Visit Counter

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

TRUMP: EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO NEW WORLD ORDER



By James D Veltmeyer, MD



The ongoing attacks by the political establishment on President Donald
Trump –which began even before he was elected – are without parallel
in history. The savagery, frenzy, and outright hysteria displayed by
the President’s enemies within the Democrat Party, the media, and the
various power centers of the globalist elites have no prior precedent.

This President has been spied on, lied about, made the subject of
phony foreign dossiers, insulted, ridiculed, scorned, mocked and
threatened. We have witnessed Hollywood celebrities advocate for
blowing up the White House, demand the President be beaten, jailed or
even assassinated, and his children tortured and sexually abused. We
have seen politicians in Washington try to convict the President of
non-existent crimes, investigate him and his family members for
everything from tax returns to guests at his hotels, project on to him
crimes that they themselves have committed, and seed his
Administration with leakers and double-agents.

No other President in American history has been treated in such a
shameful manner. Not Lincoln. Not FDR. Not Nixon. Not Reagan.
What is it about this President that has roused such demons in his
political foes? What is it about this President that drives his
opponents to the brink of insanity? What is it about this President
that so terrifies and terrorizes the Pelosis, Schiffs, Schumers and
the George Soroses?

Is it simply that he is not part of the club, a brash outsider with a
different style? Is it merely because he’s outspoken and tramples on
political correctness? Is it because he’s sometimes unpresidential in
his demeanor (at least in their minds)?

Not at all. After all, aren’t these the same folks who loved Bill
Clinton whose extracurricular activities involved cigars and staining
blue dresses in the Oval Office?
Of course, Clinton was beloved by the globalist elites who pull the
strings on world governments. He gave them NAFTA, after all. He gave
them the WTO. He made tens of billions of dollars for them and their
stockholders through these unfair trade deals that cost America five
million manufacturing jobs and closed 70,000 factories. He also gave
the military-industrial complex plenty of profit-making military
interventions, from Haiti to Bosnia to Serbia and Iraq. Bill Clinton,
for all his corruption, delivered the goods for the New World Order.

Donald Trump, of course, never played ball with these globalists. He
was elected explicitly on an anti-globalist platform that put America
first. From day one, he started to implement that America-first
agenda, earning him the undying enmity of all those whose profits are
secured by selling out American workers, American jobs, and America’s
national sovereignty.

President Trump pulled us out of the TPP. Billions in lost profits
for the globalists.

President Trump pulled us out of the job-destroying Paris Climate
Accords. Billions in lost profits for foreign nations like Communist
China, at our expense. Read NASA's Report.

President Trump began the process of securing the U.S. border.
Billions in lost cheap illegal immigrant labor for the Business
Roundtable.

President Trump imposed tariffs on China, becoming the first President
ever to address Beijing’s annual $500 billion rape of our economy.
Billions in lost profits for corporations who ship our jobs to one of
the worst tyrannies on the planet.

President Trump renegotiated NAFTA. Again, billions in lost profits
for the cheap labor crowd.

President Trump launched the process of extricating the U.S. from
endless foreign wars and avoiding new wars with nations like Iran and
North Korea. Billions –perhaps trillions – in lost profits for the
globalist war machine.

Is the picture becoming a little clearer? In each instance, the
President’s policies have represented a dramatic upending of the
globalist agenda of both parties, the Carter-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama
agendas of continuous war and the continuous looting of America’s
wealth and hollowing out of the American middle class. With both
parties and their representatives in Congress beholden to campaign
donors whose profits are threatened by Trump’s America-first
initiatives, is it no wonder that both Democrats and Never-Trump
Republicans, all Globalist-Socialist, are determined to bring this
President down? Most of the mass media is controlled by these same
global corporations. After all, doesn’t Amazon’s Jeff Bezos - the
richest man in the world – own the Washington Post?
As was said in Watergate, just follow the money. And -while you’re
following the money—see if it leads to a $500 million left-wing slush
fund run by a shadowy Soros and Clinton -linked group called
Arabella Advisors which is funding the anti-Trump political agenda
through dozens of high-sounding front groups.

Folks, the New World Order gang is in full retreat all over the globe.
From Brexit in the UK to the populist governments of Hungary and
Poland to the Yellow Vest movement in France and Salvini in Italy, the
middle and working classes are demanding the overthrow of their
nation-destroying overlords. The overlords who have flooded their
countries with unassimilable immigrants from North Africa and
surrendered their sovereignty to the European Union and its
unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels. They have lived the unfulfilled
promises of the globalists, that giving up national sovereignty and
relocating jobs abroad would usher in a new era of peace and
prosperity. The exact opposite has happened. The globalist vision has
resulted in $7 trillion of pointless wars in the Middle East, an
immigration crisis, the loss of jobs, and declining standards of
living.

In the United States, Donald J. Trump has emerged as the New World
Order’s most tenacious and determined foe as he fights the good
fight for the American people, our constitutional rights and liberties
and the sovereignty of our nation . He is an existential threat to
the New World Order. Unlike other Republican presidents of the
recent past, he can’t be bought and has no price. Unlike them, he
doesn’t give in and he doesn’t give up.

