The Hemingway Report

Monday, August 1, 2016

Please read this and take into account before you vote in November

Is this what you want in Washington?

Have you ever had someone lie to you when you knew they were lying to you?

Looks like that is what the people of this nation continue to allow to happen.

If you muddy the water long enough and bad enough the truth cannot be found. Ever notice that there is always a long history behind these types of situations?

My name is Mike Greene. Some of you know me as a former NYPD detective and former Orange County sheriff candidate.

I conducted local level criminal investigations through high level national and international level ones (terrorism, espionage, international abductions,crimes on the high seas, etc.)

Many of us saw the FBI Directors speech. Like many of us, I was a bit pissed when Director Comey described a mountain of very serious wrong doing, but his agency was not going to recommend prosecution of the case. Like many of us, I smelled a rat. So, I proceeded to conduct my own investigation. These results will astound you and show a clear path to corruption here. Here is a step by step breakdown of this seemingly corrupt decision:

1. Loretta Lynch was appointed as the U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, NY from 1999 to 2001. Who appointed her? The then President Bill Clinton.

2. Lynch resigned in 2001 to join the law firm Hogan & Hartson. This is the same law firm that represented the company MXLogic. MXLogic was the company Hillary Clinton first used to set up her private email server and account. Executives from this law firm have also donated to the Clintons.

3. From 2003 to 2005 Lynch served as a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Federal Reserve Bank is actually a privately owned corporation comprised of numerous banks of which several of these banks and or their executives have donated to the Clintons political campaigns and to their foundation.

4. In 2010, President Obama re-appointed Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn. In 2015, Obama then appointed her as head U.S. Attorney for the nation

5. As we all know, Lynch met privately with Bill Clinton on her private government jet. This meeting was just a few days before the FBI interviewed Hillary.

6. After this meeting, Lynch said something that no U.S. Attorney has ever said. She first apologized and said she should not have met with him (obviously an apology based on her being caught, not for the act itself). She then stated something U.S. Attorneys do not ever do, that her office will be guided by whatever recommendation the FBI gives them. Why was this a ridiculous statement ? After all, she is the head of the U.S. Justice Department. The FBI is a sub-unit of the DOJ. She is the top boss, not Comey nor the FBI. Her office is the one that decides to or not to prosecute, not the FBI.

7. In 1996 Comey was appointed as a Senate Committee Investigator and Counsel to investigate the Clintons in the infamous Whitewater case. His findings concluded there was no wrongdoing by the Clintons.

8. Comey and Lynch met back in the early 2000's. Comey was appointed by George Bush as the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan.

9. In 2002, Bush then appointed Comey as Deputy U.S. Attorney and was tasked with investigating Bill Clintons mass pardons as he left office. Again Comey concluded that Clinton had done nothing wrong?

10. Comey went into private practice in 2005.

11. In 2014, Obama appointed Comey as FBI Director. Lynch was now Comey's boss as head of the parent agency, the DOJ. Lynch is the chief law enforcement officer of the nation, with Comey in the number two position as head of the FBI.

At the end of the day, how do we have Lynch, previously appointed by Bill Clinton (and formerly an employee of the law firm that is connected to Hillary's email scandal) in charge of the investigation into Hillary's email scandal, with the lead investigative agency led by a man who twice investigated the Clintons and both times found them not guilty of wrong doing. Both were appointed by the current U.S. President Obama with Lynch now Comey's boss??? Comey and Lynch have known each other for decades as well.

Conclusion: How could this investigation have ever been legitimate?

Yours truly, Mike Greene

-----------------------------

PS:

The main ingredient in the scandal stew is #1.

Bill Clinton launched her career and the reason she is the head of the DOJ. Did anyone really expect she was going to prosecute his wife? If she had an ounce of integrity she would have recused herself. In an obvious case of Judicial misconduct this sweat hog took a further step beyond the realm meeting with Bill privately for a half an hour on her plane and shortly thereafter Killary was exonerated.

I mean...the MSM is so in the tank for them they don't even bother to cover it up!

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Justice department investigating fatal police shooting of Loreal Tsingine

This bitch is barely cold and her death is already being investigated by worthless lying Lynch and her cohorts.

Meanwhile...

Kate Steinle's family is still recoiling from how an illegal who was DEPORTED FIVE TIMES was able to shoot and kill their daughter on July 1, 2015. No investigation of the SFPD. No investigation of ICE. Everything is copasetic. Just the way it should be according to Democrats.

