Visit Counter

Monday, April 23, 2018

I hate Piers Morgan...but this time he's right


How the hell was a paranoid, delusional, police-hating, gun-crazed, White House storming, Taylor Swift obsessed whackjob able to get his hands on an AR-15 to commit mass murder in a Waffle House?


Every time I think I've seen it all when it comes to American gun violence, something happens to snap my eyelids back with stunned bemusement.

In the early hours of yesterday morning, a half-naked 29-year-old man named Travis Reinking opened fire with an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle on customers in and outside Antioch Waffle House in Nashville, Tennessee.

He killed four people and wounded another four before unarmed heroic bystander James Shaw (note to the NRA: a good guy without a gun) confronted him and wrestled the gun away.


Travis Reinking, 29, shot dead four people and injured seven others at the Waffle House in Antioch early Sunday morning before an unarmed hero wrestled the gun away




None of that, though, is the incomprehensible part of this horrific incident.

Let's be horribly frank: a crazed young man committing a mass shooting in the US with an AR-15 is almost a weekly occurrence these days.

No, what is utterly staggering is how he came to be in possession of his gun to commit his heinous crime.

For Reinking is a complete lunatic.

And a self-evidently dangerous lunatic.

I don't say this lightly, or to infringe on his human rights not to be called a lunatic in case it hurts his feeling.

I say it because it's an incontrovertible fact.

In May, 2016, an ambulance was called to a CVS parking lot after Reinking threatened to kill himself. His family told deputies at Tazewell County Sheriff's Department in Illinois he was having paranoid delusions that music superstar Taylor Swift was stalking him and hacking his phone and Netflix account. He also believed his parents and police were involved.

Reinking himself told police Swift had wanted to meet him at a Dairy Queen and when he went there, she screamed at him across the street then ran away.

He said he chased her 'to stop her harassing me', then followed Swift up the side of the building and onto its roof but when he got there, she had gone.

Reinking was taken to a local hospital for an evaluation 'against his will', according to the report.



In May 2016, an ambulance was called to a CVS parking lot after Reinking threatened to kill himself. His family told deputies he was having paranoid delusions that Taylor Swift was stalking him. He was taken to a local hospital for an evaluation 'against his will'



His family told police he had suffered similar delusions since August 2014. 'Travis is hostile towards police,' they said, 'and does not recognize police authority.'

In June 2017, Reinking jumped into a nearby community swimming pool wearing a pink woman's coat over his underwear and began threatening lifeguards, urging them to fight him and then exposing his genitals.

The same day, an employee at a construction site owned by the Reinking family told police he had a yelling match with Reinking, who had shown up in the pink coat with an AR-15 in his hand and shouted 'Is this what you f***ing want?' before putting the gun back in his car and speeding off. No charges were filed, but the Sheriff's Department advised members of Reinking's family to take away his guns and lock them up until he got some help.

A month later, on July 7, 2017, Reinking pitched up at the White House demanding to meet President Trump. He crossed a restricted area and approached a Secret Service agent, saying he had to get inside and instructing the agent to 'do what you need to do, arrest me if you have to.' He was duly arrested, charged and later ordered by the D.C. Superior Court to do 32 hours of community service. Oh, and he was told to stay away from the White House.

On August 11, 2017, Reinking spoke with a Tazewell sheriff's deputy and claimed that dozens of people were tapping into his computer and phone and people were lurking outside his home 'barking like dogs'.

Following the White House incident, the FBI requested that police in Illinois revoke Reinking's state 'Firearm Owners Identification' card and seize his four weapons.

These were a Kimber 9mm handgun, a CZ-USA .22 rifle, a Remington 710, and the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle he used at the Waffle House.

Reinking gave them up to the Tazewell County Sheriff's Department on August 24, 2017. But deputies returned the guns to his father Jeffrey after he promised to 'keep the weapons secure and away from Travis.'

Today, Nashville police spokesman Don Aaron said Jeffrey Reinking had admitted giving the guns back to his son.


After a string of crazy incidents, including Reinking showing up at the White House demanding to meet Trump, his guns were confiscated. But deputies returned the guns, including this AR-15 used at the Waffle House, to his father Jeffrey after he promised to 'keep the weapons secure and away from Travis.' But Jeffrey gave the guns back to his delusional son


This despite him telling police he often locked up his son's rifles when 'Travis was having problems.'

