San Diego police killed boy, 15, in school parking lot

Here we go again.

What a surprise! Another black imbecile points a gun at the cops (real or not) and winds up dead.

Naturally, if white people did the same thing they would still be sucking air.

Bet his name has already been submitted by BLM for canonization. Still, the last paragraph in this article kills me.

[A crisis-response team will be on campus Monday to support students, staff, and parents, Dill said. Counseling also will be available at all district schools for anyone who needs a place to talk about the shooting or "to mourn and process this tragedy," he said.]

Allow me to "process this tragedy" for you...it's called out-and-out stupidity. I guess I'm supposed to feel bad because it was 'only' a BB gun. How would the cops know that?  

Speaking of stupidity remember this saint?

This is the photo the media released. An angelic "Trayvon-like" Tamir Rice. A former Cleveland, Ohio native.

This is what the cops saw (A man waving a gun) when Rice's neighbors called it in.

(Little different image...you think)

Original photo of  Rice's gun.

Surprise me. Which one did he carry?

It's the one on the top a toy gun. It's easy for liberals to make a snap decision when their ass is not on the line. The fact is from 30 feet away could a cop be able to distinguish the difference? I can't. They both look like a Colt 1911.

Instead of learning from this incident they just continue to join the ranks of the fatality stupid. This could be the reason. Rather than teach kids in the inner-cities...Don't Point A Gun At A Cop Real Or Not.

They did this:

Gazebo where 12-year-old Tamir Rice was killed to go on display at memorial museum

BTW...The Grand Jury declined to indict the police officers but the Cleveland taxpayers had to cough up $6 million for Rice's family.

Think about that for a moment.

---------------------------------------------------

Members of the San Diego Police Department collect evidence at the scene of a fatal police officer involved shooting of a 15-year-old boy in one of the parking lots in front of Torrey Pines High School, early Saturday morning. The boy reportedly called the police and when they arrived pointed what appears to be a gun at them. (Howard Lipin/The San Diego Union-Tribune via AP)

SAN DIEGO (AP) — Police shot and killed a 15-year-old student Saturday after he pointed a BB gun at them in a high school parking lot, authorities said.

The Torrey Pines High School student called 911 shortly before 3:30 a.m. to ask officers to check on the welfare of an unarmed boy in front of the school, according to a police statement.

He didn't name the boy, but investigators later determined he was referring to himself, police said.

When two officers arrived, they spotted a youth in the front parking lot. But as they got out of their patrol cars, he pulled a gun from his waistband and pointed it at an officer, police said.

The officers drew their guns and ordered him to drop the weapon. But instead, he began to walk toward an officer, ignoring more demands to drop the weapon, police said.

Both officers fired, hitting him several times. They performed first aid and summoned paramedics, but the teen was pronounced dead at a hospital, police said.

The gun was found to be a BB air pistol.

Police didn't release the teen's name because of his age.

"Our hearts go out to the student, his family, and his friends," said a statement from Eric Dill, superintendent of the San Diego Union High School District.

A crisis-response team will be on campus Monday to support students, staff, and parents, Dill said. Counseling also will be available at all district schools for anyone who needs a place to talk about the shooting or "to mourn and process this tragedy," he said. 

San Diego police killed boy, 15, in school parking lot

Classic Pelosi

She's enough to make you cringe.

Video 343

And then some.

Classic Pelosi

The House Passed Its Health Care Bill. Now the CBO Will Weigh In.

Now that the House has passed its big health care bill, it will find out what that bill could actually do.

The Congressional Budget Office, Washington’s nonpartisan scorekeeper, (debatable) did not have time to evaluate the effects of the American Health Care Act before Thursday’s vote since the bill was being amended until just before passage. But the budget office will not ignore the health law, and next week it is expected to release detailed estimates of how many people will be covered by the bill, and at what cost to the government.

During the debate over the Affordable Care Act in 2009, the budget office played a central role. Many Democratic lawmakers would not vote for the bill without knowing how many more people it would cover or that it would not increase the deficit. This time House Republicans, who have assailed the budget office’s calculations as inaccurate, were far less concerned about waiting for a score.

Okay, stop here. This is the reason why:

The CBO's Lousy Track Record on Coverage Projections

 By Jeffrey H. Anderson

 Congressional Budget Office Director Keith Hall

(Everything he knows he learned from Nancy Pelosi)

Congressional members and staffers generally act like their fellow Americans sit around waiting for the Congressional Budget Office to release scoring of major legislative proposals, much like they await the release of March Madness brackets. The truth is that most Americans hardly care what the CBO says. Moreover, they are right not to care: The CBO is often wildly off. 

