Visit Counter

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Ready For This?


ACLU Whines That Trump Saying 'America' Too Many Times During State of the Union Was 'Exclusionary'

Can't believe I just read this!!!

Wait a minute...isn't the first word in ACLU American?






After last night’s State of the Union address, the American Civil Liberties Union was extremely upset at the fact that President Trump used the word “America” more than 80 times throughout the course of his speech. 

Faiz Shakir, the organization’s National Political Director, issued a statement expressing shock and dismay that Trump openly talked about putting American citizens first in matters of public policy.

Stop here:


Who is Faiz Shakir???
Maybe a little background information on this Muslim might prove enlightening.



This is him in his younger years when he was PRESIDENT OF THE ISLAMIC "PEACE" CENTRE... before he joined the ACLU.





 I swear to God if the ACLU could resurrect Bin Laden they would find a place  for him in their fine organization.

Check out the opening line/lie from Wikipedia:


The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization[6][7] whose stated mission is "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States."


No one in their right mind could possibly believe that! How many people at the ACLU vote Republican? 
Slim and none. 

--------------------------------------


“Tonight, President Trump said the word ‘America’ more than 80 times in his speech. Yet, after a divisive first year, we hear and feel how exclusionary that ‘America’ is, with policies that have harmed so many vulnerable American communities. The ACLU stands ready to protect these communities, both in the courts and at the polls.

“In particular, the immigration plan put forth by Trump would hold Dreamers hostage to his demands for a harmful border wall and an even larger mass deportation force. We are at this crossroads because of the president’s deeply destructive ideas fomented by his nativist allies and divisive rhetoric. We will continue to stand up for these young immigrants and ensure they continue to contribute to our country. We cannot let America’s Dreamers be deported.”

The ACLU has been at the forefront of efforts to support illegal immigrants and pro-illegal alien activists in their fight against law enforcement and the rule of law over the past several years. Thus, it’s no surprise that they would be so emotionally triggered by a president refusing to grant unconditional amnesty to Obama’s DACA recipients, whom the ACLU has strenuously campaigned for recently. Last August, the ACLU set the tone for demands for a “clean” DACA bill by issuing a statement decrying the Trump administration for considering an immigration reform bill that would ask for restrictions on legal immigration, more funds for border security, and an E-verify system in return for shielding DACA recipients from deportation:

It is abhorrent for the Trump administration to treat the lives and futures of Dreamers, including 800,000 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients, as bargaining chips to further its racist agenda. For the past five years, Americans have benefited from the protections and opportunities, afforded by the DACA program, that make it possible for Dreamers to fully contribute to our communities. President Trump, who is currently considering ending DACA following an ultimatum issued by ten states, should commit to keeping the program on the books until Congress passes a clean legislative solution to address Dreamers’ status.

Bloggers for the ACLU’s official website have also repeatedly published Orwellian pieces of pro-illegal agitprop.

For example, ACLU Legislative Assistant Katie Egan wrote a blog post yesterday complaining about ICE agents arresting and deporting illegal aliens who openly engage in pro-amnesty protests while flouting their immigration status. Egan characterized these law enforcement actions as a dangerous attack on freedom of speech. She also labeled the arrests of violent anarcho-communist rioters at last year’s inauguration as another example of Trump’s supposed contempt for free speech and dissent, raising further questions about the ACLU’s respect for the actual civil rights of Americans not to have their cars set on fire, storefronts smashed, or heads bashed in with bricks and baseball bats.

Of course, as long as mainstream Democratic politicians continue to openly support undermining America’s sovereign right to borders and laud anarchist terrorism (which Rep. Keith Ellison did last year), groups like the ACLU will likely continue to flourish in the country whose name they cannot even stand to hear their own president say.





Share/Bookmark

China is building a laser 10 trillion times more intense than the Sun that could tear space apart






 ...And they are only going to use this laser to give scientists a new way to accelerate particles for advanced physics research?

 BTW...has anybody truly examined what would happen when space is torn apart?