“Kate’s Law” Gets Shot Down in the US Senate

Why is it in this "White House" if you're not a minority you don't count? If this isn't a travesty of JUSTICE someone tell me what fuck is!

----------------------------------

The Justice Department will investigate the police shooting of a Native American woman in Arizona, a spokesman said on Friday, a day after footage released by the Winslow police department raised concerns about racial bias in the fatal shooting.

The department’s civil rights division will review the local investigation into the March 27 shooting death of Loreal Tsingine, spokesman Wyn Hornbuckle said.

Tsingine, 27, was shot and killed by the Winslow police officer Austin Shipley in late March after officers suspected her of shoplifting in a local store and confronted her. Silent body-camera footage, first obtained by the Arizona Daily Sun, shows a police officer trying to restrain Tsingine then shoving her to the ground and finally drawing a gun on her as she approaches him.

In the video, Tsingine gets up and walks toward Shipley with a small pair of medical scissors in her left hand, and another officer quickly approaches her from behind. Shipley draws his gun and directs it at Tsingine, and the footage is cut off before he fires the fatal shot.

The shooting was ruled justified by the Maricopa County attorney’s office last Friday.

Tsingine’s aunt, Floranda Dempsey, said her niece was 5ft tall and weighed 95lbs. “They should have been able to subdue her with their huge size and weight,” she said. “It wasn’t like she came at them first. I’m sure anyone would be mad if they were thrown around.” She added a question: “Where were the tasers, pepper sprays, batons?”

The family filed a $10.5m wrongful death lawsuit against the city at the beginning of the month, claiming that “the city of Winslow was negligent in hiring, training, retaining, controlling and supervising” the officer who killed Tsingine.

Shipley’s training records show two of his fellow officers had serious concerns that he was too quick to go for his service weapon, that he ignored directives from superiors, and that he was liable to falsify reports and not control his emotions.

A day before Shipley’s training ended, nearly three years ago, a police corporal recommended that the Winslow police department not retain him.

“They were warned he was likely to hurt someone back in 2013 or so, by another commanding officer,” Floranda said. “It’s unbelievable as to why he was still allowed to wear a badge.”

Floranda said watching the video shocked her and made her angry, and that all she saw was “a bully who got angry for getting his ego squashed” by a small Native American woman.

Nationwide, Native Americans are disproportionately killed by police. Based on data from the Counted, the Guardian’s database of police killings in the US, fatal police shootings of black, white, Hispanic and Asian Americans have all gone down slightly or remained roughly the same from 2015 into 2016, but twice as many Native Americans have been killed over the same period.

Because the number of Native Americans, relative to other racial and ethnic categories, is quite small, just a handful of incidents can dramatically change the per capita rate. Still, 13 Native American people have been killed just over halfway through 2016, more than the 10 that were killed in all of 2015.

Tsingine is one of four Native Americans killed in 2016, representing about 30% of the incidents in contrast to the rate among all racial groups, in which women represent victims in about 3% of fatal shootings. For comparison, only one Hispanic or Asian American woman has been shot and killed by police in all of 2016, even though they represent a much larger portion of the population than Native American women.

In another controversial shooting of a Native American woman this year, pregnant 32-year-old Jacqueline Salyers was killed after she allegedly drove her vehicle towards a Tacoma, Washington, police officer. Although the US justice department has repeatedly advised against officers shooting at moving vehicles, the incident was ruled justified by county prosecutors in May.

Simon Moya-Smith, an activist and Oglala-Lakota tribal member, said it was “unfortunate that Native Americans are routinely excluded from this conversation” about racialized police violence. Moya-Smith noted as an example that in her Democratic nomination acceptance speech Thursday night, Hillary Clinton did not mention systemic racialized violence or discrimination against Native Americans.

“We know that many people don’t see us as human. We’re relics of centuries of lore,” Moya-Smith said. “We first need to get the cops to recognize us as human, and hopefully then they won’t think of themselves as the judge, the jury and the executioner.”

Trump stirs outrage after he lashes out at the Muslim parents of a dead U.S. soldier

Via:
https://earloftaint.com

My initial impression was Trump should have kept his mouth shut.

But the fact is these two Muslim pawns were a deliberate plant.

They were put on stage for the sole purpose of discrediting Trump’s Muslim ban from countries we don’t trust.