Go ahead, globalists. Try your impeachment games. Try your Senate
trials. It won’t work In fact, it will backfire on all of you as
after three years of trying to prevent the Electoral College from
voting for Trump, stopping the inauguration, unleashing Jim Comey and
the FBI, CIA spying, Robert Mueller and his phony Russiagate probe,
tax returns, emoluments, Kavanaugh, and all the rest - the patience
of the American public is wearing thin. We aren’t as stupid as you
think.

Something you will recognize clearly come November 3, 2020.






Share/Bookmark

Stampede at Iran general's funeral leaves 32 dead




And we didn't even need a drone!





But not in the way he imagined.




Looking back...What a f-ing joke!





A stampede at the funeral for a top Iranian general killed 32 people and injured 190 on Tuesday in the southeastern city of Kerman, state television reported. 

"Unfortunately, because of overcrowding 32 of our citizens lost their lives in the procession... and 190 were injured," the head of the country's emergency services, Pirhossein Koolivand, told the channel. 

The injured were immediately transferred to a hospital, he added. 


AFP correspondents in Kerman said the streets of the southeastern city were packed with mourners for the funeral of Revolutionary Guards commander Qasem Soleimani in his hometown. 

People were seen taking refuge on hillsides around the city on state television. 

Soleimani, the hugely popular head of the Guards' Quds Force, was assassinated on Friday in a US drone strike near Baghdad international airport, an operation that shocked the Islamic republic. 


When they say 'assassinated' that indicates leftists wrote this article. 
The multi-colored butterfly is a nice touch, don't you think?


Tuesday's funeral comes after days of processions through the southwestern city of Ahvaz and the shrine cities of Qom and Mashhad as well as the capital Tehran. 

The United States killed Iran's top general and architect of Tehran's proxy wars in the Middle East in an airstrike at Baghdad's international airport on Jan. 2, an attack that threatens to dramatically ratchet up tensions in the region.





Share/Bookmark

It appears Iran wants you to vote Democrat in 2020



On a tip from Ed Kilbane.

REVEALING: Iranian Ayatollah at Friday Prayers Warns Americans to Reject Donald Trump in 2020 



WOW what an endorsement!

So the Democratic party is endorsed by terrorists... What a great campaign ad.








When liberals refer to this guy as a 
‘Austere Religious Scholar’





And this imbecile leftest Muslim loving dog tweeted this after Trump took out  Soleimani who murdered thousands...

Her tweet read: “Dear #Iran, The USA has disrespected your country, your flag, your people. 52% of us humbly apologize. We want peace with your nation. We are being held hostage by a terrorist regime. We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us.”

Rose McGowan is an American? She doesn't know how to escape? When did Trump put armed guards around her home? Wasn't she supposed to be living in Canada a long time ago?


Is it any wonder Iran doesn't want you to vote for Trump?

-------------------------



On Friday, Ayatollah Mohammad Emami Kashani delivered the sermon in Tehran following the death of al-Quds leader Qassim Soleimani.




Ayatollah Kashani warned American voters to reject Trump in 2020.

Vote Democrat or else!!


Kashani: "Americans should know that if this unworthy ignoramus wins the elections, they will be partners to the spilling of all that blood. The voters are partners to all the crimes. They will be held accountable before God and history. If they vote for him and, God forbid, he wins again, they will be held accountable before God." 

Audience: Death to America! Death to America! 

Nothing new here. Iran and the Dems have been chanting Death to America for years. 





Share/Bookmark

Monday, January 6, 2020

Remember this?








That was before... 





& this was after Trump turned their top general into a tomato omelet.










Share/Bookmark

Sunday, January 5, 2020

U.S. Killing of Soleimani Leaves Trump ‘Totally Unpredictable’





Had to check twice to make sure this article came from Bloomberg.


Remember this:




They listened to their boss. So instead,  for the most part, this article is heaping praise on a Republican... Trump no less! I love it. Although you would barely know Bloomberg was running for president, he has spent $166 million of his own money on his campaign and thus far impacted the Dem race about as much as the NY mayor Warren Wilhelm Jr.

He must have flipped his lid after reading this. 



  


Three years into Donald Trump’s presidency, U.S. allies and adversaries thought they had him figured out as a leader prone to bellicose talk who rarely delivered on his boldest military threats.

That all changed Thursday with Trump’s decision to kill a key Iranian commander in the biggest foreign policy gamble of his time in office.

With the high-stakes drone strike against General Qassem Soleimani, one of Iran’s most venerated leaders, Trump caught Tehran -- and the rest of the world -- by surprise, restoring a sense of unpredictability that could play to his advantage as world leaders are left wondering what his endgame is in the Middle East and beyond.

“The Americans are now totally unpredictable,” Gerard Araud, a former French ambassador to the U.S. and the United Nations, said in an interview. “There was no response to Iranian attacks against oil tankers, a U.S. drone and Saudi oil fields, but out of the blue comes this surprising hit on Soleimani. We are depending on the unpredictable reaction of one man.”

