The hypocrisy here blows me away!

EXCLUSIVE — DONALD TRUMP: MSM INVESTIGATION INTO SCOTT WALKER'S COLLEGE A 'DOUBLE STANDARD'

Suddenly the MSM takes an interest in college records. Scott walker's to be exact. Meanwhile Barry's college transcripts are shrouded in secrecy and as we all know sealed. Didn't the MSM find that the slightest bit suspicious? Yet they didn't seem to have any problem digging into George W. Bush's life and discovering a DWI way back in 1976. Guess it depends on what party you belong to. Now the bloodhounds of this unbiased MSM have been released and are...

 

investigating Walker's college records. Of course they will avoid mentioning with 34 credits to go Walker quit college to join the Red Cross. One good thing. It's clear who the MSM fears.

Why would you want your college transcripts sealed unless you had something to hide? I believe Barry presented himself as a foreign exchange student.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/revealed-bio-names-obamas-birthplace/ 

Breitbart originally broke the story by digging this up. If this was a "mistake" why didn't Barry address it? I could understand Indiana and they meant Illinois...but Kenya?

If you believe Barry's not lying I got a Bosnian sniper rifle I like to sell you.

   So the bottom line is either Breitbart is lying or Barry's involved in a coverup.  With Barry's track record my money's on him. Speaking of money maybe Trump could offer a mil to anyone who comes forward with the correct information. 

Don't we have a right to know?

Real estate magnate and reality television star Donald Trump, a potential 2016 GOP presidential candidate, tells Breitbart News it's a "double standard" for the Washington Post to spend as much time and effort as it did investigating Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's college days, when reporters haven't put much effort into investigating President Barack Obama's background.

"Why didn't they send a reporter over to Occidental and to Columbia and to the various Obama schools?" Trump said in a phone interview. "There's never been a reporter over there. Nobody's ever found anything. There's no records available. Why didn't send a reporter over to talk to the people from the schools he went to? It seems like a terrible double standard."

When asked about how, six years deep now into the Obama administration, the president has been able to keep his college transcripts and records hidden from the American people, Trump said it's largely because Obama spent millions in legal fees aiming to keep them hidden.

"They have nothing. They have nothing," Trump said. "They don't even have any records at all. They have no record of names. They have no record he went there. And of course the president spent $3.2 million to make sure they don't have any records."

In a story before the 2012 election, the Washington Times' Dave Boyer wrote that, "most presidents' academic records are made public by the time they reach the highest office in the land, either with their consent or by someone else digging them up."

"There's no reason why people shouldn't know," Stephen Hess, a senior fellow at the liberal Brookings Institution, told the Times then, imploring Obama to be transparent. "At this point, it's pretty moot — perhaps amusing if it turned out that he didn't do very well."

Boyer wrote that, "whenever Team Obama is asked about the president's college performance, officials dodge the question, obviously with Mr. Obama's blessing."

Specifically, the way Obama dodges the questions, Boyer added, is an orchestrated process.

"The White House press office refers such questions to campaign officials, who in turn refuse to provide any information," Boyer wrote. "The Obama campaign didn't respond to questions for this article."

Fox News' Bill O'Reilly has also called on the president to publicly release his college records.

"President Obama himself has a very compelling story to tell," O'Reilly said on the O'Reilly Factor in early 2013.

His father abandoned him. He was raised primarily by his maternal grandparents in Hawaii. He had few resources. Yet, Barack Obama rose up to become the most powerful man in the world, a stunning achievement. How much the system helped Mr. Obama is unknown as his college records have been kept private. We don't know the extent of affirmative action. We don't know how much the government subsidized his climb to the top. It would be very helpful to have that information simply to be fair to the president and his vision. There's no question President Obama believes his success is partly due to government. That goes to his famous line: "You didn't build that."

At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 2013, 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin remarked about Obama's hidden background as well—in a joke about gun control efforts via more "background checks" for gun purchasers.

"Background checks?" Palin said on the stage. "Yeah, I guess to learn more about a person's thinking and associations and intentions. More background checks? Dandy idea, Mr. President — should have started with yours."

The hypocrisy here blows me away!

What more do you need to know about Barry?

