Visit Counter

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Barack Obama takes on Donald Trump




"I continue to believe Mr. Trump will not be president," Obama said at a news conference in California after a meeting with southeast Asian leaders. "And the reason is that I have a lot of faith in the American people. Being president is a serious job. It's not like hosting a talk show, or a reality show."



Al Green...hit it Barry.



Video 240



No time to for Netanyahu at the WH when work like this needs to be done.






Headline:

President Obama appears on Alaskan reality show.

(Seriously... I'm not making this shit up)






Barry Z at the WH Correspondence Dinner:
(Rapper in Chief)


Video 241




And of course there's this:

via

Click 



(If I'm not mistaken he did more late night talk shows than Johnny Carson)


Really Barry… Give me a fucking break! 

Too bad you didn't have your wife's ass. You could have made a guest appearance on Keeping up with the Kardashians. 



--------------------------------







Barack Obama: I don't think Donald Trump will be President






Washington (CNN)President Barack Obama has a message for Donald Trump — being president is tougher than being on a reality show and the American people are too "sensible" to elect him.


"I continue to believe Mr. Trump will not be president," Obama said at a news conference in California after a meeting with southeast Asian leaders. "And the reason is that I have a lot of faith in the American people. Being president is a serious job. It's not like hosting a talk show, or a reality show." 

He went on: "It's not promotion, it's not marketing. It's hard. And a lot of people count on us getting it right." 



The comments marked a political resurgence for a lame-duck President in his final year in office. Obama offered surprisingly frank assessments of the campaign to replace him, taking shots at Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio. He also hinted hint that he was sympathetic to Hillary Clinton's position on the difficulty of enacting political change, as she faces a tough challenge from a candidate in Bernie Sanders, who has fired up Democratic primary voters who are demanding sweeping reform.

Obama was clear on one thing -- he's happy not to be in the race himself.

"The thing I can say unequivocally, I am not unhappy that I am not on the ballot."


(Not as happy as we are)






Share/Bookmark

Mitt Romney met privately with Bill Kristol, who is leading the effort to draft an independent candidate




Talk about desperation! 

I'm thinking if this actually takes place, after a hard fought primary with 17 candidates slugging it out, Mitt Romney is just going to waltz in and snatch the brass ring? This is supposed to unify the party? Trump has a tendency to cry about being treated unfairly. This time, I would have to agree with him. On its face, this is blatantly unfair and is sure to create an even bigger chasm in the party. Sorry Mitt... but if you listen to Kristol and try to pull this off it'll be your third failed attempt at the WH. And this time rightfully so.

Look... is Trump a flawed candidate? Sure he is. But look at the alternative. A case in point which is critical. The Supreme Court. With the death of Scalia, and Ginsburg basically on life support, Killary is a sure lock on two appointments and very possibly three... even if she serves just one term! Imagine the Supreme Court with three more Kaganesque/Sotomayor types serving lifetime appointments? 

We won't have to worry about who's going to pay for the border wall.
There won't be one.


------------------------------------



Former GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney in 2013 at the Conservative Political Action Conference. (Nicholas Kamm /AFP/Getty Images)


In spite of his insistence that he will not run, Mitt Romney is being courted this week by a leading conservative commentator to reconsider and jump into the volatile 2016 presidential race as an independent candidate.

William Kristol, the longtime editor of the Weekly Standard magazine and a leading voice on the right, met privately with the 2012 nominee on Thursday afternoon to discuss the possibility of launching an independent bid, potentially with Romney as its standard-bearer.

“He came pretty close to being elected president, so I thought he may consider doing it, especially since he has been very forthright in explaining why Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton should not be president of the United States,” Kristol said in a phone interview Friday, during which he confirmed that he and Romney had a “little meeting in Washington.”

But knowing Romney’s reluctance, Kristol told Romney that if he remains unwilling to run, many top conservatives would appreciate having the former Massachusetts governor’s support for an independent candidate, should Kristol and other right-leaning figures enlist a willing contender.

“Obviously, if there were to be an independent candidacy, Romney’s support would be very important,” Kristol said. “I wanted to get his wisdom on whether it was more or less doable than I thought.”

“It was not like, ‘You should do it.’ I wouldn’t presume he’d do it. But I’m hoping that he begins to think about it a little more,” Kristol said. “His name is one of the names that is part of the discussion.”


William Kristol, the longtime editor of the Weekly Standard, is leading an effort to draft an independent candidate for president. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The closed-door huddle was held at the J.W. Marriott hotel in Washington, which is just blocks from the White House. It was requested by Kristol, according to a person close to Romney who requested anonymity to discuss the session. Kristol said the conversation was held over glasses of water.

Kristol has been working informally for weeks to seek out a prominent political or military figure who could be drafted into the general-election contest, such as retired Marine Gen. James N. Mattis, who recently declined such overtures.

Later Thursday, both Kristol and Romney attended an awards gala for American Friends of The Hebrew University, an area group that supports the Jerusalem-based school.

At the dinner, when asked in front of the attendees about possibly running as an independent this year, Romney said he was not interested.

