Visit Counter

Monday, April 11, 2016

Obama: Not going to help Hillary get out of FBI investigation




What did you expect him to say?

This coming from the same guy who guaranteed you could keep your insurance.

----------------------------------------

(Click)



President Obama said on Sunday that he is not going to help Hillary Clinton escape the FBI investigation into her server, or a potential indictment by the Justice Department.

"I can guarantee that," Obama said, rejecting claims by some Republicans that the Justice Department will face pressure to avoid finding fault by Clinton over her use of a private email account.

Obama offered cautious criticism of Clinton's management of her email.

"She's acknowledged that there's a carelessness in terms of managing e-mails that she has owned," he said. "And she recognizes that."

Obama said he can guaranttee there will be no interference with the Justice Department because "I do not talk to the attorney general about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it," Obama said in an interview with "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace.

"I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case. Full stop. Period. Guaranteed. Full stop. No one gets treated differently when it comes to the Justice Department, because nobody is above the law," Obama reiterated.

Asked if that would remain the case if she receives the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama was clear: "How many times do I have to say it, Chris? Guaranteed."

Obama said that Clinton had done an "excellent" job as secretary of state.

"I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America's national security," he said.

"It also is important to recognize and to keep it in perspective this is someone who served her country for four years as secretary of state and did an outstanding job, and no one has suggested that in some way as a consequence of how she's handled emails, that that detracted from her excellent ability to carry out her duties," he added.

(You know, like the great job she did with Benghazi)



Charles Krauthammer put it best:

"When people talk about Hillary being a superb secretary of state, I just ask one question. Name me one thing, just one, not three, give me one thing she achieved in her four years as secretary of state. I have yet to hear an answer. ... She traveled a lot. So did Marco Polo. And you want him to be president?"






Share/Bookmark

Sunday, April 10, 2016

Boston Globe prints fake front page on 'President' Trump




These fuckers are so warped they're out of their minds. They can't get enough of illegals… tripling of ICE force to facilitate deportation is unthinkable. And God forbid if an ISIS family member should die at the hands of our military. 

On 911 they flew into the wrong fucking buildings!






BOSTON (AP) - The Boston Globe printed a satirical front page complete with fake stories that show how "troubling" its editorial board says a Donald Trump presidency would be for America.

The newspaper's front page is dated April 9, 2017, and its lead story is about Trump calling for deportations. Another article mentions work being halted on a wall at the Mexico border.

There's also a short item about backlash Trump received after tweeting a photo of his new dog he named "Madame Peng," after China's first lady Peng Liyuan.

In an editorial , the Globe calls the satire "an exercise in taking a man at his word."

(If they took Barry at his word the deficit would be $5.3 trillion instead of moving towards $20)

The board says Republicans need to put up every roadblock to Trump they can.

The Trump campaign hasn't responded to requests for comment.

------------------------------------




Maybe the NYP could run this.















Share/Bookmark

Saturday, April 9, 2016

Chicago's grim murder trend blamed on light sentencing, misguided reforms






800 shootings so far this year and it’s only April!



Congratulations!

I suspect it finally dawned on them locking these dogs up and keeping them locked up, is the answer since more stringent gun controls laws have no effect on people who don't follow the law to begin with.

The key word in this whole article is propensity. If we could get them to seek a college degree with the same zeal as they seek violence the country would be a better place.


See the guns?


 (How much would you like to bet they didn't purchased them at a legitimate gun shop after a background check?)








---------------------------------



Lamar Harris had seven felony convictions and 43 arrests when he shot three Chicago police officers. The same week, Samuel Harviley, who had just been paroled after serving less than half of his sentence for armed carjacking, shot yet another of the Windy City’s finest.

Police officials, researchers and many elected leaders all agree that the pair were prime examples of the violent pool of criminals driving the city’s historically high crime rate. Ex-cons well-known to police and with a proven propensity for violence are being let out early from prison or let off lightly by judges, only to wreak havoc on the city, they say. 


“We are not incarcerating a bunch of harmless sad sacks who are merely caught with a joint.”

- Heather Mac Donald, Manhattan Institute

"The fact that a convicted felon and gun offender is yet again out on early release to torment communities is representative of the types of individuals who are overwhelmingly driving the recent spike in violence," then-interim police Superintendent John Escalante said at a news conference last month announcing charges against Harviley.

The cycle of violence has resulted in more than 800 shootings so far this year, including seven shootings and one murder on April 4 alone. Escalante’s successor, former Chicago Police Department Chief of Patrol Eddie Johnson, says the rate of murders and shootings can’t be reversed until the criminal justice system begins to hold offenders accountable.

