Brutal Conditions Back Home Force Refugees To Seek A Better Life In Your House

Via:

https://earloftaint.com

Brutal Conditions Back Home Force Refugees To Seek A Better Life In Your House

'Charlie Brown Thanksgiving' criticized as racist

My God where are we going with this? Pretty soon I'll be called a racist for owning a white stove instead of a black one. Maybe I shouldn't have said 'owning'. 

Wonder if these libs went out to tear down some Confederate statues right after the show?

"A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving" is getting heat for its portrayal of a black character. (ABC)

You’re a racist man, Charlie Brown!

Critics are slamming ABC’s “A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving” for seating its only black character, Franklin, alone on one side of the holiday table — in a rickety old lawn chair.

Meanwhile, white friends — including Peppermint Patty, Charlie Brown, Sally and even Snoopy — were all seated across from him in real chairs as they feasted, Twitter users pointed out.

The special, which debuted Nov. 20, 1973, aired again on Wednesday — prompting social media outrage over the gang’s highly unwoke picnic table arrangement.

“Why is Franklin in Charlie Brown Thanksgiving sitting all by himself at the table. Man. Things that I did not notice as a child,” @Asharp52 blasted on Twitter.

Others said good grief over a seating chart that would have thrilled George Wallace.

“Not watching Charlie Brown Thanksgiving anymore, until they sit some people on the same side of the table as Franklin,” another critic tweeted, along with two black power-style fist emojis.

The scene in question centers on an impromptu holiday feast — of toast, jelly beans, and ice cream — in Charlie Brown’s backyard.

At one point, poor lonesome Franklin topples over in his half-broken chair.

“They give our friend the busted chair and won’t even sit on the same side of the table, more proof that Charlie Brown and his cohorts are RACIST,” slammed Twitter user @mwizzy128.

But others defended the classic special, pointing out its creator Charles Schulz fought to add Franklin to the cast to stand up against racism in 1968.

“Seriously please get some historical context. Charles M. Schultz was a trailblazer and bucked racism in those days by adding Franklin to reflect the issue… and challenging what was then going on in society,” tweeted California radio show host Mark Larson.

'Charlie Brown Thanksgiving' criticized as racist

Joseph DiGenova is dead right

Joseph diGenova

Justice Roberts’ attack against President Trump was blatantly political and wrong

---------------------------

Yes:

U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar is an Obama judge. 

Trump stated if the migrant vagrants want to claim asylum they have to do it through the proper channels. What Tigar is stating is he doesn't care how they get in. Jump the fence, burrow under it, or parachute in they're eligible for asylum. If that's not a San Francisco Obama judge I don't know WTF is! Does this bastard care more about what's sensible and right for the American people or what's in the best interest of the vagrants?

PS:
I regret the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts. He sucks and is the reason we have ObamaCare. 

I think he will turn out worse than Anthony Kennedy... and he's well on his way.

---------------------------- 

In a remarkably inappropriate and blatantly political statement Wednesday, U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts chastised President Trump for the president’s quite accurate criticism of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and its rogue district and appellate court judges.

The spectacle of the ostensibly non-political chief justice engaged in a dispute with the president of the United States is insulting to the Supreme Court and to our system of justice.

Shame on the chief justice. What he did is unforgivable, especially after the corrosive Senate confirmation battle over now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was the subject of bitter and baseless partisan attacks and character assassination by Senate Democrats.

With everyone looking for ways to remove the high court from the political thicket, Roberts strode arrogantly right into it. Sad day.

Roberts responded Wednesday to comments President Trump made to reporters a day earlier after a district court judge appointed by President Obama issued an order to stop Trump’s new emergency restrictions on asylum claims by immigrants from taking effect.

U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar in San Francisco issued the nationwide injunction blocking the president’s restrictions. The restrictions would have made it harder for many of the thousands of Central American migrants now heading toward the U.S. border in caravans to apply for asylum in America.

