Visit Counter

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Stein spent nearly $1 million of recount funds on consultants, staff, admin expenses







Better check if the Green Party candidate bought a green Prius recently. 


-----------------------------------------------
 




Recounts stalled in Pa., Mich.; Trump Gained 131 Net Votes in Wisconsin

Joe SchoffstallDecember 13, 2016 2:10 pm





Green Party nominee Jill Stein spent nearly $1 million of the funds she raised for recount efforts in three battleground states on consultants, staff, and administrative costs.

Stein, who pushed for recounts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, raised $7.3 million for the efforts and said that “every dollar” went towards costs associated with the recount efforts. The group, which claimed costs associated with the recounts hit $7.4 million, upped their fundraising goal four times since first calling for recounts.

According to a breakdown of expenses contained on the fund’s website, Stein paid nearly $1 million on consultants and staff. The staff payroll tallied $212,500 while consultants pocketed $364,000. Administrative expenses, such as travel costs, ran $353,618. In all, $930,118 was used to pay consultants, staff, and administrative costs.

Filing fees in the three states cost $4,488,939, the group says. Wisconsin filing fees totaled $3,499,689, Pennsylvania fees were $16,000, and Michigan filing fees ran the group $973,250. Legal expenses cost the group $1.6 million.

Stein’s recount efforts hit roadblocks in both Michigan and Pennsylvania after being blocked by courts in both states. A federal judge on Monday rejected Stein’s recount request in Pennsylvania. Another federal judge put an end to Stein’s recount efforts in Michigan last week.

Wisconsin, the only state where a recount was launched, wrapped up its effort on Monday. After counting more than 3 million ballots, Trump was shown to have won the state by 131 more net votes than he had before the recount had taken place. Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in Wisconsin by more than 22,000 votes.

The recount efforts pulled in more than twice as much as Stein’s campaign had throughout the entire 2016 election cycle.

Stein’s campaign committee received $3.2 million in contributions and finished with $87,740 in debts, according to campaign finance records filed with the Federal Election Commission.

The unsuccessful efforts garnered massive amounts of media attention for Stein who received very little publicity during the election. Stein received 12 times more coverage from the recounts than she had from her campaign, according to a study conducted by the Media Research Center.

“When Jill Stein was the Green Party’s candidate for U.S. president, the networks only gave her 36 seconds of coverage,” the watchdog wrote. “However, as soon as she launched a campaign to contest the presidential election and demand a recount of ballots in several key states, the evening news shows on ABC, CBS and NBC managed to find 7 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage for her in just four days. “

President-elect Donald Trump previously called the recount efforts a “scam.” Rep. Paul Ryan has referred to them as a “ridiculous fundraising and publicity stunt.”

Stein’s team did not immediately return a request for comment on the amount of recount funds that were spent on staff and consultants.






Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Remember when Trump would destroy our democracy by not accepting the election results?



With Jill Stein's recount a total flop Killary and her swarm are trying to pull off an electoral coup to discredit the actual results to make it look like a hoax. In other words... Trump never really won because she got the popular vote. And Putin put in the "fix". 

When hacking boils down to Wassermouth-Shultz they don't want to talk about that. Sanders wanted to get rid of Wassermouth the Chair of the DNC because he was not treated fairly.

Later Wikileaks exposed the email when she was confronted with what Sanders said, “This is a silly story,” she wrote. “He isn’t going to be president.”

Confirming whose side she was on all along.



Video 310





Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Trump WINS the recount! Jill Stein left looking a fool as he GAINS votes in Wisconsin - and judges shut down Green loser's other bids to overturn election


Disappointment Exemplified



Wonder if they'll 'recount' the $7 million to find out where it went?



Republican Donald Trump's victory in Wisconsin was reaffirmed Monday following a recount that showed him defeating Democrat Hillary Clinton by more than 22,000 votes - a net gain of 162.

Wisconsin finalized its recount on the same day that a federal judge issued a stinging rejection of a Green Party-backed request to recount paper ballots in Pennsylvania's presidential election and scan some counties' election systems for signs of hacking.

Green Party candidate Jill Stein successfully requested, and paid for, the Wisconsin recount while her attempts for similar statewide recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan were blocked by the courts. 

Stein only got about 1 percent of the vote in each of the states that Trump narrowly won on his way to the White House. She argued, without evidence, that voting machines in all three states were susceptible to hacking.

The numbers barely budged in Wisconsin after nearly 3 million votes were recounted. Trump picked up a net 162 votes and still won by more than 22,000 votes. The final results changed just 0.06 percent.

In Pennsylvania, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond said there were at least six grounds that required him to reject the Green Party's lawsuit, which had been opposed by Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the Pennsylvania attorney general's office.

Suspicion of a hacked Pennsylvania election 'borders on the irrational' while granting the Green Party's recount bid could 'ensure that no Pennsylvania vote counts' given Tuesday's federal deadline to certify the vote for the Electoral College, wrote Diamond, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, a Republican.

'Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any 'hack' occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania's voting system was not in any way compromised,' Diamond wrote.

He also said the lawsuit suffered from a lack of standing, potentially the lack of federal jurisdiction and an 'unexplained, highly prejudicial' wait before filing last week's lawsuit, four weeks after the Nov. 8 election.

The decision was the Green Party's latest roadblock in Pennsylvania after hitting numerous walls in county and state courts. 

Green Party-backed lawyers argue that it was possible that computer hackers changed the election outcome and that Pennsylvania's heavy use of paperless machines makes it a prime target. 

Stein also contended that Pennsylvania has erected unconstitutional barriers to voters seeking a recount.

A lawyer for the Green Party said Monday they were disappointed and unable to immediately say whether they would appeal.

'But one thing is clear,' said the lawyer, Ilann Maazel. 'The Pennsylvania election system is not fair to voters and voters don't know if their votes counted, and that's a very large problem.'

In Pennsylvania, Trump beat Clinton in Pennsylvania by about 44,000 votes out of 6 million cast.

A federal judge halted Michigan's recount last week after three days. Trump won Michigan by fewer than 11,000 votes out of nearly 4.8 million votes cast.





Share/Bookmark

Monday, December 12, 2016

Dems claim Russian involvement in Trump victory














Share/Bookmark

The CIA - Russia Debate











Share/Bookmark