Bill Clinton finally sighted in NY

Bill Clinton was all smiles as he donned a snazzy pair of blue suede shoes to walk the family dogs around New York on Saturday while Hillary visited the local Post Office nearby. The former President was spotted walking the couple's dogs, a white poodle-shih tzu mix named Tally and a grey poodle-toy-cross named Maisie, in Madison Square Park.

Clinton's shoes are believed to be a pair of custom-made Johnston & Murphy shoes, gifted to every President, which were made in blue suede in honor of his skills at playing the saxophone and bumping into the head of the DOJ at the Phoenix, AZ airport.

The former President stops to check out the pu$$y as a passersby made her way around the park. 

The couple appeared to be taking it easy away from the campaign trail, though Hillary was spotted carrying a box of mail into Chelsea's $10.5million Manhattan condo... which is remarkable considering she never had a real job in her entire life.

The boxes are believed to contain hate mail.

Hillary seems unconcerned even though the containers clearly says: WARNING NOT FOR PRIVATE USE 

While it is not known how Clinton came by the boxes, the U.S. Code states that theft of property used by the Postal Service is punishable by a fine and up to a year in jail.

Hey… when did that ever stop a Clinton?

Bill Clinton finally sighted in NY

WHAT ARE MY CHOICES?

On a tip from Phil McCafferty

The folks speaking out against Trump are helping me make up my mind a little more every day!

Is he the Perfect Candidate whose thoughts mirrors mine on all fronts? NOPE

Does he say everything the way I wish he would say it? NOPE

Am I absolutely sure that his motives are absolutely pure? NOPE

Can I point to any other Dem Politician that I like better? NOPE

Is there any of the other RINO Politicians I like better? NOPE

Am I going to sit home, refuse to Vote, and let Hillary win; because he is NOT Perfect? NOPE

Do I like what I have seen for the last 7-1/2 years with the undercover Muslim  that sleeps in my White House? NOPE

Was it Halloween? Would you dress like this if you weren't a Muslim?

Do I like the "fundamental changes" that same undercover Muslim has brought about in MY America? NOPE

OK, your turn to decide what you are going to do in about 4 months!

Trump's presidential qualifications…

Obama is against Trump... Check

The Media are against Trump... Check

The establishment Democrats are against Trump... Check

The establishment Republicans are against Trump... Check

The Pope is against Trump... Check

The UN is against Trump... Check

The EU is against Trump... Check

China is against Trump... Check

Mexico is against Trump... Check

Soros is against Trump... Check

Black Lives Matter is against Trump... Check

Move On is against Trump... Check

Koch Brothers are against Trump... Check

Bushes are against Trump ... Check

Planned Parenthood is against Trump....Check

Hillary & Bernie are both against Trump ... Check

Illegal aliens are against Trump ... Check

Islam is against Trump ... Check

Kasich is against Trump ... Check

Hateful, racist, violent Liberals are against Trump.. Check

NOW THAT BEING SAID...

It seems to me, Trump MUST BE the Best Qualified Candidate we could ever have.

If you have so many political insiders and left wing NUT CASES--- all SCARED TO DEATH, that they all speak out against him at the same time!

Most of all, it will be the People's Choice...

PLUS

He's not a Lifetime Politician...Check

He's not a Lawyer.....Check

He's not doing it for the money...Check

He's a Natural Born American Citizen born in the USA from American parents. . .

Bonus points!

Whoopi says she will leave the country...

Rosie says she will leave the country...

Sharpton says he will leave the country...

Cher says she will leave the country...

Cyrus says she will leave the country...

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights will prevail....

Hillary will go to jail.....

The budget will be balanced in 8 years....

Americans will have first choice at jobs.....

You will not be able to marry your pet....

You will be able to keep your gun(s) if you qualify... 

(Not a criminal or crazy, etc.)

Only living, registered U.S. citizens can vote....

MUST SHOW ID TO VOTE...

You can have and keep your own doctor.....

You can say whatever you want without being called a racist, Islamophobic, xenophobic, etc....

He will make AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Come to think of it, we have no place to go, but UP!

WHAT ARE MY CHOICES?

Krauthammer: Comey failed to indict because he didn't want to 'change the course of American political history'

By not changing history he changed it. Wonder how Comey will feel after a Killary first term knowing he put her there?

So if Comey felt this way he shouldn't have torn his candidate to shreds on live TV lashing her for 15 minutes. His job was to file charges. DOJ's job was to drop them. Bill saw to that in Phoenix. "Listen Loretta, I already spoke to Jim, all you have to say is you'll accept any recommendation the FBI recommends."

Case closed. 

---------------------------------

Charles Krauthammer told viewers Thursday on "Special Report with Bret Baier" that FBI director James Comey decided not to prosecute Hillary Clinton because he "didn't want to be remembered as the guy who changed the course of American political history." 

"She would have been out of the race. The entire campaign would have been upended," the syndicated columnist said. "And to me, it's a bit like and I've spoken about this before, Chief Justice Roberts in deciding on Obamacare."

