Visit Counter

Saturday, March 27, 2021

Frustrated Trump demands to know if Special Counsel Durham is still 'living'






'Where’s Durham? Is he a living, breathing human being? Will there ever be a Durham report?' Trump said


I have been saying the same thing for about a year now. Durham said he didn't want to release his report in order to not influence the election. How would you interpret that? Bribem is corrupt as hell? Or he's such an exemplamary human being he makes Trump look bad? I'm going with the former. This investigation has been going on since May 2019. When he said he didn't want to interfere with the election I thought he was talking about 2020 not 2024. 

"The Worthless 3"


They couldn't find their own ass with both hands. I guarantee you their 'investigation' is residing in a black hole just like Hunter's computer.




Remember this meme.


What it doesn't speak to... Barry had invited him for dinner to congratulate him for the great job he did covering his ass.  

-----------------------------





Former president of the United States joins 'The Ingraham Angle' for an exclusive interview.

Donald Trump mockingly wondered if Special Counsel John Durham is still alive, as the prosecutor's probe drags on into the origins of the FBI’s "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation of his 2016 campaign's alleged ties to Russia.

Durham has been probing the matter for about two years and was officially appointed a "special counsel" by former Attorney General Barr last October. Trump has long referred to the FBI’s Russia investigation as a "hoax" and has been hoping to see more results from Durham's investigation. 

"Where’s Durham? Is he a living, breathing human being? Will there ever be a Durham report?" Trump said in a statement.

Trump has accused FBI officials of improper conduct during their investigation. Special Counsel Robert Mueller found insufficient evidence to prove collusion between members of the Trump 2016 campaign and Russia.


Durham and other U.S. attorneys who served under the Trump administration were asked to resign earlier this year after Biden entered the White House. Durham stepped down from his post as U.S. attorney for Connecticut but retained his status as special counsel for purposes of his "RussiaGate" probe.

President Biden has pledged not to interfere with Justice Department investigations.

Barr said Durham "is authorized to investigate whether any federal official, employee, or any other person or entity violated the law in connection with the intelligence, counter-intelligence, or law-enforcement activities directed at the 2016 presidential campaigns, individuals associated with those campaigns, and individuals associated with the administration of President Donald J. Trump, including but not limited to Crossfire Hurricane and the investigation of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III."

Last year, the Senate Intelligence Committee published a five-part report detailing Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Officials said some of the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russian officials were a "grave counterintelligence threat," but "found no evidence" that Trump or members of his campaign colluded with Russia. 

The committee also determined that FBI officials gave "unjustified credence" to allegations levied in the infamous Steele dossier, an unverified report compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele.







Share/Bookmark

Thursday, March 25, 2021

Yes... and a giraffe is really a zebra





When Trump was president these were kids in cages.




Now at the exact same location (ready for this) they're being held in 'aspirational facilities’.




(I wouldn't put it past them)




BTW... Bribem is sending Harris down to the border. He said, "she speaks for me." Why isn't he going? Because the powers that be know he'll be peppered with questions and he's too damn stupid to answer them without looking like a fool.







Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

The opening of the floodgates



Evanston, Illinois first in US to pay reparations to Black residents
The Chicago suburb’s City Council voted 8-1 to distribute $400,000 to eligible Black households




No one alive today was a slave and no one is a slave owner. So if they want to talk about reparations let's talk about the here and now not what happened hundreds of years ago. Want reparations? How about to the families whose loved ones were killed because our government refuses to enforce our immigration laws allowing illegals to come here with impunity. 



Not only allowing it but taking it a step further by encouraging them to come here, an open invitation, with the end result of killing our own citizens. 



It happens, it's true, and they won't see a damn dime.


VICTIMS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS MEMORIAL




-------------------------------------------




The City Council in Evanston, Ill., voted 8-1 late Monday to approve a plan to make reparations available to Black residents over past discrimination and the lingering effects of slavery.

The plan, which could be the first of its kind in the U.S., is to distribute $400,000 to eligible Black households. The Associated Press reported that qualifying households in the city of 73,000 would be eligible to receive $25,000 for home repairs or down payments on property.

