Visit Counter

Saturday, December 16, 2017

Babies born near fracking wells more likely to be underweight, says study





Yes…and when my shoelace becomes undone that’s climate change.





Expectant moms who live close to fracking sites are significantly more likely to give birth to underweight babies, according to a comprehensive new study out of Pennsylvania.

And the closer they are to the well, the greater the risk, say researchers in the journal Science Advances. The researchers found that infants born within about a half-mile of a fracking site were 25 percent more likely to weigh 5.5 pounds or less, reports Science.

The study found an increased risk for a radius up to about two miles (three kilometers, to be exact) from wells, but not much of a risk beyond that.

The study is based on data from 1.1 million babies born in the fracking-heavy state between 2004 and 2013. Low birth weights are linked to later problems ranging from asthma to lower test scores, and the toxic chemicals used in the fracking process have long raised health concerns, notes the LA Times.

"I think I was surprised by the magnitude of the impact within the half-mile radius," co-author Michael Greenstone of the University of Chicago tells the Washington Post.
More on this...

But, he adds, while fracking opponents may focus on that part of the study, supporters may focus on the lack of a risk for babies outside the three-kilometer radius.

Still, given that 30,000 US babies a year are born within a half-mile and 100,000 within two miles of a fracking site, the results are noteworthy, he says.

An industry spokesperson countered that the study fails to take into account factors such as smoking and alcohol use, and says "it's dangerously misleading and inflammatory to suggest that natural gas development has done anything but improve public health.” 





Share/Bookmark

Friday, December 15, 2017

Here's a switch



Woman Accused Of Sexual Harassment Drops Out Of Congressional Race



Democratic congressional candidate Andrea Ramsey announced that she will drop out of the race for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday after allegations of sexual harassment against a male coworker resurfaced.

“In its rush to claim the high ground in our roiling national conversation about harassment, the Democratic Party has implemented a zero-tolerance standard,” Ramsey said in a statement Friday, announcing her retirement from the race.

Her announcement comes after Gary Funkhouser accused Ramsey — the former executive vice president of human resources at LabOne — of subjecting him to “unwelcome and inappropriate sexual comments and innuendos” in 2004 when he was a LabOne human resources manager, according to the Kansas City Star.

“After I told her I was not interested in having a sexual relationship with her, she stopped talking to me,” Funkhouser wrote in a 2005 lawsuit against her. He alleges that prior to rejecting her advances, Ramsey had said great things about his performance, but that following his refusal of her posturing, she reported poor performance and subsequently fired him. LabOne dismissed the lawsuit in 2006 after mediation.

CNN political reporter Eric Bradner tweeted out the surprising news Friday morning.

Ramsey maintains that she fired Funkhouser because he was not adequately fulfilling the duties of his position in the company. It’s sad that “a vindictive, terminated employee’s false allegations are enough for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to decide not to support our promising campaign,” Ramsey said in her Friday statement.

“If anyone is guilty of sexual harassment or sexual assault, that person should not hold public office,” said DCCC spokeswoman, Meredith Kelly, the Kansas City Star reports.

Her 2018 challenge to Republican Rep. Kevin Yoder in Kansas’ 3rd District will now go unfulfilled.






Share/Bookmark

This whole thing stinks



James Comey Drafted Statement Ending Hillary Clinton Email Probe Months Before Interviewing Her




1. While under subpoena, repeat subpoena, to turn over her emails Killary deletes 31,000 of them. That had to be a crime unto itself.

2. The infamous tarmac meeting most certainly was not about golf and grandchildren. Would have liked to be a fly on the fuselage for that one.

3. After systematically shooting down every one of Killary's lies, "I never sent nor did I receive any classified material".  "I wanted to use only one device", etc. Then after concluding his blistering dissertation, Comey allows her to walk.
 I about fell out of my chair!






If this was the WWE they would be tag team champions.


BTW...WTF...is Jeff Sessions????

--------------------------------   



The draft of the July 5, 2016, statement, first reported by Newsweek, was released into the FBI’s “vault” reading room Monday. The release was called “Drafts of Director Comey's [sic] July 5, 2016 Statement Regarding Email Server Investigation Part 01 of 01,” but almost all of it is redacted.