Krauthammer believed Comey was looking for a way to "avoid" indicting Clinton because it "would have changed the course of American political history."

Krauthammer: Comey failed to indict because he didn't want to 'change the course of American political history'

Bias IS corruption in the highest court of the land

Ginsburg doesn't want to envision a Trump win

So if Trump becomes president what do you think the odds are of him receiving any favorable rulings from this bitch? A case hasn't even been presented yet and the decision as already been made!

Asked what if Republican Donald Trump won she said, "I don't want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs."

Via: https://earloftaint.com

Evidently...so is her integrity.

If the Republican Congress had any balls they would file a motion to have her removed from the SC. And less we forget. With Scalia's death and Ginsburg on life support Killary in all likelihood will appoint 4 to the SC even if she's a one termer! All of whom, I promise you, will be make Ginsburg look like Scalia… and remember they're lifetime appointments. So we're screwed for generations!

 I'm not a big Trump fan myself...but NOT to the extent of holding the WH door open for Killary!  Trump haters beware of what you're in for.

---------------------------------------

WASHINGTON — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she doesn't want to think about the possibility of Donald Trump winning the White House, and she predicts the next president — "whoever she will be" — will have a few appointments to make to the Supreme Court.

In an interview, Thursday in her court office, the 83-year-old justice, and leader of the court's liberal wing said she presumes Democrat Hillary Clinton will be the next president. Asked what if Republican Donald Trump won instead, she said, "I don't want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs."

That includes the future of the high court itself, on which she is the oldest justice. Two justices, Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer, are in their late 70s.

"It's likely that the next president, whoever she will be, will have a few appointments to make," Ginsburg said, smiling.

She didn't sound as though she is preparing to step down soon and shows no signs of slowing down. Ginsburg said she has been catching up on sleep since the court finished its work last week before a busy summer of travel that will take her to Europe and, as is her custom, to see as much opera as she can fit in.

In the wide-ranging interview, Ginsburg reviewed the just-ended term during which she lost her best friend on the court and, partly as a result, was on the winning side of most of the high-profile cases. Justice Antonin Scalia died in February, depriving his conservative allies of a reliable vote and leaving eight justices to decide nearly five dozen cases.

President Barack Obama has nominated Judge Merrick Garland for the ninth seat, but Senate Republicans have refused to hold a hearing or vote on Garland's nomination, arguing the next president should have the right to name Scalia's replacement. Even if the Senate were to confirm Garland after the election, the court probably would hear three months of cases without him, Ginsburg said.

And if there's no action in a postelection, lame-duck session of Congress, the vacancy could last the entire term, she said.

She said court majorities this term moved to shut down tactics used by opponents of abortion and of affirmative action in higher education in two major cases.

Ginsburg said she doesn't expect to see any more such cases after the court upheld the use of race in college admissions in Texas and struck down Texas abortion-clinic regulations that the state said were needed to protect patients.

"It seemed to me it was a sham to pretend this was about a woman's health," rather than about making it harder to get an abortion, Ginsburg said.

She disputed reports that the court is taking on only relatively unimportant cases while waiting for a ninth justice.

"It isn't so. We haven't selected them with a view to dodging challenging cases. We take them as they come to us," she said.

But she did suggest that the court probably would not take up a major challenge to the death penalty any time soon. She joined Breyer's opinion a year ago that called for considering outlawing capital punishment.

"There are only two votes so far to have asked for it so I don't think it's likely, if there is such a challenge, that it would get four votes to grant cert," she said, using court shorthand. It takes four justices to vote to hear a case, or grant certiorari.

Looking back over the term's cases, Ginsburg said Scalia's death essentially broke a tie in the affirmative action case, which ended with a 4-3 decision in favor of Texas' admissions plan. Justice Elena Kagan did not take part because she earlier worked on the case when she served in the Justice Department.

Ginsburg wrote a short separate opinion in the abortion case to complement Breyer's majority opinion. "I fully subscribed to everything Breyer said, but it was long, and I wanted something pithy," she said. "I wrote to say, 'Don't try this anymore.' "

She said she misses the colorful, outspoken Scalia, whom she described as charming. "The public got the wrong impression of him," she said. Among the many pictures and mementos in her office is one of the two of them atop an elephant in India many years ago.

Without him, she said, the court is "a paler place." But she thinks she and her colleagues did well to divide 4-4 in only four cases, including one that effectively killed Obama's plan to help millions of immigrants who are living in the country illegally.

Another consequence of Scalia's death was an increase in the number of dissenting opinions written by Justice Clarence Thomas, she said. Thomas wrote 18 dissents. Justice Sonia Sotomayor was next, with eight.

"Thomas always wrote a lot of dissents, but I think he was kind of making up for Scalia not being here. He wrote so many," she said.

