Visit Counter

Sunday, May 17, 2020

As an American citizen, regardless of party, how could you possible rationalize this?




You and Sarah haven't worked in 3 months and consequently your behind on the mortgage payment, car payment, taxes, credit cards. Not only are you worried about your finances you have 3 kids to raise age 2, 5, and 7. Sometimes you wonder... how will I feed my family?

Then you read this. 


(Now Pelosi knows she's not going to get it but the stupidity is beyond the pale)


The Democratic-majority House of Representatives on Friday passed the $3 trillion Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions Act

For short they're calling it (HEROES)
How clever.


Let's break it down step-by-step.


1. To a Democrat, there is no such thing as 'illegal'. They can't even say 'illegal'. So for breaking our immigration laws we're going to give the perpetrators $1200 bucks. That ought to go over big. Not quite sure what "certain illegals" means but assuming there are about 15 million (probably more) that would come to at least $180 billion!



2. Pelosi is pushing a ‘SALT shakeup’ stimulus that could reduce her tax bill and enrich her wealthy district. Pelosi and her husband have a property tax liability of approximately $198,337.62 considering their two homes, a winery and two commercial properties, public records show, indicating that the couple could reap substantial benefits in the event of a full SALT repeal.


Pelosi’s 2020 property taxes in Washington, D.C. totaled $13,997.20 on her Georgetown condo and garage, valued at $1,646,730. Her San Francisco property taxes totaled $51,480.02 — plus $47,631.98 from her Napa winery, $64,874.66 from a San Francisco commercial property, and $20,353.76 for another building. 


3. Were going through the greatest health crisis to ever face America and they're worried about marijuana businesses getting access to banking services?


4. So $20 million for Arts & Humanities helps with C-19 how?


5. Yes, Harvard doesn't have enough money.


6. This one's my favorite! Not only do they want illegals to vote they want to pave the way by funding it!!!


7. The post office. Didn't they get $10 billion in the last go around?


8. $100 million for domestic violence. So when Billy Bob gets drunk in Elbow Grease, West Virginia then decides to beat his wife Jennie Lee he's gonna think about that $100 million and say...



Seriously, if you want to stop domestic violence release the American people from lockup.


Bottom line: 

258,720,000,000

Thrown out the window. 

The last thing we need is another $3 trillion in debt. If I was Trump I'd cancel any further stimulus and put everybody back to work as safely as possible and let the chips fall where they may. We can't go on like this.








Share/Bookmark

Friday, May 15, 2020

(NBC) Biden says he would not pardon Trump





Joe's right... you can't pardon anybody from behind bars.



-------------------------------


Biden committed to ensuring that any prosecutorial decisions would be dictated by the law, in contrast to what he called the "dereliction of duty” by Trump and his attorney general, William Barr.
Mike Memoli is an NBC News correspondent.May 14, 2020, 11:56 PM EDT

Former Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he would not pardon President Donald Trump if elected and insisted any prosecutorial decisions would be left to a more independent Justice Department.

Answering questions in a virtual town hall-style event on MSNBC Thursday, the Democratic presidential hopeful was asked by a voter about whether he’d follow the lead of former President Gerald Ford, who pardoned Richard Nixon in large part to help the nation move beyond the Watergate scandal.

Biden, while not speaking to any specific potential charge, committed to ensuring that any prosecutorial decisions would be dictated by the law, in contrast to what he called the "dereliction of duty” by Trump and his attorney general, William Barr.

"It's hands off completely. The attorney general is not the president's lawyer. It's the people's lawyer,” Biden said. “We never saw anything like the prostitution of that office like we see it today.”

During the exchange, Biden was also asked to clarify whether he was aware of or participated in decisions related to incoming Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn during his final weeks as vice president in 2017. The president and his allies this week have accused Biden and former President Barack Obama of a conspiracy to entrap Flynn as part of a larger scheme to undercut the incoming administration, which they have dubbed “Obamagate."

The Justice Department announced last week their intent to drop the case against Flynn, a decision the judge in the case is now weighing after Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI.

"I was never a part or had any knowledge of any criminal investigation into Flynn while I was in office, period. Not one single time,” Biden told O’Donnell.

