Visit Counter

Monday, June 8, 2009

545 vs 300,000,000 Revisited





1. I thought I would repost this. It is so simple and true, not to mention, the most popular post of all time. Naturally I didn't write it.

2. Liberals, please don't write me complaining how it chastises only Democrats. How you come up with that assertion is beyond me. But then again; you are a liberal.



By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red .

If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it.......... is up to you.




Share/Bookmark

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Laptops for detainees! Have we gone mad?

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/terrorists_with_laptops.jpg

It is well documented Muslims have an affinity for cutting peoples heads off. For this vile (beyond what words can convey behavior) the United States government in a act of supreme retaliation are now giving Gitmo prisoners laptops.


First they were offered a colonoscopy for anyone 55 years of age or older. There are US citizens without health care who cannot afford a colonoscopy! Now we're giving them laptops!!!

Rumor has it they were issued HP's but the terrorists were upset with that choice so they were given Apples. Reportedly the HP's were then sent to Al-Qaeda to this address:

Osama Bin Laden
Cave No. 1
Quetta, Pakistan
Zip Code 666

The HP's were filled with uplifting quotes from the Bible in the hope it will rehabilitate them.


Some Guantánamo detainees to get laptops

To better prepare them for life in asylum, the U.S. military is setting up a virtual computer lab for some Guantánamo captives now cleared for release.

crosenberg@MiamiHerald.com

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVY BASE, Cuba -- These captives already get to order fast-food takeout from the base and have access to a phone booth for weekly calls. Now some 17 Uighur Muslims awaiting a nation to grant them asylum are about to go high-tech, with laptops and web training.

While awaiting details of President Barack Obama's order to close the prison camps by Jan. 22, commanders here have ordered 20 laptops for the captives of Camp Iguana.

''As you know, detainees are leaving this place,'' said Army Lt. Col. Miguel Mendez, who oversees detainee classes, a multilingual library and now-emerging virtual computer lab. "We're getting them computer classes to prepare for their return.''

A federal judge last year ordered that the men be set free after reviewing the American military's reasons for holding them in habeas corpus petitions that reached the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. by order of the Supreme Court.

But the Chinese citizens in exile have no place to go.

As devout Muslims, they fear religious persecution in their homeland, in part because of the stigma of having been held at Guantánamo for allegedly getting paramilitary training in Afghanistan before Sept. 11, 2001.

Attorney General Eric Holder said some could come to the United States for resettlement, triggering protests from members of Congress around Virginia, where other Uighurs live and have offered to settle them.

Nury Turkel, a Washington, D.C.-based Uighur rights activist, hailed the computer training development. Internet access could allow the men to listen to Uighur broadcasts of Radio Free Asia, he said.

Moreover, laptops would help the men ''be reintroduced into a modern society,'' said Turkel, who noted that after eight years in U.S. custody the computer training "also would give hope to the men that their freedom is nearing.''

Some Uighurs sent from Guantánamo to asylum in Albania several years ago now e-mail with Turkel regularly, he said.

Attorneys for the men did not respond to requests for comment.


Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

One angry woman


This is a letter from a woman who lives in New Brunswick, Canada. I don't know who she is; but she damn sure makes sense.



Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001 and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan, across the Potomac from the nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency.

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan.

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

I'll care when the Canadian media stops pretending that their freedom of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a CANADIAN soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:

I don't care.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed 'special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it,

I don't care!!

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behaviour!

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country!





I wonder how she feels about closing Gitmo?
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Chandra Levy Scandal Revisited

This story is not about Chandra Levy or Gary Condit. It goes far deeper then that. This is a story about the manipulative powers of the main stream media. Lets turn back the clock to May 2001:


This is Chandra Levy. She was found murdered
at Rock Creek Park in Washington, DC
























She was having an affair with this guy. Gary Condit.
A married Democratic Congressman from California.
When Chandra Levy went missing Gary Condit had some explaining to do. He denied over and over that he was having an affair.
Finally he admitted it after he got caught trying to hide a
gift box for her in the dumpster. The media went crazy with speculation. It was front page news in the newspapers. It was the lead story on all the network news stations.

Did her kill? Did he pay someone to kill her? Why? Was she going to the press with the story to ruin his career? Where's the body? He had motive. He had to do it! The variety of stories was endless!




















Fast forward to March 2009:




Enter this creep. Ingmar Guandique.


Now the real truth is revealed and the murderer arrested. Barely a whimper from the MSM. You would need the Hubbell telescope to find any coverage! Why is that I wondered?



