Visit Counter

Showing posts sorted by date for query happy muslims. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query happy muslims. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, December 18, 2017

Are they finally coming to their senses?





Geert Wilders calls for Trump-style Muslim travel ban in Europe

When Muslims are allowed into your country what's the first thing they do? Start bitching about the country they just migrated to! 



Don't have to tell you what the second thing is.

------------------------------

Dutch Freedom party leader tells far-right gathering in Prague Europe should also turn back migrant boats like Australia

Geert Wilders called for a ‘totally new strategy’ which might include building border walls. Photograph: David W Cerny/Reuters



European countries should adopt Donald Trump-style travel bans to counter a wave of Islamisation supposedly sweeping the continent, the Dutch anti-immigrant politician Geert Wilders has said.

Wilders, the leader of the Netherlands’ Freedom party (PVV), made his comments at a gathering of far-right leaders in Prague. He also urged Europe to adopt Australia’s tactics in turning back migrant boats and to build new border walls, as Trump has vowed to do along the US frontier with Mexico.

Wilders was flanked during his press conference by France’s Front National leader, Marine Le Pen, and Tomio Okamura, the leader of the Czech Freedom and Direct Democracy party (SPD), which finished joint third in the recent parliamentary election with nearly 11% of the vote.

Security was tight at the press event, held at a hotel just off Wenceslas Square, apparently in recognition of death threats against Wilders in response to his fierce denunciations of Islam.

Wilders, who was convicted last year by a Dutch court for incitement against Moroccans, cited US research he claimed showed that the Czech Republic would be bordered to the north, south, and west by countries that were more than 20% Muslim by the middle of the century if current demographic trends continued.

“It will be almost as if you are bordering a kind of Gaza Strip on almost every border,” he said.

“We must adopt a totally new strategy. We must have the courage to restrict legal immigration instead of expanding it, even if we sometimes have to build a wall.”

Trump’s travel ban, which applies to six Muslim-majority nations plus North Korea and Venezuela, has been one of his most controversial policies. It has been the subject of various challenges in court, and rulings that have overturned and suspended it. The US supreme court ruled this month that it could be implemented for now while numerous challenges were resolved. 

The Prague gathering came at an encouraging moment for the organizers, the European parliament’s populist Europe of Nations and Freedom grouping,. The Austrian Freedom Party (FPO), one of the participants, became the only far-right party in government in a western European state on Friday, after joining a coalition with the conservative People’s party.

That followed a year of setbacks for Wilders and Le Pen, who failed to make the electoral breakthroughs many had forecast. The PVV remains in opposition in the Netherlands after a poorer than predicted parliamentary election result last March, and Emmanuel Macron beat Le Pen in the second round of France’s presidential poll in May.

A similar meeting last January in the German town of Koblenz was held amid euphoric expectations of major successes in 2017.

Le Pen said Europe’s rightwing groups were linked by a belief that the European Union was a “catastrophic, disastrous organization” and that the migration flows were “unbearable”. She also praised Okamura, with whom she said she had been working for many months.

Tokyo born-Okamura, the son of a part-Japanese father and Czech mother, said the parties were defending European values.

Wilders, Le Pen, and Okamura later received rousing ovations at the weekend’s main event, a conference at the Top Hotel, a nondescript Communist-era building in Chodov, a bleak suburb several miles from the center of Prague.

The venue was cordoned off, a police helicopter hovered overhead and riot police monitored two groups of leftwing protesters. 

“The dangerous thing is that the extreme views we see on display here have entered the mainstream, with even the Czech Social Democrats accepting them,” said Honza, a protest organizer who declined to give his full name for safety reasons.

Similar mistrust was evident inside, where security personnel scrutinized journalists closely and escorted them to and from a sectioned-off area.

The independent British MEP, Janice Atkinson, a former UKIP member, invoked the Czech fight against communism, the failed 1968 Prague Spring and Margaret Thatcher to encourage her audience to campaign for a Czexit referendum that could enable the Czech Republic to follow Britain out of the EU.

“As Margaret Thatcher said, Europe is stronger precisely because France is France, Spain is Spain, Britain is Britain and, just as important, Czech is Czech,” she said. “Long live the Europe of nations. Long live the Czech Republic.”



Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

PIERS MORGAN: He claims he wants peace but Trump has just enraged a billion Muslims and poured oil on the flames of a war that could consume us all




Morgan is an asshole wuss. 

Didn't Britain just discover a Muslim planned terrorist attack to kill Theresa May?


I'll squash his argument with two indisputable facts.

1. The controversy surrounding the move of the embassy dates back decades. A law passed in 1995 under the Clinton administration considers Jerusalem the capital, and even mandates the move of the embassy there. Trump is the only president who had the balls to do it.