“We have five districts that are driving the crime in the city,” Johnson said in a recent radio interview. “And within those districts, there is a small subset of individuals who are responsible for those crimes. They have multiple arrests for gun offenses and until we start holding these people accountable [the problem will persist].”

According to the CPD’s most recent CompStat figures, 133 people have been murdered in 2016, compared to 77 during the same period in 2015. Shootings are up 91 percent.

Johnson, unlike many of the city’s African-American elected officials, is seeking tougher sentencing laws. Over the coming weeks, he plans to be “asking our legislative partners in the near future to help us” pass new laws that will ensure judges throw the book at violent offenders.

It’s become easy for police to predict who will be on both ends of the explosion in gun violence. Some two-thirds of murder victims are already on the Police Department’s “strategic subject list,” a roster of residents identified as being at risk of being a victim or an offender of gun violence. The list is kept so police can carry out lifestyle intervention efforts.

In one weekend in late March, 76 percent of shooting victims were on the SSL and 95 percent had lengthy criminal histories.

Illinois is one of several states implementing recommendations from prison reform commissions to reduce or even eliminate mandatory minimum sentences. Those groups seek to reduce prison populations by as much as 25 percent. 

The movement to slash sentences and free inmates is given momentum by controversial, police-involved shootings that galvanize communities, as well as protests by Black Lives Matter and civil rights groups. But shortening sentences of violent offenders puts both police and law-abiding residents of the inner city at risk, say law enforcement officials.

“Every day our members risk life and limb to defend our constitution and the rights it affords our citizens,” wrote Dominick Stokes, vice president for legislative affairs for the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association in a December letter to Senate leadership. “Mandatory minimums are a vital tool utilized in dismantling criminal drug trafficking enterprises.”

Stokes’ group is opposed to the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2015, one of several bills aimed at reducing or eliminating mandatory prison sentences on the Federal level. And researchers say laws that ensure robust prison terms for dangerous people keep everyone safe.

“We are not incarcerating a bunch of harmless sad sacks who are merely caught with a joint,” said Heather Mac Donald, of the Manhattan Institute, a non-partisan research institute. “Prisons today mostly house violent criminals. Prison populations have increased because violent crimes increased.”

Mac Donald acknowledges some validity to arguments against imprisoning non-violent drug offenders, but rejects claims that rising incarceration rates are a consequence of racism.







Share/Bookmark

Friday, April 8, 2016

Hillary email probe is 'independent' says FBI chief



FBI head James Comey said that the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails would be wrapped up 'promptly.' Depends upon what your definition of promptly is since this investigation has been going on for over a year now.

Notice the good law professor below is trying to characterize Petraeus as worse than Killary. What Petraeus did was a drop in the bucket compared to the wholesale abuse of the rules perpetrated by Killary. You have to have your own server  because you're a Clinton marinaded in scandals which requires covering shit up. Petraeus committed a crime. The big difference is he wasn't running for president.


--------------------------------------------

  




FBI chief James Comney touted the 'independent' nature of his bureau, while saying he's 'stayed close' to the ongoing investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails. 

He made these remarks yesterday at Ohio's Kenyon College, according to Politico, assuring students that the FBI would ward off any political influence due to the ongoing presidential campaign.

'I love the FBI because we aspire to, and I think we are, three things: We're honest, we're competent, we're independent,' Comey said. 'We're not perfect. We're competent, we're independent,' the director said reiterating the latter two. 



FBI Director James Comey wouldn't say too much about the ongoing FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, but did praise the bureau for its independence, competence and honesty 




FBI head James Comey said that the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails would be wrapped up 'promptly,' but said he's not taking the timing of the Democratic National Convention into account 


While he gave a general 'no comment' on the investigation, he also gave an explanation of what his role was. 

'I've stayed close to that investigation to ensure that it's done that way,' Comey said. 'That we have the resources, the technology, the people and that there's no outside influence.' 

'So, if I talk about the investigation while it's going on there's a risk that I'll compromise both the reality and the perception that it's done honestly, competently and independently,' he added. 

Earlier this week, while Comey was addressing an audience in New York he said the investigation would be wrapped up 'promptly,' but would not be taking the timing of the Democratic National Convention into consideration. 

A week ago, Al Jazeera America reported that the investigation has now reached a 'critical stage,' in that the bureau has finished examining her emails and homebrew server and will now be interviewing top aides, along with Clinton herself.