“This was an Obama judge, and I'll tell you what, it's not going to happen like this anymore," the president said of Tigar. "Everybody that wants to sue the U.S. – almost – they file their case in the 9th Circuit, and it means an automatic loss. No matter what you do, no matter how good your case is. And the 9th Circuit is really something we have to take a look at because it's not fair."

“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts shot back Wednesday as if he were facing Trump in a presidential candidate debate. “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."

The spectacle of the ostensibly non-political chief justice engaged in a dispute with the president of the United States is insulting to the Supreme Court and to our system of justice.

But President Trump’s criticism of liberal judges in the 9th Circuit who were nominated by President Obama was accurate. These judges previously issued an order blocking the president’s Travel Ban Executive Order that was designed to protect our country from terrorists crossing our borders. As President Trump correctly noted, the Supreme Court later overturned the ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Roberts’ comments seemed particularly strange because he had never injected himself into a political debate before.

In fact, Roberts sat quietly through President Obama’s 2010 State of the Union Address when Obama sharply attacked Supreme Court justices sitting in the audience for their ruling in the Citizens United case, which allowed unlimited political campaign contributions by unions and corporations.

President Obama falsely claimed in this speech that the Citizens United ruling allowed massive political contributions by foreign corporations. It did no such thing.

As the justices sat in the House chamber listening to his speech, President Obama embarrassed the court directly and fiercely. Not a peep from Roberts. Only Justice Samuel Alito quietly mouthed to himself “no, no” as Obama railed against foreign campaign contributions.

Roberts has said nothing about Obama’s remarks in the eight years since.

So why did Roberts attack President Trump on Wednesday? Well, Trump is not a Democrat.

Many believe that Roberts caved to political criticism by President Obama and his Democratic cohorts in a case where Roberts was the decisive vote in a ruling that found ObamaCare was constitutional – a historic victory for Democrats.

Roberts clearly accepted the claim by Democrats in that case that the Supreme Court could not overturn ObamaCare or the high court would forever harm the republic and subvert the legislative process and the will of the people.

It is widely believed that Roberts changed his vote at the last minute to stop the Supreme Court from overturning ObamaCare in that landmark case because of pressure from outside forces directed against him.

Indeed, the wording of various dissents in the ObamaCare case – especially Justice Antonin Scalia’s – made it clear that Roberts’ decision to find that ObamaCare was constitutional was political and nothing more – not a decision based on the Constitution or on the law.

The ObamaCare ruling was a legacy opinion for Roberts because he couldn’t take another wave of criticism like what he received from the liberal media, Obama and the Democrats after his ruling in the Citizens United case. Roberts caved in an obvious nod to the attacks on him. It was palpable and most unfortunate.

Roberts’ ObamaCare opinion had a quality of “oh by the way” and artificiality to it that was apparent to Supreme Court observers.

So Roberts’ pro-Democratic bias that we saw Wednesday is nothing new. It is, in fact, a repetition and a return to normal for him.

The chief justice was institutionally the wrong person to make his point in criticizing President Trump. If the point was to be made at all, it should have been made by the usual suspects: the American Bar Association, any well-known and respected lawyer, or a prominent media commentator or newspaper editorial page.

The candidates for attacking President Trump are numerous and inoffensive. Perhaps Roberts could have chosen his favorite Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee. At any rate, he chose none of these options. One wonders why.

Why would Roberts insert himself, at this time, in this situation, to attack President Trump? He is a very smart man. This was not an accident or a coincidence.

Joseph diGenova is a former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, co-founder of the law firm of diGenova & Toensing and an informal legal adviser to President Trump.

Joseph DiGenova is dead right

My Favorite Holiday

My Favorite Holiday

Fox News Jesse Watters who split from wife over affair demands she pay his legal bills

See if I got this straight.