The drone strike shatters an assumption -- often repeated by Western officials in anonymous briefings -- that Trump would do his utmost to avoid war during an election year. Yet the move may only reinforce the determination of North Korea’s Kim Jong Un to build a stronger nuclear deterrent, as the Iraq strike underscores that a nuclear arsenal -- which Kim’s regime possesses and Iran is capable of developing -- is the surest way to ensure a regime’s survival.

Since entering the White House in 2017 without previous experience in government, Trump built a reputation as a bellicose but risk-averse commander-in-chief. He repeatedly sought to pull troops out of the Middle East, look past North Korean violations of international sanctions and avoid what he called the “endless wars” his predecessors got the U.S. mired in.

After almost three years of Trump badgering NATO allies on matters such as defense spending and praising autocrats like Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Kim -- who the president said he “fell in love” with -- world leaders started to think they knew how to read the former New York real estate developer.

That’s gone now, probably permanently.


Holding Back

Even as the U.S. blamed Iran for a slew of hostile actions in the Persian Gulf region last year and began bolstering troop levels in the region in May, Trump held back on direct military reprisals against Tehran. Instead, he pressed Iran to join him at the negotiating table, banking on unsparing U.S. sanctions to force Tehran’s hand.

At the same time, he sought to pull some troops from Afghanistan and withdraw most forces from northern Syria. Since then, though, Trump has actually sent more forces to the Mideast -- more than 17,000 since May, including about 3,500 this week alone.

The strike at the Baghdad airport late on Thursday came together swiftly after the death of an American contractor in a Dec. 27 rocket attack by an Iranian-backed militia against a U.S. base in Iraq.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif quickly vowed payback for the killing of Soleimani, saying the Islamic Republic’s response to America’s “cowardly terrorism” will come “at any time and by any means.”

Yet Trump’s willingness to risk an escalation in an already volatile region gives him some leverage against U.S. foes even as it raises the risk of miscalculation, diplomats and analysts said in interviews. Leaders like North Korea’s Kim and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad will have to proceed cautiously before crossing a U.S. “red line,” and Iran will struggle to come up with a suitable response that won’t further destabilize its already embattled regime.


Risk Tolerance

“What we have seen over the course of the past 24 hours, or, more arguably, over the course of the past week, is a newfound risk tolerance which I think is going to create some need for recalculation on the Iranian part,” said Suzanne Maloney, deputy director of the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution. “They thought they had Trump figured out. It’s no longer clear that they did.”

Trump defended his strike on Friday, arguing that Soleimani was planning “imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel.”

“We caught him in the act and terminated him,” he said, adding that the U.S. doesn’t seek war with Iran. “We took action last night to stop a war. We did not take action to start a war.”





Trump’s move catches Iran at its weakest point in years, with the regime’s economy crushed under the weight of U.S. sanctions. That leaves Tehran, with its outdated air force and navy, in little position to respond with a direct assault against U.S. interests in the region, Araud said. Ray Takeyh, a senior fellow for Middle East studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, agreed.

“The Islamic Republic is a battered regime, beset by protests at home and abroad,” he wrote. Since Trump “withdrew from the Iran nuclear agreement and reimposed sanctions, Iran’s economy has essentially collapsed,” he said, adding that “Iran is not in a position to go to war with the United States, and is likely not capable of mounting effective asymmetric attacks on U.S. positions.”

Zarif seemed to suggest as much on Friday, telling Iranian state television that the consequences of the U.S. killing Soleimani will be “broad” and will be out of Iran’s hands because of the general’s widespread popularity in the region.


Allies’ Qualms

That doesn’t mean Iran will back down. Allies largely sided with the U.S. on Friday, but some said they viewed the escalation as the result of a U.S. “maximum pressure” campaign they see as diplomatically untenable.

Juergen Hardt, foreign policy spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s political bloc, said the targeted strike won’t cow Iran, risking an “asymmetric Iranian retaliation and a new wave of violence.” U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab joined other world leaders in calling for de-escalation.

“Frankly, the Europeans haven’t been as helpful as I wish that they could be,” Secretary of State Michael Pompeo told Sean Hannity of Fox News on Friday. “The Brits, the French, the Germans all need to understand that what we did, what the Americans did, saved lives in Europe as well.”

How the conflict evolves will depend as much on the credibility of the U.S.’s threats as it will on its ability to leverage economic and military superiority to achieve diplomatic results, the diplomats and analysts said. Yet Trump’s previous unpredictability cost him in the diplomatic sphere, angering allies such as France with his abrupt plan to pull out of Syria and undermining support for a U.S.-led security initiative in the Persian Gulf.

“One problem the United States has had in the Middle East is that it’s often acted in disregard for allies, snubbed allies, and that could be quite costly as the United States is upping the confrontation with Iran,” said Dan Byman, vice dean for undergraduate affairs at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service and a professor in its Security Studies Program.






Share/Bookmark