---------------------------------------------






China is building a mega-laser that's so powerful it could literally tear space apart.

Physicists in Shanghai are constructing what they call a 'Station of Extreme Light', which could be operational as soon as 2023.

The end goal is to create a laser so powerful it can produce 100-petawatt laser pulses –that's 100 million billion watts.

For context, that's 10,000 times the power of all the world's electrical grids combined.

These ludicrously powerful pulses could be targeted at incredible precise spots measuring just three micrometers across – that's 2000 times less than the thickness of a standard pencil.

This means the researchers could achieve a laser intensity 10 trillion trillion times greater than the sunlight striking earth.

According to the Science journal, this laser would be so powerful it "could rip apart empty space".

The idea is to achieve a phenomenon known as "breaking the vacuum", whereby electrons are torn away from positrons (their antimatter counterparts) in the empty vacuum of space.

Right now, it's possible to convert matter into huge amounts of heat and light, as proved by nuclear weapons. But reversing the process is more difficult – although Chinese physicist Ruxin Li believes his laser could manage it.

"That would be very exciting. It would mean you could generate something from nothing," he explained.

The team has already created a less powerful version called the Shanghai Superintense Ultrafast Laser, which is capable of a 5.3-petawatt pulse.

If the new laser eventually becomes operational, it could give scientists a new way to accelerate particles for advanced physics research.





Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Democrat campaign poster... gearing up for the midterms


Share/Bookmark

Three out of four Americans APPROVE of Trump's State of the Union address, poll shows





This from the Daily Mail no less... not exactly a bastion of Trump lovers!




If liberals think they're going places with this motto:

***"We love illegals pouring into our country"***

They got another thought coming. This is not a motto but the death nail for Democrats in the upcoming elections.

Keep up the great work!!!


---------------------------------------

Three in four Americans said they approved of Tuesday night's State of the Union Address, according to a new poll. 

CBS News says that 75 percent of Americans approved of the speech - which was the first of the Trump presidency. Just a quarter of the people who tuned in and took the poll had a disapproving view.

And when broken down - the numbers look even more positive and optimistic for the president.



Three in four Americans said they approved of Tuesday night's State of the Union Address, according to a new poll



Additionally, two-thirds of poll-takers said the speech made them feel proud. However, only about one-third said the speech made them feel more safe than they felt before hearing it




CBS News says that 75 percent of Americans approved of the speech - which was the first of the Trump presidency. Just a quarter of the people who tuned in and took the poll had a disapproving view

Eight in 10 Americans who watched and took the poll said they felt the president was trying to unite the country with his message, according to CBS. 

Additionally, two-thirds of poll-takers said the speech made them feel proud. However, only about one-third said the speech made them feel more safe than they felt before hearing it.

Less than a quarter of the people who tuned in reported that the address made them feel scared or angry. 

But those numbers could be somewhat skewed to the rest of the population because most of the people who watched the speech identified as Republicans.

In the latest poll released earlier this month by CBS - 24 percent of Americans said they identify as Republicans. But tonight that number was up to 42 percent. 

In comparison, only 25 percent of the people who watched said they were Democrats, and 33 percent identified as Independents. 

And of the Democrats who watched, most did not like what they heard.


When broken down - the numbers look even more positive and optimistic for President Trump



Additionally, two-thirds of poll-takers said the speech made them feel proud. However, only about one-third said the speech made them feel more safe than they felt before hearing it



However, those numbers could be somewhat skewed to the rest of the population, as most of the people who watched the speech identified as republicans



Over half of the Democrats tuning in said the speech made them angry - which vastly differs to the 90 percent of Republicans who said it left them feeling proud. 

Independents who voted generally approved of Trump's message. Just under half of those said they would consider themselves Trump supporters.

Most poll takers also said the policies discussed tonight would help them personally - though the Democrats who voted said the opposite. 

In particular - the people who voted reacted most positively to President Trump's points about the nation's infrastructure, immigration, and national security. 