Did the idiots who voted for Barry know his promise to close Gitmo was based upon setting the detainees free? Did the 5  for 1 swap make a shred of sense? Now Congress rightfully wants to pass a bill preventing any further release of  Gitmo detainees and Barry says he'll veto it! Does this sound like a president who's foremost concern is the United States or the world of Islam? How can anyone truly believe releasing these dogs  is somehow going to benefit the United States? 

Now is the time to get serious. We have the House and Senate and I see no reason not to file impeachment charges especially in view of his latest treasonous act. Of course he'll scream racism but we can fire back with more than enough ammunition starting with amnesty and a plethora of scandals as long as your arm. What Clinton did was child's play compared to this guy. 

 Only a no good Commander in Chief  would ever allow stuff like this to go on.
This Muslim has got to go.

---------------------------------------------------

Obama would veto bill to stop transfers of Guantanamo prisoners: White House

Thomson ReutersThe exterior of Camp Delta is seen at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama would veto a bill being considered by Republicans that aims to freeze all transfers of terrorism suspects out of the U.S. prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, White House spokesman Eric Schultz told reporters on Thursday.

The bill was proposed by Republicans in the wake of attacks by Islamic militant gunmen in Paris in January.

(Reporting By Julia Edwards; Editing by Sandra Maler)

What more do you need to know about Barry?

IRS to pay back-refunds to illegal immigrants who didn’t pay taxes

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen told Congress on Wednesday that even illegal immigrants who didn’t pay taxes will be able to claim back-refunds once they get Social Security numbers under President Obama’s temporary deportation amnesty.

The revelation — which contradicts what he told Congress last week — comes as lawmakers also raised concerns Mr. Obama’s amnesty could open a window to illegal immigrants finding ways to vote, despite it being against the law.

“While we may disagree about whether your deferred action programs were lawfully created and implemented, we are confident that we can all agree that these programs cannot be permitted to impair the integrity of our elections,” Republican members of Congress from Ohio wrote in a letter to Mr. Obama Wednesday, ahead of a hearing on the issue in the House on Thursday.

Mr. Obama’s new deportation policies, which carve most illegal immigrants out of danger of being removed, and could proactively grant as many as 4 million illegal immigrants work permits and Social Security numbers, are increasingly under fire for ancillary consequences such as tax credits and competition for jobs.

Mr. Koskinen, testifying to the House oversight committee, said the White House never asked him or anyone else at the IRS about the potential tax effects of his amnesty policy.

“I haven’t talked to the White House about this at all,” he said.

Sure he didn't. This is the guy who thought Lois Lerner was Superman's girlfriend and uses Mr Clean on IRS hard drives.

No lie...he actually said this. 

He also clarified his testimony to the Senate last week, where he acknowledged illegal immigrants who had paid taxes using substitute Social Security numbers but who gain real Social Security numbers when they are approved for the amnesty can apply for back-refunds of the Earned Income Tax Credit.

On Wednesday, he said even illegal immigrants who didn’t pay taxes will be able to apply for back-credits once they get Social Security numbers.

The EITC is a refundable tax credit, which means those who don’t have any tax liability can still get money back from the government.

“Under the new program, if you get a Social Security number and you work, you’ll be eligible to apply for the Earned Income Tax Credit,” Mr. Koskinensaid.

He said that would apply even “if you did not file” taxes, as long as the illegal immigrant could demonstrate having worked off-the-books during those years.

That expands the universe of people eligible for the tax credit by millions. He said only about 700,000 illegal immigrants currently work and pay taxes using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, but as many as 4 million illegal immigrants could get a stay of deportation and work permits under the temporary amnesty, which would mean they would be eligible to claim back-refunds if they worked those years.

Rep. Mick Mulvaney, the South Carolina Republican who grilled Mr. Koskinenon the tax credits, said he was stunned the White House never checked with the IRS on the tax implications of its move.

“That’s just outrageous,” he said. “If Congress had passed a law doing exactly what the president did, we would have had not only an estimate of the costs, but we would have also been required to propose ways to pay for the programs. This is just another example of the administration operating outside the rule of law.”

Mr. Koskinen said he didn’t know how much money the tax refunds would cost, and said the White House never checked with him before announcing the amnesty. He said the maximum annual credit is between $500 and $600 for an individual.

Meanwhile, the concerns over voting are beginning to bubble up.

