Unless the perp asks you to be his VP.
Visit Counter
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Monday, August 17, 2020
Jill Biden’s ex-husband accuses her of affair with Joe in 1970s
Wouldn't be a bit surprised.
I wonder privately what Jill thinks about Tara Reade’s claim?
---------------------------------
Joe Biden and his wife Jill have lied to the world for more than 40 years about how they started dating — they actually had an affair that broke up her first marriage, her first husband claims
By Ebony Bowden and Aaron Feis
Jill Biden’s ex-husband has accused the potential first lady of having an affair with Joe Biden and says they lied about how they met in the 1970s, according to a bombshell new report.
Stevenson married Jill Jacobs in 1970. 'It was February, I believe it was the 7th,' he told DailyMail.com. Two years later, he said, the couple were working on then-New Castle County Councilman Biden's first campaign for the Senate. 'Jill and I sat in the Bidens' kitchen,' said Stevenson. 'We worked on his campaign'
Bill Stevenson on Monday accused the presumptive Democratic nominee of being a home-wrecker and says the feel-good story of how Joe and Jill met on a blind date is completely made up, the Daily Mail reported.
“I don’t want to hurt anyone,” said Stevenson, now 72, who is working on a book that includes the lurid claim. “But facts are facts and what happened, happened.”
Stevenson and his then-wife grew close to Biden in 1972 while working on his first campaign to represent Delaware in the US Senate.
That same year, tragedy struck when Biden’s first wife, Neilia, and infant daughter were killed in a car crash.
Stevenson said he first suspected an affair in 1974, when his wife passed on meeting an up-and-coming rock star who was set to play at his Delaware club.
“I know exactly when it was,” he told the Daily Mail. “Bruce Springsteen was going to play at The Stone Balloon and I had to go to Northern New Jersey to pay him in advance.
“’I asked Jill to go with me and she said no — she had things to do, she had to look after Joe’s kids, Beau and Hunter. It was kind of a big deal to go meet Springsteen,” he continued. “I had no idea she and Joe were that kind of friendly.
“Then one of her best friends told me she thought Joe and Jill were getting a little too close. I was surprised that she came to me.”
A couple months later, Stevenson got all the evidence he needed when he was told that his wife had been in a fender-bender in her car — while Biden was behind the wheel.
“I was at work and a guy came in and asked, ‘Do you own a brown Corvette?’” Stevenson recalled. “He said back in May it had crunched his bumper and they told him to get an estimate and he never heard back from them.
“I said, ‘Wait a minute. Who is they?’ And he said, ‘Funnily enough, Senator Biden was driving.’”
“I considered Joe a friend. I’m not surprised he fell in love with Jill. Everyone who meets Jill falls in love with her immediately. It’s hard not to,” Stevenson said.
The Bidens, who have been married since 1977, have publicly said they met on a blind date in 1975 — after Joe became a widower and Jill’s first marriage had broken up.
The damaging Daily Mail report comes just days before Biden is expected to be officially named the Democratic nominee Thursday.
The Biden campaign declined comment.
Sunday, August 16, 2020
Finally, some common sense prevails!
State Supreme Court asked to weigh in on recall petition against Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan
Update:
https://nypost.com/2020/08/14/seattle-blm-protesters-demand-white-people-give-up-their-homes/
If you're white and own a home in Seattle it belongs to BLM. Kinda harkens back to Barry.
------------------------------------
Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan asked the state Supreme Court to reverse the decision of a King County circuit court judge that allowed a recall effort to move forward against her, which could result in her expulsion from office.
This should send a clear signal to the other 3 idiots.
If you recall (forgive the pun) Gray Davis (D-CA) governor was recalled and his views were light years from these Marxists.
Durkan, a Democrat, was called out by five Seattle residents who filed a petition seeking to recall her because of how law enforcement officials have responded to protests this summer, according to The Seattle Times.
Durkan reportedly asked the circuit court judge to reconsider the decision, but the request was denied.
The state’s highest court is now being asked to render judgment after a notice of appeal was filed on Wednesday, The Times reported.
The petitioners in turn asked the state Supreme Court to reconsider two of the charges the judge initially dismissed and to broaden their original charges against Durkan.
This comes just one day after Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best announced her resignation, saying that she was not leaving because of pay cuts to her department, but rather because of the “lack of respect” toward her fellow officers.
Best’s resignation comes amid the City Council’s decision to reduce the department by as many as 100 officers through layoffs and attrition.
