Nancy Pelosi: Voting for Democrats Gives ‘Leverage’ to Illegal Aliens

Gotta love the use of the word 'Leverage'. I got a visual of Democrats armed with crowbars going to town on the border wall.

But wait there's more.
In an attempt to pull the wool over our eyes how many name changes have illegals had over the years? Well, they just got another new makeover...now they're "newcomers".

So, folks, a vote for a Democrat is a vote to shield an illegal alien, or at least give them leverage on the Hill, according to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). 

At a press conference in El Paso, Texas, Pelosi said she didn’t want to get political, but got political anyway, saying that the more Democrats there are in Congress, the more leverage illegal aliens get.

In her remarks, Pelosi opted against distinguishing between lawful and unlawful immigrants describing amnesty for illegal aliens as “inevitable for America.”

Video 417

Partial transcript below:

PELOSI: I don’t want to be political here. I would say that to the extent that people hear the stories, it’s interesting because there was a recent survey that said if you ask people about their attitudes toward immigration and newcomers to the country, they might have one view. They haven’t thought about it a whole lot except they’re hearing the president, and this and that. But if they know one family, if they know one immigrant family, if they go to school with any immigrant children, or if their children go to school with any immigrant children, if they go to church with immigrants, they have a completely positive view. It changes everything. That’s why I keep talking about public sentiment. And so because this is the right thing to do, I have confidence that we will get where we need to go. But everything is about time, and we want to shorten the distance as your question indicated between what we think is inevitable for America. They think it is inconceivable, but we believe that we can get this done. We are not going to be able to get it done under the Republican leadership in Congress. We believe that we will have leverage when we win in November. And why is that important? Because it gives leverage to every family, to every mom who courageously brought her child across the desert to escape — to escape death, rape, gang violence, and the rest. Because it gives hope, because of the leverage it gives to families who may have followed dad home for a family funeral and now can’t come back into the country. As all of those injustices have to be corrected, there’s a path and that path is greatly brightened by the knowledge that is in this community who sees firsthand simple solutions which make a big difference in people’s lives. And so we’re getting ready for this and it is only to come back to a place that honors our values, recognizes the importance of immigration to the success of America.

She's such a fucking moron and it appears she hired Ted 

Kaczynski to write this speech...aka"The Lunatic Manifesto"

When she took the Oath of Office she swore to "support and defend the Constitution." 

Does this sound like it?

In February, Pelosi delivered a speech that lasted more than eight hours on the U.S. House floor, demanding a vote for amnesty for illegal aliens brought to the country as minors, who have been helped by the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program since 2012. 

In her address, Pelosi described illegal aliens as “more American than Americans.”

(Stop...How in the fuck do they get elected and keep getting reelected with this insane thinking !?!) 

She goes on...

“Illegal immigrants are a blessing, they are doing what the Founding Fathers would wish, they are the best of the best, more American than Americans, reinvigorating, they are fabulous, beautiful, and patriotic, yes, very patriotic,” she said.

What she's doing is treasonous, to say the least!

So there you have it. The message they're sending is loud and clear in the upcoming midterms and 2020. 

Nancy Pelosi: Voting for Democrats Gives ‘Leverage’ to Illegal Aliens

I’m an immigrant — and Trump is right on immigration

When Guyanese-born NEIL GOUVEIA immigrated to New York at age 7, his mother made a devastating decision to leave one child behind to expedite the family exodus. Six years later, they became US citizens. Now 39, gay and newly conservative, Gouveia takes a tough, unpopular stance against those who cross the border illegally. He shared his story with The Post’s Susan Edelman. 

You’ve heard news about families being separated at the US southern border. Legal immigrants have to deal with separation as well. My mother made her own “Sophie’s Choice.”

In Guyana back in 1986, an immigration officer broke the terrible news. After a three-year wait, my mother, Bassodai Gouveia, arrived at the US embassy in Georgetown to pick up visas for our family of nine to go live in America.

“Mrs. Gouveia, we can’t give you the visas,” he told my mom. “You have a sick child. If you brought her to the United States, it would be a huge government expense. And you can’t abandon her.”

When immigrants apply to come to America, they have to go through a complete physical. My sister, Vera, 9, had cerebral palsy. She couldn’t walk or talk and was mostly bed-bound. But she smiled and laughed. When I got a spanking for misbehaving, I would hug Vera, who was 17 months older than me, for comfort. 