Nobody yet seems to know why Mr. Reinking would, therefore, give them back to his son, knowing his state of mind.

I'd like to know why the hell he did that. Urgently.

But more importantly, I'd like to know why the Tazewell County Sheriff's Department thought it was a good idea to return Travis Reinking's guns in the first place?

'There's certainly evidence that there's some sort of mental health issues involved,' said Tazewell sheriff Robert Houston, in what you might conclude is the understatement of the century.

Yet he insisted officers did not believe they had any legal authority to withhold the weapons.

Sorry?

All due respect Sheriff - what the **** are you talking about?

How many more red flags was this loon supposed to wave at you?

Travis Reinking had revealed himself over a period of several years to be a paranoid, delusional, threatening, police-hating, gun-toting, potentially very dangerous whackjob.

The FBI told you to seize his guns after he tried to storm the White House to get to President Trump.

But instead, you gave them all back to his dad, who gave them back to his mad, dangerous son despite knowing he is delusional and suicidal.


The FBI told authorities to seize his guns but police gave them all back to his dad, who gave them back to his mad, dangerous son despite knowing he is delusional and suicidal. Travis Reinking then used one of those guns to commit mass murder on a random selection of innocent people eating at this Waffle House


Travis Reinking then used one of those guns to commit mass murder on a random selection of innocent people eating at a Waffle House.

I'm sure this all makes perfect sense to NRA supporters.

(I support the NRA… but not giving guns to lunatics)

After all, Jeffrey Reinking had his own firearms certificate, so he was a 'responsible law-abiding gun owner' – right?

That's why he was allowed to take back his son's guns.

No. He was woeful, criminally irresponsible.

But so were the police, who should have done what the FBI told them to do and seized the guns.

Giving them back was as insane as what they KNEW to be the disturbed dangerous state of Travis Reinking's mind. 








Share/Bookmark

Sunday, April 22, 2018

Barbara Bush's Funeral





Check out Michelle’s reaction to Barry talking to Melania.

Video 404


The Clinton’s almost look innocent. Wonder what Bill’s really thinking?




Share/Bookmark

Friday, April 20, 2018

Democratic Party files suit alleging conspiracy by Trump campaign, Russia, WikiLeaks to sway 2016 election




A more appropriate headline for this stunt...

DESPERATION



Harken back. Wasn't it Clinton who said...



It's been 15 months since Trump took the oath of office. Tell me again...who's not accepting the election results???




----------------------------------------------



The Democratic Party on Friday filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against Trump campaign officials, the Russian government, and WikiLeaks alleging a widespread conspiracy to tilt the 2016 election in Donald Trump's favor. 

Calling it an “all-out assault on our democracy,” the Democratic National Committee filed the civil suit in federal district court in Manhattan. The suit amounts to another legal broadside related to the 2016 race, on top of the special counsel's ongoing Russia probe and the FBI raid on Trump's personal attorney last week. 

"The conspiracy constituted an act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency," the suit states. 

It claims that Trump campaign officials worked in tandem with the Russian government and its military spy agency to bring down Hillary Clinton by hacking into the computer networks of the DNC and spreading stolen material.


“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign,” said DNC Chairman Tom Perez in a statement, calling the alleged collusion “an act of unprecedented treachery.”





The suit names several Trump campaign aides who met with Russian nationals during the campaign, including son-in-law Jared Kushner, campaign chair Paul Manafort and campaign deputy Rick Gates. 

“In the Trump campaign, Russia found a willing and active partner,” the suit claims. “In 2016, individuals tied to the Kremlin notified the Trump campaign that Russia intended to interfere with our democracy. Through multiple meetings, emails, and other communications, these Russian agents made clear that their government supported Trump and was prepared to use stolen emails and other information to damage his opponent and the Democratic Party.”

Gates and Manafort have both been charged in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The suit also claims Wikileaks founder Julian Assange “shared the defendants’ common goal of damaging the Democratic Party in advance of the election.” The suit states Russia, using WikiLeaks, would disseminate information stolen from the DNC “at times when it would best suit the Trump campaign.”

Trump has strongly – and repeatedly – denied colluding with the Russians. 

Most recently, he cited the newly released memos from former FBI boss James Comey to assert his innocence and decry the Russia probe itself.




I think it will. Trump's been under investigation like 5 minutes after he took the oath of office. The Dems want to drag this out well into his second term. The truth of the matter is... Clinton and the 'investigators' are the culprits who should be behind bars! Think the American people are beginning to tire of this charade.