Saturday, August 15, 2020
Clinesmith...the first domino to fall?
FBI Lawyer Indicted in Review of Trump-Russia Probe; Plea Expected
(He reminds me of ‘Pajama Boy’)
Clinesmith is small potatoes. The question now is... who directed him to do it?
---------------------------------------------------
WASHINGTON (CN) — President Trump was ebullient Friday afternoon in announcing the forthcoming guilty plea of a lawyer in, as he put it, “James Comey’s very corrupt FBI.”
“The fact is they spied on my campaign and they got caught,” Trump said at a White House briefing, calling the charges against Kevin Clinesmith, 38, “just the beginning … because what happened should never happen again.”
As detailed in charging papers filed this morning in Washington, Clinesmith was an assistant general counsel for the FBI assigned to support the bureau’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign’s suspected facilitation of those efforts.
In an apparent reference to Trump campaign aide Carter Page, the indictment notes that the FBI executed a wiretap against Individual #1 under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in October 2016, and that three subsequent applications to approve that warrant were approved over the next year.
The FBI cited probable cause that the target “was a knowing agent of a foreign power, specifically Russia,” but Clinesmith’s indictment says the FBI was already informed in August 2016 this individual served as an “operational contact” for an unspecified government agency from 2008 to 2013, and that he had provided the agency with information about his “prior contacts with certain Russian intelligence officers” to that end.
Robert Mueller had been appointed as special counsel to oversee the investigation by May 2017 when the FBI needed to renew the surveillance warrant of Page for the third time. It was around this time, however, that Page had asserted publicly that he was a CIA source.
Prosecutors say Clinesmith verified Page’s status with a CIA liaison on June 15, 2017, but misrepresented what the liaison told him to incorrectly say that Page was “not a source.”
Falsifying this information allowed the FBI to renew Page’s warrant for the third time on June 29, 2017.
Clinesmith resigned from the FBI last year and is expected to plead guilty to one count of making a false statement.
Justin Shur, an attorney for the lawyer with the firm MoloLamken, did not immediately return a request for comment Friday. Shur told The New York Times, however, that Clinesmith regrets altering the email.
“It was never his intent to mislead the court or his colleagues, as he believed the information he relayed was accurate,” Shur said, “but Kevin understands what he did was wrong and accepts responsibility.”
Clinesmith’s indictment follows a report from the Justice Department’s inspector general, who concluded independently that the FBI made “significant inaccuracies and omissions” across its four applications concerning Page’s surveillance, and that “the Crossfire Hurricane team failed to comply with FBI policies and in doing so fell short of what is rightfully expected from a premier law enforcement agency entrusted with such an intrusive surveillance tool.”
This is the first criminal case to come from a probe of Operation Crossfire Hurricane since U.S. Attorney General William Barr tapped U.S. Attorney John Durham to lead it last year while Democrats opened an impeachment inquiry against Trump.
For Democratic Congressmen Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff, the chairmen of the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees, respectively, the Justice Department under Barr has “become a vehicle for President Trump’s political revenge.”
Party leaders contend that scrutiny of the Russia investigation is a naked attempt to sways the 2020 presidential election in Trump’s favor while playing directly into the Kremlin’s disinformation campaign. Although Justice Department policy says prosecutors should not take public actions in the weeks before an election or use investigations to affect an election’s results, Barr has said these rules do not apply in this scenario.
Back in April, Barr told conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt he thinks this rule only applies to investigations concerning presidential “candidates or perhaps someone that’s sufficiently close to a candidate,” whereas none of the individuals Durham is examining “are running for president.”
Trump supporters see the case brought against Clinesmith as an exposition into whether the FBI engaged in wrongdoing by investigating whether the Trump campaign and Russia worked together to pull off Trump’s presidential victory in 2016.
Barr appointed Durham, who is the U.S. attorney for Connecticut, after telling members of Congress he believed “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign in 2016. Durham’s office said it had “no further comment” on the Clinesmith matter Friday.
After Trump’s election, the FBI turned over the Crossfire Hurricane investigation to special counsel Robert Mueller report. Mueller’s report of the probe in April 2019 failed to allege a criminal conspiracy but did find that Trump’s campaign had contact with Russia during the 2016 campaign.
Mueller by his own words said, "he did not establish that members of Trump’s campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.”
Thursday, August 13, 2020
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)