Visit Counter

Saturday, July 11, 2015

They don't get any dumber than this






Raven-Symoné has cracked the conspriacy behind Donald Trump's presidential bid.



So I got this straight... Trump is involved in a conspiracy that set up the San Francisco killing to make his narrative about illegals more creditable? 

Someone call this bitch ambulance!




Wonder if Cosby slipped her some bath salts? 



This is an unrelated incident but added just to prove liberals are totally whacked.

When Sarandon buys donuts she likes them pre-licked.



----------------------------------------------------------------------





The newly minted "View" co-host dropped her bombshell theory on Thursday's episode of the ABC talk show, opining that the real estate mogul/reality TV star has been planted in the campaign by the real powers-that-be in order to distract voters from the nation's pressing matters.

Raven-Symoné offered her intriguing thoughts on the candidate during a heated debate about immigration. After her cohort Rosie Perez grumbled that people aren't talking about the real issues, such as Puerto Rico's crippling debt, Raven-Symoné dropped her megaton of science on the panel.

"Nobody is talking about the real issues because [Trump] is sucking up the air for everyone. He knows how to manipulate the industry," Raven-Symoné offered. "And I'm that person who thinks that he was put there by maybe Republicans or Democrats as a mole to just get people's opinions and stir stuff up, so that we don't talk about the real issues." 

Two things... he's a mole for the Democrats? 

(Over 12 million illegals is not a real issue?)

Well, looks like we know who the real Manchurian candidate is here.

Raven-Symoné continued along her conspiratorial bent during a discussion of Francisco Sanchez, an illegal immigrant and five-time deportee who's accused of fatally shooting a woman in San Francisco with a gun reportedly belonging to a federal agent.

"During the passionate back-and-forth, Raven-Symoné declared that she found it "interesting that this happened as soon as Trump started to talk about this; he randomly found a gun from a federal agent."

Guest host Candace Cameron Bure chirped in: "Right now I feel like Trump's the only one who's talking about it," an opinion that was met with sharp rebuttal from her cohorts.









Share/Bookmark

White House blames Republicans for deported San Francisco killer







U-n-b-e-l-i-e-v-e-a-b-l-e.... times 100!!!






What party is the party for illegals? Let me put it another way. If you're here illegally would you fell more comfortable with a Trump presidency or Killary?  

You would think Republicans and Democrats could at least see eye to eye when it comes to people coming here illegally.

Think again.

-----------------------------------------------











The White House blamed congressional Republicans Monday for the death of a San Francisco woman allegedly shot by a repeat offender illegal immigrant, and for a spate of gun violence last weekend in President Obama's hometown of Chicago.

Referring to the shooting death last week of Kathryn Steinle, allegedly shot by a Mexican man who has been deported five times, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said the U.S. would be safer if Republican lawmakers had approved comprehensive immigration reform backed by the president.


"The president has done everything within his power to make sure that we're focusing our law enforcement resources on criminals and those who pose a threat to public safety," Mr. Earnest said. "It's because of the political efforts of Republicans that we have not been able to make the kind of investment that we would like to make in securing our border and keeping our communities safe."

In fact, DHS has released tens of thousands of illegal aliens convicted of felonies, so the case of the man accused of murdering Kate Steinle, Francisco Sanchez, who was deported five times and released on a technicality last March, is not unusual.







Share/Bookmark

Friday, July 10, 2015

The Worst Agreement In U.S. Diplomatic History





On a tip from Ed Kilbane






Once this 'deal' is finalized watch what happens. It'll blow up in their face in a matter of months.







WASHINGTON — The devil is not in the details. It’s in the entire conception of the Iran deal, animated by President Obama’s fantastical belief that he, uniquely, could achieve detente with a fanatical Islamist regime whose foundational purpose is to cleanse the Middle East of the poisonous corruption of American power and influence.

In pursuit of his desire to make the Islamic Republic into an accepted, normalized “successful regional power,” Obama decided to take over the nuclear negotiations. At the time, Tehran was reeling — the rial plunging, inflation skyrocketing, the economy contracting — under a regime of international sanctions painstakingly constructed over a decade.