The FBI record shows an email titled “Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED” sent from Comey on May 2, 2016, to a group including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, general counsel James Baker and chief of staff James Rybicki.

The document also shows a May 16 response from Rybicki requests comments “so we may roll into a master doc for discussion with the Director at a future date.”

The release would appear to confirm the contents of a letter sent by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) to FBI Director Christopher Wray in August in which he wrote that “it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Corney had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton.”

According to Newsweek, in the months between May and the July statement, Comey interviewed Clinton as well as several other key figures.

In that nationally televised July statement, Comey blasted Clinton at length for being “extremely careless” with classified information when she served as secretary of state. However, crucially for Clinton and her presidential campaign, he did not recommend charges to the Justice Department — effectively killing off the chances of Clinton being prosecuted by then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s Justice Department.

The early drafting of the statement raised eyebrows among FBI analysts, suggesting such a move was highly unusual.

“To me, this is so far out of bounds it’s not even in the stadium,” Chris Swecker, who retired from the FBI in 2006 told Newsweek. “That is just not how things operate…. It’s built in our DNA not to prejudge investigations, particularly from the top.”

Comey’s statement kept Clinton’s campaign alive, at least until October when Comey announced the reopening of the investigation after the discovery of related emails on a laptop belonging to disgraced former Rep. Anthony Weiner — the husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Clinton has repeatedly blamed that announcement for sinking her campaign and losing her the White House.

Trump, in turn, pointed to the initial revelations in August that Comey had drafted the July statement in May as proof of a “rigged system.”







Share/Bookmark

Are you on the internet this morning?




Not according to CNN.

The end of net neutrality took effect today. You would have thought the apocalypse was upon us. 













Share/Bookmark

Uh-OH... they'll have to refund the $billions$ Barry gave them




Haley says missile parts prove Iran violating UN resolutions



U.N. ambassador holds a news conference on Iran violating the U.N. resolution, arming rebels in Yemen.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said Thursday that she had "undeniable" evidence that Iran has been funneling missiles to Houthi rebels in Yemen in violation of U.N. resolutions.

The evidence Haley unveiled included segments of missiles launched at Saudi Arabia from Houthi-controlled territory in Yemen. She said the missile parts bear markings showing they originate in Iran and that they have technical specifications that are specific to Iranian-manufactured weapons.

"The evidence is undeniable," Haley told reporters in a hangar at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling in Washington. "The weapons might as well have had 'Made in Iran' stickers all over it."


Haley gestures as she speaks in front of recovered segments of an Iranian missile. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)




U.S. officials have long suspected Tehran of supporting the Shiite Houthis in Yemen, which has been locked in a vicious civil war since 2015. On Wednedsday, U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres said the world body was investigating Iran's possible transfer of ballistic missiles that may have been used in launches aimed at Saudi Arabia on July 22 and Nov. 4.

Haley said the recovered missile fragments came from a weapon that targeted the main airport in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia.

"Just imagine if this missile had been launched at Dulles Airport or JFK, or the airports in Paris, London, or Berlin," Haley said. "That’s what Iran is actively supporting."

Haley said the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran, the U.S. and five other world powers "has done nothing to moderate the regime’s conduct in other areas ... It's hard to find a conflict or a terrorist group in the Middle East that does not have Iran’s fingerprints all over it."

Haley vowed that the U.S. would rally other nations to push back on Iran's behavior.

"The fight against Iranian aggression is the world’s fight," said Haley, who later added, "We must speak with one voice in exposing the regime for what it is: a threat to the peace and security of the entire world."

“For months, we've seen Iran disregard international laws and norms by continuing its provocative ballistic missile testing. Now, with the evidence unveiled today by Ambassador Haley, Iran has been caught red-handed flagrantly violating the prohibition on transferring missile technology to third parties—namely the Houthis in Yemen,” former Sen. Joe Lieberman, now the chairman of the advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran, responded.






Share/Bookmark