Visit Counter

Saturday, August 14, 2021

I great question




The Afghan Military Was Built Over 20 Years. How Did It Collapse So Quickly?


I have noticed this throughout my lifetime. Anytime we go into a country and try to prop it up militarily the inevitable result once we leave... they fold like a cheap suit. Case in point. Iraq had 250,000 troops and they couldn't hold off 15,000 ISIS fighters. Just like the South Vietnamese forces got their ass kicked by the Viet Cong. How would we like to have all the American lives lost and the gazillions of dollars we spent on these dogs back in our own coffers?

This turns my stomach:

"The swift offensive has resulted in mass surrenders, captured helicopters and millions of dollars of American-supplied equipment paraded by the Taliban on grainy cellphone videos. In some cities, heavy fighting had been underway for weeks on their outskirts, but the Taliban ultimately overtook their defensive lines and then walked in with little or no resistance."

  Where's Bribem?


Bribem's go to quote during the campaign "America is back" 

We certainly are ... back to where we were 20 years ago!

 One last thing. America isn't the only country who failed in Afghanistan. Ask the Russians. Ironically, we were the idiots that gave the Afghans stinger missiles which ultimately turned the tide against the Russians. In my opinion Afghanistan can never be civilized. We made a mistake to even try. Feel bad for the women and children going back to sharia law but then again it seems no one in the country wants to lift a finger to preserve their freedom. Like they say there's a fine line between supporting someone and them taking advantage of you. It is clearly evident they became totally dependent on us and why we are where we are today. Maybe a better strategy would have been to let no one in or out of the country and drop 'sterilization bombs' and over time let the country go back to the animals... this time the four-legged kind. Because as I see it they won't be satisfied with controlling Afghanistan and won't be long before they start planning another 9/11 type attack. 


-----------------------------------------------




The Taliban’s rapid advance has made clear that U.S. efforts to turn Afghanistan’s military into a robust, independent fighting force have failed, with its soldiers feeling abandoned by inept leaders.




An Afghan police special forces soldier at a frontline position in Kandahar this month.



KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — The surrenders seem to be happening as fast as the Taliban can travel.

In the past several days, the Afghan security forces have collapsed in more than 15 cities under the pressure of a Taliban advance that began in May. On Friday, officials confirmed that those included two of the country’s most important provincial capitals: Kandahar and Herat.

The swift offensive has resulted in mass surrenders, captured helicopters and millions of dollars of American-supplied equipment paraded by the Taliban on grainy cellphone videos. In some cities, heavy fighting had been underway for weeks on their outskirts, but the Taliban ultimately overtook their defensive lines and then walked in with little or no resistance.

This implosion comes despite the United States having poured more than $83 billion in weapons, equipment and training into the country’s security forces over two decades.

Building the Afghan security apparatus was one of the key parts of the Obama administration’s strategy as it sought to find a way to hand over security and leave nearly a decade ago. These efforts produced an army modeled in the image of the United States’ military, an Afghan institution that was supposed to outlast the American war.


But it will likely be gone before the United States is.

While the future of Afghanistan seems more and more uncertain, one thing is becoming exceedingly clear: The United States’ 20-year endeavor to rebuild Afghanistan’s military into a robust and independent fighting force has failed, and that failure is now playing out in real time as the country slips into Taliban control.
American soldiers overseeing training of their Afghan counterparts in Helmand Province in 2016.


How the Afghan military came to disintegrate first became apparent not last week but months ago in an accumulation of losses that started even before President Biden’s announcement that the United States would withdraw by Sept. 11.

It began with individual outposts in rural areas where starving and ammunition-depleted soldiers and police units were surrounded by Taliban fighters and promised safe passage if they surrendered and left behind their equipment, slowly giving the insurgents more and more control of roads, then entire districts. As positions collapsed, the complaint was almost always the same: There was no air support or they had run out of supplies and food.

But even before that, the systemic weaknesses of the Afghan security forces — which on paper numbered somewhere around 300,000 people, but in recent days have totaled around just one-sixth of that, according to U.S. officials — were apparent. These shortfalls can be traced to numerous issues that sprung from the West’s insistence on building a fully modern military with all the logistical and supply complexities one requires, and which has proved unsustainable without the United States and its NATO allies.