“No, I’m certainly going to be hoping that we find someone who I have my confidence in who becomes nominee. I don’t intend on supporting either of the major-party candidates at this point,” Romney said, according to the Washington Examiner.

But, Romney added, “I am dismayed at where we are now, I wish we had better choices, and I keep hoping that somehow things will get better, and I just don’t see an easy answer from where we are.”

A Romney spokesperson was not available for comment Friday evening.

In a speech in Salt Lake City, former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney denounced support for candidate Donald Trump, saying Trump "is playing the members of the American public for suckers." 






Share/Bookmark

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Obama budgets $17,613 for every new illegal minor, more than Social Security retirees get





On a tip from Ed Kilbane


And remember according to Mitt and his cohorts Trump is going to be worse!!!



-------------------------------------



President Obama has budgeted $17,613 for each of the estimated 75,000 Central American teens expected to illegally cross into the United States this year, $2,841 more than the average annual Social Security retirement benefit, according to a new report.

The total bill to taxpayers: $1.3 billion in benefits to "unaccompanied children," more than double what the federal government spent in 2010, according to an analysis of the administration's programs for illegal minors from the Center for Immigration Studies. The average Social Security retirement benefit is $14,772.




The report notes that the president's budget, facing congressional approval, includes another $2.1 billion for refugees, which can include the illegals from Central America, mostly Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

What's more, the administration is also spending heavily on a program with the United Nations to help the illegal minors avoid the dangerous trip by declaring them refugees and handing them a plane ticket to the U.S. where, once here, they get special legal status.

The report, titled "Welcoming Unaccompanied Alien Children to the United States," is a deep dive into the administration's evolving efforts to let hundreds of thousands of mostly 16- and 17-year-old males settle in the country.



It said that most of the undocumented minors do not qualify for refugee status or are even in any danger in their native countries. Instead, they are seeking to unify with their family members, commonly parents in the United States illegally.

The report cited Department of Health and Human Services data showing the trend. "New data," said CIS, "shows that 80 percent of the 71,000 Central American children placed between February 2014 and September 2015 were released to sponsors who are in the United States illegally."

Author Nayla Rush suggested that the administration's Central American Refugee/Parole Program with the United Nations that declares minors refugees could have the effect of giving legal status to their illegal parents once in the U.S.

"Children will be able to qualify for refugee status and then be flown to the United States. As a reminder, refugees receive automatic legal status and are required to apply for a green card within their first year following arrival. They can apply for citizenship five years from the date of entry.

"Since parents from Central America illegally present in the United States could not benefit from the CAM program and sponsor their children, perhaps the reverse can take place with children admitted under this new version of the refugee program. Children, acquiring legal status followed by naturalization by the time they reach adulthood, could indeed sponsor their parents," wrote Rush.







Share/Bookmark

Vincente Fox would make a damn good Democrat










Vicente Fox Stuns FBN Anchor: 'I'm Not Going To Pay For That F*cking Wall'



I thought he was going to blow a gasket!


Video 238



Now listen to him on Cavuto yesterday.
This is the reason I said he would make a damn good Democrat.

He's got a knack for the liberal rational.

Video 239

To deter illegal migration Neil asked FOX..."Isn't the burden on Mexico to improve its economy?"

Listen to his answer towards the end of the interview. This is classic liberal bullshit consistent with spinning terrorist attacks into workplace violence. He tries to equate Americans who move from one state to another to get a better job is precisely the same as his denizens illegally jumping the border wall to achieve the same thing! As I said... liberal logic.

And if you don't believe they're the same?














Share/Bookmark

Top allies break with Ryan over Trump





Sure as hell hope they can patch things up. Think how awkward it's going to be in Cleveland if the chairman who presides over the convention does not support the GOP candidate!

There are quite a few Republicans, mostly losers with an axe to grind, who should remember the old adage 'Don't cut off your nose to spite your face'.

Meaning... the alternative is Killary.

---------------------------------------





'I honestly don’t understand what Paul’s thinking — I don’t get it,' one says.



Two prominent House allies of Paul Ryan broke with the speaker Friday over his decision to withhold support from Donald Trump, comments that point to a growing split among congressional Republicans over how to deal with the presumptive nominee. 

Reps. Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia and Dennis Ross of Florida — who, as House whips, help Republican leaders muster support to pass legislation — told POLITICO in interviews on Friday that they disagreed with Ryan’s decision to break with Trump in a bombshell interview a day earlier. Both lawmakers said they believe their leader is in denial about how Republican voters feel about the real-estate tycoon.

“I honestly don’t understand what Paul’s thinking — I don’t get it,” said Westmoreland, who is retiring after this year. “I try not to give advice to the speaker, but I think it just really brought about, in my opinion, even more confusion to this thing.”

“Trust me, I haven’t been on the Donald Trump bandwagon, but I will support him, and I disagree with Ryan’s comment,” Ross said. “I think it’s time we unite (and) … extend an olive branch and start working this out.”

The sharp rebuke from two senior, longtime GOP leadership allies is a rare sight in the House. It highlights a schism in the lower chamber that's expected to grow next week when Congress returns from recess and some House Republicans line up behind their leader and others rally around the GOP standard bearer-in-waiting.

