Visit Counter

Thursday, September 16, 2021

There are so many twists and turns in this case you could make a movie out of it

 

I normally don't post this kind of thing but this is a intriguing case to say the least. Below is just one more facet.



Death of Murdaugh housekeeper who fell in home yields criminal investigation


a group of people posing for the camera




The death three years ago of a longtime housekeeper and nanny for the Murdaugh family will be the subject of a criminal investigation, South Carolina authorities announced Wednesday, yielding yet another unexpected turn in a case that has entangled a prominent legal family.

A spokesman for the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division said the death of Gloria Satterfield has prompted a review following a request from the Hampton County coroner and based on "information gathered" during a separate investigation involving Alex Murdaugh, the legal scion whose wife and son were fatally shot in June.



© Brice W. Herndon and Sons Funeral Home Image: Gloria Satterfield (Brice W. Herndon and Sons Funeral…




Satterfield's death "was not reported to the coroner at the time, nor was an autopsy performed," Hampton County Coroner Angela Topper wrote in a letter to state investigators in her request. "On the death certificate, the manner of death was ruled 'natural,' which is inconsistent with injuries sustained in a trip and fall accident."

Earlier Wednesday, an attorney for Satterfield's family filed a lawsuit in Hampton County court accusing Murdaugh and others of breach of fiduciary duty in failing to pay them as part of a wrongful death settlement.

Satterfield was 57 when she died in February 2018 from injuries sustained from a fall in the Murdaugh home, where she was employed for more than two decades. According to the suit, "the exact details of the fall remain unclear" to her two sons, Michael "Tony" Satterfield and Brian Harriott, who were supposed to get $475,000 in direct payment to "compensate them for the grief, sorrow and mourning associated with the loss of their mother."

The home was insured through Lloyd's of London, according to the suit. Murdaugh initially pledged that he was "going to take care of the boys," the suit added, by suing himself to collect on personal liability insurance through Lloyd's. But nearly two years after a partial settlement was reached with the insurance firm, a "stipulation of dismissal" was filed in October 2020, purportedly ending the estate's claims against Murdaugh. Murdaugh also signed the stipulation, according to an exhibit attached to the suit.

"Neither Tony, nor Brian, were consulted about the dismissal, nor were they told of what, if any, additional actions had been taken on their behalves in the years following the partial settlement," the suit said. "Tony and Brian first learned that money had been recovered from the death of their mother when it was reported in the press."


South Carolina attorney now accused of planning his own shooting

Ronald Richter Jr., an attorney for Satterfield's family, told NBC News they've received "not a dime."

"We're informed that the settlement was $505,000, but the net proceeds of that settlement, we're told that they have received none of that money, although the case supposedly resolved in 2018," he said.

Another attorney, Eric Bland, said Satterfield's sons didn't previously want to make waves.

"It's hard. One of our clients is special needs, the other lives in a small Southern town ... and they didn't ask questions," he said. They previously "tried to call their lawyers and didn't get a response, but they didn't take it beyond that. They were scared."

A Murdaugh family spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The latest investigation surrounding the family comes after state investigators and lawyers for Murdaugh revealed he used a gunman to attempt to stage his own death so that a $10 million life insurance policy can be paid to another son.

The bizarre plot unraveled, however, when the lawyers said the man, Curtis Edward Smith, only grazed Murdaugh's head with a bullet during the Sept. 4 roadside shooting, and days later, Murdaugh's law firm accused him of misappropriating money.

Jim Griffin, one of Murdaugh's lawyers, said that his client did not tell state investigators that he paid Smith and that Smith "willingly shot him without pay," The Post and Courier reported. He also said Smith was the "primary" drug dealer for Murdaugh, who had been dealing with an addiction to painkillers.

Smith, 61, was charged with assisted suicide, insurance fraud, conspiracy to commit insurance fraud and other counts, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division said in a statement. Murdaugh, who was listed as a co-defendant, was not immediately arrested; another of his lawyers, Richard Harpootlian, said on NBC's "TODAY" show that he expects charges to be filed.

Court documents show that Murdaugh had first represented Smith in a personal injury lawsuit in 2012 and then for a speeding ticket in 2013. Other details surrounding their connection, and whether the shooting might also be tied to the unsolved slayings of Murdaugh's wife, Margaret, and son Paul remain unclear.

Harpootlian said Murdaugh was "distraught" over their deaths and overcome by emotions exacerbated by a 20-year opioid addiction, but insisted he did not play a role in their killings.

