Visit Counter

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Another one of those coincidences...




US delivered $400m in CASH stashed inside wooden pallets to Iran on same day as American hostages were freed but the Obama administration DENIES it paid a ransom



WOW... Barry sure drives a hard bargain! 
Only in the mind of this warped waste of skin could a plan of this magnanimous derangement be conceived. This administration's negotiating skills has no equal! We lifted the sanctions. We gave them 400 million (so far). And we allow them to inspect themselves regarding their nuclear facilities. What's next? Give them ObamaCare?

Makes me wonder about the 5 for 1 swap. How much money did he slip them under the table?

Obama's legacy in one photo.


Barry's using your tax dollars to finance Iran's nuclear program just like Bill Clinton did with North Korea.



Bill Clinton's VS Barack Obama's Nuclear Agreement Speech Similarities Warns US of  The Future

(Please watch to the end)


Video 274 


It was bullshit then just like it is now.


------------------------------------------ 

The US secretly flew $400 million stashed inside wooden pallets out to Iran as four Americans were released from Tehran - but the Obama administration insists it was not a ransom payment.

The pallets, which were stuffed with euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currencies, arrived in Tehran on January 17. That same day, four US citizens were released in exchange for seven Iranians held in the United States.

Officials denied any link between the payment and the prisoner exchange, saying the deal was part of a $1.7 billion settlement to resolve a failed 1979 arms deal, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Bur critics claim that the clandestine multi-million dollar payment was part of the hostage negotiations.

They also point to the fact that President Barack Obama failed to make any mention of the $400 million when he announced the prisoner exchange. 



Critics have accused the Obama administration of paying a $1.7 billion 'ransom' for the hostages (President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden speaking last year about the Iran nuclear deal)



'With the nuclear deal done, prisoners released, the time was right to resolve this dispute as well,' President Barack Obama said on January 17.

Iranians had demanded the return of the $400 million which was paid to the Pentagon by Iran, shortly before the fall of Iran's last monarch, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, to purchase US fighter jets. 

Officials admit that Iranian negotiators had demanded cash over the exchange to show they had won something from the US in negotiations.

But they insist that negotiations on the prisoner exchange, and the failed arms deal settlement were completely separate.

'As we've made clear, the negotiations over the settlement of an outstanding claim…were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,' State Department spokesman John Kirby said.

US officials admit they realized the United States was going to lose its case over the arms deal in The Hague, where Iran was seeking more than $10 billion compensation.

Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, Arkansas, accused the Obama administration of paying a $1.7 billion 'ransom' for the hostages.

They have also expressed concerns the money could be used to fund terrorist groups such as Lebanese militia Hezbollah or it could be funding Assad's regime in Syria. 

Local press reports also quoted Iranian defense officials describing the money as a ransom payment. 

The Obama administration has refused to say how the $1.7 billion was paid.

But officials say the $400 million was paid in foreign currency, because transactions with Iran in US dollars is illegal in the United States.

It was such a large amount of cash that the US was forced to transfer the money into the central banks of the Switzerland and the Netherlands. 

Once the dollars were converted to foreign currency, it was stacked in the wooden pallets and sent off to Iran.

The cargo plane carrying the money arrived in Tehran’s Mehrabad airport on January 17 - the same day the American detainees were released.

Negotiations for their release began back in 2014 with Switzerland’s foreign minister hosting the discussions at the InterContinental Hotel, Geneva, on behalf of the US which has not had diplomatic interests in Iran since closing its Tehran embassy following the 1979 hostage crisis.



US Secretary of State John Kerry, hailed the new deal with Iran which successfully resolved a decades-old failed arms deal, is pictured talking with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif


Talks began picking up pace in July 2015 when Iran agreed to restrain its nuclear program in exchange for the international sanctions against it being lifted.

US and European officials told the Wall Street Journal the negotiations began by focusing on a straight forward prisoner swap but grew to envelop compensation for the failed arms deal.

Eventually, Obama agreed to pay the $400 million and the four Americans were released from a Tehran prison last January. 








Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Freddie Gray case goes Duke lacrosse




When you're driving down the street and a cop see's your passenger is not wearing their seatbelt does he give you a ticket or charge you with depraved murder? 

Wouldn't mind seeing the cops get the same $6.4 mil as the Gray family received.

-----------------------------------------

Law professor goes after Maryland prosecutor for Freddie Gray case


Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby could face the same fallout from the Freddie Gray case as prosecutor Michael Nifong did after the Duke lacrosse case in 2006. (L- Reuters, R- AP)



A law professor with a history of taking prosecutors to task has set his sights on the Baltimore state’s attorney, who failed in her bid to put six cops in prison in connection with the racially-charged death of Freddie Gray.