2. He uses the word enraged. Name me a time dating back to the RFK assassination Muslims weren't enraged about something?




It's called fear of Islam.

------------------------------------



Before you start to read good old Piers bear in mind every forthcoming terrorist attack, which was going to happen anyway, will quickly be blamed on Trump's Jerusalem decision. 

BTW...Here are some of Piers buddies after they were allowed to colonize his country:





What's the first thing you're told by your parents as a kid when you're anywhere near fire?

That's right: don't pour oil on it.

Why?

Well, ignore the advice and see for yourself – the fire will instantly erupt into a far larger and more furious ball of violent flame, endangering the lives of everyone in the immediate vicinity.

Today, President Donald Trump has taken a million-ton barrel of oil and tipped it all over the Middle East.

His decision to officially recognize Jerusalem as the new capital city of Israel, and to move the US embassy there from Tel Aviv, is a staggeringly reckless act of willful provocation even by his tweet-enraging standards.

And it could very quickly turn out to be a far more worrying threat to world peace than even the North Korea crisis.

I don't say this lightly.


U.S. President Donald Trump holds up the proclamation Wednesday that announces the United States recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moving its embassy there


To understand the enormity of this decision, it's important to understand the history behind it.

Jerusalem is at the very heart of the Israel/Palestine conflict.

West Jerusalem is the home of Israel's government; East Jerusalem is the home to 300,000 Palestinians.

Both sides insist it must be the capital of their states.

This is why America has trodden very carefully when it comes to Jerusalem, locating its embassy in Tel Aviv since Israel's creation in 1948.

They are not alone in this. No other country in the world has their Israeli embassy in Jerusalem, acknowledging that to do so would be incredibly inflammatory.

Now President Trump is re-igniting this smoldering tinderbox in spectacular fashion.

He apparently considers it a roll of the dice worth throwing to force through a peace settlement.


Palestinian protesters burn the American flag and Israeli flag in the city of Gaza City on December 6 after Trump recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel


Almost everyone else sees it as a desperately dangerous gamble that could have disastrous consequences for the whole already war-ravaged region.

Saudi Arabia's King Salman told Trump personally in a phone call it 'would constitute a flagrant provocation of Muslims all over the world'.

King Abdullah of Jordan said it would have 'serious implications for security and stability in the Middle East'.

Turkish President Erdogan described it as a violation of international law and a 'red line' for Muslims that would force Turkey to sever all diplomatic ties with Israel.

China warned it could 'sharpen regional conflict, initiating new hostility'.

Russia, a key Middle East player, agreed, expressing concern over 'possible deterioration'.


'I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel,' Trump said from the White House Wednesday. 'It's the right thing to do'

French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking in similar terms to Germany and the UK, told Trump to urgently reconsider the plan, stressing that the status of Jerusalem 'must be resolved through negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians'.

Pope Francis spoke of his 'deep worry' about the situation and pleaded for 'wisdom and prudence' to prevail. He said: 'I make a heartfelt appeal so that all commit themselves to respecting the status quo of the city.'

Palestinians, obviously, are livid. Their leader Mahmoud Abbas warned of 'dangerous consequences' and an end to the peace process.

Hamas, the extremist arm of the Palestinians, said it would constitute a 'dangerous escalation' that 'crosses every red line' and called for 'days of rage' to protest.

Despite this extraordinary global opposition, Trump has gone ahead and done it anyway.

As things stand, the only people who will be happy about this are Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his right-wing government, and their supporters.

And the Christian Right in America.


French President Emmanuel Macron (left) told Trump to urgently reconsider the plan and Pope Francis (right) spoke of his 'deep worry' about the situation and pleaded for 'wisdom and prudence' to prevail

Having been raised Catholic allow me to say in my lifetime this is the most worthless pope we ever had. As far as Macron goes he'll be wearing this by tomorrow...





But this decision is not even something most Americans support.

A new poll by the University of Maryland found that 66% of Americans, including 44% of Republicans, oppose moving the embassy.

The majority of Americans and American Jews believe that international recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital city can and should only come to an agreement with the Palestinians on a two-state solution.

And in that eventuality, parts of the city would be ring-fenced as Israel's capital, other parts as Palestinian's capital – with each side having sovereignty over the areas in which its citizens reside.

Jerusalem is one of the most sacred cities on the planet, home to Muslims, Jews and Christians and some of the most important holy sites of all those religions.

Trump's decision tells the entire Arab and Christian world that it now belongs to the Jews of Israel and not them.

This incendiary move comes at a time when many were hoping real progress could be made in reaching some kind of two-state solution.


