Visit Counter

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Siri recommends where to get an abortion






 No kidding. I just said 'abortion' on my iPhone and Siri gave me a PP office 8 miles away. So much for the ruse.. Healthcare Clinic.

Notice the ACLU had to get involved because dead baby part production was being impeded. Of course, the article below addresses it as a technical flaw, not a moral one.

-----------------------------------




Apple correcting Siri "abortion" search issue uncovered in 2011


More than four years after the discovery of a purported Siri flaw that led users searching for abortion clinics to adoption agencies and fertility clinics, it seems Apple and its data providers are slowly working to correct the issue.





In 2011, Apple was met with a flurry of negative press, and pressure from rights groups like the ACLU, after it was discovered that its Siri virtual assistant was incorrectly processing requests for information about abortions. At the time, Apple blamed a glitch for the apparent omission of results relating to abortion clinics and birth control, though the company has been slow to resolve the situation.

Over the past month, Fast Company revisited the issue, querying Siri and Apple Maps with pointed searches like, "Where can I find an abortion provider?" Early results still lacked information for nearby abortion clinics in the publication's search area of San Francisco, but things have changed during the past week.

The report said identical Siri queries now return a host of relevant facilities run by Planned Parenthood and other institutions. Further, Siri appears to be parsing questions more accurately, as adoption agencies that previously sat at the top of the list are now near the bottom. 

While the publication did not receive comment from Apple, it theorizes iOS 9 Maps' new location-based Nearby point of interest feature is at least partially responsible for the change. That Apple is constantly building out its Maps product with new data providers and better search algorithms likely helped as well.

A non-profit organization called Sea Change Program has been working with UC San Francisco personnel to put pressure on Apple to clear up the issue, going so far as to write a letter to CEO Tim Cook in November, the report said. 

Fast Company notes Apple's recent search optimization came prior to the article's publication on Friday, which would suggest media coverage did not play a role in the change. However, in a separate report from TechCrunch that cited the same sources but was published hours later, Sea Change Program communications manager Lauren Himiak called the timing "suspect."

Whatever the case, Siri is now providing accurate Maps directions and data for abortion related searches across the U.S. AppleInsider confirmed Planned Parenthood and other pertinent agencies are showing up in search results within major metropolitan cities from New York to Honolulu.






Share/Bookmark

Friday, January 29, 2016

Killary's latest emails are to damaging to ever be released





State Department will not release 22 'top secret' Clinton emails


Unmistakably, things are far worse than we thought. With this latest development, you have to wonder why hasn't the FBI taken possession of all Killary's emails? There are still “loyalists” who remain in the former Clinton State Dept in charge of her emails. God only knows what they manipulated and deleted to save her ass… not to mention their own.




-------------------------------------- 




The State Department announced Friday that it will not release 22 emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton because they contain "top secret" information, the highest level of government classification.

The decision, coming three days before the Iowa caucuses, could provide fodder for Clinton's political opponents, especially Republicans, who are likely to make note of the emails' "top secret" designation. Clinton's email use has haunted her on the campaign trail since it became public early last year that she maintained a private server while leading the State Department.

State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information.

This is total bullshit. According to Catherine Herridge, they were not upgraded. They were sent as top secret.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4728776781001/clinton-emails-too-damaging-to-release#sp=show-clips

"We are aware that there is intense interest in this matter, and we are announcing this decision now because the (Freedom of Information Act) process regarding these emails has been completed," Kirby said. "While we have requested a month's extension to complete the entire review, we did not need the extension for these documents."

But, Kirby said, a separate review by the bureaus of Diplomatic Security and Intelligence and Research is being held into whether the information in the emails was classified at the time they were sent and received. He would not say when the review began or how long it would go, and acknowledged it's possible there could be classified emails that weren't marked as such.

A senior State Department official said the review "began very recently" and was initiated by the State Department, but the official wouldn't say what prompted it.

A spokesperson for the Intelligence Community's inspector general declined to comment.

Kirby also said 18 emails, comprised of eight email chains between Clinton and President Barack Obama, are being "withheld in full" to "protect the President's ability to receive unvarnished advice and counsel." But, Kirby said, they "have not been determined to be classified" and said they will "ultimately be released in accordance with the Presidential records act."

(Probably the one's relating to Benghazi)

Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Clinton's campaign, said in a statement that Friday's development was a case of "over-classification run amok."

"We firmly oppose the complete blocking of the release of these emails. Since first providing her emails to the State Department more than one year ago, Hillary Clinton has urged that they be made available to the public. We feel no differently today," Fallon said.

Fallon also contended on MSNBC that the decision to withhold the 22 emails is "happening at the behest of other agencies in the government who have hijacked the process that's been taking place for the last several months."

Asked Friday if he had "certainty and confidence" that Clinton will not be indicted over the email controversy, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said any decision to prosecute Clinton would rest with the Justice Department.

"That is a decision to be made solely by independent prosecutors," Earnest said. "But again, based on what we know from the Department of Justice, it does not seem to be headed in that direction."

Earnest, the piece of garbage he is unwittingly tipped his hat. In other words, the WH is in communication with the DOJ working on the "fix".


In a veiled attack to divert blame elsewhere, Killary said of the Intelligence Community, "some of the members (Republican) have a hidden agenda". This is the beginning of her smear campaign. If Comey recommends prosecuting her she'll say the FBI director is just another Republican out to get her and, of course, the MSM will try to bury it or spin it to her advantage. To top this off 70% of the simpletons, (aka) her supporters, don't care about her emails.


More emails to be released

The State Department will release another batch of Clinton's emails Friday, but the release is expected to fall well behind the judge-imposed timetable for producing all of her emails.