George Washington University law professor John Banzhaf has filed complaints against Marilyn Mosby with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. He alleges Mosby and two deputies committed ethics violations, used “fraudulent or misleading tactics," withheld evidence from the defense and brought charges without probable cause against the Baltimore police officers involved in the April 12, 2015 arrest of Gray, who died of injuries suffered inside a police van.

“My concern is that this will encourage other prosecutors from other large cities to do the same,” Banzhaf told FoxNews.com. “The line she [Mosby] is giving her supporters is that the case was a success and that she has been victimized in just bringing them up on charges. “I think her supporters, which she depends on to be re-elected, support what she did.”

Mosby announced last week all charges against the police officers would be dropped. The bombshell announcement came after three were found not guilty and another’s case declared a mistrial.

In the complaint, Banzhaf alleges that Mosby violated state rules of professional conduct for attorneys. He also alleged that Mosby violated rules of conduct with public statements about the case.

In addition to being a law professor, Banzhaf is an activist and watchdog when it comes to the actions of those who work in the court of law and public service. During his career, he has filed complaints against Geraldine Ferraro, Barney Frank, and former Maryland Gov. Spiro Agnew, who went on to be Richard Nixon’s vice president.

He also threatened to file a complaint against former North Carolina prosecutor Mike Nifong, who was disbarred after his conduct in handling the 2006 Duke lacrosse case, in which three members of the school’s men’s lacrosse team were falsely accused of rape. The charges were eventually dropped by Nifong just days after Banzhaf publicly said that he was considering bring forth a lawsuit against the prosecutor for violating the civil rights of the students. The case sparked a national discussion on due process and led to Nifong’s resignation and subsequent disbarment.

Banzhaf says that he sees similarities between Nifong’s conduct and Mosby’s and that her career may see the same fate.

“Both of them violated rights of the defendants by not providing exculpatory evidence [to the defense],” he said. “Second, both continued cases long after it was determined who may win.”

The law professor says that in some respects, Mosby’s handling of the Freddie Gray trial may have been the more egregious.

“When Nifong first brought forth the case it was solid, and as time went on, it was not,” he said. “With Mosby, the moment she filed the case, it was known that it couldn’t be brought forward.”

Now that a complaint has been filed, an investigation into the claims will be launched by the state and charges could go forward in 90 days unless it’s determined that the allegations are frivolous. The fallout from the dropped charges in the Freddie Gray case has already sent shockwaves through the State’s Attorney’s office.

Veteran prosecutor Lisa Phelps, who was assigned to try two of the cases against the police officers and had objected to their continued prosecution, resigned from her post on Monday according to the Baltimore Sun.

"Her refusal to continue with a doomed-to-failure criminal case was apparently the straw that forced Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby to finally drop all of the remaining Freddie Gray cop cases," said Banzhaf, "and her reluctance to continue may have been caused by my threat to seek her disbarment if she did."

Mosby did not immediately return calls for comment.

Banzhaf said the State Attorney’s motivations may have been greater than just pursuing justice.

“When Nifong filed his case, it was widely suspected that he brought it forth for political purposes,” he said. “In Mosby’s case she virtually said so.”




Share/Bookmark

Monday, August 1, 2016

Miami quadruple shooting shocks community








Miami quadruple shooting shocks community

Anyone with information as to his whereabouts is asked to call Miami-Dade Crime Stoppers at 305-471-TIPS. While you're on the phone ask them when they think the BLM demonstrations will begin.


Miami quadruple shooting

According to media reports Monday, Miami police have identified a suspect in a shooting that left a mother and her two children dead and another child wounded.

As reported by the Miami Herald, police said Antwon Fair is wanted in connection with the early Sunday morning shooting at a home near Southwest 203rd Terrace and Southwest 115th Avenue.



Takeeya “KeKe” Fulton, a 39-year-old mother of six, and her daughter, Nuckeria “Keria” Harris, 19, were shot inside the home after Fulton got into an argument with a man, relatives told Local 10 News.

Police say Fulton and Harris were pronounced dead at the scene.

Harris was shot and killed while trying to defend her mother, sources said.


Corey “CJ” Johnson, 17, was sleeping in his bedroom when he was shot. He later died at Kendall Regional Medical Center.

Fulton’s 12-year-old son was also shot and taken to Kendall Regional Medical Center. He is listed in stable condition.

Evette Woodard, a coworker of Fulton, said Fulton and her boyfriend got in arguments, but she thought they were nothing more than normal relationship struggles.

“I was shocked, so shocked,” Woodard told the Herald. “Never in a million years would I have thought it would end this way.”

