Visit Counter

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

The loss of clouds could add another 8 °C to global warming




The polar bears are missing, the Arctic ice is disappearing, and now we have a loss of clouds?



Climate Change Predictions vs What Actually Happened

This video goes back to 1983 (see how young Gore is) professing global warming and predicting the end is near. Remember it started out as global warming but when that catchphrase couldn't account for severe snow storms, because of a thing called weather, so they had to change the narrative to climate change to cover all the bases.

Video 489





Of course, the left stream media was only too happy to go along with it.




-----------------------------




Clouds cover about two-thirds of the planet at any moment, but as the Earth warms, they’re becoming scarcer, risking a feedback loop of runaway warming which could push surface temperatures up by roughly a further 8 °C, according to new research.

The findings: Supercomputer simulations suggest that greenhouse gases are causing the disappearance of clouds over our oceans, and that could drastically speed up global warming over the next century, a paper in Nature Geoscience suggests. Specifically, the tipping point is predicted to come once atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations reach about 1,200 parts per million. The figure is currently about 410 ppm but could reach 1,200 ppm within the next century.

Past disaster: This scenario would be similar to an event that occurred about 56 million years ago during the Eocene period, according to the authors. During the so-called Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), a sudden release of carbon into the atmosphere was followed by a sudden temperature increase of more than 5 °C. It had catastrophic effects. It caused mass extinction in the seas and was hot enough for crocodiles to swim in the Arctic.

Time to worry? Yes and no. It’s undoubtedly a scary prospect. It would mean the end of human civilization.

But there are plenty of assumptions that would have to be borne out, and steps that would have to take place before we reach that point.

Climate scientist Tapio Schneider, who co-authored the paper, said it's important to note "there are substantial uncertainties about quantitative results. The largest uncertainty is in the CO2 level at which the clouds become unstable—we cannot pinpoint that with precision."

"The central point to me is that our study points to the possibility of previously undiscovered and strong feedbacks in the climate system," he added.

Your response to that possibility might depend on how optimistic you are about the likelihood of humanity tackling climate change before it inflicts further irreparable damage.







Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Last night I had a dream about a roundup of many deep state conspirators



On a tip from Ed Kilbane



If only it wasn’t a dream......

Video 488








Share/Bookmark

Green New Deal Cost Revealed







------------------------------------




Price tag of Green New Deal put at $93 trillion

by Josh Siegel





 The "Green New Deal" resolution introduced by progressive Democrats would cost up to $93 trillion over 10 years. 

The American Action Forum, led by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, said in a report the proposal would cost between $51 trillion and $93 trillion over 10 years. 

In comparison, total government spending over the next 10 years is projected to total less than $60 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. 

The American Action Forum analysis says the Green New Deal's call to eliminate carbon emissions from the power and transportation sectors would cost between $8.3 trillion and $12.3 trillion. 

It estimates a federal job guarantee proposed in the resolution would cost $6.8 trillion to $44.6 trillion. Universal healthcare, another component of the Green New Deal resolution, would cost $36 trillion over 10 years, the report found. 

Republicans jumped on the report. 

“The American Action Forum’s analysis shows that the Green New Deal would bankrupt the nation,” said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., the chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. 

Barrasso said government policy to combat climate change should emphasize promoting innovation through investments in new technologies like advanced nuclear power and carbon capture on fossil fuels plants. 

But supporters of the Green New Deal say those targeted investments are insufficient. Sponsors of the resolution also said the American Action Forum report is intentionally misleading. That’s because sponsors intended the Green New Deal to be a broad vision to combat climate change, with details to be filled in later through various pieces of legislation after debate through relevant congressional committees. 

“Any so-called 'analysis' of the #GreenNewDeal that includes artificially inflated numbers that rely on lazy assumptions, incl. about policies that aren’t even in the resolution is bogus,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., who co-introduced the Green New Deal resolution. “Putting a price on a resolution of principles, not policies, is just Big Oil misinformation.” 

More Democratic mumble-jumble horse shit.









Share/Bookmark

I was watching “In Pursuit With John Walsh” last night





They did a story on a guy who committed a murder 14 years ago.





Wonder if he's a Muslim? 












Share/Bookmark

Monday, February 25, 2019

First photograph of the backdated, $3,500 check Smollett paid Nigerian brothers 'to beat him' emerges





On Monday, Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie T. Johnson appeared on Good Morning America to say he had more proof the actor lied 





They should tack on 5 more years for stupidity!


This is the check Jussie Smollett paid Abimbola 'Abel' Osundairo to allegedly beat him on January 29. He backdated it to January 23, according to police. Smollett labeled it '5-week nutrition/workout program' but the brothers say it was for the attack





Share/Bookmark