Harpootlian said they're doing their own investigation, and "we think we'll know this week whether the one suspect we're looking at bears further scrutiny, and we'll make that available to law enforcement."

Smith was also charged with distribution of methamphetamine and possession of marijuana. Court records indicate he has traffic violations in Colleton County going back to 1995, and it was not immediately clear if he currently has an attorney.

Given what investigators and his attorneys have already said, Murdaugh himself could face numerous charges, including conspiracy to commit insurance fraud, as well as charges related to the theft of money from his law firm and the purchasing of illegal drugs, according to Kenneth Gaines, a law professor at the University of South Carolina.

"When they pull back the covers on this, there's going to be a whole lot of things flying out," he said.

Harpootlian said on "TODAY" that Murdaugh remains cooperative with state investigators as he seeks treatment for his drug addiction at a rehab center. He said Murdaugh also provided investigators with his bank accounts and "told them how to find out how much he spent, where it went, where the bank accounts were, what went in, what came out," as well as "checks written to drug dealers.

The family's powerful legal connections were in the spotlight after Paul Murdaugh was indicted in a boat crash in 2019 that left Mallory Beach, 19, dead. A police report said people on the boat were "grossly intoxicated."

Paul Murdaugh, who had pleaded not guilty to three felony counts of boating under the influence, was awaiting trial at the time of his death.

In addition, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division announced in June that it was opening an investigation into the death of another 19-year-old, Stephen Smith, who was found on a rural road in Hampton County in 2015. Investigators said the case was opened after information was found while investigating the double homicide of Margaret and Paul Murdaugh.








Share/Bookmark

General Milley worked with Pelosi to undermine President Trump and should be convicted of treason

 





This is serious and likely treason. Milley acted outside of the chain of command when holding back channel discussions with China and Pelosi colluded with him. One of the calls with China was relayed to speaker Nancy Pelosi which likely makes her an accomplice in a treasonous act. What right did Pelosi or General Milley have in communicating with China or any foreign government on behalf of the president of the United States? How was Milley able to give his assurances without usurping the duties of his president Donald Trump? 

------------------------------


Is Nancy Pelosi pulling General Mark Milley’s strings?

[And 10 to 1 she's the one pushing the button to end Bribem's press conferences or she instructed someone to do so]

Miranda Devine

If you believe the latest Bob Woodward book, the United States has lost civilian control of its military — unless you count Nancy Pelosi who seems to have been in control of everything since she became speaker in 2019 with the single-minded goal of bringing down Donald Trump.

Everything has gone downhill since, and most dangerously at the Pentagon where a cohort of woke generals fell under Pelosi’s malign spell.

That’s the only way you can ­understand how Gen. Mark Milley could have become so deranged that he cast himself as the hero of a “Seven Days in May”-style fever dream in which only he could save the nation from Trump launching nuclear war with China to stay in office.

It’s an insane scenario, a left-wing equivalent of the most farfetched QAnon conspiracies.

But this is what is claimed in the Woodward book, titled “Peril,” co-authored by Robert Costa. So alarmed was the tightly wound general about what he imagined Trump might do in the weeks before and after last year’s election that he made “secret calls” to his counterpart in China promising to warn him if the president ordered an attack.

A lot of Republicans are demanding that Milley be tried for treason, after The Washington Post published extracts from “Peril” this week. But a lunatic asylum might be more appropriate.

A statement Wednesday from the Pentagon confirmed that Milley had made the calls to Chinese Gen. Li Zuocheng in October and January but denied that they were secret or that he was usurping presidential authority.

Yet Trump says he didn’t know about them, and neither did Chris Miller, the acting defense secretary in January, who told Fox News he “did not and would not ever authorize” the general to make such calls.

It’s clear that Milley, or people authorized by him, leaked details of his delusional derring-do to a number of authors because he is proud of his actions. His lack of shame bodes ill for the country if he remains the nation’s highest-ranking military officer as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The botched withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan over which he presided was bad enough. What’s next?

The most disturbing part of the Milley story that emerges from at least three accounts of the Trump presidency vying for bookshelf space this fall is Pelosi’s malign ­influence. 


Former President Donald Trump stated Gen. Mark Milley “would be tried for TREASON” for allegedly contacting his Chinese counterpart.REUTERS/Tom Brenner


The general seemed to treat her as his commander in chief. Pelosi, who was engaged in a blood feud with Trump that had sent her batty, ­manipulated and bullied Milley.

A transcript of a call with Pelosi two days after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, obtained by the “Peril” authors, has her ranting at Milley about Trump’s access to nuclear weapons.