Soldiers and policemen have expressed ever-deeper resentment of the Afghan leadership. Officials often turned a blind eye to what was happening, knowing full well that the Afghan forces’ real manpower count was far lower than what was on the books, skewed by corruption and secrecy that they quietly accepted.

And when the Taliban started building momentum after the United States’ announcement of withdrawal, it only increased the belief that fighting in the security forces — fighting for President Ashraf Ghani’s government — wasn’t worth dying for. In interview after interview, soldiers and police officers described moments of despair and feelings of abandonment.

On one frontline in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar last week, the Afghan security forces’ seeming inability to fend off the Taliban’s devastating offensive came down to potatoes.

After weeks of fighting, one cardboard box full of slimy potatoes was supposed to pass as a police unit’s daily rations. They hadn’t received anything other than spuds in various forms in several days, and their hunger and fatigue were wearing them down.

“These French fries are not going to hold these front lines!” a police officer yelled, disgusted by the lack of support they were receiving in the country’s second-largest city.

By Thursday, this front line collapsed, and Kandahar was in Taliban control by Friday morning.

Afghan troops were then consolidated to defend Afghanistan’s 34 provincial capitals in recent weeks as the Taliban pivoted from attacking rural areas to targeting cities. But that strategy proved futile as the insurgent fighters overran city after city, capturing around half of Afghanistan’s provincial capitals in a week, and encircling Kabul.

“They’re just trying to finish us off,” said Abdulhai, 45, a police chief who was holding Kandahar’s northern front line last week.

The Afghan security forces have suffered well over 60,000 deaths since 2001. But Abdulhai was not talking about the Taliban, but rather his own government, which he believed was so inept that it had to be part of a broader plan to cede territory to the Taliban.

The months of defeats all seemed to culminate on Wednesday when the entire headquarters of an Afghan Army corps — the 217th — fell to the Taliban at the northern city of Kunduz’s airport. The insurgents captured a defunct helicopter gunship. Images of an American-supplied drone seized by the Taliban circulated on the internet along with images of rows of armored vehicles.

Brig. Gen. Abbas Tawakoli, commander of the 217th Afghan Army corps who was in a nearby province when his base fell, echoed Abdulhai’s sentiments as reasons for his troops’ defeat on the battlefield.

“Unfortunately, knowingly and unknowingly, a number of Parliament members and politicians fanned the flame started by the enemy,” General Tawakoli said, just hours after the Taliban had posted videos of their fighters looting the general’s sprawling base.


“No region fell as a result of the war, but as a result of the psychological war,” he said.

That psychological war has played out at varying levels.

Afghan pilots say that their leadership cares more about the state of the aircraft rather than the people flying them: men and at least one woman who are burned out from countless missions of evacuating outposts — often under fire — all while the Taliban carry out a brutal assassination campaign against them.

What remains of the elite commando forces, who are used to hold what ground is still under government control, are shuttled from one province to the next, with no clear objective and very little sleep.

The ethnically aligned militia groups that have risen to prominence as forces capable of reinforcing government lines also have nearly all been overrun.

The second city to fall this week was Sheberghan in Afghanistan’s north, a capital that was supposed to be defended by a formidable force under the command of Marshal Abdul Rashid Dostum, an infamous warlord and a former Afghan vice president who has survived the past 40 years of war by cutting deals and switching sides.

On Friday, another prominent Afghan warlord and former governor, Mohammad Ismail Khan, who had resisted Taliban attacks in western Afghanistan for weeks and rallied many to his cause to push back the insurgent offensive, surrendered to the insurgents.


“We are drowning in corruption,” said Abdul Haleem, 38, a police officer on the Kandahar frontline earlier this month. His special operations unit was at half strength — 15 out of 30 people — and several of his comrades who remained on the front were there because their villages had been captured.

“How are we supposed to defeat the Taliban with this amount of ammunition?” he said. The heavy machine gun, for which his unit had very few bullets, broke later that night.

As of Thursday, it was unclear if Mr. Haleem was still alive and what remained of his comrades.

As the Taliban carry out an almost uninterrupted sweep of the country, their strength has been in question. Official estimates have long sat at somewhere between 50,000 to 100,000 fighters. Now that number is even murkier as international forces and their intelligence capabilities withdraw.

Some U.S. officials say the Taliban numbers have swelled because of an influx of foreign fighters and an aggressive conscription campaign in captured territory. Other experts say the Taliban have taken a bulk of their strength from Pakistan. 

