Visit Counter

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Climate Change (real this time)




Al Roker's 'Wake Up With Al' Weather Channel show cancelled

Al Roker's show was reportedly cancelled on Monday
Sources say a series of blustery emails between Roker and boss David Clark led to his firing



Al Roker's Wake Up With Al Show on the Weather Channel has reportedly been cancelled




It was cloudy with a chance of getting fired on Monday when Al Roker's 'Wake Up With Al' show on the Weather Channel was axed after a stormy email session with his boss.

The Today Show's weather guru was reportedly canned after email flurries with David Clark, president of the Weather Co.’s TV division, reports Page Six.

The squall reportedly began when the veteran weather watcher wanted to cover the tenth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.

But Clark reportedly insisted on covering Tropical Storm Erika instead, even though Roker pointed out it wouldn’t arrive in Florida for days, if ever. 

Erika sputtered into rainfall before reaching the U.S.

'Viewers aren’t stupid. They can see when potential landfall is,' Roker reportedly pinged his boss.

Clark is then said to have replied, 'If you disagree with a decision you are welcome to speak up ... but this is out of line and not how we do things here.'

Roker then supposedly made a digital gaffe when he shot back 'Really David. You want to try and spank me in front of people.'



Roker and his cohost Stephanie Abrams (above) are reportedly out of a job - at least at The Weather Channel







Roker reportedly got the boot after a turbulent series of emails between him and his boss, David Clark



He also reportedly accidentally carbon copied several other executives.

In a followup mea culpa, Roker apparently wrote, 'I didn’t mean for this to be a public argument,' saying that he didn't mean to 'reply all.'

Quicker than an April shower, Roker's show was cancelled after six years.

Roker has not commented on the report that his show has been iced.





Share/Bookmark

Donald Trump campaign ‘bad’ for US political system: Hillary Clinton





This coming from the candidate who is currently under FBI investigation for having a private server to send and receive classified emails. Not to mention while SOS selling our uranium to the Russians.





------------------------------------------------------




Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said that Republican front runner Trump is unqualified to be president. 

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has slammed her leading Republican rival Donald Trump saying his high-profile campaign is a “bad development” for the American political system.

The former Secretary of State, who is battling declining popularity ratings after it became known that she had used a private email server during her term as the top US diplomat, also said that Republican front runner Trump is unqualified to be president.

Asked yesterday about real estate tycoon Trump’s attacks on her longtime aide Huma Abedin, Clinton said the Republican’s candidacy is “a bad development for our American political system” and that his bravado could have dangerous repercussions if he became president, NBC News reported.

“Loose talk, threats, insults — they have consequences. The president of the United States needs to be careful about what he or she says,” she said.

She went to say that Trump is “great at innuendo and conspiracy theories and really defaming people. He is the candidate of being against”.

“That’s not what I want to do in my campaign, and that’s not how I’m going to conduct myself,” she said.

Trump and fellow Republican candidate Ted Cruz will hold a rally opposing President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran next week at the same time Clinton will be defending it in a speech in Washington.

Asked about that, Clinton suggested that Trump and Cruz “don’t believe in diplomacy” and said Americans want a president who does.






Share/Bookmark

Clinton family reportedly personally paid State Dept. staffer to maintain private server




Odd statement coming from a Clinton where lying is as natural as breathing.




Check out in particular the last paragraph. Gives me hope this one is not going the way of on the IRS scandal.

------------------------------------------------------





Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton and her family reportedly paid a State Department staffer to maintain the private email server she used during her tenure as secretary of state.

The Washington Post, citing an unnamed campaign official, reports the arrangement helped Clinton maintain her personal control over the server that she used to conduct public and private business. The official also said it also ensure that taxpayers weren’t paying for the upkeep of the server that was shared by Clinton, her president and their daughter as well as former aides, the Post reports.

The State Department staffer in question, Bryan Pagliano, told a congressional committee that he would invoke his Fifth Amendment rights instead of testifying about the private server. A congressional source told Fox News on Friday that investigators on the Benghazi Select Committee hoped to question Pagliano, a former IT specialist, over possible destruction of evidence.

Pagliano served as Clinton’s IT director of her 2008 campaign committee and then on her political action committee, according to The Post. He installed and managed her serve and left his IT job at the State Department in February 2013, the same month Clinton stepped down as secretary.

The Post reports the Clintons paid Pagliano $5,000 for “computer services” prior to him joining the State Department, according to a 2009 financial disclosure form he filed. After he arrived on the State Department’s staff in 2009, he continued to be paid by the Clinton’s to maintain the server, a campaign official and another person familiar with the arrangement told The Post.

When asked about whether former IT specialist had been paid privately to maintain the server, a State Department official said the agency “found no evidence that he ever informed the department that he had outside income,” The Post reports. This week, a different State Department official, couldn’t clarify to the newspaper Pagliano’s pay situation.

Pagliano reportedly didn’t list any outside income in the required personal financial disclosures he filed each year. The Post reports he remains a State Department contractor doing work on “mobile and remote computing functions,’ a State Department spokesperson said.

It’s not known exactly when or who “wiped” Clinton’s personal email server. However, it seems clear the move came after October 2014, when the State Department requested personal emails be returned as part of her business records.