Among those to be interviewed: Clinton's State Department chief of staff Cheryl Mills and senior advisor Philippe Reines, Al Jazeera America said.

'Soon after those interviews – in the next few days and weeks – officials expect director Comey to make his recommendation to Attorney General Loretta Lynch about potential criminal charges,' network anchor David Shuster said. 

The Justice Department and the FBI opened up their investigation in July upon receiving a security referral from the inspector general of the intelligence community, who concluded at the time that Clinton had sent emails deemed 'secret,' the highest level of classification, through her personal email system.

The inspector general's office was leafing through the 30,500 emails Clinton had turned over from her homebrew server that she said were work-related.

'None of the emails we reviewed has classification or dissemination markings, but some included [intelligence community]-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network,' Inspector General I. Charles McCollough wrote Congress in a letter at the start of the investigation.

Previously, the inspector general and the State Department were shown to be in a dispute over whether these correspondences should be considered classified. 

Since then the State Department has released the emails publicly, as part of Freedom of Information Act requests, and 22 emails were marked 'top secret,' while hundreds of others were marked 'secret' or 'confidential.'

None of the emails had markings indicating their classified nature at the time.

Clinton has used this as part of her public defense of the email scandal explaining that these emails were 'retroactively' classified.

She's complained of the government's overzealous nature in classifying the documents and called for the contents of them to come out publicly so that the stink of the scandal would subside.

Clinton had also deleted 31,830 emails from her server that she said were personal correspondence.

The Los Angeles Times found out that most of those emails have since been recovered since Clinton handed the physical server over to the FBI in August. 

Legal experts suggested to the Times that it would be difficult to prosecute Clinton over her handling of classified information as prosecutors would have to prove she knew the information was classified at the time she was sending it.

While Democratic rival Sanders has shied away from criticizing Clinton for the email scandal – famously saying on the first Democratic debate stage that 'the American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails' – Republicans have been chomping at the bit over it.

Throughout the campaign they've portrayed Clinton as worse than former CIA head David Petraeus, who pleaded guilty of a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified material and thus was spared prison time.

'I mean look at Petraeus – good guy, made a mistake, and by the way, leave the guy alone,' said Republican frontrunner Donald Trump in January. 'Leave Petraeus alone. Right? Enough already. Enough. They've gone after him, they've destroyed him and yet Hillary's flying safe and she did 100 times worse than what he did,'

But there's a pivotal distinction between the Petraeus case and the ongoing one swirling around Clinton.

Petraeus knowingly provided classified material to his mistress and biographer Paula Broadwell, legal experts pointed out. Broadwell was a civilian.

Clinton's emails, even the ones that were later marked classified, were sent to aides who had been cleared to receive the contents.


'Those cases are just so different from what Clinton is accused of doing,' American University law professor Stephen Vladeck told the Times. 'And the Justice Department lawyers know it.'








Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Ted Nugent’s 20 Reasons to Vote for Trump Go Viral… Liberals Horrified




As much as I hate to admit it there are some favorable aspects in his thought process. 

------------------------------- 


Conservative favorite Ted Nugent is known for his straightforward approach.

It should come as no surprise, then, that a recent Facebook post by the outspoken guitarist explaining reasons to vote for GOP front-runner Donald Trump would send liberals into full panic mode.

While Nugent did not endorse any candidate, he said his list in favor of voting for “The Donald” was too special not to share.

We think you’ll agree with him:


Obama is against Trump
The Media is against Trump
The establishment Democrats are against Trump
The establishment Republicans are against Trump
The Pope is against Trump
The UN is against Trump
The EU is against Trump
China is against Trump
Mexico is against Trump
Soros is against Trump
Black Lives Matter is against Trump
MoveOn.Org is against Trump
Koch Bro’s are against Trump



The Nuge nailed it. The reason these people and organizations are against Trump is because he threatens them and their left-wing agenda. A Trump presidency would certainly shake up the infrastructure many on this list have either established or fought to maintain under President Barack Obama and his administration.

Nugent even provided a few “bonus points” for a Trump presidency as well:


Cher says she will leave the country
Mylie Cyrus says she will leave the country
Whoopi says she will leave the country
Rosie says she will leave the country
Al Sharpton says he will leave the country
Gov. Brown says California will build a wall



There is absolutely no reason to argue with Nugent on any of this. In fact, this looks more like a reason to celebrate should Trump make his way to the White House.



Share/Bookmark