 Watters met his future wife (Noelle) on the set of the O'Reilly show. Meanwhile, Bolling gets fired from The Five for texting photo's of his genitals to female FOX associates and Watters takes his place. Later O'Reilly gets fired for multiple unwanted sexual advances and lewd comments to women. Then we find out while Watters was still on the set of O'Reilly he was bonking the associate producer Emma DiGiovine. Somewhere along this timeline, Guilfoyle took to bonking Donald Jr while he was still married to Vanessa. Later we discover Watters attends WH dinners with President Trump who was bonking Stormy Daniels.

I think I got it.

------------------------

Fox News commentator Jesse Watters is demanding his estranged wife pay for his legal bill, a year after she filed for divorce when he had an affair with a producer on his show.

Court records seen by DailyMail.com reveal Jesse filed a motion on November 19 demanding Noelle Watters pay his attorney while the case is pending in Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, New York.

Noelle 42, filed for divorce last October from 40-year-old Jesse. He has admitted to cheating on her with associate producer Emma DiGiovine, 25, who worked on his show Watters' World.

News of the couple's split was not made public until March of this year.

Jesse Watters, 40, filed a motion demanding his wife Noelle Watters, 42, pick up his legal fees during their divorce case at Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, New York

Watters admitted he was having an affair with associate producer Emma DiGiovine (pictured)

Watters request for Noelle to pay his legal fees came after his wife filed a similar motion on October 1 demanding that he pick up the tab for her attorney costs.

Presiding Judge Glenn A. Murphy has yet to decide on which motion to grant.

Watters told his bosses about the affair shortly after Noelle filed for divorce, sources previously said.

Noelle, maiden name Inguagiato, met Watters on the job and the two married in 2009.

Court records filed November 19 show Jesse Watters is seeking 'pendente lite counsel fees', meaning he wants wife Noelle to pay for his legal bills during their divorce case

He was working for Bill O'Reilly's show and she worked for the advertising and promotions department and was the host of a web show called iMag Style. 

She gave birth to their twin daughters in 2011, but never returned from maternity leave. 

After Watters revealed his affair with DiGiovine, she was transferred to work for The Ingraham Angle, but the pair continued to date, sources said.

Watters replaced Eric Bolling as a co-host on roundtable show The Five last year

'Within 24 hours of Jesse Watters voluntarily reporting to the Chief of Human Resources in November 2017 that he was in a consensual relationship with a woman on his staff, management met with both parties and a decision was made for the woman to be transferred to work on another program on the network where she currently remains,' a Fox News spokeswoman told the Daily News.

Watters and Noelle met at Fox News when he was on Bill O'Reilly's show and she was in the advertising and promotions department. They married in 2009 and had twin girls in 2011

According to her LinkedIn profile, DiGiovine became Watters' associate producer in June 2016, when his segment was still part of O'Reilly's show. 

Known for his brash, macho and sometimes obnoxious style, Watters hosted a segment on the O'Reilly Factor that combined man-on-the-street with ambush journalism. 

Watters' humorous approach fell flat at times, such as in an October 2016 segment he filmed in New York City's Chinatown. It was panned as 'racist' after he wandered the streets asking locals if they knew karate and how often their watches were stolen. 

The segment, Watters' World, was spun out into a weekly show in January 2017. It airs at 8pm on Saturdays, combining humor and political news in a fresh slant aimed at a younger audience. 

When O'Reilly was ousted from the network in April 2017, over revelations that he'd secretly settled numerous sexual harassment suits, Watters also replaced Eric Bolling on roundtable show The Five. Bolling himself was ousted last September over sexual harassment allegations.

Watters is said to be a favorite cable news personality of President Donald Trump and even dined with the commander-in-chief earlier this year.

Trump asked Watters and former aide Sebastian Gorka to dinner at the White House because 'he couldn’t get enough of them on TV', one source told the Daily Beast. 

Trump even signed the menu, which Watters tweeted a picture of. It read: 'To Jesse you are great!' 

President Donald Trump is reportedly a fan of Watters and asked him to join him for dinner at the White House earlier this year

Fox News Jesse Watters who split from wife over affair demands she pay his legal bills