Yet even amid what could be a complete surrender by the Afghan government and its forces, there are troops still fighting.

More often than not, as is the case in any conflict since the beginning of time, the soldiers and police are fighting for each other, and for the lower-ranking leaders who inspire them to fight despite what hell lies ahead.

In May, when the Taliban were breaching the outskirts of the southern city of Lashkar Gah, a hodgepodge group of border force soldiers were holding the line. 

The police officers who were supposed to be defending the area had long surrendered, retreated or had been paid off by the Taliban, as has occurred in many parts of the country over the past year.

Equipped with rifles and machine guns, some dressed in uniforms, others not, the border soldiers beamed when their stubble-bearded captain, Ezzatullah Tofan, arrived at their shell-racked position, a house abandoned during the fighting.
Capt. Ezzatullah Tofan, second right, arriving at a beleaguered Afghan Border Force position on the front line in Lashkar Gah in May.

He always comes to the rescue, one soldier said.

Late last month, as the Taliban pushed into Lashkar Gah, the provincial capital of Helmand Province, an outpost called their headquarters elsewhere in the city asking for reinforcements. In an audio recording obtained by The New York Times, the senior commander on the other end asked them to stay and fight.

Captain Tofan was bringing reinforcements, he said, and to hold on a little longer. That was around two weeks ago.

By Friday, despite the Afghan military’s tired resistance, repeated flights of reinforcements and even American B-52 bombers overhead, the city was in the hands of the Taliban.

Taimoor Shah and Jim Huylebroek contributed reporting from Kandahar, Afghanistan. Najim Rahim and Fatima Faizi contributed from Kabul. Eric Schmitt contributed reporting.






Share/Bookmark

Friday, August 13, 2021

Trump blasts the 'tragic mess' Biden has left in Afghanistan










This is reminiscent of when Barry pulled out of Iraq and created ISIS. 


I'm all for pulling out of Afghanistan but not in this fashion! Troops had to be sent back in to help neutralize the situation. That said, we have spent trillions on these bastards and we could be there for another 50 years and things are never going to change. What have we accomplished there all this time? Bribem just announced very recently he was pulling out of Afghanistan and now the Taliban has just about swamped the entire country. And we've been there how long? This shows me the blood, sweat, and financial assistance we put into this effort, rescuing this country, was totally futile. 



Afghan fighters drive a vehicle captured from the Afghan National Army through the streets of Kandahar on Friday after capturing the key southern city. The Taliban completed their sweep of the country's south, taking four more provincial capitals in a lightning offensive


 The Taliban are using weapons captured from the Afghan National Army. How lame is that?



Speaking of lame...

The State Department has asked the Taliban to spare the U.S. embassy if their fighters overrun the Afghan capital Kabul.

When did we become France?








Share/Bookmark

Could this be the reason why people refuse to get vaccinated?



Talk about night and day! When Trump had his fingerprints on the vaccine bottle it it was Kryptonite now Bribem has his it's the Holy Grail.

The epitome of hypocrisy:
 
 
Video 633



What a f-ing turn around from then and now especially on Bribem’s part! At Bribem’s next press conference would like to see Peter Doocy ask him…Mr. President could this be the reason many people are refusing to get the shot... then play him this video. 



The probable result:








Share/Bookmark

Thursday, August 12, 2021

New take on an old song


 






Share/Bookmark

More on white people going the way of the dinosaur






New Census data to show US diversifying at fastest rate ever


They gave some lame and some not so lame excuses as to why the white population is declining. What this census doesn't address? What is the true number of illegals  currently living 'diluting the pool' in the United States and how many thousands continue to enter every day?

It cannot be denied the left is the reason for this evolution. 


They're open border policy...

"Covid, murderer, child molester, gang member, etc we don't care come on in."  

Their ploy is to dupe white people into believing they're no good and it's working... CRT, reparations, and of course the blown out of all proportion white supremacy bullshit just to mention a few. They employ these tactics to induce self loathing to pave the path for the browning of America.



These are the type of people who were useful idiots to Hitler.



If there was a milk carton for the brainwashed he would be the poster child.


------------------------------------------------



Data to be released Thursday by the Census Bureau is likely to show the U.S. is diversifying at the fastest rate in the nation’s history, even as overall population growth slows to the most sluggish pace since the country’s founding.