My mother walked away from the immigration officer, dejected, then suddenly turned around and went back: “Sir, I have an aunt who can take care of my child while we’re in America,” she told him, fibbing. (She actually had a friend who would look after Vera.)

It tore my mother apart, but she had to make a decision to leave Vera behind — or start the application process all over again. She had to sacrifice Vera to save the American dream for the rest of us — me and five kids from her previous marriage along with my father.

When we came to America, we lived in a basement apartment in the South Bronx. Mom and Dad had to hustle and get jobs. There was no time to relax. Dad, a customs official in Guyana, became a janitor. Mom, who had left school when her father died at age 9 to sell fruit, cleaned houses. 

One day, a woman whose house she was cleaning saw her crying and asked what was wrong. My mom explained that she had to leave her daughter in Guyana. It so happened that the woman was the principal of a special-needs school. “I’m going to help you,” she promised.

The principal and my mother pleaded with local politicians to petition on her behalf. About six months later, she had a letter granting permission for Vera to enter the US. My mom went back to South America and brought her to New York.

About a month later, Vera came down with pneumonia and died. We were heartbroken, but my mom still felt vindicated. One of her greatest satisfactions in life is knowing that she never gave up on her daughter.

I learned a lot about American culture and traditions from watching sit-coms: “Three’s Company,” “Diff’rent Strokes,” “All in the Family,” “The Jeffersons.” I went to some of the worst elementary and middle schools in the South Bronx but won a scholarship to Monsignor Scanlan High School and escaped a cycle of subpar education. It gave me the discipline I was not exposed to in the public school system. I earned a bachelor’s degree in communications from St. John’s University in Queens and a master’s degree in education from Baruch College.

Those experiences shaped my “conservative” views on immigration. It took five years after we arrived in the US before we could apply for citizenship. While I was exempt because of my age, 13, mom and dad had to prepare for a naturalization test on American history and government. Mom was the nervous one — she did not have a formal education and the thought of taking an exam terrified her. She and my dad studied for hours to answer the 100 questions that could seal their fate. 

On test day, an immigration officer asked 10 questions, and my parents had to answer at least six correctly. Dad passed easily, but mom barely made it. At the official ceremony, I stood with my parents, bursting with pride, as they took the citizenship oath and pledged allegiance to the US flag. At that moment, I, too, became an American citizen. If under age 18, the children of a naturalized parent are automatically granted the same status.

I remained defiant because my parents’ journey here was not easy, and I could not betray the country that has done so much for me.

Today, if someone hops the US border and gives birth to a child, that child gets the exact same benefit that took my parents eight years to achieve. They waited their turn, but babies born to illegal immigrants in the US automatically become citizens. That’s a huge flaw in our immigration system.

Stop here for a moment.

He's echoing what I've been saying for Y-E-A-R-S! She jumps the wall 17 hours later she has a kid... and that kid is an America citizen! How in the hell is that fair? The 14th Amendment was adopted in response to issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War which had held that Americans descended from African slaves could not be citizens of the United States. It was enacted in part to protect the slaves and their right to vote. It was never intended to include Mexicans coming here illegally to have anchor babies.

Change the 14th Amendment with 3 words:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States of legal parents, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

How does this harm anybody... but illegals?

-------------------

What President Trump is pitching is already practiced in Australia and Canada. They’re very selective about who they admit. I also think it’s legitimate to separate children, initially, to verify whom they really belong to. If these people don’t have documents to prove the children belong to them, border agents have to act in their best interest. Human and child trafficking is a huge problem.

Before the 2016 presidential campaign, I didn’t fully understand how the left and right operated. I was always fed the narrative that since I was a person of color — my mother of Indian descent, my father Portuguese — an immigrant and gay that I had to follow a script: Support the Democratic Party and liberal values; conservatives were the boogeyman.

After Trump won the election, my friends instantly wanted him to fail as a leader. I would explain that if he failed, we failed. This point of view was met with heavy backlash and a barrage of insults. Anyone who showed any type of support toward Trump was deemed the enemy.

People accused me of turning my back on minorities and their struggle. I remained defiant because my parents’ journey here was not easy, and I could not betray the country that has done so much for me.