Rep. Jim Jordan, Ohio Republican, will hold a hearing on the issue Thursday.

Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, who has told Mr. Obama that illegal immigrants could find ways to vote thanks to his policy, is slated to testify.

That was the plan all along.

IRS to pay back-refunds to illegal immigrants who didn’t pay taxes

Climate Change a Greater Threat Than Terrorism, White House Says

In his interview with Vox, President Obama said the media “absolutely” overstates the threat of terrorism in comparison to the threat of climate change.

Vox asked Obama, "Do you think the media sometimes overstates the level of alarm people should have about terrorism and this kind of chaos, as opposed to a longer-term problem of climate change and epidemic disease?"

White House Asking Authorization for Military to Fight ISIS

The president responded in the interview released this week: "Absolutely. And I don't blame the media for that. What's the famous saying about local newscasts, right? If it bleeds, it leads, right? You show crime stories and you show fires, because that's what folks watch, and it's all about ratings. And, you know, the problems of terrorism and dysfunction and chaos, along with plane crashes and a few other things, that's the equivalent when it comes to covering international affairs. … And climate change is one that is happening at such a broad scale and at such a complex system, it's a hard story for the media to tell on a day-to-day basis."

In today’s White House briefing, Press Secretary Josh Earnest explained why the White House views climate change as a greater threat than terrorism.

KARL: [The president] was asked if the media overstate the level of alarm people should have about terrorism, as opposed to longer-term problems of climate change and epidemic disease. He said absolutely. So, let me just clarify. Is the president saying, as he seems to be implying here, that the threat of climate change is greater than the threat of terrorism?

EARNEST: I think, Jon, the point that the president is making is that there are many more people on -- on an annual basis who have to confront the impact -- the direct impact on their lives -- of climate change, or on the spread of a disease, than on terrorism.

KARL: So, the answer is yes? The president thinks that climate change...

EARNEST: Well...

KARL: ... is a greater threat than terrorism?

EARNEST: ... I think the -- the point that the president is making is that when you're talking about the direct daily impact of these kind of challenges on the daily lives of Americans, particularly Americans living in this country, that that direct impact is more -- that more people are directly affected by those things than by terrorism.

KARL: So -- so, climate change is more of a clear and present danger to the United States than terrorism?

EARNEST: Well, I think even the Department of Defense has spoken to the significant threat that climate change poses to our national securityinterests. Principally because of the impact that it can have on countries with less well developed infrastructure than we have.

KARL: I'm not asking if it's a significant, but I'm asking if it's a greater threat.

EARNEST: Well, again, I -- I wouldn't have a whole lot more to say about what the president has said in that interview.

Climate Change a Greater Threat Than Terrorism, White House Says

Rev. Wright's Star Pupil

Pat Buchanan brought up some good points in the article below especially about slavery and Barry tip-toeing around the name Muhammad. I can't imagine, nor have I heard, any other president come up with this garbage. Barry's a very complex guy. He has Muslim blood flowing through his veins, calls waterboarding torture, wants to close Gitmo which now appears by attrition… but occasionally he drones a terrorist. I suggest the latter is to keep up appearances. His record speaks for itself.

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula The Egyptian-born Coptic Christian who shot a video was to blame for Benghazi not the Muslims who actually perpetrated it.

Nadal Hasan the Ft. Hood admitted terrorist killed 13 people shouting Allah Akbar. The atrocity was quickly rebranded by this administration as Workplace Violence.

Not long ago a Muslim cut off a woman's head in Oklahoma and again they called it Workplace Violence.

(Good thing the Tsarnaev brothers didn't have jobs)

Recently this administration tried to downplay the Taliban as terrorists preferring to call them armed insurgents.

Wasn't it Barry who supported the overthrow of Mubarak so the Muslim Brotherhood could rise to power in Egypt?

Barry does a 5 for 1 trade exchanging 5 top Taliban operatives for a worthless deserter... and does it behind the back of Congress.

As the rest of the world stood with France over the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Barry didn't attend and sent no one.

This administration goes berserk and threatens to boycott our only ally in the Middle East Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu from speaking before Congress. This is after Barry said they should go back to the 1967 borders.

Ask yourself this. Has he done more to help or hinder the onslaught of Islam?

