Visit Counter

Thursday, November 8, 2018

The POS was suspended



White House Suspends Jim Acosta’s Press Pass After Combative Briefing


Unlike past Republican presidents, Trump takes no crap from these dogs.

---------------------------





"Hit"...is that what they call it in the business or is that his calling card?



The White House on Wednesday evening suspended CNN reporter Jim Acosta’s White House press room pass after a combative exchange with President Trump in which he refused to give up the microphone and wrangled with a female intern trying to take it back.

“President Trump believes in a free press and expects and welcomes tough questions of him and his Administration. We will, however, never tolerate a reporter placing his hands on a young woman just trying to do her job as a White House intern,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement.

“This conduct is absolutely unacceptable. It is also completely disrespectful to the reporter’s colleagues not to allow them an opportunity to ask a question.”

She continued:

President Trump has given the press more access than any President in history. Contrary to CNN’s assertions, there is no greater demonstration of the President’s support for a free press than the event he held today. Only they would attack the President for not being supportive of a free press in the midst of him taking 68 questions from 35 different reporters over the course of an hour and a half – including several from the reporter in question. The fact that CNN is proud of the way their employee behaved is not only disgusting, it is an example of their outrageous disregard for everyone, including young women, who work in this Administration. As a result of today’s incident, the White House is suspending the hard pass of the reporter involved until further notice.


The exchange happened Wednesday afternoon as the president was giving a press conference to discuss the results of the midterm election. Acosta began his question by saying he wanted to challenge him on calling the caravan an “invasion.”

“As you know, Mr. President, the caravan was not an invasion. It’s a group of migrants moving up from Central America towards the border with the U.S. Why did you characterize it as such?” he asked.

“Because I consider it an invasion. You and I have a difference of opinion,” Trump responded. Acosta then asked if he thought he “demonized immigrants” in the midterm election.

Trump responded, “I want them to come into the country, but they have to come in legally. You know, they have to come in, Jim, through a process. I want it to be a process. And I want people to come in. And we need the people.”

Acosta then followed up with an assertion that migrants in the caravan would not be climbing over walls, and that they were “hundreds and hundreds of miles away.” “That’s not an invasion,” he told Trump.

Trump told Acosta, “Honestly, I think you should let me run the country, you run CNN — and if you did it well, your ratings would be much better.”

Acosta then attempted to ask another question, but Trump tried to move on several times. Acosta repeatedly refused to give up the microphone. When a female intern tried twice to take back the microphone, Acosta pushed her arm away.

Acosta then asked two more questions before the intern succeeded in taking the microphone away.

Trump told Acosta, “I’ll tell you what: CNN should be ashamed of itself having you working for them. You are a rude, terrible person. You shouldn’t be working for CNN.”

Acosta protested that he thought, “that’s unfair.”

“You’re a very rude person. The way you treat Sarah Huckabee is horrible. And the way you treat other people are horrible. You shouldn’t treat people that way,” Trump countered.




If you asked this prick if he is for or against the caravan what do you think his response would be?










Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

BREAKING




Trump ousts Attorney General Jeff Sessions



By Allan Smith

Attorney General Jeff Sessions resigned Wednesday at President Donald Trump's request.

The announcement came the day after the midterm elections. He submitted his letter of resignation earlier Wednesday.

Trump announced the resignation on Twitter. The president has repeatedly criticized Sessions, particularly for recusing himself from the Russia investigation.

Sessions' departure after the midterms was not unexpected.

Trump was asked about Sessions' future during a lengthy press conference Wednesday afternoon. At the time, he declined to comment on whether Sessions would be leaving the administration.

"I'd rather answer that at a little bit different time," Trump said, adding that he was "looking at different people for different positions." He commented that Cabinet-level changes were "very common after the midterms."

Trump named Matthew Whitaker, Sessions' chief of staff, as acting attorney general.

Whitaker, a U.S. attorney in the Southern District of Iowa from 2003-09 and Sessions' chief of staff since late 2017, was a conservative legal commentator. He wrote an opinion column for CNN before joining the Justice Department titled "Mueller's investigation into Trump is going too far."






Share/Bookmark

So Much for the Blue Wave




On a tip from Ed Kilbane










Share/Bookmark

A couple of observations on the election





Kavanaugh is tainted. He supposedly assaulted women without a shred of evidence and needs to be impeached.


Meanwhile in Liberal Land...


Menendez (aka) Mr. Corruption



Wins by 10 points







Keith (the Muslim) Ellison. They love their Muslims in MN! 



His girlfriend released a medical document on Twitter that cites both emotional and physical abuse.




Ellison wins the AG election by 100,000 votes




If Kavanaugh is guilty as judged by the Democratic standard isn't Menedez and Ellison just as guilty?

So you see it never was a matter of who assaulted whom. 
The benchmark is .... what party are they affiliated with?









Share/Bookmark

MSM... you won't find this story



BREAKING: Two Men Admit They Are the Ones Who Assaulted Ford, Not Kavanaugh



According to a report, two men have come forward to say that they, not Judge Brett Kavanaugh, were the ones who assaulted accuser Christine Blasey Ford back in 1982.

As Ford sits before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify about her claims, two men have come forward to say that Ford has confused her memories of the incident that occurred 35 years ago and it was they who attacked her at a party, not the judge.

As reported by the New York Post:


On Monday, the timeline recounts GOP staff members interviewing “a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982.”

The “encounter” refers to an episode in which Ford claims that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in a bedroom at a Maryland house party.

They had a follow-up interview with that man, and he provided more detail about the assault.

Then on Wednesday, the committee staff said they spoke with a second man who said he assaulted Ford in 1982.

Ford has insisted that this could not be the case.

Despite that she can’t remember what day the attack happened, can’t remember exactly where the attack happened, and can’t remember the date (only the general year of 1982), Ford insists she can’t forget that it was Kavanaugh who attacked her.

Ford has huge gaps in her memory of the supposed attack she says occurred “sometime in 1982,” but she claims that Kavanaugh’s participation is crystal clear.

Also of interest is the fact that Ford has named a group of people who she claims were at the party where she was attacked — some of whom she has at various times claimed were also in the room during the attack. Yet not a single one of these people have substantiated her claims.






Share/Bookmark