The emails have been publishing over the last eight months more or less in accordance with a schedule set by Judge Rudolph Contreras, with increasingly large batches uploaded to a State Department website at the end of each month. 

This month's release was supposed to be the final one and include just over 9,000 pages of documents -- the largest number to date. 

But last Thursday, the State Department filed a motion to extend the final productions until February 29 because the department had failed to send more than 7,000 pages of those emails to other government agencies for review, only recognizing the mistake earlier this month. 

That delay was then compounded by a huge snowstorm that shut down the federal government for several days, according to the State Department's motion. 

I forgot... you can't send emails when it's snowing. 

In a separate filing Thursday night, lawyers for the State Department said the State Department "candidly acknowledged -- and regrets -- that it was responsible for the failure to send the documents for consultation and that it was simply a mistake that occurred during the enormous undertaking of reviewing and processing the entire Clinton email collection in a compressed time frame." 

A State Department official told CNN Thursday, "State Department staff are working extremely hard to get as many emails are through our FOIA process as possible," but wouldn't elaborate on what was in the legal filing. 

Contreras has not yet ruled on the State Department's request for more time. But regardless of his ruling, the State Department is unlikely to meet its full production quota since, as it acknowledges in Thursday's filing, some of the emails flagged for further review had not even been sent to a dozen relevant agencies for review. 

"State has experienced some difficulty contacting some of the appropriate agency personnel since the snow storm and is still making arrangements with some of the receiving agencies for secure delivery of the documents," the department lawyers wrote, emphasizing that these represent a small portion of the total remaining emails. 

Lawyers for the plaintiff in the Freedom of Information Act case have submitted their own filing opposing the State Department's request for more time.

The delay, they note, pushes the final release back until after the early presidential primaries, causing "grave, incurable harm."

In May, Contreras ordered the State Department to "aspire to abide" by the monthly production schedule. And while the timeline he set is aspirational, the department must also submit reports each month to explain its progress. 





Share/Bookmark

Carly Fiorina attacks Hillary: I would’ve dumped Bill long ago







On a tip from Ed Kilbane.




Must admit I didn't watch the first debate. Major mistake on my part. Good thing I got a friend covering for me.

I'd like to call this "The Scorched Earth Video"

How much would you pay to see a Carly vs Killary debate? 

Video 214


Hey...if you want a good laugh go here.


Evidently MSNBC never got the memo there was ever any strife in the Clinton marriage.


---------------------------------


Carly Fiorina offered a blistering critique of Hillary Clinton's personal life Thursday night by digging up her husband's extramarital trysts.

"Listen, if my husband did what Bill Clinton did, I would have left him long ago," Fiornia said at the under card GOP presidential debate to cheers from the Iowa audience.

The former Hewlett-Packard CEO said Clinton will do anything for power even if it means staying with her philandering husband. Previously Fiorina assailed Clinton's relationship by saying she actually loves spending time with her husband, unlike Clinton.

"It wasn't a personal attack," Fiorina said Thursday in defending that previous dig. "I was pointing out the fact that Hillary Clinton will do anything to gain and hang onto power — anything."

Struggling to gain traction in Iowa days before voters head to the caucuses, Fiorina unleashed a series of crowd pleasing insults at Clinton during the Fox News debate for the lower-polling candidates.




Carly Fiorina tells voters why Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States. 

— Carly Fiorina (@CarlyFiorina) 8:38 PM - 28 Jan 2016

"She is trying for the White House, but she's probably more qualified for the Big House," Fiorina said of Clinton's FBI investigation over classified emails.


"She's escaped prosecution more times than El Chapo, perhaps Sean Penn should interview her."


Fiornia was joined on stage by former Sen. Rick Santorum, former Gov. Mike Huckabee and former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore.






Share/Bookmark

Oscar rage continues...
















Share/Bookmark

Navy commander pleads guilty in bribery case, faces up to 20 years in prison





So if this guy is going to do 20 tell me...


-------------------------------------------





SAN DIEGO – A Navy commander accused of diverting ships to Asian ports for a Malaysian contractor offering prostitution services and other gifts pleaded guilty to bribery charges Thursday, marking the eighth conviction in the massive scandal.

Michael Misiewicz is one of the highest ranking Naval officers charged in the case, which is centered on businessman Leonard Francis, nicknamed "Fat Leonard" because of his wide girth. Misiewicz pleaded guilty to one count each of conspiracy to commit bribery and bribery of a public official at a hearing in federal court in San Diego.

He faces up to 20 years in prison if sentenced to the maximum amount for both charges.

His defense lawyers said in a statement that Misiewicz regrets his actions from 2011 to 2012. They went on to say that they plan to show at his sentencing hearing this was an "extreme departure from his otherwise distinguished and honorable 30 plus year career."

Only one defendant of the nine named in the case is still fighting the charges. Prosecutors say the investigation is ongoing and there could be more arrests.

Francis has admitted to providing an exhaustive list of gifts in exchange for classified information that helped his Singapore-based company, Glenn Defense Marine Asia Ltd., or GDMA, overbill the Navy by at least $20 million. He is awaiting sentencing.

Misiewicz accepted theater tickets, prostitution services and other items, according to the criminal complaint. He provided ship routes to Francis and then they moved ships like chess pieces, diverting them to Pacific ports with lax oversight where GDMA submitted fake tariffs and other fees, prosecutors said.

In 2010, Misiewicz caught the world's attention when he made an emotional return as a U.S. Naval commander to his native Cambodia, where he had been rescued as a child from the violence of the Khmer Rouge and adopted by an American woman. His homecoming was widely covered by international media.

A sentencing hearing was set for April 29.

Lt. Commander Todd Malaki, who has pleaded guilty in the same case, and is scheduled to be sentenced Friday. He faces a maximum of five years in prison.








Share/Bookmark