BTW... didn’t Kate Steinle’s mother lose a daughter to an illegal dog. Why was she absent? Because unlike the pro-Muslim rhetoric, her loss didn't fit the Democratic doctrine of promoting illegal invasion and sanctuary cities.

Also:

According to Giuliani did you know uniformed cops were banned from the DNC floor?

http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/giuliani-uniformed-police-officers-not-allowed-on-dnc-floor/

They didn't want to offend the cop killing BLM who couldn't keep their big mouth shut for one minute allowing law abiding citizens a moment of silence for the fallen cops. I'm happy to report just like OWS... BLM is now an integral part of the Democratic party.

---------------------------------------------------

Trump to Khizr Khan: 'I've made a lot of sacrifices'

(CNN)Donald Trump rejected a Muslim lawyer's assertion on the Democratic convention stage that the Republican nominee has "sacrificed nothing and no one."

"Who wrote that? Did Hillary's script writers write it?" Trump said in an interview with with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos that will air Sunday. "I think I've made a lot of sacrifices. I work very, very hard."

Khizr Khan, whose son Army Capt. Humayun Khan died in Baghdad in 2004, delivered one of the most powerful speeches of the Democratic National Convention. With his wife Ghazala at his side, Khan repeatedly blasted Trump's immigration proposals -- specifically those aimed at barring Muslims -- and said the billionaire businessman has "sacrificed nothing and no one."

Trump, in the ABC interview, said in response, "I've created thousands and thousands of jobs, tens of thousands of jobs, built great structures. I've had tremendous success. I think I've done a lot."

Khan "was, you know, very emotional and probably looked like a nice guy to me," Trump added.

Trump, in a statement released Saturday by his campaign, called Capt. Khan "a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe."

He argued that the "radical Islamist terrorists who killed him and the attempts by such people to enter the United States and "do us further harm" represent the "real problem."

During his appearance at the Democratic National convention, Khizr Khan held up a copy of the U.S. Consitution and asked Trump if he has ever read it.

"I will gladly lend you my copy. In this document, look for the words, look for the words, liberty and equal protection (under) law," Khizr Khan said.

In his statement, Trump took sharp offense, saying that "while I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things."

Clinton early Saturday evening issued a statement coming to Khan's defense.

"I was very moved to see Ghazala Khan stand bravely and with dignity in support of her son on Thursday night. And I was very moved to hear her speak last night, bravely and with dignity, about her son's life and the ultimate sacrifice he made for his country.

"This is a time for all Americans to stand with the Khans, and with all the families whose children have died in service to our country. And this is a time to honor the sacrifice of Captain Khan and all the fallen. Captain Khan and his family represent the best of America, and we salute them."

At a Clinton campaign appearance in Pennsylvania, lines about the Khan family were visible on a teleprompter, but she did not deliver them. Inquiries to the Clinton campaign about why went unanswered.

Still, a senior spokeswoman for the Clinton campaign, Karen Finney, took a sharper tone against Trump.

"Trump is truly shameless to attack the family of an American hero. Many thanks to the Khan family for your sacrifice, we stand with you," tweeted Karen Finney, a senior spokeswoman for the Clinton campaign.

By Saturday afternoon Trump's comparison of his own sacrifices to Khan's had blown up to blew on Twitter into a hashtag, #TrumpSacrifices. Users wrote satirically that the candidate had, among other things, been subjected to such hardships as flying commercial, playing golf on a public course and staying at a three-star hotel.

Trump previously responded more obliquely to Khan's convention remarks, in a lightning-round interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd.

"I'd like to hear his wife say something," Trump said.

In a Friday evening interview on MSNBC, Ghazala Khan spoke briefly about her final interaction with her son, on Mother's Day 2004, wishing him safety while serving in Iraq.

In the New York Times interview, Trump also opined on a range of Democratic convention speakers. He was sharply critical of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an independent who threw his support behind Hillary Clinton and spoke to the Democratic convention. Trump called Bloomberg "a guy who didn't have the guts to run for president."

"He doesn't know anything about me," Trump said. "But he never had the guts to run. He probably wished he did but he didn't. He spent millions of dollars on polling but he was missing one thing: guts."

The two have been exchanging barbs this week after Bloomberg, who once considered entering the 2016 race as an independent, endorsed Clinton over Trump last weekend, then blasted Trump as a "dangerous demagogue" in Philadelphia.