The new figures are almost certain to shine a spotlight on a trend that annual surveys have illustrated over the last several years: The number of white Americans is declining.

The white population in America has grown far more slowly than minority groups for decades. White people are having fewer children and starting their families at a later age than other groups, a long-term trend that demographers have called a baby bust. The opioid epidemic, too, has claimed so many lives that it measurably reduced the nation’s life expectancy, especially among white people.

Over the last four years, annual census surveys have shown the white population has declined by more than 1 million — a drop that is sufficient to wipe out the population growth among white people from 2010 to 2016.

The pace of the decrease is accelerating, too. Between 2016 and 2017, the white population fell by an estimated 129,000 people. From 2019 to 2020, that decline sped up to 482,000.

If trends from annual estimates conducted over the last decade hold, the census data released Thursday is likely to show an America that is, for the first time in the nation’s history, less than 60 percent white.

Minority groups, however, are growing.

The number of Hispanic or Latino Americans grew by at least 1 million in eight of the last 10 years, and by 10.5 million between 2010 and 2020. The number of Asian Americans grew by about half a million in seven of the last 10 years, up 4.7 million over the decade. And the number of African Americans grew by at least 300,000 in eight of the last 10 years, or an estimated 3.4 million since the 2010 census.

“All of the U.S. population growth from 2016 to 2020 comes from gains in people of color,” wrote William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution who closely tracks census data. “The statistics … imply that, as the white population ages and declines further, racial and ethnic diversity will be the hallmark demographic feature of America’s younger generations.”

Frey’s analysis shows the rising minority populations come mainly from natural growth — that is, people already living in the U.S. who are giving birth. Among Latino or Hispanic Americans, about three-quarters of the population added over the last decade came from natural increase, and the remaining quarter from immigration.

Asian Americans were the only demographic group to experience more growth from immigration, 3.3 million people, than from natural increase, 1.2 million.

But the data is also likely to show that the declines among white Americans is being mirrored in slowing growth among minority populations: All three of the nation’s largest minority groups — Latinos or Hispanic Americans, African Americans and Asian Americans — experienced their slowest growth rates of the last decade between 2019 and 2020.

The figures, taken in the middle of each year measured, do not include the vast majority of those who have died during the coronavirus pandemic.

The Census Bureau data to be released Thursday will officially kick off a scramble to redraw political boundaries that is already underway in many states. The data — which will include the first precinct-level population counts and demographic characteristic information from last year’s survey — will provide state legislators and redistricting commissions with the information they need to draw legislative and congressional district lines that will be in effect over the next decade.

The data is coming months later than initially expected, in part because of the effects of a national pandemic that forced the Bureau’s 4,200 employees to work from home and curtail some of the planned in-person count that typically follows the mail-in portion of the survey.

“The COVID-19 pandemic significantly delayed our schedule for collecting and processing the data for the 2020 Census,” acting Census Bureau Director Ron Jarmin wrote in a blog post.

The Bureau published its initial count, which showed state-level populations needed for apportioning seats in the House of Representatives, in April. Those results showed a continued shift of political power away from the Northeast and the Rust Belt and into the South and West.

California, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia all saw their delegations reduced by one seat, while Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina and Oregon all gained a seat. Texas will add two seats to its delegation.

The redistricting process has different rules in every state, but Republicans begin the map-making cycle with a distinct advantage: They will have complete power to draw 38 percent of congressional district lines, while Democrats will only hold total control — through majorities in state legislatures and governorships — of 16 percent of U.S. House seats.

Another third of the seats will be drawn with input from both parties, or by independent or nonpartisan commissions. Six states — Alaska, Delaware, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming — elect only a single at-large member of the House of Representatives.


Both Democrats and Republicans have set up well-funded outside groups dedicated to creating a partisan advantage, a decade after the most contentious and litigious redistricting process left Republicans with a huge advantage in controlling the House and state legislative bodies.

Those groups, and the attention that activists and party officials now pay to what was once a cartographic exercise that took place behind closed doors, means this year’s redistricting process is likely to be the most transparent in American history: Voters will be able to witness in real time their legislators remapping their states.

But at the same time, the process is likely to be governed by fewer guardrails than in previous decades. Several Supreme Court decisions in recent years have eroded the power of the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the federal Justice Department’s authority to limit a state legislature’s ability to draw lines for partisan purposes.





Share/Bookmark