While the FBI recently raided Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen’s home, office and hotel room to seize a collection of documents, a source said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein assured that Trump was not a target of that probe. 

Trump’s legal team, meanwhile, is expanding with the addition of former federal prosecutor and New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is vowing to seek a swift resolution to the special counsel probe. 







Share/Bookmark

Justice Department Watchdog Refers McCabe Finding to Prosecutors









Remember this:

“Not in my worst nightmares did I ever dream my FBI career would end this way.”




Comey, McCabe, Lynch…We had to die on the cross to save Hillary. This will be their self-righteous defense on the GoFundMe website. Oh, I forgot McCabe is already on it.

----------------------------------


Nearly a dozen GOP congressmen send a criminal referral to the Justice Department and FBI seeking an investigation of former FBI Director James Comey, his deputy Andrew McCabe, ex-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Hillary Clinton in connection with 2016 campaign scandals. #Tucker

The Justice Department’s internal watchdog has sent a criminal referral for fired FBI official Andrew McCabe to the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington.

The move follows a recent DOJ inspector general report that found McCabe leaked a self-serving story to the press and later lied about it to then-Director James Comey and federal investigators, prompting Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire him on March 16.

A source confirmed to Fox News that the referral was sent.

The Washington Post reported earlier that the IG referred the finding that McCabe misled investigators "some time ago," asking the top federal prosecutor for D.C. to examine whether he should be charged.



Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz found that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe lacked "candor" (aka lied) in conversations with federal investigators. (AP)


Representatives with the Justice Department, inspector general’s office and U.S. attorney’s office all declined to comment.

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., backed the move in a tweet Thursday afternoon.

"The criminal referral from the IG is the right decision. It's about time we have some accountability for this type of conduct at the Justice Department," he said.


Andrew McCabe lied to his FBI superiors not once. Not twice. Not three times. He lied four times--multiple times under oath.

The criminal referral from the IG is the right decision. It's about time we have some accountability for this type of conduct at the Justice Department.— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) 2:17 PM - Apr 19, 2018


In an interview with CNN Thursday, Comey said that he had no knowledge of the referral, but confirmed that he could be a witness against McCabe if he is prosecuted.

"Given that the IG’s report reflects interactions that Andy McCabe had with me and other FBI senior executives, I could well be a witness," said Comey.

The former FBI Director added that he liked McCabe "very much as a person, but sometimes even good people do things they shouldn’t do ... I think it is accountability mechanisms working and they should work because it’s not acceptable in the FBI or the Justice Department for people to lack candor. It’s something we take really seriously."

In a statement, McCabe's legal team said they were advised of the referral "within the past few weeks."

"Although we believe the referral is unjustified, the standard for an IG referral is very low. We have already met with staff members from the U.S. Attorney’s Office. We are confident that, unless there is inappropriate pressure from high levels of the Administration, the US Attorney’s Office will conclude that it should decline to prosecute," they said.

While Comey may not have intentionally launched the investigation gunning for McCabe, it was spurred by a desire to find who leaked to The Wall Street Journal in October 2016 about an FBI probe of the Clinton Foundation. The story said a senior Justice Department official expressed displeasure to McCabe that FBI agents were still looking into the Clinton Foundation, and McCabe had defended agents' authority to pursue the issue.

That leak confirmed the existence of the probe into the Clinton Foundation, which Comey, who led the bureau at the time, refused to do.


Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz sent a criminal referral for Andrew McCabe to the U.S. Attorneys Office in Washington D.C. (AP)


Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report said McCabe authorized the leak and then misled investigators about it, leaking in a way that did not fall under the “public interest” exception.

Horowitz found that McCabe lacked “candor” when questioned by FBI agents on multiple occasions and that he told agents he did not authorize the disclosure and did not know who was responsible. 

But McCabe’s legal counsel, Michael Bromwich, has blasted the inspector general report and has criticized Comey. The report said Comey and McCabe gave conflicting accounts about a conversation they had on the leak. 