A GoFundMe account was created to help the family.

Police said Fair is considered armed and dangerous. Police said he was last seen in a white 2009 Chevrolet Impala with Florida license plate No. BDYW67.








Share/Bookmark

Guess Chris Wallace doesn't know when he's being lied to





I would have loved to see his old man grill this bitch!

Watch her lie and try to spin what Comey REALLY said to Chris Wallace. Pay particular attention to this:

"There were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain emails"

Classic Clinton muddling the water.


Video 272




Comey: 110 of Clinton's emails contained classified information AT TIME THEY WERE SENT AND RECEIVED.


Anyone hear him use the word "retroactively"? 



Video273










Share/Bookmark

Please read this and take into account before you vote in November




Is this what you want in Washington?



Have you ever had someone lie to you when you knew they were lying to you?

 Looks like that is what the people of this nation continue to allow to happen.

If you muddy the water long enough and bad enough the truth cannot be found. Ever notice that there is always a long history behind these types of situations?

My name is Mike Greene. Some of you know me as a former NYPD detective and former Orange County sheriff candidate.

I conducted local level criminal investigations through high level national and international level ones (terrorism, espionage, international abductions,crimes on the high seas, etc.)

Many of us saw the FBI Directors speech. Like many of us, I was a bit pissed when Director Comey described a mountain of very serious wrong doing, but his agency was not going to recommend prosecution of the case. Like many of us, I smelled a rat. So, I proceeded to conduct my own investigation. These results will astound you and show a clear path to corruption here. Here is a step by step breakdown of this seemingly corrupt decision:



1. Loretta Lynch was appointed as the U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, NY from 1999 to 2001. Who appointed her? The then President Bill Clinton.


2. Lynch resigned in 2001 to join the law firm Hogan & Hartson. This is the same law firm that represented the company MXLogic. MXLogic was the company Hillary Clinton first used to set up her private email server and account. Executives from this law firm have also donated to the Clintons.


3. From 2003 to 2005 Lynch served as a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Federal Reserve Bank is actually a privately owned corporation comprised of numerous banks of which several of these banks and or their executives have donated to the Clintons political campaigns and to their foundation.


4. In 2010, President Obama re-appointed Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn. In 2015, Obama then appointed her as head U.S. Attorney for the nation


5. As we all know, Lynch met privately with Bill Clinton on her private government jet. This meeting was just a few days before the FBI interviewed Hillary.


6. After this meeting, Lynch said something that no U.S. Attorney has ever said. She first apologized and said she should not have met with him (obviously an apology based on her being caught, not for the act itself). She then stated something U.S. Attorneys do not ever do, that her office will be guided by whatever recommendation the FBI gives them. Why was this a ridiculous statement ? After all, she is the head of the U.S. Justice Department. The FBI is a sub-unit of the DOJ. She is the top boss, not Comey nor the FBI. Her office is the one that decides to or not to prosecute, not the FBI.


7. In 1996 Comey was appointed as a Senate Committee Investigator and Counsel to investigate the Clintons in the infamous Whitewater case. His findings concluded there was no wrongdoing by the Clintons.


8. Comey and Lynch met back in the early 2000's. Comey was appointed by George Bush as the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan.


9. In 2002, Bush then appointed Comey as Deputy U.S. Attorney and was tasked with investigating Bill Clintons mass pardons as he left office. Again Comey concluded that Clinton had done nothing wrong?


10. Comey went into private practice in 2005.


11. In 2014, Obama appointed Comey as FBI Director. Lynch was now Comey's boss as head of the parent agency, the DOJ. Lynch is the chief law enforcement officer of the nation, with Comey in the number two position as head of the FBI.

At the end of the day, how do we have Lynch, previously appointed by Bill Clinton (and formerly an employee of the law firm that is connected to Hillary's email scandal) in charge of the investigation into Hillary's email scandal, with the lead investigative agency led by a man who twice investigated the Clintons and both times found them not guilty of wrong doing. Both were appointed by the current U.S. President Obama with Lynch now Comey's boss??? Comey and Lynch have known each other for decades as well.



Conclusion: How could this investigation have ever been legitimate?


Yours truly, Mike Greene 

-----------------------------

PS:

The main ingredient in the scandal stew is #1.

Bill Clinton launched her career and the reason she is the head of the DOJ. Did anyone really expect she was going to prosecute his wife? If she had an ounce of integrity she would have recused herself. In an obvious case of Judicial misconduct this sweat hog took a further step beyond the realm meeting with Bill privately for a half an hour on her plane and shortly thereafter Killary was exonerated. 

I mean...the MSM is so in the tank for them they don't even bother to cover it up! 






Share/Bookmark