The answer clarified what he had told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos days earlier when asked about a January 5 meeting in the Oval Office in which Flynn was discussed. Biden was asked how he didn’t know anything about the FBI investigating Flynn at the time when “you were reported to be at a Jan. 5, 2017, meeting where you and the president were briefed on the FBI's plan to question Michael Flynn over those conversations he had with the Russian Ambassador Kislyak.”



BTW...If Flynn's conversation with Sergey Kislyak amounted to Russian collusion (and they had to be wiretapped) that would mean neither one of them could be trusted right?


So why in March 2017 did Sergey Kislyak attend a Trump Joint Session Congressional Speech? The Russian ambassador was noted in numerous conversations with Senate Democrats and was seated on the Democrat side of the venue.


WH records show Kislyak was in Barry's oval office at least 22 times!


So if Flynn's conversation with Kislyak was tantamount to subversion what do you call the Dems interaction with him?




That question was not accurate, according to a senior Obama administration official with direct knowledge of the meeting, who said the meeting did not include any discussion of an FBI investigation into Flynn or of FBI questioning of Flynn about his contacts with the Russians.

Much of Thursday’s hour-long Q&A with Biden was focused on how he as president would respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, and included a notable personnel commitment.

“I hope if I'm president that Dr. Fauci will stay on in the administration,” Biden said, offering a vote of confidence in the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases as Trump has ratcheted up criticism of him.












Share/Bookmark

Thursday, May 14, 2020

The Contradiction













Share/Bookmark

Richard Grenell hits pay dirt







There is one missing 'mug shot'.



Anyone believe they acted alone without Barry's consent? According to FOX Joe Hiden requested the unmasking of Flynn 8 days before the Trump administration was to take over. At that point if it wasn't politically motivated what was it?


Watch this Biden and Stephanopoulos interview. He acts like he has no knowledge of the Flynn fiasco. When Stephanopoulos asks him about it Joe said, "Its all about diversion" he's right. Biden tried to skirt the questions on Flynn and instead changed the subject to Trump's handling of C-19. I guarantee you if Stephanopoulos asked...Did you request the unmasking of Michael Flynn? Biden would have said NO.  

Video 559





What is unfolding now is likely the reason Barry didn't endorse Biden until the very last minute. He knows what a gaffe-prone asshole Biden is and wanted him to ride off into the sunset rather than risk Biden exposing The Obama Corruption Machine.










Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

'The Leader America Needs:' Stacey Abrams Formally Endorses Biden as she Lobbies for VP







So if Joe becomes president and selects Abrams for VP then a year later jumps off we now have what is tantamount to a Walmart clerk serving as POTUS.

--------------------------------



Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams offered her formal endorsement of presumed Democratic nominee Joe Biden on Tuesday morning:

Abrams is said to be under consideration for a vice presidential tap, and has made it clear that she thinks that her presence on Biden’s ticket is the best-case scenario:

“I would be an excellent running mate. I have the capacity to attract voters by motivating typically ignored communities,” she said in April. 

Abrams’ political accomplishments are severely limited, having only been elected to Georgia’s state legislature. For Biden to pick Abrams would leave the Democratic nominee with a vice presidential candidate with virtually no political experience; Abrams elected not to run for either of Georgia’s open Senate seats, making her higher ambitions clear. 

The Georgia Democrat also emerged as one of Biden's defenders against the allegations of sexual assault coming from former Biden aide Tara Reade, claiming that she believes the former vice president's innocence and does not find Reade to be credible:

If this defense does not make Abrams' vice presidential hopes clear, nothing will; her defense of Biden is a complete pivot from her rhetoric against then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who faced allegations that were less credible, unsubstantiated and uncorroborated. Abrams claimed that Kavanaugh was in the middle of a job interview during his confirmation to the highest court, but turns the other way as Biden, who is seeking the most powerful office, is accused of sexual misconduct.

An Abrams pick would also bring identity politics to Biden's ticket. The Georgia Democrat gained her name recognition during her 2018 gubernatorial run against Georgia Governor Brian Kemp (R); rather than concede her defeat to Gov. Kemp, Abrams credited her loss to "voter suppression" and deemed Republicans as racist for recognizing Kemp as governor.





Share/Bookmark