Visit Counter

Friday, May 22, 2009

Obama calls Gitmo 'a misguided experiment'










I got to hand it to Obama. He is one smooth talking S.O.B. He stood in the National Archives building in Washington, DC.... just in front of The Declaration of Independence... and gave the most wonderful speech I ever heard.


The Messiah's words echoed through the halls, wrapped in the American flag, dripping with self-righteousness. Chris Matthews must have felt another tingle going up his leg.

Were there any out and out lies? Maybe not.... But lets just say he was less then forthcoming with the facts, starting with this quote.





Instead of giving Bush a pat on the back for keeping us safe since 911 he said this:


"There are no neat or easy answers here," Obama said in a speech in which he pledged anew to clean up what he said was "quite simply a mess, a misguided experiment" at Guantanamo that he had inherited from the Bush administration.




He went on to say:


"In the midst of all these challenges, however, my single most important responsibility as President is to keep the American people safe. It's the first thing that I think about when I wake up in the morning. It's the last thing that I think about when I go to sleep at night. "


I suggest that on the surface this may be true. But when you dig down he is trying to fulfill a campaign promise to far left organizations like Code Pink the left wing Cindy Sheehan's that got him elected. I also believe he cares more about world-wide opinion on Gitmo then he does about the true safety of Americans. Its funny. All the bleeding heart cry baby liberals around the world, including the US, want Gitmo closed; but no one wants the terrorists in their own back yard!




Another quote:


"As we make these decisions, bear in mind the following fact: Nobody has ever escaped from one of our federal, supermax prisons, which hold hundreds of convicted terrorists."


I guess as President of the United States no one informed him that Gitmo is registered as a supermax prison. Mr. Obama no one has ever escaped from Gitmo either; but some released detainee's went on to kill again!


Mr. Obama. As you know we are up to our eyeballs in dept. In large part due to the 787 billion dollar stimulus plan you signed into law that no one bothered to read(10,000 dead people got a check). I don't know if any one told you but Gitmo cost the American taxpayer 200 million dollars to build. It was built for the sole purpose of keeping these butchers where they belong. What do you suggest we do with this Gitmo facility the US taxpayer just paid 200 million dollars for? A low ball estimate of over 100 million dollars is what it is going to take to bring these dogs to the United States. Your own party voted against funding it for Christ's sake! Money is easy to spend when it's not yours... isn't it?



By the way Mr. Obama. 





 I'm sure you heard about the homegrown terror suspects arrested in NYC. They were going to blow up a temple and shoot down a military plane. All of these guys were in jail on a unrelated charges when they converted to radical Islam. What do you think is going to happen if you introduce 240 Gitmo dogs into our federal prison system??? I'll tell you what it will do. Our federal prisons become a breeding ground for terrorists!






One final note. I noticed you conveniently left out the welfare check any released detainee's will be receiving. Smart move. In this eloquent speech you gave, you blamed Bush for everything. Since your so slippery with the facts you failed to mention why we have not been attacked since 911. There is a reason. Which is it Mr. Obama.... an accident or just a coincidence or maybe waterboarding? 







Share/Bookmark

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Now It Has Come To This!

Remember.....Press one for English........Press two for Spanish?

Now it has come to this!

If I was one of these Supervisor's I would file a multi-million dollar law suit.



A 36 second video. You won't believe what you hear






Share/Bookmark

Monday, May 11, 2009

Taliban's Alternative To Waterboarding

Warning:
This video gives new meaning to the word graphic!!!!

(No BS)

We all know Pelosi said she knew nothing about waterboarding. Liberals condemn it. However, no one has ever died from waterboarding.




Now it is time to look at what goes on..... on the other side of the fence.








How do you feel now? Do you feel like throwing up? I was so repulsed I turned it off.
Now image what's going to happen if Gitmo is closed down. Some of these butchers are going to be released into our American society. Your taxes are going to them in the form of a Welfare check!

As sickening as this video is it is a reminder of what animals they truly are.

How comfortable are you going to be with these butchers living next door?

Write your Congressman or Senator now and demand they not be released!

Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Shocking.....Specter A Democrat!


The shock of a lifetime!!! .........Someone cut me some slack.



I was going to say he is a closet liberal but he is in the closet about as much as Barney Frank!

There are two constants in life:

1. The sun coming up in the morning.

2. Arlen Specter stabbing the Republican party in the back.

Every time the Republican Party needed his vote on a pivotal issue... The Bailout... Illegals getting Social Security... Abortion.... The Ted Kennedy inspired Shamnesty Bill.... to name a few, he always went the other way.


Unequivocally Arlen Specter has told us this....I have no value system. Screw America. I would run in the Nazi party as long as I was re-elected Senator!

I hope the people of PA see this for what it is. A con job!
He is one of the reasons I have been shouting for term limits.

Here is the problem as I see it with Specter on the next go around. Americans are basically stupid, becoming just another twig in the river of hope and change. We allow the "wind" of the media to influence are decisions and follow blindly whatever the "growing trend" is with no research of the candidate. We are so absorbed with are everyday lives that we expect nothing from are politicians. And that's exactly what we get! Why do I say that? Because I could almost guarantee you people like Pelosi, Specter, Frank, and Dodd (all incompetent lying bastards) are going to be re-elected.

A case in point.

Let's take the good people of Minnesota. First they elect Jesse (The Joke) Ventura a wrestler for governor. Now it appears Stewart Smalley (aka Al Franken) is going to be a Senator. Why? Because Donald Duck turned it down.

