Visit Counter

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

I don't even have words for this one


Let me get this straight. An American judge issues a judgement allowing Mexico to sue AZ because they are stopping and deporting illegal Mexicans from their state????


I need help.  I scoured the internet but can't find the name of this judge. They only refer to this person as a "federal judge". I desperately want to find out who this person is so I can crucify them on this blog. I want to expose he or she for what they are. If anyone can procure their name please email to me. I emailed Bill O'Reilly and Bernie Goldberg hoping they might do a story on it.



 Perhaps we should file a class action loss suit against Mexico and sue for the billions of dollars illegals have cost us over the years! 



Mexico Sues Arizona over Law 



A REAL American President would tell Mexico to butt out of the affairs of the United States.


A REAL American President would secure our borders without any pre-conditions including amnesty for ILLEGALS.


A REAL American President would stand with Arizona.


A REAL American President would stand with America.


Anybody know where we can find a REAL American President?



Mexico's death toll in the drug war: 22,700 in 3 years!






Coming to a city near you?



Share/Bookmark

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely


 Lord Acton... you are soooo right!


Pete Stark Congressman from CA.


This arrogant, smug, son-of-a bitch, had the audacity to talk down to
people gathered at a townhall meeting as if they were "serfs" in his kingdom. The only prop missing was a golden goblet in his "lefty" hand.

Californians... how much border protection do you think your going get from this asshole?



Christ...I can't wait until November!

Share/Bookmark

Delivering the high hard one for 90 years





Delivering the high hard one for 90 years




As Holiday Weekend Approaches, ACLU Affiliates Issue Alerts To Individuals Traveling To Arizona




Arizona Racial Profiling Law Threatens Civil Liberties FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org

NEW YORK – In response to civil liberties threats caused by the recent passage of Arizona's racial profiling law, state-based American Civil Liberties Union affiliates across the country are issuing travel alerts informing individuals of their rights when stopped by law enforcement when traveling in Arizona.


The unconstitutional law, known as SB 1070, requires law enforcement agents to demand "papers" from people they stop who they suspect are not authorized to be in the U.S. If individuals are unable to prove to officers that they are permitted to be in the U.S., they may be subject to warrantless arrest without any probable cause that they have committed a crime. 


--------------------------------------------------------------          




The American Civil Liberties Union. A name can be so "catchy" sometimes. I copied the above and pasted it from their website. I would like to address the paragraph highlighted in red which is issuing a "travel alert" for anyone traveling in AZ. This paragraph is deliberately misleading and vague. 


"The unconstitutional law, known as SB 1070, requires law enforcement agents to demand "papers" from people they stop who they suspect are not authorized to be in the U.S." 


Now if I was an Hispanic here legally planning a trip to AZ to see the Grand Canyon I would tell my wife....Better not go honey we might get arrested!


 demand "papers" from people they stop who they suspect are not authorized to be in the U.S." They conveniently left out demand "papers" from people they stop who BROKE THE LAW. 


A tale of two Hispanic couples. The Garcia's are pulled over for going 70 in a 55 mph zone. The cop asks for a driver license, registration, and insurance. They produce it and are issued a warning or a ticket.


Same situation with the Lopez's. But he can't produce a driver license, registration, or insurance. He has liquor on his breath and the cop notices Corona bottles lying on the floor. He is arrested and taken to jail and after futher investigation it is determined they are here illegally.


I don't see a problem here. Lets say it was you or I pulled over for speeding  (IN ANY STATE) and we could not produce a driver license, registration, or insurance. Would we not be arrested?


Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Paul Krugman speaks




"We are now, I fear, in the early stages of a third depression," the Nobel laureate wrote in a NY Times Op-Ed Sunday, dipping his toes into a pool we've been sloshing around in for some time.



What... Klugman is actually making sense? Wait a minute... he is an economist…... and he did win the Nobel Prize in Economics. Right?



That is, until he follows his comments up with this piece of shit of advice to G-20 meeting attendees: "This depression will actually be "a failure of policy... governments are obsessing about inflation when the real threat is deflation, preaching the need for belt-tightening, when the real problem is inadequate spending."





Thank God. For a minute there I was getting worried. He was beginning to make sense.









Share/Bookmark

Liberalism...Ain't it great




California Tax dollars at work.

California welfare recipients withdrew $1.8 million at casino ATMs over eight months 



California welfare recipients using state-issued debit cards withdrew more than $1.8 million in taxpayer cash on casino floors between October 2009 and last month, state officials said Thursday.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger issued an executive order requiring welfare recipients to promise they will use cash benefits only to "meet the basic subsistence needs" of their families. The order also gave the state Department of Social Services seven days to produce a plan to reduce other types of "waste, fraud and abuse" in the welfare program.

The moves came after The Times reported Wednesday that officials at the department failed to notice for years that welfare recipients could use the state-issued cards to withdraw taxpayer cash at more than half of the tribal casinos and state-licensed poker rooms in California. The state initiated the debit card program in 2002.


Casino withdrawals, which represented far less than 1% of total welfare spending during the eight months for which the department released data, averaged just over $227,392 a month.

Schwarzenegger has already ordered the vendor that runs the state welfare system's ATM network to prohibit the cards from working at casino machines. Republican lawmakers are now calling on the administration to track down the people who withdrew cash at gaming centers and recover the money.

"I'd say that $227,000 per month is an astounding waste of taxpayer dollars," said Seth Unger, spokesman for Assembly Republican Leader Martin Garrick of Solana Beach. "To me it is absolutely clear that the department failed in its duty to provide oversight. We should explore all options to get the money back."

The electronic benefit transfer cards allow welfare recipients to access two accounts: cash offered through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program and an electronic version of food stamps, which comes with strict rules governing how the money can be spent.

The cash benefits, however, can be withdrawn and spent just about anywhere. A Times review of state records found that the cards work at ATMs in 32 of 58 tribal casinos and 47 of 90 state-licensed poker rooms.

Most of the ATMs impose a withdrawal limit of about $300 a day. The monthly cash grant for a family of three ranges up to $694, while families with more than 10 people can get as much as $1,469, documents from the Social Services Department show.

Some Assembly Republicans called Thursday for assurances that welfare recipients can't access ATMs at other "seedy" businesses. "If they're going to shut down … the casinos, why not also shut down the ATMs at liquor stores and bars?" Unger asked.

Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear said the point of the executive order was to force the department to examine the program for all manner of abuse, but did not specify any other kinds of businesses that might be weeded out of the network. "We're going to eliminate any waste, fraud and abuse that makes sense to eliminate," he said.

Democrats, who have been fighting to preserve the state's fraying social safety net in the face of a $19-billion budget gap, angrily rejected a Schwarzenegger proposal last month to eliminate the cash portion of welfare.

That was before anyone in Sacramento realized the money could be withdrawn by someone strolling from a poker game to a blackjack table.

Democratic leaders steered away from specifics while discussing calls for reform.

"We will conduct timely legislative oversight," said Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento). "We want to make sure all families are spending the money on the children it's intended to serve."




Share/Bookmark