Ryan and Trump will meet face-to-face Thursday at Republican headquarters in Washington to see if there’s any way to reconcile their differences in both style and substance. Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus will play counselor, after Ryan said Thursday he could not support Trump and Trump’s camp fired back Friday morning Ryan has no business being speaker if he can't back the party's pick for president.

Lawmakers will be asked to take a side: the young, conservative budget wonk that his party establishment clamored for to run for president himself? Or the bombastic bomb-thrower whose rocked the party with his surprise voter-appeal.

Ryan's choice of words — that there are "lots of questions" about Trump that conservatives want answered, "myself included" — suggests that his stand might be partly or even mostly a calculated attempt to try to mold the unwieldy nominee into one who thinks and acts more like the speaker.

Trump, for instance, has pitched banning Muslims from the country — an idea Ryan says is the antithesis of America’s founding. Trump is anti-trade, while the speaker thinks free markets are simply good economics. And then there were those quips about Hispanics and his initial refusal to reject white supremacist David Duke’s support of his candidacy — which flew in the face of Ryan’s efforts to diversify the GOP base.

Pennsylvanian Republican Charlie Dent, who leads the moderate GOP Tuesday Group, said he's all in favor of doing anything to change Trump's positions. The speaker, Dent said, is trying to save the party — and as far as he’s concerned Trump still “has a great deal of work to do to convince the American people, myself included, that he’s able to lead this nation.”

“I thought that Paul Ryan struck the right tone and the right balance,” he said. “Paul had to step up and disassociate himself and distance himself from some of these comments. … We’re concerned [that] his comments are affecting our shot at the White House.”

Westmoreland, however, said Ryan’s remarks just make it hard for everyone to get on the same page. The Georgia lawmaker has been trying to convince his conservative friends that they have a choice: embrace Trump now, or roll out the red carpet for a President Hillary Clinton. Ryan’s comments essentially blessed a third option — hold out for now — that Westmoreland believes is poor politics.

Westmoreland wishes Ryan had been more subtle. “He could have come out and said, ‘Look, I’ll be 100 percent behind whoever comes out of our convention,’ and that would have been a simple way of saying: ‘I’m not endorsing Trump right now,’” he said.

Ross said it’s hard to take a stand like Ryan’s when 45 percent of Republicans in his district voted for Trump. That’s his predicament right now.

“I’m listening: They’re fed up with Washington politicians,” he said. “And unfortunately, I think there are some in my party who don’t get what is happening.”

Thus far, there doesn’t seem to be a distinct pattern as to whether members endorse and support Trump now, or hold out as Ryan has chosen to do. Many believed lawmakers in the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, for example, would line up behind Trump. But, in turns out, many of the group's members are repelled by the New Yorker over what they call his “disdain” for the Constitution.

Establishment types, one would think, would line up with Ryan. But Transportation Chairman Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) endorsed Trump late last month.

Meanwhile, vulnerable lawmakers facing tight reelection races are coming down on both sides: Broadly speaking, they take Ryan’s approach if they’re facing a threat from Democrats on the left, but stand with Trump if they’re facing a primary challenge from the right.

Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-Va.), for example, faces a tough reelection battle in Northern Virginia, an area where Republicans fear a Trump backlash could put their seats in jeopardy. Comstock, who blasted Trump’s proposed Muslim ban and will square off against former Rep. Jim Moran’s (D-Va.) ex-wife this fall, essentially echoed Ryan’s comments on Trump this week.

"I can't support Hillary Clinton. But I'm like any voter, a candidate has to earn my vote, and at this time Donald Trump has not done so," she said, according to The Winchester Star. “We're going to watch the process. I've expressed my concerns before."

Contrast that with another vulnerable Republican Rep. Renee Ellmers, whose North Carolina seat is being challenged by a candidate to her right. She told POLITICO earlier this week that Donald Trumpmania has “opened my eyes.”

“I had spent a lot of time listening to the voters and their concerns and how they felt about Donald Trump, and it really opened my eyes and made me realize that Donald Trump is having a conversation with the American people that many of us, especially us Republicans, have absolutely missed for years and years,” Ellmers said. “We in the Republican Party have talked about how we need to bring more people into the party, do a better job increasing votes and connecting to the American people, and here’s Donald Trump doing it and yet there are many in Washington who are kind of rejecting that.”

Westmoreland believes that some of his fellow Republicans simply don't get it, Ryan included.

“I just don’t think any of them realize… the reason Trump is the nominee is because people are mad at Republicans in Congress for not getting anything done,” he said. “We brag about a lot of stuff we do, but most of the time members are sent home to defend their votes rather than going home and bragging about them. ... And they’re looking at Trump for a change.”

Ross predicted that many in the GOP conference will be dissatisfied with Ryan's stance, and he hopes that will pressure the party to coalesce.

“I think we all should humble ourselves to a degree and unite,” he said. “We can’t be angry and upset and say, ‘We’re just going to take our ball and go home.’ That is not why we were elected. We’re supposed to be leaders and play with the cards we’re dealt.”







Share/Bookmark