---------------------------------------------------

On a tip from Ed Kilbane

Rev. Wright’s Star Pupil

By Pat Buchanan

“A steady patriot of the world alone, The friend of every country — but his own.”

George Canning’s couplet about the Englishmen who professed love for all the world except their own native land comes to mind on reading Obama’s remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast.

After listing the horrors of ISIS, al-Qaida and Boko Haram, the president decided his recital of crimes committed in the name of Islam would be unbalanced, if he did not backhand those smug Christians sitting right in front of him.

“And lest we get on our high horse … remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

Why did he do it? He had to know that dredging up and dragging in real or imagined crimes of Christianity from centuries ago would anger Christians and obliterate whatever else he had to say.

Was it Edgar Allen Poe’s “Imp of the Perverse” prodding him to stick it to the Christians? Was it the voice of his old pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah “God damn America!” Wright muttering in his ear?

I believe this betrays something deeper. Obama revels in reciting the sins of Christianity and the West because he does not see himself as a loyal son of the civilization Christianity produced.

He sees himself as a citizen of the world who rejects the idea that our cradle faith Christianity is superior or that our civilization is superior. For he seems to seize every opportunity to point up the sins of Christianity and the West and the contributions of other faiths and civilizations.

Consider the bill of particulars in Obama’s indictment of crimes committed “in the name of Christ.”

Slavery was not invented by Christians. It existed when Christ was born. Fifth century Athens and the Roman republic had slaves. African slaves were brought not only to the New World in the 17th and 18th centuries but to Arabia and the Islamic world. Black African chieftains produced the captives for the slave trade.

Why then does Obama single out Christianity for indictment, when it was Christians and their teachings about human dignity, and Christian moral leaders and Christian nations that abolished the slave trade and slavery itself, which endured in the Islamic world into the 20th century?

Though he brought up crimes committed “in the name of Christ,” Obama did not mention the name of Muhammad. An oversight?

As for the Crusades, there were indeed atrocities on both sides during these expeditions and wars from the end of the 11th to the end of the 13th century, with the fall of Acre in 1291.

But were the Crusades, military expeditions by Christian knights to liberate Jerusalem from the Muslims who had overrun these lands where Jesus had walked, preached, and died, unjust wars?

Obama seems to see the Crusades from the Saracen point of view.

But does he really believe that when Pope Urban II preached the First Crusade at Clermont in 1095 to have Christian knights relieve the siege of Byzantium and liberate the Holy Land, this was the moral equivalent of Bin Laden declaring war to rid the Islamic Middle East of Americans?

Not long go, our popular culture portrayed Crusaders as heroes, their cause as noble. Among the most famous was Richard the Lionhearted who led the Third Crusade. Gen. Eisenhower entitled his war memoirs “Crusade in Europe.”

Like his derisive remarks about Middle Pennsylvanians, that they cling with bitterness to their bibles, guns and antipathy to immigrants, Obama’s Prayer Breakfast digression reveals much more about who the man is.

He dragged in the Inquisition. Yet, as Alexander Solzhenitsyn noted, Vladimir Lenin ordered more people executed in his first days in power than did the Spanish Inquisition in 300 years.

In drawing parallels between Christianity and Islam, Obama misses a basic point. Unlike Islam, which, in one century, conquered Arabia, the Middle and Near East, the Holy Land, North Africa and Spain, until the Muslim advance was halted by Charles Martel at Poitiers in France, Christianity did not conquer with the sword, but with the Word.

Only after 300 years of persecution and martyrdom were the Christians, through the Edict of Milan, allowed to practice their faith.

Christianity was not imposed on the Old World, but embraced.

America’s problem: With Islamic fanaticism surging, with ISIS using the term “Crusader” as a curse word equivalent to “Nazi,” we have as leader of the West a man who partly shares the enemy’s views about the Christian Crusades, and who seems at best ambivalent about the superiority of the civilization that he leads.

Again, Canning’s words come to mind:

“No narrow bigot he; — his reason’d view Thy interests, England, ranks with thine, Peru!

France at our doors, he sees no danger nigh, But heaves for Turkey’s woes the impartial sigh;

A steady patriot of the world alone, The friend of every country — but his own.”

Rev. Wright's Star Pupil