After hearing his speech - 54 percent of those who tuned in give him the majority of the credit for the country's economic prosperity. That number is up from 51 percent of people polled by CBS before they watched the State of the Union.



Most poll takers also said the policies discussed tonight would help them personally - though the Democrats who voted said the opposite. In particular - the people who voted reacted most positively to President Trump's points about the nation's infrastructure, immigration, and national security



And after hearing his speech - 54 percent of those who tuned in give him the majority of the credit for the country's economic prosperity. That number is up from 51 percent of people polled by CBS before they watched the State of the Union




Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Democrats show how they will protest Trump's SOTU



Guess the bitches are coming home to roost. Take it from the horse's mouth.



Video 395

The activist bitches will be out in full force tonight decked out in black!

 "Tammy Wynette" knows a thing or two about sexual predators.

Wait a minute I think I hear a song coming on. 

Stand by your man...

And:


Remember when Barry was president and all the Republicans wore red outfits in protest at the SOTU. Neither do I.

When the lib dogs pull this stunt off tonight conservatives will reap the reward. 


------------------------------------



 As I read the article this morning, their antics, while sipping a hot cup coffee hearing the distinct sound of the garbage truck going through its mechanical steps picking up the trash  of coffee  and reminded me, thinking what did I forget to throw out

Hours before the State of the Union address, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi gathered together her fellow Democratic women – and some men too – for a photo-op, as they showed off their black outfits for tonight. 

The lawmakers were taking a page from the women of Hollywood, who sported black gowns to the Golden Globes to pay homage to the 'Me Too' and 'Time's Up' movements. 

The Democrats followed the lead of Oprah Winfrey too, who had brought up the rape and subsequent activism of the late Recy Taylor. 

For the State of the Union, the lawmakers sported pink 'RECY' pins too. 

Pelosi, according to Politico, thought the wardrobe revolt was enough of a message, as she also instructed her members not to walk out of the speech or make a commotion. 

'Let the attention be on his slobbering self,' Pelosi said of President Trump, who delivers his first official State of the Union tonight. 'If you walk out, don't come in.'


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic women decided to wear black to President Trump's first State of the Union in honor of the 'Me Too' movement 



'Let the attention be on his slobbering self,' Nancy Pelosi reportedly told her colleagues, urging them not to cause a commotion in the chamber during President Trump's first State of the Union 



Rep. Lisa Blunt, a Democrat from Delaware, straightens her 'RECY' pin in advance of Tuesday night's State of the Union. The pins pay homage to the late Recy Taylor, a rape victim turned activist that talk show queen Oprah Winfrey paid homage to in her Golden Globes speech 



Rep. Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat from Connecticut, adjusts her 'Time Up' pin as she joins other House members for a photo-op showing many women lawmakers, and some men too, dressed in black for Tuesday night's State of the Union speech 


Democratic lawmakers, and some men too show off their ensembles for tonight's State of the Union speech as they show their support for the 'Me Too' movement. President Trump was previously accused of sexual assault 


Democratic lawmakers, dressed in all black to show support for the 'Me Too' and 'Time's Up' movements throw up a fist bump during a photo-op Tuesday before President Trump's State of the Union address



House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi stands up among her peers as Democratic women show off their black attire, which they'll be wearing at tonight's State of the Union address 



Rep. Jan Schakowsky (left), an Illinois Democrat who is among the lawmakers boycotting tonight's speech, sat for the photo with the other women in black. She was seated beside Rep. Susan Davis (right), a Democrat from California 

A handful of Democratic members opted to do the latter with Rep. Frederica Wilson kicking off State of the Union eve yesterday by explaining why she wouldn't attend the affair. 

'I'm not going because to do would be to honor the president, and I don't think he deserves to be honored at this time,' the Florida Democrat said on CNN. 'After being so hateful toward black people and then black countries, Haiti and the whole continent of Africa, it hurts, it hurts, and he has brought the White House to the lowest, and I don't think he needs to be honored with my presence,' she went on. 

Wilson is not alone in making tomorrow night's State of the Union speech, Trump's first, into a political point. 