“The OIG should credit Mr. McCabe’s account over Director Comey’s,” Bromwich wrote to Horowitz in a letter, complaining that the report “paints Director Comey as a white knight carefully guarding FBI information, while overlooking that Mr. McCabe’s account is more credible…” 

He issued a similar statement Wednesday in response to Comey's interview comments:

"In his comments this week about the McCabe matter, former FBI Director James Comey has relied on the accuracy and the soundness of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) conclusions in their report on Mr. McCabe. In fact, the report fails to adequately address the evidence (including sworn testimony) and documents that prove that Mr. McCabe advised Director Comey repeatedly that he was working with the Wall Street Journal on the stories in question prior to publication. Neither Mr. Comey nor the OIG is infallible, and in this case neither of them has it right." 

On Wednesday, nearly a dozen Republican members of Congress sent their own criminal referral to the Justice Department and FBI seeking an investigation of McCabe, along with Comey, ex-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and others. 



Our letter from yesterday referred McCabe to DOJ for potential false statements and I’m glad to see the OIG follow suit. Was wondering what was taking so long. Hopefully this is a step towards equal application of the law by DOJ. https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/987032703026585600 …— Ron DeSantis (@RepDeSantis) 2:22 PM - Apr 19, 2018



The IG referral, however, could represent a more serious problem for McCabe.







Share/Bookmark

‘What a Waste’ NRA Lashes Out at Dick's Sporting Goods for Destroying Unsold Firearms



Dick's CEO Edward W. Stack 

"Following all of the rules and laws, we sold a shotgun to the Parkland shooter in November of 2017. It was not the gun, nor type of gun, he used in the shooting," he continued. "But it could have been."

So if it was would they destroy all the shotguns? If they hate the assault rifles that much why not donate them to a police department somewhere. What if Cruz bought a knife from Dick's to use on his rampage? Where does it stop? Why is it everything and everybody is to blame, particularly the NRA, but the shooter who actually perpetrated the crime is treated like another victim in the Parkland shooting? 

When I see a gun with two legs walk into a school then it's time to abolish the second amendment.

--------------------------------



On Tuesday, the National Rifle Association criticized Dick's Sporting Goods over its decision to destroy unsold firearms.

"@DICKS decision isn't focusing on the actual problem, what it is doing is punishing law-abiding citizens," the NRA tweeted. "What a waste, and what a strange business model."



.@DICKS decision isn't focusing on the actual problem, what it is doing is punishing law-abiding citizens. What a waste, and what a strange business model. #DefendTheSecond #2A #NRA http://ms.spr.ly/6017rFV5U 

— NRA (@NRA) 12:36 PM - Apr 17, 2018

Dick's Sporting Goods is in the process of "destroying" firearms and accessories that the company pulled from shelves after a February 28 policy change, according to a report last week from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

At the end of February, the company's chairman and CEO Edward W. Stack announced that Dick's Sporting Goods would no longer sell "assault-style rifles, also referred to as modern sporting rifles." Stack also noted that following the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, the company's main retail store (Dick's) no longer carried the aforementioned rifles; now its 35 specialty Field & Stream stores will follow suit.

"We are destroying the firearms in accordance with federal guidelines and regulations," a spokesperson for Dick's, which is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pa., told the Post-Gazette last week. The parts will be recycled by a salvage company.

Companies can sometimes return unsold merchandise to the manufacturer for a partial refund, HuffPost notes. It's not clear if Dick's had that option.

Following the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., and the renewed push for gun control measures, Stack wrote a letter outlining its new firearm and accessory policies.

"We support and respect the Second Amendment, and we recognize and appreciate that the vast majority of gun owners in this country are responsible, law-abiding citizens," Stack wrote. "But we have to help solve the problem that's in front of us. Gun violence is an epidemic that's taking the lives of too many people, including the brightest hope for the future of America – our kids."

"Following all of the rules and laws, we sold a shotgun to the Parkland shooter in November of 2017. It was not the gun, nor type of gun, he used in the shooting," he continued. "But it could have been."

In addition to stopping sales of assault-style rifles at its Field & Stream specialty stores, Dick's stated they would no longer carry high-capacity magazines or sell firearms to those younger than 21, and they renewed their policy on not carrying bump stocks. The company also called on lawmakers to pass "common sense gun reform," including the banning of assault rifles, high-capacity magazines, and bump stocks, enact universal background checks, and more.

Walmart also made firearm policy changes following the Parkland shooting; the retailer raised the minimum age for purchasing ammunition and firearms. In 2015, Walmart stopped carrying assault-style rifles.

These policy changes caused a social media backlash earlier this year and threats to boycott.






Share/Bookmark