Visit Counter

Friday, November 30, 2018

White South Africans lose legal fight against plans to seize their land





Cyril Ramaphosa has made land redistribution from white farmers to black disadvantaged citizens a flagship policy.





A few years from now South Africa will be on the same economic level with Mozambique.

---------------------------------



South Africa's High Court rejected a legal challenge today brought by a group representing white farmers against President Cyril Ramaphosa's plans for land expropriation without compensation.

Land is a hot-button issue in South Africa where racial inequality remains entrenched more than two decades after the end of apartheid when millions of the black majority were dispossessed of their land by a white minority.

Ramaphosa, who replaced scandal-plagued Jacob Zuma in February, has made land redistribution a flagship policy as he seeks to unite the fractured ruling African National Congress (ANC) and win public support ahead of an election next year.

In its legal challenge, Afriforum questioned the legality of a key parliamentary committee report which recommended a change to the constitution to allow land expropriation without compensation.

President Cyril Ramaphosa (right) arriving at the G20 summit by Argentina's Foreign Affairs Minister Jorge Faurie, at Ezeiza International airport in Buenos Aires yesterday

'The relief sought by the applicants... is dismissed,' said Judge Vincent Saldanha.

Afriforum, which represents mostly white Afrikaners, alleged that the parliamentary committee had illegally appointed an external service provider to compile the report, and also failed to consider more than 100,000 submissions opposing land expropriation without compensation.

Around 65 percent of public submissions were against a change, according to parliamentary officials.

Parliament successfully countered Afriforum's case by saying the court action was premature, the committee had not abrogated its powers and all views had been taken into account.

'We welcome the orders handed down today particularly because we've always been of the view that the matter was not urgent,'

Lewis Nzimande, co-chair of the constitutional review committee, told reporters outside the High Court in Cape Town.

'They [lawmakers] may set aside the recommendations, they may reject the recommendations but procedurally... we can't just reject the whole work of the committee,' he said.





Share/Bookmark

Thursday, November 29, 2018

US agents fire tear gas at migrant vagabonds in start of border clash



The MSM:

Trump gases migrants


Meanwhile...when this occurred the MSM said nothing.


(From The Daily Mail no less)



Video 470














---------------------------


 Defending the border Democrat style:





-----------------------------















Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Mars landing: NASA's InSight spacecraft takes selfie after supersonic landing







CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — Minutes after touching down on Mars, NASA's InSight spacecraft sent back a "nice and dirty" snapshot of its new digs. Yet the dust-speckled image looked like a work of art to scientists. The photo revealed a mostly smooth and sandy terrain around the spacecraft with only one sizable rock visible.

Another photo taken by its robotic arm-mounted camera after it landed on the planet shows a close-up of the spacecraft itself.



This photo provided by NASA shows an image on Mars that its spacecraft called InSight acquired using its robotic arm-mounted, Instrument Deployment Camera (IDC) after it landed on the planet on Monday, Nov. 26, 2018.

NASA / AP

"I'm very, very happy that it looks like we have an incredibly safe and boring landing location," project manager Tom Hoffman said after Monday's touchdown. "That's exactly what we were going for."


Images which have baffled scientists came hours later and more are expected in the days ahead after the dust covers come off the lander's cameras. These photos came from a camera low on the lander. Late Monday, NASA released a clear photo taken by a higher camera that showed part of the lander and the landscape.





"In the coming months and years even, history books will be rewritten about the interior of Mars," said JPL's director, Michael Watkins.








Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Obama's 'car of the future' goes kaput




On a tip from Ed Kilbane


It came with a turbocharged four-cylinder engine, churned out about 140 horsepower, and made upwards 40 mpg highway. What’s more, the Chevy Cruze was the only compact sedan to come with a presidential seal of approval. 

When a prototype of the 2011 model rolled off the assembly line, then President Barack Obama put his signature on the hood writing that the Cruze was “the car of the future.” 

But the future lasted only seven years. Responding to slumping sales, General Motors announced plans to push the Cruze out of their showrooms and off of a cliff. 

(What rhymes with cliff? Sniff...and I'm getting hints of Solyndra with notes of Fisker and Ener1)







The Motor City has learned the hard way that what was good for Obama’s green agenda wasn’t good for GM. Fuel efficiency made the Cruze a poster child of that president’s energy legacy. If Detroit could make a car capable of making the round trip between New York City and Washington, D.C. on a single tank of gas (the Cruze comes standard with a 13.7 gallon gas tank and those cities are 220 miles apart), then the automaker could make higher fuel economy standards. 

Obama wanted higher Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, and his administration mandated a 54.5 mpg standard for cars and light-duty trucks by model year 2025. Consumers did not, however, want the Cruze. 

Sales were never stellar and more were sold in China than in the United States. And when President Trump reversed the Obama-era fuel standards, sales plummeted even further. Automotive News reports that sales of the Cruze dropped 26 percent through last March. Soon they will free-fall. 

A freshened up 2019 Cruze goes on sale in the fall for a final time. Soon after, the plant in Lordstown, Ohio, that makes them will cease production.







Share/Bookmark

This was nothing more than one big F--KING scam


Christine Blasey Ford updates fundraising page, says testifying against Kavanaugh was ‘terrifying’



You know what's really 'terrifying'? 
She found enough assholes to increase her net worth by $650,000!

--------------------------------


Christine Blasey Ford shared on a fundraising page how “terrifying” it was to testify against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh but noted that she’s “grateful” that she was able to fulfill her “civic duty.”

“Although coming forward was terrifying, and caused disruption to our lives, I am grateful to have had the opportunity to fulfill my civic duty,” Ford wrote in a recent post on GoFundMe.

(Her real duty was to make money) 



She said that the fundraiser, which raised nearly $650,000, had allowed her family to “take reasonable steps to protect ourselves against frightening threats, including physical protection and security for me and my family, and to enhance the security for our home.”

Ford has kept a fairly low profile since testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September.

“Words are not adequate to thank all of you who supported me since I came forward to tell the Senate that I had been sexually assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh,” she wrote Thursday.

The Palo Alto University psychology professor claimed that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her during high school in the 1980s. Her accusations were uncorroborated by alleged witnesses.

Kavanaugh has adamantly denied all of Ford’s allegations.
What else did she say?

Ford thanked her supporters for their support.

“Your tremendous outpouring of support and kind letters have made it possible for us to cope with the immeasurable stress, particularly the disruption to our safety and privacy. Because of your support, I feel hopeful that our lives will return to normal,” she said.
How has the GoFundMe money been used?

Ford described the donations as a “godsend” that helped pay for a security service since Sept. 19, a security system for her home, the costs of housing and security while she was in Washington, D.C., and local housing for some of the time since she returned to California.

Oh yes, she needed the security. I'm sure everybody and their brother were out to kill her.






Share/Bookmark