Earlier this months, on the heels of reports that said Trump referred to Haiti, El Salvador and the whole of Africa as 's***hole' countries, during a closed-door immigration meeting, Rep. John Lewis, a civil rights pioneer, announced that he would not go. 

'In good conscience, I can not and will not sit there and listen at him as he gives the State of the Union Address,' Lewis said then. 

That's when Wilson originally announced she would sit out, as did Democratic Reps. Maxine Waters, of California, and Pramila Jayapal, of Washington state. 

On Friday, they were joined by Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat, who said in a statement she was boycotting the address 'because I refuse to normalize President Donald Trump and his loathsome language and actions.' 

'With every day that passes, a new tweet, breaking news story, or leaked quote sheds new light on President Trump’s twisted and prejudiced mind,' she added. 

The congresswoman took particular offense to his 's***hole countries' comment, his reaction to the racial violence in Charlottesville, Virginia last summer, in which he said there were good people on 'both sides' of a clash between neo-Nazis, KKK members and white supremacists and counter-protesters, and for the roll-out of his 'Muslim ban' last year, which Schakowsky pointed out happened on Holocaust Remembrance Day. 

On Sunday, Rep. Gregory Meeks, a Democrat from New York, told MSNBC he would not be there. '

'I cannot give this man, who does not respect me, the respect to be in that audience,' Meeks said. 'I will not be there.' 

THE DEMOCRATS BOYCOTTING TRUMP'S 2018 STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS



Rep. Danny Davis - 7th district, Illinois 

Rep. Earl Blumenauer - 3rd district, Oregon

Rep. Frederica Wilson - 24th district, Florida

Rep. Rep. Jan Schakowsky - 9th district, Illinois 

Rep. John Lewis - 5th district, Georgia

Rep. Maxine Waters - 43rd district, California (Working the night shift at Motel 6) 

Rep. Gregory Meeks - 5th district, New York 

Rep. Pramila Jayapal - 7th district, Washington 

Rep. Bobby Rush - 1st district, Illinois 

Rep. Barbara Lee - 13th district, California 

Rep. Juan Vargas - 51st district, California 

Rep. Albio Sires - 8th district, New Jersey 

Meeks was joined by two other black House members, both from Illinois, on Monday as Reps Danny Davis and Bobby Rush, announced they would not attend. 

Rush called Trump's first year in office 'the most chaotic, divisive, and incompetent' and said he would not 'watch as Trump pretends that he's off to a successful start.' 

'He's not,' Rush said in a statement put out by his office. 

Late Monday, Rep. Juan Vargas, a Democrat from California, indicated that he would not attend. 

'President Trump continues to disrespect women, insult people of color, and attack our immigrant communities. I will not be attending the State of the Union—I stand in solidarity with all the people he has and continues to disrespect,' the congressman tweeted. 

While a majority of Democratic members boycotting were minorities, the first lawmaker to announce he would be playing hooky was a white guy, Rep. Earl Blumenauer from Oregon. 

Blumenauer later said he would be sending in his stead, a 'dreamer' to the speech, as Congress continues to debate what happens next with DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an Obama-era order that allowed undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children to gain legal status. 

Trump has since announced he was scrapping the program and tossed the problem to Congress. 

Other Democrats, too, are using their guests as mini-protests. 

Rep. Joe Kennedy, (still awaiting his first Kennedy DWI) the Massachusetts Democrat whose great-uncle was the late President John F. Kennedy, is bringing a transgender soldier – Staff Sgt. Patricia King – to the State of the Union, to protest the president's proposed transgender troops ban. 

The congressman's guest was first reported in the Boston Globe. 

Kennedy will also be giving the Democrats' official rebuttal after Trump leaves the dais. 


Later he will be giving a driving lesson on how to get on and off of Chappaquiddick Island without running off the bridge.
(He hopes) 

Rep. Ruben J. Kihuen, a Nevada Democrat, is bringing well-known 'Dreamer' Astrid Silva as his guest.







Share/Bookmark