Another side of 911 I never heard about

Video 133

Another side of 911 I never heard about

I good reason to change the 14th Amendment

Which I have been saying for years.

Immigrant parents suing Texas for withholding birth certificates to US-born kids

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. 

This was the intended purpose:

The Citizenship Clause is the first sentence of Section 1 in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." This clause represented Congress's reversal of a portion of the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision which had declared that African Americans were not and could not become citizens of the United States or enjoy any of the privileges and immunities of citizenship.

It's because of this clause we now have "anchor babies". All you have to do to rectify this loophole is add three words

All persons born or naturalized in the United States of legal parents, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. 

Why?

Because two wrongs don't make a right. 

Think about it. Is it too much to ask to be born of legal parents?

-------------------------------------------------------

June 12, 2015: A Texas state flag attached to a bike waves after the Republic of Texas (ROT) Biker Rally parade in Austin, Texas. (Reuters)

Immigrant parents living in Texas without proper identification papers are suing the state for withholding birth certificates from their American-born children, in a tricky case that pits Texas' strict ID laws against the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. 

The suit was filed in May in U.S. District Court in Austin by a group of Mexican citizen parents living in Texas. The suit claims the state refused birth certificates for 23 children because the parents could not provide the proper photo identification under state law. 

But the parents argue Texas is, in doing so, violating the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil regardless of their parents’ status. 

The lawsuit does not outright say the parents are illegal immigrants, but strongly suggests it -- at one point alleging the state is denying their kids birth certificates due to their "immigration status." 

“We’re trying to resolve this issue once and for all,” Efren Olivares, the plaintiffs' lawyer who also works with the Texas Civil Rights Project, told FoxNews.com. “Our two main objectives: obtain birth certificates for the 23 children and to obtain a clear statement from the state agency as to what people in this situation will have to produce in the future to get their birth certificate.” 

The concept of birthright citizenship is controversial in its own right, with illegal immigration foes concerned that undocumented parents are having children inside the U.S. to help the entire family stay in the country. 

But the right is nevertheless enshrined in the Constitution. Yet some illegal immigrant parents in Texas have had trouble getting a birth certificate for their kids because they themselves lack the right papers. 

In 2013, local jurisdictions stopped accepting consulate cards, called “matriculas,” under state pressure. Immigrants had been able to get matriculas from their home country’s consulate in the state, but since have had to show their foreign driver’s license or border ID card as primary verification. Passports without U.S. visas don’t count.

Advocacy groups point out that many illegal immigrants don’t have these documents and going back home to get them would probably mean they couldn't return. 

The state, however, says that blocking matriculas is just a matter of enforcing its own rule.

“Texas has never accepted the consular ID’s,” said Chris Van Deussen, press officer for the Texas Department of State Health Services. “Birth and death records are filed at the local registrar … so while we’ve never accepted them at the state level, I cannot say that every registrar rejected them.”

Van Deussen emphasized that matriculas weren’t secure forms of identification. He said “the issuer doesn’t verify data or documents that go into them.”

The purpose of enforcing the ID rules is in part to ensure parents are who they say they are. Van Deussen said while the agency is committed to getting people the documents, they also have a duty to ensure people provide valid information to prevent fraud and ID theft. 

“This is not a policy that’s based on anybody’s immigrant status, it is based on the ID a person can present.”

Identification restrictions nevertheless have big implications for immigrants.

The suit claims that potentially thousands of Mexican and Central American parents have been denied birth certificates for their children. Families need certificates to register their children in school or enroll in appropriate health insurance and government programs.

Olivares said that children can be denied benefits over certificates, and that even churches sometimes don’t baptize children without their form. Some parents have been unable to get the certificates for several years, according to an NPR report.

Texas’ ID crackdown coincides with a boom in Central American children being born in the state. Last year alone, more than 55,000 families came to the U.S. from Central America. Three-fourths of them went to Texas, according to the Los Angeles Times. 

Jennifer Harbury, another lawyer for the plaintiffs, said Texas’ certificate denials are politically motivated. She told the Los Angeles Times that they're part of the pushback to the Obama administration’s 2012 deportation protections and 2014 proposals to protect immigrant parents with American-born children.

