Visit Counter

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Megyn Kelly set for next Fox News debate





Megyn Kelly will be there.


 Will Donald Trump?



Fox News Channel has announced that Kelly, Bret Baier and Chris Wallace will return to moderate the third GOP presidential debate this election season on Fox News Channel.

The live event starts at 9 p.m. March 3 in Detroit and will run two hours.

"The debate will take place at a pivotal point in the 2016 election cycle, hosted two days after Super Tuesday and ahead of key primary votes in Michigan on March 8th and Florida and Ohio on March 15th," Fox News said in its release.

Fox News is bringing back top talent: "Special Report" anchor Baier, "Kelly File" anchor Kelly and "Fox News Sunday" host Wallace.

Debate criteria for the candidates to participate will be announced closer to the event.

Fox News scored its highest-rated telecasts with its previous GOP debates this election season. The Aug. 6 edition with Trump brought in a record 24 million viewers. The Jan. 28 debate without Trump drew a still-impressive 12.5 million and stands as the No. 2 audience in Fox News history.

Trump has repeatedly relayed his lack of respect for Kelly, but she has won wide acclaim for her work. Some pundits say that Trump's passing on the Jan. 28 debate hurt him in Iowa, and he has acknowledged that skipping the event may have cost him votes.

The next GOP debate will be in New Hampshire and starts at 8 p.m. Saturday on ABC.






Share/Bookmark

Top House Republican demands Kerry explain $1.7 billion Iran payment





Now it makes sense. Remember when everyone was bitching, including me, about giving Iran $150 billion and we couldn't get 4 American  prisoners released? The Iranian deal was finalized in April of 2015, the WH downplaying the importance of securing the prisoners freedom. Tragically a done deal. Then out of the blue in January 2016, the "hostages" are released right around the same time Kerry paid a $1.7 billion "interest" payment. 

Anyone truly believe this was an interest payment?



click




------------------------------ 

The chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee demanded Wednesday that Secretary of State John Kerry explain a $1.7 billion settlement paid to Iran that some Republicans have described as a "ransom" tied to last month's release of five American prisoners.

Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., complained in a letter to Kerry that his committee was not consulted about the payment. The Obama administration claimed the agreement was made to settle a dispute with Iran over $400 million in frozen funds that dated back to 1979. The remaining $1.3 billion was described by the Obama administration as "interest".

"It is unclear how this $1.7 billion payment is in the national security interests of the United States," Royce wrote.

Royce's letter included 10 questions to Kerry about the settlement. Among them are how the administration calculated the $1.3 billion "interest" on the payment, a timeline of negotiations over the payment since this past summer's nuclear deal, and why the money was not used to "compensate American victims of Iranian terrorism who have been awarded judgments against Iran."

Royce's letter also asks for a list of U.S. officials who participated in negotiations with Iran over the payment, the prisoner release and the nuclear agreement. 

The White House announced the payment on Jan. 17, the same day that Iran released five American prisoners, including Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian, former Marine Amir Hekmati, and Christian pastor Saeed Abedini.

At the time, Obama defended the amount paid by the U.S., saying it was "much less than the amount Iran sought." The president added that the one-time payment was preferable to letting more interest accumulate while waiting for a judgement from the Iran-US Claims Tribunal, which is based in The Hague and was created in the deal that ended the Iran hostage crisis in 1981. 

"I have a larger concern that in choosing to resolve this relatively minor bilateral dispute at this time, the Obama Administration is aggressively moving towards reestablishing diplomatic relations with Iran," Royce wrote. "Such action would clearly violate the President’s pledge to 'remain vigilant' in countering the threat Iran poses to the United States and our allies in the region."

State Department spokesman John Kirby confirmed to Reuters that Royce's letter had been received. 

"As with all Congressional correspondence, we'll respond as appropriate," Kirby said. Royce's letter gives Kerry until Feb. 17 to respond to his questions.








Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Rick Santorum to drop out of 2016 presidential race



Gilmore must have won the lottery! 

They'll be another 2 or 3 gone by the time they leave SC. Although I like Kasich he's going to have to do reasonably well in NH or he's a goner. Like Carly too. But she's hanging on by her fingernails. Carson/Christe are also on thin ice. Can't say it's not interesting to watch.

