Friends and family hold vigil for slain unarmed West Virginia teen

Don't know for sure... bet there's more to this story then meets the eye. Looks like the same meal the media dishes up only later we find out he's not quite the angel the media purports.

Trayvon Déjà vu:

Media prop

Reality

-----------------------------

CHARLESTON, W.Va. – 

A black teenager fatally shot after police say he bumped into a 62-year-old white man is being remembered as a funny, smart and a good friend.

The Charleston Gazette-Mail reports (http://bit.ly/2fJq3Is) vigils have been held for 15-year-old James Means. Police say he was shot in Charleston by William Pulliam who showed no remorse.

Pulliam in a jail interview with WCHS-TV said he shot the teenager in self-defense because he felt threatened.

Thirteen-year-old James Cooper witnessed the shooting. He called James a good friend who "always came up with ideas of what to do and how to make it fun."

(Anyone remember all the "witnesses" who claimed Wilson shot St. Michael in the back)

City police say the teen was shot Monday evening at an intersection and was taken by ambulance to a Charleston hospital, where he was pronounced dead from two gunshot wounds.

Friends and family hold vigil for slain unarmed West Virginia teen

The Mysterious Case Of Jill Stein's Surging Recount Costs

On a tip from Ed Kilbane

What is the true motivation here? After all, she ran against Clinton. What opposing candidate demands a recount for another loser? Next thing you know Gary Johnson who did not get one electoral vote will be demanding a recount.

The money collected would have been better spent on a children's hospital than pissed away on this pointless endeavor.

Check out the video. 

Why would she want a recount for someone she claims would lead us to a nuclear war?

-------------------------------------

by Tyler Durden

Just yesterday we noted that Jill Stein was acting on behalf of Hillary Clinton to raise money for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. As we noted then, we continue to be astonished by the amount of money flowing into the fundraising campaign and would love to see which of Hillary's mega-donors have spent the most on the effort...somehow we suspect this isn't just a "grassroots organizing" effort as Stein described it.

So, in less than 1 day, Jill Stein raised over $3mm, which is more than the $2mm needed to force a recount in Wisconsin. While she attributed the accomplishment to "the power of grassroots organizing," we would tend to be a little more skeptical and would love to see exactly where those donations came from. Then again, maybe we're wrong and there really are just that many disaffected snowflakes out there willing to blow their money on an extreme long shot.

But, today a new mystery has emerged in Stein's fundraising efforts. Apparently, the more money she raises the more expensive the recount effort becomes. Courtesy of the Wayback Machine we have the following snapshots from her fundraising page over the past couple of days:

November 24, 2016, at 3:46AM - In the beginning, Stein figured she needed a total of $2.5mm to fund her recount efforts. That figure included $2.2mm for the actual filing fees and presumably another $0.3mm for legal fees and other costs.

November 24, 2016, at 1:20PM - Then, just 12 hours later, after the cash just kept flowing in, Stein figured she needed at least another $2mm as her fundraising goal was raised to $4.5mm in total. Of course, the filing fees of $2.2mm didn't change but the "attorney's fees" apparently surged by about 300% and the total costs of the effort skyrocketed to $6-7mm.

November 25, 2016, at 6:11AM - Now, just this morning as Stein approaches $5mm in total donations, her overall fundraising goal has surged once again and now stands at $7mm.

So, with nearly $5mm raised so far, the question is no longer whether recounts will occur in WI, MI, and PA but just how much Jill Stein will be able to drain from the pockets of disaffected Hillary supporters to fund her long-shot efforts.

All that said, here is Jill Stein admitting to CNN that she has absolutely no evidence of election hacking....even though she asks that you please keep sending your money anyway.

Jill Stein: "We don't know" if the election was stolen, but it was a "hack-riddled election" https://t.co/yxsdKzEsVg https://t.co/7y9Obwtpyo

— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) November 25, 2016

And another where she says she would have challenged the election result even if Hillary won...though somehow we suspect she wouldn't have been able to raise quite so much money under that scenario.

Jill Stein says she would still be raising money for vote recounts, even if Clinton had won https://t.co/9ZwRiCbT9u https://t.co/xKY1au3oRj

— CNN (@CNN) November 24, 2016

And finally we leave you with this latest epic rant from PJW on the whole situation:

Video 301

The Mysterious Case Of Jill Stein's Surging Recount Costs

Election Reflection

Election Reflection

Trump wins Michigan by nearly 11,000 votes, bringing his electoral vote win over Clinton to 306

Before and After

President-elect Donald Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes, according to final results posted by the Michigan secretary of state

Democrats mostly dismissed the idea throughout the general election, although in the final days of the campaign Clinton rushed to Grand Rapids and Detroit, and dispatched President Obama to Ann Arbor in a futile effort to stave off the upset.

With Michigan in his column, Trump won 306 electoral votes, to Clinton's 232, a convincing electoral win. But Clinton has amassed a 2 million vote lead in the popular vote – the second time since 2000 where the Democrat got more votes but lost the White House anyway.

Trump also seized two other Democratic prizes by winning Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

And the liberal fools just pissed away $4 million on a futile recount.  

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/does-jill-steins-recount-effort-have-any-chance/

Trump wins Michigan by nearly 11,000 votes, bringing his electoral vote win over Clinton to 306

Poll: Despite Trump victory, voters support abortion, oppose border wall

Take a good hard look at the headline above. It tells you all you need about the liberal agenda. They're all in for slaughtering the unborn on a wholesale scale but...

and God forbid harm in the way of deportation should come to any illegal who scrambled over the fence.

 

--------------------------------------         

Trump doubles down on border wall during Mexico visit

Despite his electoral victory, a majority of Americans do not support President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign promises to overturn Roe v. Wade, build a border wall with Mexico or cut off the path to citizenship for undocumented workers, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll.

I believe it has come to light polls may not be the most reliable source for truthful information.

“Two of President-elect Donald Trump’s signature campaign mantras get hearty thumbs down,” Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University poll, said. “Voters to Trump: No way on reversing Roe v Wade and not a chance on building that wall.”

Sixty-four percent of those surveyed said they agreed with the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion. Of those that supported it, 26 percent said that it should be legal in “all cases,” while 38 percent said it should be legal in “most cases.” Ten percent said it should be illegal in all cases.

When it comes to immigration, 55 percent of those polled oppose building a wall along the Mexican border. Sixty percent also say they support a path to citizenship. Another 12 percent of American voters say illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the country but not become citizens, while 25 percent say they should be deported.

An overwhelming 76 percent said prejudice against minority groups is a somewhat serious-to-serious problem. Forty-three percent have expressed concern about more discrimination and violence against minorities following the election.

A total of 68 percent of Americans voters said they were “very concerned” or “somewhat concerned” about climate change and say that Trump should not remove regulations in place intended to fight climate change.

In an open-ended question, allowing for any answer, 24 percent of voters said Trump’s first priority should be the economy.

The Quinnipiac University survey of 1,071 voters was conducted Nov. 17-20 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Poll: Despite Trump victory, voters support abortion, oppose border wall