Committee Republicans have long argued they don’t have all the documents that should be available to the investigation, after Clinton, using her personal discretion, purged some 30,000.

Fox News put additional questions to Pagliano’s attorney, Mark J. MacDougall, Friday about whether his client played a direct role or had knowledge of the server scrub, but MacDougall said there was nothing further to add beyond the letter.

An intelligence source who confirmed to Fox that the FBI’s “A-team” was handling the Clinton email case, described the investigation as “moving along well,” adding investigators remain “confident” deleted records can be recovered because whoever did the scrub may “not be a very good IT guy. There are different standards to scrub when you do it for government vs. commercial.”







Share/Bookmark

Friday, September 4, 2015

Scarborough Stunned by Hillary Clinton’s Response to Staffer Who Told Her He Couldn’t Send Her ‘Classified’ Email





Either she gets indicted or we are now living in a Banana Republic. One in which you can get in more trouble for a deflated football then sending and receiving unsecured classified information!

-------------------------


Following the release of roughly 7,000 new emails, "Morning Joe" co-host Joe Scarborough expressed concern over Hillary Clinton's response to a staffer who told her he couldn't send her classified information. Clinton has maintained that she never sent or received classified information from her private email account.

In a February 2010 email, Clinton wrote to her aide, Jacob Sullivan, "It's a public statement! Just email it."





"Trust me, I share your exasperation," Sullivan replied. "But until ops coverts it to the unclassified email system, there is no physical way for me to email it. I can't even access it."



Scarborough reacted, "Everything she said in that…press conference about, 'this is just patently false' — and here, you actually have her berating somebody that worked for her…and works for her still."

"Berating him, saying, 'send me this classified email,'" he added. "And he said, basically, 'I can't, it's classified. I can't even access it because it's classified.'"

MSNBC contributor Mike Barnicle said Clinton's email controversy is continuously becoming less about the actual emails and more about the "way that she's handling it."

"That's the burden she's carrying," he said.

Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart defended Clinton, saying the statement that the former secretary of state was a statement that had already been released to the public.

(So somehow that makes it okay?)

-----------------------------



The trail of lies:

“I’m confident that this process will prove that I never sent nor received any e-mail that was marked classified.”
–Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, news conference, Ankeny, Iowa, Aug. 26, 2015


“Whether it was a personal account or a government account, I did not send classified material and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified, which is the way you know whether something is.”
–Clinton, news conference, Las Vegas, Aug. 18, 2015


 “I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. There is no classified material. I’m certainly well-aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material.”
— Clinton, news conference, New York, March 10

And we now know this was the biggest lie of all:

“The system we used was set up for Pres. Clinton’s office and it had numerous safeguards. It was on property, guarded by the Secret Service and there were no security breaches. So I think that the use of that server which started with my husband certainly proved to be effective and secure.”


The server, with no security whatsoever, was actually in a bathroom closet of some 3rd rate IT company in Colorado. 

What more evidence do you need???











Share/Bookmark

Thursday, September 3, 2015

This is a deal only a Muslim could love






Obama wins critical backing on Iran deal, virtually ensuring survival in Congress

Barry needed one more idiot and he got it after retiring Maryland Democratic senator came out Wednesday morning in favor of the pact. 



"President Obama and I are convinced beyond any reasonable doubt that the framework that we have put forward will get the job done," Kerry said.

Lets talk about this "framework".

1. Anywhere, Anytime inspections which we were promised would take place went out the window in the first 10 minutes of discussion. But wait there's more...the IAEA only has to wait 24 days after giving notice of inspection.

2. We're going to give Iran $150 billion so they can finance terrorism! A lot of this money will go to Hamas and Hezbollah to help them achieve their goal of destroying Israel. How is this any different than giving money to Al-Qaeda or the Taliban?

3. Barry brokered this deal yet no American is allowed on the inspection team that is going to cost $10.5 million a year. How can anyone trust Iran or Barry for that matter. While dealing with Iran they chanted "Death To America" what confidence to you derive from that? And as far as Barry is concerned... how many other secret side deals are out there?

4. And the topper. In some instances we're going to allow Iran to inspect themselves. They're going to get their own soil sample too!



Barry said,"If Iran violates the deal, sanctions can be snapped back into place." What a joke the horse is already out of the barn. This comes from the same guy who said you can keep your insurance.



This is why this deal will come about. We have imbeciles posing as a Congress. Is there anyone willing to put politics aside and do what's right for America? This is an example of what I mean.

Watch this idiot  (Casey) on Cavuto. He honestly believes "Ball-less Barry" the Caitlyn Jenner of presidents is going to attack Iran if they don't... tow the line. Barry can't muster up the guts to call them Muslim terrorists let alone attack! Like how Cavuto reminded him of the red line in Syria.


Video 148


Of all the scandals Barry's been involved in, and there are many, they pale in comparison. This deal is out and out treason. The only possible conclusion you can come to Barry truly is a Muslim. There's no two ways about it. I am going to be very mindful of every son-of-a-bitch who voted for this deal. Blood is on their hands.

We own the Senate and the House and we have one card left to play. 
Articles of Impeachment.

What else does if have to do before the proceeding begin?






Share/Bookmark