Then, instead of welcoming Congress’ attempt to tighten sanctions to increase the pressure on the mullahs, Obama began the negotiations by loosening sanctions, injecting billions into the Iranian economy (which began growing again in 2014) and conceding in advance an Iranian right to enrich uranium.

It’s been downhill ever since. Desperate for a legacy deal, Obama has played the supplicant, abandoning every red line his administration had declared essential to any acceptable deal.

Inspections

They were to be anywhere, anytime, unimpeded. Now? Total cave. Unfettered access has become “managed access.” Nuclear inspectors will have to negotiate and receive Iranian approval for inspections. Which allows them denial and/or crucial delay for concealing any clandestine activities.

To give a flavor of the degree of our capitulation, the administration played Iran’s lawyer on this one, explaining that, after all, “the United States of America wouldn’t allow anybody to get into every military site, so that’s not appropriate.” Apart from the absurdity of morally equating America with the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism, if we were going to parrot the Iranian position, why wait 19 months to do so — after repeatedly insisting on free access as essential to any inspection regime?

Coming clean on past nuclear activity

The current interim agreement that governed the last 19 months of negotiation required Iran to do exactly that. Tehran has offered nothing. The administration had insisted that this accounting was essential because how can you verify future illegal advances in Iran’s nuclear program if you have no baseline?

After continually demanding access to their scientists, plans and weaponization facilities, Secretary of State John Kerry two weeks ago airily dismissed the need, saying he is focused on the future, “not fixated” on the past. And that we have “absolute knowledge” of the Iranian program anyway — a whopper that his staffers had to spend days walking back.

Not to worry, we are told. The accounting will be done after the final deal is signed. Which is ridiculous. If the Iranians haven’t budged on disclosing previous work under the current sanctions regime, by what logic will they comply after sanctions are lifted?

Sanctions relief

These were to be gradual and staged as the International Atomic Energy Agency certified Iranian compliance over time. Now we’re going to be releasing up to $150 billion as an upfront signing bonus. That’s 25 times the annual budget of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. Enough to fuel a generation of intensified Iranian aggression from Yemen to Lebanon to Bahrain.

Yet three months ago, Obama expressed nonchalance about immediate sanctions relief. It’s not the issue, he said. The real issue is “snap-back” sanctions to be reimposed if Iran is found in violation.

Good grief. Iran won’t be found in violation. The inspection regime is laughable and the bureaucratic procedures endless. Moreover, does anyone imagine that Russia and China will reimpose sanctions? Or that the myriad European businesses preparing to join the Iranian gold rush the day the deal is signed will simply turn around and go home?

Non-nuclear-related sanctions

The administration insisted that the nuclear talks would not affect separate sanctions imposed because of Iranian aggression and terrorism. That was then. The administration is now leaking that everything will be lifted.

Taken together, the catalog of capitulations is breathtaking: spot inspections, disclosure of previous nuclear activity, gradual sanctions relief, retention of non-nuclear sanctions.

What’s left? A surrender document of the kind offered by defeated nations suing for peace. Consider: The strongest military and economic power on earth, backed by the five other major powers, armed with what had been a crushing sanctions regime, is about to sign the worst international agreement in American diplomatic history.

How did it come to this? With every concession, Obama and Kerry made clear they were desperate for a deal.

And they will get it. Obama will get his “legacy.” Kerry will get his Nobel. And Iran will get the bomb.






Share/Bookmark

Thursday, July 9, 2015

A perfect example of government common sense


















Share/Bookmark

Jimmy Carter insists Jesus would not condemn homosexuality







I think he's jealous of losing his place in history as 'The Worse President Of The Modern Era'
This is his attempt to make a comeback. 




Seen one? I think he got off of one!



Leviticus 18:22


"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination"

So this verse is what... an overwhelming endorsement of homosexuality?




(He doesn't have any verse in scripture alright)

Video 127











Share/Bookmark