Ald. Robin Rue Simmons, the lawmaker who proposed the initiative back in 2019, called the approval a first step but said more needs to be done.

"It is, alone, not enough," she said, according to the Chicago Tribune. "We all know that the road to repair and justice in the Black community is going to be a generation of work. It’s going to be many programs and initiatives and more funding."

She told the New York Times, "It is the reckoning. We’re really proud as a city to be leading the nation toward repair and justice."

The funding for the program will come from the 3% tax on the sale of recreational marijuana and donations. The city expects to spend about $10 million over 10 years.

Qualifying residents must either have lived in or been a direct descendant of a Black person who lived in Evanston between 1919 to 1969 and who suffered discrimination in housing because of city ordinances, policies or practices.

Simmons said pro-reparations groups have offered pro-bono legal assistance if the program is challenged in court.

The City Council acted after dozens of citizens addressed the body and the plan received some pushback from several.

Alderman Cicely Fleming, the lone vote against the plan, said she supports reparations, but what the City Council was debating is a housing plan that is being called reparations. She said the people should dictate the terms of how their grievances are repaired. Fleming described the program as paternalistic, and it assumes Black people can’t manage their own money.

In January, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, reintroduced legislation that would fund a commission for studying and developing proposals for giving reparations to African Americans. Reparations have become an especially controversial topic in the past year and encountered pushback from Congressional Republicans.

Hundreds of communities and organizations across the country are considering providing reparations to Black people. They range from the state of California to cities like Amherst, Massachusetts, Providence, Rhode Island, Asheville, North Carolina, and Iowa City, Iowa; religious denominations like the Episcopal Church; and prominent colleges like Georgetown University in Washington.



President Biden has signaled support, Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, told reporters last month.

"He certainly would support a study of reparations. He understands we don’t need a study to take action right now on systemic racism, so he wants to take actions within his own government in the meantime," she said.

Fox News' Sam Dorman and The Associated Press contributed to this report

Share/Bookmark

I can smell the distain from here

 






Just think if something happens to Bribem and Harris simultaneously we got Pelosi for president!!!

This is the stuff nightmares are made of. 




Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 23, 2021

JoeBama Administration Blocks Journalists From Reviewing Evidence of Ongoing Massive Border Crisis








Since there's no crisis what is there to hide?

--------------------------------



The same thing happened in 2014 when Obama blocked the media from reporting on the escalating border crisis. Breitbart news then came under attack for independently talking to border patrol and documenting the crisis. In the 2021 version the JoeBama administration is back to their old tricks.

Journalists are not being allowed to review or document the escalating crisis at the southern U.S. border. No pictures are allowed, and the Biden crew has instructed all government officials not to talk to reporters or journalists. 



WASHINGTON — The Biden administration is restricting the information Border Patrol agents and sector chiefs can share with the media as a surge of migrants tests the agency’s capacity at the southern border, according to four current and two former Customs and Border Protection officials.

[…] Multiple news organizations, including NBC News, have requested access to or photos from inside overcrowded border processing facilities holding unaccompanied migrant children; they have been denied. The DHS press office released one photo late Tuesday of a mother and child undergoing a health screening inside a border facility, but no wider shots to show conditions or sleeping arrangements.


Remember this?


 There are now four times the amount of illegals... where is she?



At the height of the Trump administration’s child separation policy in June 2018, it allowed media to tour facilities where separated children were held.

The new restrictions have been passed down verbally, not through an official memo, the officials said. (read more)




Epilogue:


The people killed in Atlanta is Trump's fault because he used the term 'China virus'.

The surge at the border with illegals decked out in Bribem T-shirts is Trump's fault because of his failed immigration policies. 

10 dead in Colorado grocery store.

Still waiting for this one...



BTW... Because of Colorado and Atlanta I'm sure they're gonna be going after the second amendment... again. Almost 3,000 people a year die because of texting and driving. They would never for an instant consider taking away your phone. Probably because the telemarketers wouldn't have anybody to call.






Share/Bookmark