Visit Counter

Saturday, October 6, 2018

Congratulations America




The rule of law still prevails.



Although the Kavanaugh hearing wasn't a criminal trial it might as well have been.





------------------------------



Presumption of Innocence


One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.


The phrase “beyond the shadow of a doubt" is commonly used in criminal trial proceedings. In a criminal court of law, juries are often asked to determine if there is any reasonable doubt concerning whether an individual committed a crime. They are not required to decide if the defendant is absolutely guilty, or absolutely innocent. They are merely asked by the counsel for the defense if it is remotely possible that someone else committed the crime.


The job of the prosecuting counsel Democrats is to provide evidence that proves concretely that no other person could have possibly carried out the crime in question. The prosecuting counsel Democrats must establish their case beyond the shadow of a doubt. If any doubt remains in the minds of the jury, no matter how small, they are required to vote by law that the defendant not be convicted.












Share/Bookmark

Friday, October 5, 2018

You will never see this interview on any of the major networks



When you're done watching it... you'll know why.

The Democrats have concluded due to his drinking and temperament Kavanaugh is not fit to be a Supreme Court justice. But Barry is uniquely qualified to be POTUS?

Talk about a double standard!

Video 435







Share/Bookmark

Thursday, October 4, 2018

Blumenthal lectured embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on the importance of not telling even a single lie



Read the excerpt... or watch this POS in action.




EXCERPT:

BLUMENTHAL: “As a federal judge, you’re aware of the jury instruction falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, are you not? You’re aware of that jury instruction.”

KAVANAUGH: “I am.”

BLUMENTHAL: “You know what it means.”

KAVANAUGH: “You can translate it for me, Senator, you can do it better than I can.”

BLUMENTHAL: “False in one thing, false in everything, meaning in jury instructions, that we — some of us, as prosecutors, have heard many times, is told a jury that they can disbelieve a witness if they find them to be false in one thing. So, the core of why we’re here today really is credibility.

----------------------------


Blumenthal's own history with the truth is coming back to haunt him.

"False in one thing, false in everything"?

President Trump and Republican lawmakers noted the hypocrisy of those words coming from Blumenthal, who has been criticized for lying about his military service during the Vietnam War.


Stolen Valor DaNang Richard Blumenthal


Video 433



Blumenthal has implied in the past that he served on the ground in Vietnam, although he reportedly obtained at least five military deferments between 1965 and 1970. He eventually served in the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, but did not deploy to Vietnam.

“You have the great Vietnam War hero—who didn’t go to Vietnam—Blumenthal,” Trump said at a rally Monday evening. “How about Blumenthal? We call him ‘Da Nang Blumenthal.”



Video 434






And it did. Remember this?











Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, October 3, 2018

The rallying cry from the left... "We Believe Women"




Just arbitrarily believe all women...ignore the facts?!?












Susan Smith

Deliberately drowned her two young sons and then blamed it on a black guy saying she was carjacked.




Casey Anthony

Murdered her 3-year-old daughter Caylee Marie Anthony and blamed it on her 
father.




Karla Leanne Homolka

Homolka was convicted of raping and murdering at least three young women, one of whom was her own sister. She did a deal with prosecutors claiming that she hadn’t been a willing participant in the murders blaming it on her husband.





Hillary Clinton

Said her husband never had sex with Monica Lewinsky. Blamed it on a "vast right-wing conspiracy".








So you see Loretta women really do lie...



and this very well could be another one???












Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, October 2, 2018

Compare the Dems questioning of Kavanaugh to the Republicans kid glove treatment of Ford




Ford told the Senate Judiciary Committee that she and her husband wound up in couples counseling over a remodeling project at their California home. Ford said her husband couldn't understand why she wanted a second front door to the house.

"I insisted on a second front door. An idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand," Ford testified.

She says the alleged attack by Kavanaugh caused her to have a fear of "claustrophobia. Panic."

"Is that the reason for the second door?" asked Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the top Democrat on the committee.

"Yes," replied Ford.

-----------------------------


What a crock of shit! 

She was supposedly sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh in 1982 but suddenly in 2012, 30 years later, she demanded two front doors for her home remodel because "the alleged attack by Kavanaugh caused her to have a fear of "claustrophobia. Panic." It took thirty years to kick in...?  So the solution is to install two front doors to allow easier access for intruders to break in? Think about how absurd that sounds? I believe her husband had her in therapy because she's a nut job.




Those damn doors don't come cheap!



I'm surprised Rachel Mitchell, the Arizona prosecutor hired by the Committee  (who stunk) didn't pepper Christine Blasey Ford on the real reason she was in therapy also some reference to the GoFundMe account.

(Looks more like Ray Mitchell with a wig) 



This is from a friend of mine Ed Kilbane on the types of questions that should have been asked of Christine Blasey Ford but weren't. 

Perhaps he should have been a criminal prosecutor.

----------------------




How did you drive when you were only 15? 



Did you have a temp license? 



Were your parents with you? 

How is it that you can clearly remember you only had one beer at the party but don't remember how you got there or got home? 

How did you get out of the bedroom?

Did you have to unlock the door first? 

Was that the first beer you ever had?

How many drinking parties did you go to?

 Did you ever have more than one beer at them?

How did you and your friends get the beer?

Did you ever do drugs at these parties? 

Did you ever get drunk on booze or high on drugs?

Did you smoke weed? 

When was the first time you had sex? 

Were you ever groped like this before?

Who did it?

Was the alleged assault by Brett the only reason you were seeing a therapist?

 Did the therapist hypnotize you or otherwise put you thru memory regression?

 Have you ever treated any of your clients with memory regression therapy?

 How reliable is it? 

How many therapy sessions have you been in?

What else were you being treated for? 

You remember incidents from 36 years ago, but you can't remember if you gave the WaPo your therapy records two weeks ago???



I can think of a dozen more off the top of my head and would have gone after her like no one's business. I'm just a tax guy. The prosecutor they hired was pitiful. I'm glad they ditched her for the last part of the hearing. 












Share/Bookmark