-------------------------------







Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum speaks during a stop at Panora Telecom Solutions, Monday, June 8, 2015, in Panora, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)



Rick Santorum, the deeply conservative former senator who won nearly a dozen contests in the 2012 race for the Republican nomination, is expected to announce Wednesday that he will suspend his latest and long-struggling run for the presidency.

Santorum is scheduled to appear Wednesday evening on Fox News Channel, where an aide said he will make “two major announcements.” According to several national Republicans familiar with his plans, he will discuss his decision to end his 2016 campaign and he will likely make an endorsement of one of his GOP rivals.

Santorum’s pending departure from the race, first reported by CNN, comes after a disappointing finish in Monday's Iowa caucuses, where he faced stiff competition for the support of the religious conservatives who four years ago were his base.

In 2012, the former Pennsylvania senator vaulted from relative obscurity – and a crushing re-election loss in his home state -- to win the Iowa caucuses and 10 other states, only to fade into obscurity again after Mitt Romney clinched the GOP nomination.

Santorum becomes the third Republican to bow out of the crowded 2016 field since Monday's Iowa contest, with Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee also dropping out.

Santorum looked to build on his winning 2012 approach, making nearly 300 stops and visiting each of Iowa's 99 counties over the course of his latest campaign. But in the caucuses earlier this week, the candidate with the most Iowa-focused strategy received fewer votes than any candidate except former Virginia governor Jim Gilmore, who did not actively campaign in the state at all.

Santorum was one of a wave of deeply conservative contenders who believed that after losing two straight presidential elections behind more moderate nominees, GOP voters would turn to a candidate unflinching in ideology who can excite the party’s base.

But former Huckabee, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and others occupied the political space that Santorum hoped to again call his own, drawing fervent backing from Christian activists, foreign-policy hawks and populist conservatives.

This time around, Santorum’s campaign also lacked many of the advantages that had helped fuel his 2012 insurgency – including most of the consultants who engineered it.

His former campaign manager, Michael Biundo, signed on with Paul's campaign. Santorum's former Iowa aide, Chuck Laudner, who drove Santorum around the state in his “Chuck truck,” organized the state for Donald Trump. Two former spokesmen worked for Huckabee.

Among those still in Santorum’s camp were longtime confidant John Brabender and wealthy donor Foster Friess, whose money helped lift Santorum’s 2012 bid and who worked to raise funds for him again.

Santorum has for decades put his large family -- including severely disabled daughter Bella -- at the heart of his political life. At his campaign launch this spring near Pittsburgh, he appeared on stage alongside his wife Karen and most of their seven children.

He drew notice for speaking passionately about the need for the Republican Party to address the economic concerns of blue-collar workers. He called for an increase in the minimum wage, and criticized his party for focusing more on the needs of small business owners than on the issues affecting the people those businesses employ. “How are we going to win if 90 percent of Americans don't think we care at all?" he asked at a fall debate.

Like Huckabee, who won the Iowa caucuses in 2008, Santorum centered his 2012 strategy on reviving his support with conservatives in that state, where his victory propelled him up from the bottom of national polls after months of handshakes and grass-roots events.

He spent months traveling to each of Iowa’s 99 counties. It wasn’t enough: his support stayed mired in the low single digits in the state in 2015, and kept him off the main debate stage in the run-up to the first votes of the primary season.

Over the course of the campaign, he expressed mounting frustration with Republican officials and journalists over his relegation to the so-called “undercard” debate.

At his final debate in Iowa last month, he referred to Donald Trump as an “entertainer” and complained about the volume of media attention trained on the front-runner -- but refused to attack Trump directly. He and Huckabee had agreed to appear later that evening with the billionaire, who was skipping his own main stage debate appearance, at a rally Trump had organized to benefit veterans.

In his closing remarks at the debate, Santorum made one last plea to Iowans, pointing to the 700 speeches and town halls stops he had made in the state over the course of both his presidential campaigns.

“Here's what I'm asking you to do,” he said. “You're good people. You know good leaders. Lead. Pick the right person, not what the polls say. Not who the money give people to. Pick the leader you know is best for this country.”








Share/Bookmark

Another one bites the dust






Thought Gilmore and Santorum would have left before him.










Share/Bookmark

After the Iowa loss, the feud still rages














Share/Bookmark