But speaking my mind became isolating. People with whom I had shared many amazing years of friendship allowed politics to divide us. Dozens of my liberal friends stopped talking to me or un-friended me on social media. I tried to suppress my political views when meeting new people. I was passive and bit my tongue on many occasions. I wasn’t being true to myself. I felt like I was in the closet all over again.

Amid the backlash, however, I did meet people who looked past politics and not only accepted me but admired that I dared to be different in liberal-dominated NYC. One of those people is my partner, Dan. Although he does not agree with many of my views, he respects them.

I’m fortunate to be a US citizen because I’m able to live a quality life and enjoy the benefits this country has to offer. I find it disheartening when people gripe about being oppressed in America, especially other immigrants. I firmly believe that living in America is a privilege. This country is truly the land of opportunities.

Neil Gouveia, 39, lives in Washington Heights and works as a higher-education fund-raiser

I’m an immigrant — and Trump is right on immigration

The title alone tells you what party she represents

The Latest: First Muslim woman poised to join Congress

Former Michigan state lawmaker Rashida Tlaib has won the Democratic nomination to run unopposed for a House seat, setting her up to become the first Muslim woman elected to Congress.

No Republicans or third-party candidates ran in Tuesday's District 13 primary race, meaning Tlaib is set to win the seat in November's election. Why is that? Because no Republican has a snowball's chance in hell of winning. Just so you know District 13 includes portions of Detroit which has not had a Republican mayor since 1962. Which explains why Detroit is the worse city in America to live in.

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/detroit/detroit-is-worst-city-to-live-in-america-report-finds-flint-third-worst

And the voters love the status quo!!!

 She would take the spot held since 1965 by John Conyers, who stepped down in December citing health reasons amid charges of sexual harassment.

She's got some big shoes to fill. Conyers was the longest-serving House member and was in the habit of stripping naked in his office and groping women when they walked in.  

https://www.dailywire.com/news/24334/democrat-john-conyers-announces-retirement-after-joseph-curl

This is going to be hard to live up to... especially for a Muslim.

The title alone tells you what party she represents

Former Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen Under Investigation for Tax Fraud

Isn't it amazing? 

Every rock Mueller turns over he finds something. Nothing to

do with Trump Russian collusion...but yet he finds something. Where was this talent when it came to the Obama IRS investigation? Watch this dirty bastard dodge every damn question Jim Jordan asked him about the non-existent IRS investigation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=21&v=5x6Pj8W4mPc&ab_channel=WashingtonFreeBeacon

But when it comes to investigating Republicans he's Perry Mason and Columbo rolled into one.

-----------------------------

The legal pressures facing Michael Cohen are growing in a wide-ranging investigation of his personal business affairs and his work on behalf of his former client, President Trump.

In previously unreported developments, federal prosecutors in New York are examining whether Mr. Cohen committed tax fraud, people familiar with the investigation said.

Federal authorities are assessing whether Mr. Cohen’s income from his taxi-medallion business was underreported in federal tax returns, one of the people said. That income included hundreds of thousands of dollars received in cash and other payments over the last five years, the person said.

Prosecutors also are looking into whether any bank employees improperly allowed Mr. Cohen to obtain loans for which he didn’t provide adequate documentation, people familiar with the matter said. In particular, federal investigators are looking closely at Mr. Cohen’s relationship with Sterling National Bank—which provided financing for Mr. Cohen’s taxi-medallion business—including whether Mr. Cohen inflated the value of any of his assets as collateral for loans, according to people familiar with the matter.

Convictions for federal tax- and bank-fraud may carry potentially significant prison sentences, which could put additional pressure on Mr. Cohen to cooperate with prosecutors if he is charged with those crimes, according to former federal prosecutors.

As part of the inquiry into Mr. Cohen’s relationships with banks, federal authorities have been investigating whether Mr. Cohen made misrepresentations or false statements on loan applications, people familiar with the matter said.

Meantime, federal prosecutors subpoenaed Mr. Cohen’s former accountant, Jeffrey A. Getzel, who was responsible for preparing many of Mr. Cohen’s financial statements submitted to banks, people familiar with the matter said. Mr. Getzel also served as an accountant for Evgeny “Gene” Freidman, a taxi-medallion manager who worked with Mr. Cohen, according to public court records. Mr. Freidman is cooperating with federal prosecutors in the investigation, according to people familiar with the matter.

Mr. Cohen’s lawyer, Lanny Davis, declined to comment “out of respect for the ongoing investigation.” Mr. Cohen has previously denied any wrongdoing. 

