Anyone remember the beloved Alton Sterling?

Allow me to give you a prelude to this story in case you forgot.

Saint Alton was a convicted felon and had no right to be carrying a firearm when he would not heed the cops warning and subsequently was shot and killed in July 2016. The photo below is the warm and fuzzy almost cherubic Saint Alton the MSM wanted you to see. I'm sure he's holding a rosary behind his back and not a Glock.

These are the photos of 'family man Alton' they didn't want you to see.

Thousands of protesters took to the streets protesting for weeks over the fatal shooting of Saint Alton.

The MSM immortalized this fearless protester with this photo. Rosa Parks and Tiananmen Square rolled into one as she defied the evil dark nights (aka murdering cops in the media).

Not that the MSM was interested but this is the

Summary of Saint Alton's Offenses

The documents in Sterling’s Baton Rouge court file show Sterling was accused of these offenses (some are convictions, some only arrests, some were dismissed and a few are traffic matters. The dates represent date of offense):

Simple battery (dismissed) (Nov. 24, 1996)

Simple battery – dismissed (Oct. 28, 1997)

Simple burglary of inhabited dwelling (May 5-15, 2005) request for arrest warrant

Felony theft (May 5-15, 2005) request for arrest warrant

Simple burglary (amended to illegal possession of stolen things – guilty plea) (May 24, 2005)

Aggravated battery (amended to simple battery – guilty plea) (March 6, 2006)

Simple criminal damage to property – guilty plea (March 6, 2006)

Unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling (amended to disturbing the peace – guilty plea) (March 6, 2006)

Expired driver’s license (March 21, 2008)

Driver’s license issue (hard to read document) (2008)

Domestic abuse battery – pleaded guilty (March 31, 2008)

Illegal carrying weapons with controlled dangerous substance – pleaded guilty (May 29, 2009)

Felon in possession of a firearm – dismissed (May 29, 2009)

Contempt of court – (Aug. 10, 2009) – Guilty plea

Fail to use seat belt (Feb. 5, 2014)

Fail to renew registration (Feb. 5, 2014)

Failure to comply with sex offender registration (Aug. 11, 2015) – Forfeiture

Possession of a schedule 1 drug, (April4-5, 2016) – no conclusion

Possession of marijuana first offense. (April 5, 2016) – no conclusion

Arrest – probable cause affidavits: 

Trespassing (Aug. 25, 1996)

Damage to property (2 counts) (Aug. 25, 1996)

Criminal mischief (Aug. 25, 1996)

Illegally possess weapon (Aug. 25, 1996)

Aggravated burglary (Aug. 27, 1996)

Public intimidation, 2 counts (April 24, 2000)

Criminal damage to property (March 4, 2006)

Simple robbery (March 4, 2006)

Theft under $500 (March 4, 2006)

Possession of marijuana (March 4, 2006)

Misrepresentation during booking (March 4, 2006)

Simple battery (March 4, 2006)

Aggravated burglary (March 4, 2006)

RESISTING AN OFFICER BY FORCE (MAY 29, 2009)

Possession marijuana (May 29, 2009)

Possess stolen things (May 29, 2009)

Possess firearm with drugs (May 29, 2009)

Simple assault (May 29, 2009)

Offense too illegible to read in the record (May 29, 2009)

Sterling Had Previous Confrontations With the Baton Rouge Police

One incident stands out in the lengthy file; it involved a wrestling match with an officer that involved a gun. In 2009, the affidavit of probable cause contends that a police officer tried to pat down Sterling when Sterling resisted arrest, and the officer ended up “wrestling with the defendant on the ground” at which time a “black semi-auto gun fell from his waistband.” The officer grabbed the back of Sterling’s shirt during the incident, and he was able to arrest him without further incident.

So what am I trying to derive from all this? 

This is Saint Alton's 18-year-old son.

Cameron Sterling has been charged with raping an eight-year-old boy. 

The child told his mother and police that Sterling performed oral sex on him.

Proving once again the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. 

Anyone remember the beloved Alton Sterling?

Trump inaugural committee under criminal investigation

Trump's not lying. His entire presidency thus far has been nothing but a witch hunt. And now this. 

Good thing he doesn't have any college transcripts under lock and key he hoped to keep hidden so as not to jeopardize his election.

----------------------------------

President Donald Trump's 2017 inaugural committee is currently being investigated by federal prosecutors in New York for possible financial abuses related to the more than $100 million in donations raised for his inauguration, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The investigation was first reported by The Wall Street Journal Thursday afternoon. 

Citing conversations with people familiar with the investigation, which is being handled by the US Attorney's office in Manhattan, the Journal reported that prosecutors are also looking into whether the committee accepted donations from individuals looking to gain influence in or access to the new administration. 

The newspaper notes that "giving money in exchange for political favors" is illegal, as is misuse of any donated funds. The committee was registered as a nonprofit. 

In a statement, Trump's inaugural committee said the celebration was "in full compliance with all applicable laws."

"The (committee) is not aware of any pending investigations and has not been contacted by any prosecutors. We simply have no evidence the investigation exists," the statement read.

"The (committee's) finances were fully audited internally and independently and are fully accounted. Moreover, the inauguration's accounting was provided both to the Federal Election Commission and the IRS in compliance with all laws and regulations. These were funds raised from private individuals and were then spent in accordance with the law and the expectations of the donors. The names of donors were provided to the FEC and have been public for nearly two years and those donors were vetted in accordance with the law and no improprieties have been found regarding the vetting of those donors."