Texas’ attorney general is expected to respond to the lawsuit in the coming weeks.

I good reason to change the 14th Amendment

I was afraid something like this may happen

Obama officials deny 'secret deals' in Iran nuclear pact

This is right up Barry's alley. I was concerned Congress wasn't getting the straight dope on the deal and it turns out to be the case. This is coming from the same guy who told us ObamaCare would be on C-Span. It wasn't. Whose partner in crime told us "You have to vote for it to find out what's in it." We we found out later, "You can keep your insurance period, no matter what." Wasn't part of the deal either.

Ask yourself this... if Pompeo and Corker didn't go to Vienna would we have known about this?

“That we are only now discovering that parts of this dangerous agreement are being kept secret begs the question of what other elements may also be secret and entirely free from public scrutiny,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said in a statement. 

Please read the update below.

-----------------------------------

A senior State Department official on Wednesday pushed back against Republican claims that the administration worked out secret bargains with Iran while hammering out the landmark nuclear agreement.

The charge was leveled Tuesday by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kansas). The two said they met with officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last weekend and said two side deals were made in addition to the formal Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

One agreement covers the inspection of Iran’s Parchin military complex, and the second detials how the IAEA and Tehran will resolve outstanding issues on possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear effort, according to Cotton and Pompeo, who are members of the Senate and House Intelligence panels.

State Department spokesman John Kirby rebutted the claim.

“There's no side deals. There's no secret deals between Iran and the IAEA that the P5+1 has not been briefed on in detail,” he said during a press briefing.

So this is pretty clear. There are no side deals right? 

But read further.

Kirby acknowledged that lawmakers have expressed interest in two documents in addition to the JCPOA, annexes and related materials the department sent lawmakers Sunday.

“Congress has what we have, and what's being asked for here are IAEA documents or material that is not in our possession,” he said. 

Wait a minute... there may some 'caveats' to the deal but we don't have it in our possession.

“These kinds of technical arrangements with the IAEA are a matter of standard practice, that they're not released publicly or to other states, but our experts are familiar and comfortable with the contents, which we would be happy to discuss with Congress in a classified setting,” Kirby added.

In other words...you caught us in a lie so now we'll be happy to discuss it with you.

On Tuesday, the leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said they had fired off a letter requesting access to the reports.

Kirby's comments come as Secretary of State Kerry, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew give a classified briefing on the deal to House lawmakers.

The trio will also appear before the Foreign Relations panel Thursday to discuss the deal, part of the administration’s lobbying effort to sell the accord to a deeply skeptical Capitol Hill.

Kirby said there “will be ample opportunity” to address the issue during the meetings.

“These are issues between Iran and the IAEA, these technical agreements are never shared outside the state being questioned in the IAEA. But we have been briefed on them,” he said. 

“And we are more than comfortable in a classified setting discussing that. Should that be of interest today, I am absolutely certain that Secretary Kerry would be willing to talk about, as well as Secretary Moniz,” according to Kirby.

Update

White House acknowledges ‘side’ deals between Iran, IAEA

National Security Adviser Susan Rice on Wednesday acknowledged the existence of so-called “side” agreements between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Rice said the deals involve Iran accounting for past military uses of its nuclear program, but rejected GOP assertions that this represented “secret” side deals to the Iranian nuclear agreement. Rice said the documents between Iran and the IAEA are not public, but the administration has been informed on their contents and will share details with members of Congress in a classified briefing on Capitol Hill. 

“We’re satisfied with them and we will share the contents of those briefings in full in a classified session with the Congress,” she told reporters. “So there's nothing in that regard that we know that they won't know.”

Republicans have been demanding to see the Iran-IAEA agreements and have criticized the administration for not yet making the public.

“That we are only now discovering that parts of this dangerous agreement are being kept secret begs the question of what other elements may also be secret and entirely free from public scrutiny,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said in a statement. 

Congress is reviewing the Iran nuclear deal, which lifts sanctions on Tehran in exchange for its concessions on its nuclear program.