Oh....I almost forgot. They also elected Keith Ellison , a Minnesota Democrat and the first Muslim ever elected to Congress and sworn in on the Koran.



It gets even better. This woman is running for the Senate in Louisiana. Her name is Stormy Davis. What are her qualifications? She is a porn star! Larry Flint of Hustler magazine is going to be her campaign manager. Hey, I ain't making this stuff up. I'm just trying to keep you.... a breast.... of the situation.



Getting back to Specter. I hope the people of PA see him for what he really is. He's not a Republican or Democrat. He's a son-of-bitch!




Share/Bookmark

Monday, April 27, 2009

READ THIS NOW!...In Case You Forgot














Security Before Politics

By Porter J. Goss
Saturday, April 25, 2009

Followed by an excellent commentary by Ed Kilbane

Since leaving my post as CIA director almost three years ago, I have
remained largely silent on the public stage. I am speaking out now because I
feel our government has crossed the red line between properly protecting our
national security and trying to gain partisan political advantage. We can't
have a secret intelligence service if we keep giving away all the secrets.
Americans have to decide now.

A disturbing epidemic of amnesia seems to be plaguing my former colleagues
on Capitol Hill. After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, members of the
committees charged with overseeing our nation's intelligence services had no
higher priority than stopping al-Qaeda. In the fall of 2002, while I was
chairman of the House intelligence committee, senior members of Congress were
briefed on the CIA's "High Value Terrorist Program," including the development
of "enhanced interrogation techniques" and what those techniques were. This
was not a one-time briefing but an ongoing subject with lots of back and
forth between those members and the briefers.

Today, I am slack-jawed to read that members claim to have not understood
that the techniques on which they were briefed were to actually be
employed; or that specific techniques such as "waterboarding" were never mentioned.
It must be hard for most Americans of common sense to imagine how a member
of Congress can forget being told about the interrogations of Sept. 11
mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed. In that case, though, perhaps it is not
amnesia but political expedience.

Let me be clear. It is my recollection that:

-- The chairs and the ranking minority members of the House and Senate
intelligence committees, known as the Gang of Four, were briefed that the CIA
was holding and interrogating high-value terrorists.

-- We understood what the CIA was doing.

-- We gave the CIA our bipartisan support.

-- We gave the CIA funding to carry out its activities.

-- On a bipartisan basis, we asked if the CIA needed more support from
Congress to carry out its mission against al-Qaeda.

I do not recall a single objection from my colleagues. They did not vote
to stop authorizing CIA funding. And for those who now reveal filed
"memorandums for the record" suggesting concern, real concern should have been
expressed immediately -- to the committee chairs, the briefers, the House
speaker or minority leader, the CIA director or the president's national
security adviser -- and not quietly filed away in case the day came when the
political winds shifted. And shifted they have.

Circuses are not new in Washington, and I can see preparations being made
for tents from the Capitol straight down Pennsylvania Avenue. The CIA has
been pulled into the center ring before. The result this time will be the
same: a hollowed-out service of diminished capabilities. After Sept. 11, the
general outcry was, "Why don't we have better overseas capabilities?" I
fear that in the years to come this refrain will be heard again: once a
threat -- or God forbid, another successful attack -- captures our attention and
sends the pendulum swinging back. There is only one person who can shut
down this dangerous show: President Obama.

Unfortunately, much of the damage to our capabilities has already been
done. It is certainly not trust that is fostered when intelligence officers
are told one day "I have your back" only to learn a day later that a knife is
being held to it. After the events of this week, morale at the CIA has
been shaken to its foundation.

We must not forget: Our intelligence allies overseas view our inability to
maintain secrecy as a reason to question our worthiness as a partner.
These allies have been vital in almost every capture of a terrorist.

The suggestion that we are safer now because information about
interrogation techniques is in the public domain conjures up images of unicorns and
fairy dust. We have given our enemy invaluable information about the rules by
which we operate. The terrorists captured by the CIA perfected the act of
beheading innocents using dull knives. Khalid Sheik Mohammed boasted of the
tactic of placing explosives high enough in a building to ensure that
innocents trapped above would die if they tried to escape through windows.
There is
simply no comparison between our professionalism and their brutality.

Our enemies do not subscribe to the rules of the Marquis of Queensbury.
"Name, rank and serial number" does not apply to non-state actors but is,
regrettably, the only question this administration wants us to ask. Instead of
taking risks, our intelligence officers will soon resort to wordsmithing
cables to headquarters while opportunities to neutralize brutal radicals
are lost.

The days of fortress America are gone. We are the world's superpower. We
can sit on our hands or we can become engaged to improve global human
conditions. The bottom line is that we cannot succeed unless we have good
intelligence. Trading security for partisan political popularity will ensure that
our secrets are not secret and that our intelligence is destined to fail
us.

The writer, a Republican, was director of the CIA from September 2004 to
May 2006 and was chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence from 1997 to 2004.




Please take the time to cut and paste this article and email it to your Senators and Congressman with your take on it. Here's mine.


We wholeheartedly agree with the premise of this article by Porter Goss. Please use your influence to put a stop to these political "gotcha games". Go back and look at the pictures of the trade towers, look at the poor people, jumping hand-in-hand from them to their death in order to escape the searing heat and end their misery. Look at the Berg and Pearl beheading video's.
Enhanced interrogation techniques didn't cause this, they prevented more of it.


I guess you can't say it any better then that. Thanks Ed.
Share/Bookmark