Bias IS corruption in the highest court of the land

FOP wants Justice Department to investigate Dallas police killings as hate crime

The wheels in the Justice Dept grind slowly unless... it's deemed a black hate crime. For instance, in the Brown fiasco, the Justice Department was there before he hit the ground. But in this case, amidst 5 dead cops, the FOP has to press them to act! Remember the Charleston hate crime? Barry played it for everything it was worth even sang Amazing Grace before destroying the confederate flag. 
Where is he now?

I'll cite you a fine example of how this works. Anyone remember the Black Panther voter intimidation project in Philly?

Video 258

Holder saw no wrongdoing here. So he's either blind or lying. Through his tenure the latter had become his trademark.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/08/08/did-eric-holder-commit-perjury-in-black-panther-voter-intimidation-case-watchdog-publishes-some-revealing-documents/

Think his findings would have been the same if it was the KKK?

I'll give you another one. Barry made a big stink about a useless Trayvon right? When Kate Steinle was shot by an illegal, who was deported 5 times, where was the adoption process? He didn't even bring up his go-to "gun control" solution to absolve willful criminals/terrorists of any responsibility in committing murders?

 Remember now her assailant was deported 5 times? Wouldn't you have thought the Justice Department would have investigated?

Oh...and Kate's Law just got shot down.

Kate's Law Loss: Senate Dems Block Vote on Sanctuary Cities Bill

And so did the mandatory prison sentence for illegals!

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/2193?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22kate%27s+law%22%5D%7D&resultIndex=1

So let's get back to the story and line up all our ducks in a row. The shooter is black. Barry's black, and the impartial head of the DOJ, who clumsily bumped into an x-president at an AZ airport, is also. 

Barry's comments about the police over the years is tantamount to declaring open season on cops with no bag limit. So let's face it. There will be no hate crime charges here. You just can't put five dead police officers in the same lofty position held by martyrs.

----------------------------------

The Fraternal Order of Police, the country’s largest group of sworn law-enforcement officers, is asking the Justice Department to “immediately” investigate the killing of five Dallas police officers as a hate crime.

“The U.S. Department of Justice is always quick to insert itself into local investigations,” group President Chuck Canterbury said Friday. “Today we expect action just as swift. We want a federal investigation into those who were motivated by their hatred of police to commit mass murder in Dallas.”

Police say the shooter in Thursday’s attack, Micah Johnson, a 25-year-old black Army veteran, was angry about two recent incidents in which a police officer fatally shot a black male.

And Dallas Police Chief David Brown said Johnson, killed by officers in a standoff, “wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.”

However, the Justice Department’s definition of a hate crime is limited to bigotry, violence or intimidation based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability, despite the police group trying to get attacks on police officers addded to the list.

“If there has ever been an assassination of police officers that fits the current hate crime legislation, Dallas is it,” Canterbury told National Public Radio on Friday. “Though the main offender is dead, the hate crime investigation will show to the Justice Department and to the country that this was a hate-based crime.”

Police have said the Johnson acted alone. Three others were taken into custody amid the chaos and reports of multiple shooters. However, police have not updated their situation.

That Johnson died in the attack and apparently acted alone could also hurt the police group’s efforts to get the Justice Department to investigate the shootings as a civil rights violation or hate crime.

However, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has suggested the investigation is far from over, telling reporters that police will “continue down every rabbit trail until they're exhausted, ensuring that we eliminate any other possible suspects or co-conspirators who may have aided this gunman in anyway.”

“A hate crime is simply a crime that is committed based on the bias of the offender,” Canterbury also told NPR. “In the Dallas case, it's obvious that it fits within the umbrella because the individual has made statements to police that he wanted to kill white policemen. … That's why we've asked for a change in the federal hate crime law.”

The Justice Department didn’t directly answer a question Friday by FoxNews.com about whether the agency would investigate the Dallas shootings as a hate crime or civil rights violation.

“The Department of Justice -- including the FBI, ATF, U.S. Marshals Service and U.S. Attorney’s Office -- is working closely with our state and local counterparts, and we intend to provide any assistance we can to investigate this attack,” spokesman David Jacobs said.

In recent years, the agency has indeed started civil rights or hate crime investigations in high-profile cases in which a black male died when in contact with police.

Last year, the agency investigated the death of Freddie Gray, a black male who apparently was seriously injured while riding unrestrained in a Baltimore City Police wagon, then died seven days later.

The agency also investigated the 2014 incident in Ferguson, Mo., in which unarmed black teen Michael Brown was fatally shot by a police officer.

Both incidents touched off violent and destructive riots, but the agency did not file charges in either case.

On Saturday, President Obama declined to answer a reporter’s question about whether he thought the Dallas attack was a hate crime.

“It’s very hard to interpret the motives of this shooter, as we have seen in a host of mass shootings,” he said.

What did he just say? To the knowledgeable, you have to read between the lines. "This shooter" is absolved because he's black and the blame is deflected on the "failure of tighter gun control".

 "hard to interpret"...?

Take you back to Charleston.
 He didn't seem suffer the same puzzlement over Dylan Roof's motives.

FOP wants Justice Department to investigate Dallas police killings as hate crime