“If they couldn’t even stop him from an assault on the Capitol, who even knows what else he may do? And is there anybody in charge at the White House who was doing anything but kissing his fat butt all over this? . . .

“He’s crazy. You know he’s crazy. He’s been crazy for a long time. So don’t say you don’t know what his state of mind is.”

Milley reportedly responded: “Madam Speaker. I agree with you on everything.”

After Pelosi’s hysterical call, he phoned China.

“General Li, you and I have known each other for now five years,” Milley reportedly told him. “If we’re ­going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time.”

He also convened a meeting of top military officials in the Pentagon that afternoon and insisted they inform him if the president called about any military actions.

It wasn’t his place to insert himself in the chain of command. He was just a military adviser to the president, with no role in commanding troops.

But by then he was a fully paid-up member of the Trump Derangement cult in Washington.

You could trace the madness of Milley to the day in June 2020 when he posed with Trump outside St. John’s church in Lafayette Square near the White House.

The country was convulsed by ­anti-cop riots and Democrats, seeing political advantage in the chaos, were obstructing Trump’s efforts to contain the violence. The historic church had been firebombed in riots so ferocious that the president and his family had to be whisked into a bunker for their safety.


Then-President Donald Trump holds a Bible as he visits outside St. John’s Church across Lafayette Park amid the George Floyd riots on June 1, 2020.AP Photo/Patrick Semansky



Dozens of US Park Police and Secret Service officers were injured. The next day the Park Police cleared the square so contractors could erect extra security fencing around the park.

Trump’s photo with a Bible outside the church surrounded by members of his administration was a stunt, but it also was important to reassure the nation that the president was in command. It was frightening how close the insurgents had come to the White House.

But the media narrative pushed by candidate Joe Biden and Pelosi was that Trump had tear-gassed peaceful protesters and driven them out of the square for a photo-op. This was a lie, as the inspector general of the Department of the Interior stated in a forensic report into the incident a year later.

But Pelosi was deranged, screaming over the phone at Milley, vilifying federal law enforcement as “storm troopers” and using her favorite fatist slurs against Attorney General Bill Barr, whom she called a “blob” and a “henchman.”

Milley took her critique to heart and made a pathetic video apology that he said was on behalf of an “apolitical military.”

“My presence in that moment and in that environment created the perception of the military involved in politics.”

What a joke.

This is the same Milley who compared Trump to Hitler and called Trump’s supporters “brownshirts.”

In one account, Milley went to Biden’s inauguration and told ­Michelle Obama, “No one has a bigger smile today than I do.” 

Milley reportedly considered resigning because Trump asked him to join him for that photo-op.

But he didn’t resign when Biden insisted he abandon Bagram Air Base and set in motion the worst military disaster in half a century.

How can we allow someone with such bad judgment to remain chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? 

Milley’s delusions of grandeur could get us all killed. For real, as Joe Biden likes to say.





Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

Republican senator grills Blinken on why WH abruptly cut Bribem's live video feed mid-sentence




This is the video in question:

BTW... This has happened on multiple occasions so they can't give us the bullshit it was some sort of technical glitch.

Video 638



Senator Risch is grilling Blinken. This is another one of those, "it depends on what is... is” moments. This grinning Cheshire Cat is lying through his teeth and he knows it. 

Video 639

I know rugs that can't lie this well. 
Check the look on Menendez's face... even he knows it's absurd.


Bribem said on at least 10 occasions he's not ‘allowed' to talk to the press. Why? 

Because this happens:


Video 640


Still can't believe this asshole is POTUS!



Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, September 14, 2021

AOC ripped for attending elite Met Gala in ‘Tax the Rich’ dress



Talk about disconnect... 

AOC: The real meaning.

 "Acute Oblivious Complex” 


But remember it was her responsibility to attend the Met Gala. Judging by the photos obviously she wasn't there to have a good time I mean, this is her job. Allegedly she didn't pay for the $30,000 ticket. 

So who did?



--------------------------------------



Self-proclaimed “socialist” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed early Tuesday that it was her “responsibility” to attend the Met Gala — as she was roundly ripped for wearing a couture “Tax the Rich” dress to the elite bash, where tickets cost at least $30,000.

The mask-less Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) turned heads as she joined other left-wing leaders like Mayor Bill de Blasio at the exclusive New York bash late Monday — passing by a Black Lives Matter protest against the event taking place outside.

She justified wearing her dress by New York-based Aurora James — whom she hailed as a “sustainably focused, Black woman immigrant designer” — claiming they were there to “kick open the doors at the Met.”