President Obama has hailed the deal as a major win for the United States that will keep Tehran from getting nuclear weapons and make the Middle East more safe. Critics argue it does too little to prevent Iranian aggression and that it could leave Israel open to an attack. 

The talk of secret side deals could hurt administration efforts to defeat legislation aimed at undermining the deal, and Rice took aim at the comments.

She said it was “no secret” that Iran and the IAEA were negotiating an agreement on possible military-related nuclear activities. 

She said this had always “been an issue between Iran and the IAEA” and was a sticking point in the talks.

Obama’s top national security adviser said all components of the deal the U.S. negotiated have been shared with Congress. 

Besides agreeing to discuss the past military dimensions of its nuclear program, Iran struck a deal with the IAEA on inspections at the Parchin military base, one of the most sensitive sites discussed in the U.S.-led international talks.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and ranking member Ben Cardin (D-Md.) wrote a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry requesting that documents related to the deals be submitted to Congress. 

Lawmakers have 60 days to review the agreement before voting whether to approve or reject the Iran deal.

Kerry, along with Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, were on Capitol Hill Wednesday to hold classified briefings for members.

------------------------

The bottom line:

Instead of doing a deal with Iran we should be bombing them, especially their nuclear facilities.

I was afraid something like this may happen

He's disturbed alright

In the head!

John Kerry, the US secretary of state, said he was disturbed by a fiery speech in which Ayatollah Ali Khamenei promised to continue fomenting unrest across the Middle East and said Iran's "policy towards the arrogant US will not change".

Video 132

What a shock! The whole time this fool is 'negotiating' with Iran they're chanting:

DEATH TO AMERICA

DEATH TO ISRAEL

And now he's troubled and disturbed that...Iran's policy towards the arrogant US will not change?


Iran Vows to Buy Weapons Anytime, Anywhere



Where in the world do we find these idiots?

He's disturbed alright

What If 20 million illegal aliens were sent back to their country?

Considering the Denver Post is a very liberal paper I'm surprised they published this. This really shows how the hiring of illegals is false economic practices.

Tina Griego is a Free-Lance reporter for the Denver Post. She writes some really good stuff and she is a strong advocate for LEGAL immigration .... Homework on issues is part of her make-up and fabric ....

What if they left ?

Somebody really did their homework on this one. Best on the subject to date. It does not have a political slant to it, it’s just the facts: 

Not Democratic, not Republican, not liberal and not conservative.

What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America?

I, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, "Mexican Visitor's Lament."

I interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, "Illegal aliens pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes. What happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?"

Hmmm, I thought, what would happen ?

So I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the FACTS I found below.

It's a good question... it deserves an honest answer. Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America? The answers I found may surprise you !

In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language, again.

In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grandchildren would move back "home," mostly to Mexico. That would save Colorado an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.

Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our gridlocked cities in Colorado. Denver's 4% unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.

In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America, the rule of law, and English.

In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home,' the U.S. Economy would return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.

No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English. No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.

In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the '18th Street Gang' would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!

Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens !

America's economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the aliens' home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America's economy which currently suffers an $8.7 trillion debt. $8.7 trillion debt !!!

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act. Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country - brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.

Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities. It would also put the 'progressives' on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases (if this even matters).

Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas, to San Diego, California, in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods. 

Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.

The New York Times reported them to be America's new 'Third World' inside our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)

By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico. We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico. We already invite a million people into our country legally annually, more than all other countries combined. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.

It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.

Interesting Statistics!

Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:

1. $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens (that's Billion with a 'B') a href="http://tinyurl.com/zob77.html" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/zob77.html">http://tinyurl.com/zob77.html

3. $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English!b>http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html >

5. $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

6. $3 Million Dollars 'PER DAY' is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. That's $1.2 Billion a year. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

7. 28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01...html

8. $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt.01.html

11. During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries. Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin, crack, guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border. http://tinyurl.com/t9shta href="http://tinyurl.com/t9sht" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/t9sht">http://tinyurl.com/t9sht

12. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period. http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation

13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends. http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm

14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States! http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml

Total cost a whopping $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR !

Forward this to everyone YOU know! 

What If 20 million illegal aliens were sent back to their country?