The Huffington Post blog wrote this which is typical of most media outlets:

WASHINGTON — In the nearly eight years since intern Chandra Levy was attacked and killed in a Washington park, witnesses said a Salvadoran immigrant boasted in letters and jailhouse conversations that he picked out women randomly and stalked them. One witness said the man even bragged of maiming and killing people..



Salvadoran Immigrant? As you read the blog you get the connotation the guy is merely an immigrant who happens to be of Salvadoran decent. The plain and simple truth is; this guy is an outlaw. He is in this country illegally period. No spin no bullshit. Once the MSM found out he is here illegally they dropped the story quicker then John Edwards leaving a hotel room!



This is another fine example of spin journalism from Time Magazine. The title tries to equate our border with the Great wall of China or the Berlin Wall. Take your pick.

Check the caption!


The Great Wall of America


West of Naco, Arizona, some immigrants, including a 10-year-old boy, scale the new border fence in an effort to reach the States.
West of Naco, Arizona, some immigrants, including a 10-year-old boy, scale the new border fence in an effort to reach the States.

SPIN:

They like to substitute the word immigrants for what they actually are...illegals.What this really is, is a test of America's stupidity. The media wants to hold your hand. Just like your mother did, when you were young, crossing the street. Aren't they wonderful.


Share/Bookmark

Friday, May 22, 2009

Obama calls Gitmo 'a misguided experiment'










I got to hand it to Obama. He is one smooth talking S.O.B. He stood in the National Archives building in Washington, DC.... just in front of The Declaration of Independence... and gave the most wonderful speech I ever heard.


The Messiah's words echoed through the halls, wrapped in the American flag, dripping with self-righteousness. Chris Matthews must have felt another tingle going up his leg.

Were there any out and out lies? Maybe not.... But lets just say he was less then forthcoming with the facts, starting with this quote.





Instead of giving Bush a pat on the back for keeping us safe since 911 he said this:


"There are no neat or easy answers here," Obama said in a speech in which he pledged anew to clean up what he said was "quite simply a mess, a misguided experiment" at Guantanamo that he had inherited from the Bush administration.




He went on to say:


"In the midst of all these challenges, however, my single most important responsibility as President is to keep the American people safe. It's the first thing that I think about when I wake up in the morning. It's the last thing that I think about when I go to sleep at night. "


I suggest that on the surface this may be true. But when you dig down he is trying to fulfill a campaign promise to far left organizations like Code Pink the left wing Cindy Sheehan's that got him elected. I also believe he cares more about world-wide opinion on Gitmo then he does about the true safety of Americans. Its funny. All the bleeding heart cry baby liberals around the world, including the US, want Gitmo closed; but no one wants the terrorists in their own back yard!




Another quote:


"As we make these decisions, bear in mind the following fact: Nobody has ever escaped from one of our federal, supermax prisons, which hold hundreds of convicted terrorists."


I guess as President of the United States no one informed him that Gitmo is registered as a supermax prison. Mr. Obama no one has ever escaped from Gitmo either; but some released detainee's went on to kill again!


Mr. Obama. As you know we are up to our eyeballs in dept. In large part due to the 787 billion dollar stimulus plan you signed into law that no one bothered to read(10,000 dead people got a check). I don't know if any one told you but Gitmo cost the American taxpayer 200 million dollars to build. It was built for the sole purpose of keeping these butchers where they belong. What do you suggest we do with this Gitmo facility the US taxpayer just paid 200 million dollars for? A low ball estimate of over 100 million dollars is what it is going to take to bring these dogs to the United States. Your own party voted against funding it for Christ's sake! Money is easy to spend when it's not yours... isn't it?



By the way Mr. Obama. 





 I'm sure you heard about the homegrown terror suspects arrested in NYC. They were going to blow up a temple and shoot down a military plane. All of these guys were in jail on a unrelated charges when they converted to radical Islam. What do you think is going to happen if you introduce 240 Gitmo dogs into our federal prison system??? I'll tell you what it will do. Our federal prisons become a breeding ground for terrorists!






One final note. I noticed you conveniently left out the welfare check any released detainee's will be receiving. Smart move. In this eloquent speech you gave, you blamed Bush for everything. Since your so slippery with the facts you failed to mention why we have not been attacked since 911. There is a reason. Which is it Mr. Obama.... an accident or just a coincidence or maybe waterboarding? 







Share/Bookmark