“And before haters get wild flying off the handle, New York elected officials are routinely invited to and attend the Met due to our responsibilities in overseeing and supporting the city’s cultural institutions for the public,” she tweeted early Tuesday. “I was one of several in attendance in this evening,” she noted defensively.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attended the Met Gala wearing a Couture "Tax the Rich" dress.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attended the Met Gala wearing a couture “Tax the Rich” dress.Kevin Mazur/MG21/Getty Images For The Met Museum/Vogue


Some online suggested that her defensive message was a sign that she “already knew the optics on this were gonna be really bad” — with her attendance quickly getting a dressing down online.

“What makes @AOC a bigger fraud: The ‘tax the rich’ dress while she’s hanging out with a bunch of wealthy leftwing elites or the lack of masks after spending the past 18 months as one of the biggest authoritarian mask Karens in the country?” Donald Trump Jr. asked.

“‘Tax the Rich’ … But first I’m gonna go have the time of my life partying with them all at the most extravagant over the top party of the year that is essentially a celebration of richness,” Barstool Sports president Dave Portnoy tweeted sarcastically.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez did allegedly not pay to attend the Met Gala. Tickets cost at least $30,000.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez allegedly did not pay to attend the Met Gala. Tickets cost at least $30,000.Stephen Lovekin/Shutterstock


Actor Michael Rapaport shared a similar message, tweeting, “Custom TAX THE RICH dress while at the most elitist event in the world.”

“@AOC will soon be rich with a ginormous production deal from somewhere & done with Politics, guarantee it,” he wrote.

“Stop treating ANY of these people like celebrities they are public servants that work for US.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also touted a "Tax the Rich" handbag.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also toted a “Tax the Rich” handbag. Jamie McCarthy/MG21/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue

 


Podcaster CJ Pearson also tweeted about how the face of the “Democratic Socialists” was “wearing a Tax The Rich dress at a $33,000/person event, exclusively attended by Hollywood elites.”

“She understands irony almost as well as she does economics,” he quipped.

Human rights advocate Tina Ramirez said it was “obscenely out of touch and completely hypocritical” of the representative who “makes well over double the national average salary and who voted to give herself a pay raise.”

Benjamin Bronfman, Aurora James, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Riley Roberts depart The 2021 Met Gala.
One Twitter user said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “understands irony almost as well as she does economics.”
Jamie McCarthy/MG21/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue

Many shared images of BLM protesters angrily decrying the event from outside while the socialist leader was smiling at the upscale event, where companies spend around $300,000 to book a table.

“Police were creasing people’s heads outside while you and your friends were nibbling watermelon tarts with smoked yuzu soy on panipuri crackers,” tweeted Andray Domise, a member of Black Alliance for Peace.

AOC allegedly did not pay for her ticket, and it is still unclear who invited her to the gala. 


The price of her ticket undoubtedly was a tax deduction. So in a sense for her to go to the gala the taxpayers paid for it. Kind of ironic don't you think? 


Her head is so far up her ass you would need Voyager 1 to find it.




 


Share/Bookmark

So if you can't control him cut him off the air




White House abruptly cuts feed of Biden mid-sentence as he asks question at wildfires briefing

Biden's White House has history of preventing public from hearing him off the cuff



The president makes remarks during a briefing from federal and state fire agency officials at the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise, Idaho.

The White House abruptly cut the feed of President Biden's briefing on wildfires with federal and state officials. 





During Monday's visit to Boise, Idaho, Biden received a briefing about the ongoing wildfires that have plagued several states out west. 

While Biden spoke for much of the briefing, at one point he said he wanted to hear more from George Geissler of the National Association of State Foresters.


"Can I ask you a question?" Biden asked. 

"Of course," Geissler responded. 

"One of the things that I've been working on with some others is —" Biden said before being cut off mid-sentence.

The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment. 

This isn't the first time the White House intervened in blocking Biden from being heard by the general public. Last month, the president's audio feed was cut as he was about to respond to a reporter's question on his administration's military withdrawal deadline from Afghanistan.

In March, the White House cut the feed as Biden said he was "happy to take questions" while speaking to Democratic lawmakers at a virtual event. 

This latest incident comes just days after Politico reported how White House staffers will "either mute [Biden] or turn off his remarks" out of "anxiety" that he will veer away from "the West Wing’s carefully orchestrated messaging."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki previously admitted during an interview that Biden is often advised by her staff not to take questions. 

Biden raised eyebrows last week when he told a crowd, "I‘m supposed to stop and walk out of the room" at a White House event following his prepared remarks.






Share/Bookmark