© Scott Olson/Getty Images WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: President Elect Donald Trump arrives on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2017 in Washington, DC. In today's inauguration ceremony Donald J. Trump becomes the 45th president of the United States. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

When asked by reporters about the story Thursday, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said, "That doesn't have anything to do with the President or the first lady. The biggest thing the President did, his engagement in the inauguration, was to come here and raise his hand and take the oath of office. The President was focused on the transition at that time and not on any of the planning for the inauguration." 

According to the Journal, sources told the paper that the investigation "partly arises out of materials seized in the federal probe of former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen's business dealings."

During a raid of Cohen's properties last spring, a recorded conversation between him and Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, a former adviser to first lady Melania Trump, was seized, according to the newspaper. Wolkoff expressed concern in the conversation about how the inaugural committee was spending money, a person familiar with the Cohen investigation told the Journal. 

Rick Gates, Trump's former campaign aide who has been cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, was asked by prosecutors about the committee's spending and its donors, the Journal reported, citing conversations with people close to the matter. 

Tom Barrack, a real estate developer who ran the inaugural committee, has not yet spoken with investigators since an interview he had with the special counsel last year, a source familiar with the matter told CNN. During his conversation with Mueller, the inaugural fund was only raised briefly, the source said.

"The inaugural committee hasn't been asked for records or been contacted by prosecutors. We are not aware of any investigation," the source told CNN.

The committee, which CNN previously reported had raised a record-setting $107 million, received much of its funding from wealthy donors who gave $1 million or more, according to the Journal. Some of the fund's top donors, including billionaire Sheldon Adelson, AT&T Inc. (the parent company of CNN) and Boeing Co. are not currently under investigation, the newspaper reported. 

Trump inaugural committee under criminal investigation

Cohen gets 3

Meanwhile at “The Defenders of Justice League”

The IRS scandal, Benghazi, F&F, Clinton emails, Iran nuke deal… you name it.

I’m still waiting. All talk no action. This just turns my stomach on so many levels!!!

Professional grillers without one kill to their credit unless you count ‘Stedman’s slap on the wrist. They couldn't convict the guy who cleans the floor after the Congressional hearings even if they had a video of the rape he committed.

Cohen gets 3

Once again CA leads the way in stupidity

Text messages might be next to face California tax, reports say

Is it any wonder? This is the same state that produced the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, and Barbra Boxer all first class idiots. Oh...and lets not forget about 'Moonbeam' Jerry Brown. If they catch you drinking from a plastic straw in CA and you didn't pay your 'text tax' you'll get more time in jail than Wesley Snipes unless of course you're here illegally and get a free pass.

--------------------

California state regulators have been working on a plan to charge mobile phone users a text messaging fee intended to fund programs that make phone service accessible to the low-income residents, reports said Tuesday.

The California Public Utilities Commission is scheduled to vote on the proposal next month, but critics have already come out against the scheme, the San Jose Mercury News reported.

“It’s a dumb idea,” Jim Wunderman, president of the Bay Area Council business group, told the paper. “This is how conversations take place in this day and age, and it’s almost like saying there should be a tax on the conversations we have.”

While the amount consumers would be expected to pay remained unclear, some business groups are saying the new charges could cost wireless users more than $44 million a year, FOX11 Los Angeles reported.

“It’s a dumb idea. This is how conversations take place in this day and age, and it’s almost like saying there should be a tax on the conversations we have.”

— Jim Wunderman, Bay Area Council president

Charges may also be applied retroactively to messages sent in the past five years, which has raised questions concerning the proposal’s legality, Rufus Jeffress, vice president of the Bay Area Council, told the San Francisco Bay Area's KNTV-TV. The “alarming precedent” could chalk up to a bill of more than $220 million for consumers, the Mercury News reported.

The wireless industry argues that the fees would put carriers at a disadvantage since competing messaging services like Facebook’s Messenger and WhatsApp would not be charged the new fees, FOX11 reported.

Those against the proposal said that wireless customers already pay into the state’s Public Purpose Programs, which they call “healthy and well-funded” with nearly $1 billion in its budget, the Mercury News reported. But state regulators disagree, saying the budget has increased more than $300 million over six years, KNTV reported.

Residents lamented the potential tax, calling it “dumb” and “unfair.”

“To have them charge us something else is just dumb,” a Bay Area resident told KNTV. “I think it’s very unfair, especially for the people that can barely pay for their cell phone plan already.”

Once again CA leads the way in stupidity

More than 6,000 mail-in ballots in Florida were not counted: officials

What else does this bitch have to do to remain fired?

Update:

Brenda Snipes, Broward County Elections Chief, Rescinds Resignation in Latest Fight With Governor

-----------------------------------

More than 6,000 mailed ballots in Florida went uncounted in November's midterm elections.

Officials at the Florida Department of State informed a federal judge last week that 6,670 ballots that were mailed in ahead of the Nov. 6 midterm elections were left uncounted because they arrived after Election Day.

Ballots mailed inside the U.S. must reach election offices by 7 p.m. on Election Day under current Florida law. It is not yet clear why the ballots did not make it to the election offices on time. 

The missing ballots came from 65 of Florida's 67 counties.

The news comes after three races in the state — the Florida Senate race between Sen. Bill Nelson (D) and Gov. Rick Scott (R), the race for agriculture commissioner and the gubernatorial race — all went to recounts.

More than 6,000 mail-in ballots in Florida were not counted: officials