A lawyer for Mr. Freidman, Patrick J. Egan, said, “In Mr. Freidman’s interest, I cannot make any public statement regarding an ongoing criminal investigation.”

A spokesman for the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment. A spokesman for Sterling declined to comment, as did a lawyer for Mr. Getzel.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office have been investigating Mr. Cohen for bank fraud, campaign-finance violations and other possible crimes related to his personal business interests and his efforts to conceal negative information about Mr. Trump, including claims by two women who have said they had sexual encounters with Mr. Trump, The Wall Street Journal has previously reported. 

Mr. Trump has denied having sex with either woman, former Playboy model Karen McDougal and Stephanie Clifford, a former adult-film star known as Stormy Daniels.

Mr. Cohen began to work with Mr. Trump more than a decade ago and once described himself as the president’s “fixer.” In addition to his work for Mr. Trump, Mr. Cohen pursued his own business interests, including ventures in real estate, personal loans and investments in taxi medallions.

As of April 2018, Mr. Cohen owned 22 medallions in Chicago, and either he or his wife, Laura, controlled 32 medallions in New York City, some of which were also owned at least partly by family members and others, according to public records.

As recently as 2014, taxi medallions were considered a rock-solid investment. The medallions, issued by a city agency and required for running a taxi, are bought and sold on a secondary market. Some licenses for taxi medallions in New York sold for an average $1.25 million per medallion in 2013 and 2014, according to bankruptcy filings.

But in recent years, their value has plummeted amid competition from ride-sharing services such as Uber and Lyft. In a filing for a federal bankruptcy case in June 2017, Mr. Freidman said the estimated value of each medallion had dropped to approximately $200,000 to $225,000.

Even as Mr. Cohen is being investigated for possibly underreporting his income to evade federal taxes, prosecutors are also looking at whether he overstated his income in loan applications and refinancing efforts, according to people familiar with the matter.

In April, less than two weeks after federal investigators raided his home, office and hotel, Mr. Cohen pledged his personal residence—through a $9 million mortgage on his apartment at Trump Park Avenue—to supplement the collateral against millions of dollars in loans from Sterling National Bank that he and his wife took out in 2014 against their taxi business.

Sterling, a midsize Rockland County, N.Y., bank with about $30 billion in assets as of March 2018, backed the companies through which Mr. Cohen owns the New York medallions, according to the 2018 mortgage documents.

It couldn’t be determined whether investigators have identified a person within the bank, or connected to the bank, who may have helped get Mr. Cohen’s loans approved.

Mr. Freidman, known as the “Taxi King,” began in around 2012 and 2013 to manage Mr. Cohen’s 32 medallions in New York, paying Mr. Cohen a fixed monthly rate and keeping the profit—or suffering any loss—from each medallion, according to a person familiar with their business relationship.

The person said Mr. Freidman would sometimes pay Mr. Cohen a portion of that monthly rate—at times tens of thousands of dollars—in cash. Mr. Freidman also made other payments to Mr. Cohen in connection with the business, the person said.

Mr. Freidman pleaded guilty earlier this year to a count of criminal tax fraud stemming from his taxi businesses.

Former Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen Under Investigation for Tax Fraud

One Fired...One Hired

For the same thing!

The one on the right is the new turd at the NYT's

With a resumé like this, she fits right in at the NYT's.

She hates cops too!

A search for “cops” and “police” on Jeong’s Twitter reveals an extensive history of anti-cop sentiment and a lack of sympathy for police who are injured on the job.

In one tweet from 2014 she wrote, “let me know when a cop gets killed by a rock or molotov cocktail or a stray shard of glass from a precious precious window.”

“Cops are assholes,” she said in 2015.

“If we’re talking big sweeping bans on shit that kills people, why don’t we ever ever ever ever talk about banning the police?” a tweet from 2016 asserts.

Ya gotta love this:

New York Times newest editorial member is unfit to work for the Times, according to the Times

Matt Lewis: Sarah Jeong's Racist Tweets Hurt The Media's Credibility

He nails CNN panelists to the wall.

Video 416

This bitch was born in South Korea. The Statue of Liberty climber in the Congo. No one asked them to come here. Most people, like me, regret they ever did.

If they hate white people so much and the country they immigrated to... why in the fuck don't they move back!

One Fired...One Hired