week, and I hope you’ll keep watching ‘FOX News Sunday.’”

The 74-year-old Chicago native, a widely respected journalist who has moderated multiple presidential debates, and winner of three Emmy Awards — did not elaborate on his next apolitical undertaking on the program.     

But in a press release sent later Sunday morning, Wallace said he was “thrilled” to join CNN+ — a subscription streaming service slated to make its debut in early 2022.

“I am thrilled to join CNN+. After decades in broadcast and cable news, I am excited to explore the world of streaming,” he said. “I look forward to the new freedom and flexibility streaming affords in interviewing major figures across the new landscape — and finding new ways to to tell stories.” 

Wallace, whose father was longtime “60 Minutes” reporter Mike Wallace, praised network bosses for providing him independence and allowing him to report on key stories over the years.

Chris Wallace.
Chris Wallace hosted “Fox News Sunday” for 18 years.
Olivier Douliery/Pool via AP


“Eighteen years ago, the bosses here at Fox promised me they would never interfere with a guest I booked or a question I asked, and they kept that promise,” he said during the network’s flagship hour-long 10 a.m. Sunday program. “I have been free to report to the best of my ability to cover those stories I think are important to hold our country’s leaders to account. It’s been a great ride.”

He also gave thanks to regular viewers of the program.

“It may sound corny, but I feel we’ve built a community here. There’s a lot you can do on Sunday mornings,” Wallace said. “The fact you’ve chosen to spend this hour with us is something I cherish.”

In a statement, Fox News Media praised the veteran broadcaster.  

“We are extremely proud of our journalism and the stellar team that Chris Wallace was a part of for 18 years,” read the statement. “The legacy of FOX News Sunday will continue with our star journalists, many of whom will rotate in the position until a permanent host is named.”

During his 46-year career, Wallace has also reported for ABC, NBC and the Boston Globe, racking up numerous accolades. 

CNN president Jeff Zucker welcomed his new high-profile hire. 

This is probably why:




“It is not often that a news organization gets the opportunity to bring someone of Chris Wallace’s caliber on board,” he said in the news release. “This speaks volumes about our commitment to journalism and CNN,+ and we are thrilled to have Chris on the ground of helping us build the next generation of CNN and news.” 






Share/Bookmark

Friday, December 10, 2021

After the Smollett verdict not a peep...






This is what these dogs said upon hearing the news about Smollett in 2019.


(Click to enlarge)

Screw the facts! Needless to say they didn't even bother reading Smollett's bullshit fairytale before making a comment. All they heard was MAGA (get Trump) which was enough to trigger their stupidity in spades! First they were wrong about Rittenhouse, now Smollett, and not a hint of remorse. These bastards have no shame. Ignore and move on is the only strategy they know.


As crazy as this sounds BLM has a a lot in common with the KKK. Both are built on the foundation of hate.

Melina Abdullah co-founder of BLM (a Marxist and supporter of Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam) announced Black Lives Matter would continue to stand by disgraced actor Jussie Smollett regardless of the verdict 

So in essence his skin color trumps everything!
 
Smollett could shoot someone dear to Abdullah (real name Reimann) and somehow she would find a way to blame the police.

BLM is a terrorist organization with absolutely no credibility. They called the trial a “white supremacist charade” and stated "they could never believe police". They don't care Smollett is a scumbag. Their statement reveals the only thing that matters to BLM is skin color. If you're black you have 100% immunity... circumstances be damned! They had no credibility to begin with and now they're just a f-ing joke.








Share/Bookmark

Thursday, December 9, 2021

Update...the POS found guilty of 5 of the 6 charges

 




Had any of these fools used a half an ounce of common sense? You would have to be incredibly stupid and bias to believe his preposterous story and these 5 were up to the task.












Well what a turn around! We went from Kim Foxx, to the total disbelief of everyone, dropping the case and now he's found guilty of five of the six counts... and don't forget after he got off the son of a bitch tried to sue the city! 


Barry and his wife were instrumental in getting the case dropped but they're untouchable just like Hunter's computer.



My post on 2-12-20:

 Jussie Smollett indicted  



What will be the final outcome after all the time, effort, and money put into this case? Sadly, I'm going with he'll be sentenced to 18 months and out in 9.

He also lied to the FBI about a letter he received with white powder so there's that to contend with too.

Oh... and lets not forget 'Twana Al's' comment:



Reverend Al Sharpton claimed that the "guilty must face the maximum" for the alleged crime committed against Smollett.

Wonder if that includes Smollett?








Share/Bookmark