This has certainly been true on Obamacare. Seven years ago this month, the Democrats rammed President Obama’s namesake through the House of Representatives without a single Republican vote and with only three Democratic votes to spare. At the time, the CBO said that in 2017, 23 million people would be enrolled in insurance that they acquired through Obamacare's government-run exchanges. Well, 2017 is here, and the actual tally is 9.2 million. So the CBO missed its projection by some 14 million people and a whopping 48 percent. That's not even close enough for government work.

The CBO tends to assume that if the federal government isn't compelling someone to do something, it won't happen. So if employers aren't mandated to offer insurance, they won't. If Americans aren't mandated to buy insurance, they won't. To be sure, the CBO does grant that some private employers and some private citizens actually exercise free will. Nevertheless, the CBO plainly believes in, and is a part of, Big Government.

Evidence of this is found in the fact that the CBO generally omits a huge category in its Obamacare scoring: its effect on federal spending. It lists Obamacare's "gross cost of coverage provisions," but that counts tax breaks and federal spending as being one and the same. Maybe that's just as well, since the CBO falsely scores Obamacare's direct outlays to insurance companies as "tax credits," and hence (when the person getting the insurance is someone who actually pays income tax) as "tax cuts"—hiding some $104 billion in federal spending in the process. The fact that the CBO generally doesn't offer a clear tally for federal spending speaks volumes.

As congressional members and staffers from both parties wait with bated breath for the CBO to score the newly released House Republican health-care bill (part of which is here and part of which is here), they would do well to remind themselves that (A) the CBO's score will most likely be wildly off, (B) most Americans don't much care what the CBO thinks, and (C) those who debate and pass legislation should focus on whether it would be good policy that can be communicated to the American people on its own grounds, not on the grounds of the CBO's generally dubious scoring.

Anderson, author of "An Alternative to Obamacare," is a Hudson Institute senior fellow.

Correction: The tally of 9.2 million people enrolled in insurance acquired through the Obamacare exchanges only includes the 39 states that use the healthcare.govplatform. Adding in the other 11 states (plus Washington, D.C.) would raise that tally to approximately 12 million people. So the CBO was off by about 48 percent in its projections, rather than 60 percent. As attrition occurs throughout the year, however, dropping the enrollment tally below 12 million, the amount by which the CBO was off will rise accordingly.

The House Passed Its Health Care Bill. Now the CBO Will Weigh In.

Pelosi: House Health Care Bill 'Stupid'

If there was a Nobel Prize for stupidity she would be wearing it.

Video 341

This coming from the mental genius who once said this about ObamaCare.

Video 342

Who's stupid now?

Pelosi: House Health Care Bill 'Stupid'

Congress plans to cancel Obama's government pension

They should take away the $65 million book deal also. 

Why? 

When it comes to the National Debt if you lay $1 bills on top of each other they would make a pile 1,347,763 miles high! That's equivalent to 5.64 trips to the Moon! And he's the one largely responsible for putting the country in this situation.

The above... actual statements he made... is a testament to the lying hypocrite he really is.

When Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009, the outstanding public debt totaled $10,626,877,048,913. On Jan. 20, 2017, when Obama left office, outstanding public debt totaled $19,944,429,217,106, an increase of roughly $9.3 trillion.

Barry truly was a knife in the heart of America.

----------------------------

• Republicans plan to reintroduce legislation capping presidential pensions
• Barack Obama vetoed the bill last year
• Law would reduce pensions by $1 for every dollar over $400,000 a former president earns
• Obama is reportedly collecting $400,000 speaking fees and has signed a $65 million book deal 

Congress could soon throw a monkey-wrench into Barack Obama's retirement finances, yanking his presidential pension since he is reportedly cashing in with six-figure speaking fees.

Former presidents currently receive $207,800 per year, the same amount cabinet secretaries are paid.

But lawmakers are considering a move to shrink that payment – dollar for dollar – for Oval Office retirees who collect more than $400,000 in income.

Last year Obama vetoed a bill that did just that.

Former president Barack Obama will see his presidential pension vanish if Congress passes a law that he vetoed last year

'The Obama hypocrisy on this issue is revealing,' Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz told USA Today. 'His veto was very self-serving.' 

Chaffetz and Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst plan to reintroduce the legislation soon.

The ranking Democrat on the House Oversight committee, Elijah Cummings, likely won't stand in their way.

'Cummings definitely supports the concept, and if we can work out the technical issues with the bill that arose late in the last Congress, we expect he would strongly support it again,' his spokeswoman Jennifer Hoffman Werner said.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Jason Chaffetz says he will reintroduce the bill this year

President Donald Trump has said he will not accept a salary during his time in office. It's unclear whether he could collect a pension after his tenure comes to an end.

Obama is collecting $400,000 per speech. And he and former first lady Michelle Obama have reportedly signed a two-book publishing contract worth $65 million.

Congress plans to cancel Obama's government pension