Palestinians play cards during U.S. President Donald Trump's televised speech in the West Bank City of Nablus, Wednesday


Protesters shout slogans against US President Donald Trump as they hold Turkish flags during a protest against the Israel in Istanbul


Indeed, Trump's own son-in-law Jared Kushner has been working for months on behalf of the administration to forge new impetus for a peace deal in an attempt to finally end the conflict.

But all his efforts, and those of the myriad others who devote their lives to this are now likely to go up, quite literally, in smoke.

I'm all for fresh new thinking when it comes to the Israel/Palestine crisis, as Trump put it today because let's be perfectly frank: none of the old thinking has worked.

This, though, is a terrible idea that will make things worse, not better.

In the short term, Trump's decision will inevitably spark a new wave of violence and instability across the region.

In the longer term, it will surely embolden Islamist terror groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS right and act as their greatest possible recruitment drive.

This, self-evidently, will make Israel less safe.

As for America, by moving from peace-broker to blatant side-taker, it is deliberately waving an Israeli red rag in the face of the Arab bull.

That can only make any resolution to this interminable issue even more unlikely.

And I fear it will also make America a less safe country, too.


An ultra-Orthodox Jewish man rides a bicycle as the US and Israeli flags are projected on the walls of Jerusalem's old city, Wednesday


Donald Trump has already enraged the world's Muslims on a regular basis.

During his election campaign, he called for a ban on all Muslims entering the US following a terror attack in California.

This week, his controversial watered-down travel ban, that targets seven predominantly Muslim countries, was given the green light by the Supreme Court.

Last week, Trump retweeted three anti-Muslim videos posted by a racist, Islamophobe, criminal group named Britain First.

So Muslims already feel this President is their enemy.

Today's announcement won't just confirm that suspicion, it will heavily cement it.

The Palestinian ambassador to London said the move amounts to 'declaring war on 1.5 billion Muslims.'

Hyperbole or not, there is no question that Donald Trump has just poured oil on the fire.

Or worse, as President Erdogan's spokesman put it, he's 'plunging the region and the world into a fire with no end.'

God help us.

Who's pouring oil gas on the fire?






Share/Bookmark

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Trump stirs outrage after he lashes out at the Muslim parents of a dead U.S. soldier







My initial impression was Trump should have kept his mouth shut.
But the fact is these two Muslim pawns were a deliberate plant. 




They were put on stage for the sole purpose of discrediting Trump’s Muslim ban from countries we don’t trust.

BTW... didn’t Kate Steinle’s mother lose a daughter to an illegal dog. Why was she absent? Because unlike the pro-Muslim rhetoric, her loss didn't fit the Democratic doctrine of promoting illegal invasion and sanctuary cities.


Also:

According to Giuliani did you know uniformed cops were banned from the DNC floor? 

http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/giuliani-uniformed-police-officers-not-allowed-on-dnc-floor/

 They didn't want to offend the cop killing BLM who couldn't keep their big mouth shut for one minute allowing law abiding citizens a moment of silence for the fallen cops. I'm happy to report just like OWS... BLM is now an integral part of the Democratic party.





---------------------------------------------------


Trump to Khizr Khan: 'I've made a lot of sacrifices'


(CNN)Donald Trump rejected a Muslim lawyer's assertion on the Democratic convention stage that the Republican nominee has "sacrificed nothing and no one."
"Who wrote that? Did Hillary's script writers write it?" Trump said in an interview with with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos that will air Sunday. "I think I've made a lot of sacrifices. I work very, very hard."

Khizr Khan, whose son Army Capt. Humayun Khan died in Baghdad in 2004, delivered one of the most powerful speeches of the Democratic National Convention. With his wife Ghazala at his side, Khan repeatedly blasted Trump's immigration proposals -- specifically those aimed at barring Muslims -- and said the billionaire businessman has "sacrificed nothing and no one."

Trump, in the ABC interview, said in response, "I've created thousands and thousands of jobs, tens of thousands of jobs, built great structures. I've had tremendous success. I think I've done a lot."

Khan "was, you know, very emotional and probably looked like a nice guy to me," Trump added.

Trump, in a statement released Saturday by his campaign, called Capt. Khan "a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe."

He argued that the "radical Islamist terrorists who killed him and the attempts by such people to enter the United States and "do us further harm" represent the "real problem."

During his appearance at the Democratic National convention, Khizr Khan held up a copy of the U.S. Consitution and asked Trump if he has ever read it.

"I will gladly lend you my copy. In this document, look for the words, look for the words, liberty and equal protection (under) law," Khizr Khan said.

In his statement, Trump took sharp offense, saying that "while I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things."

Clinton early Saturday evening issued a statement coming to Khan's defense. 

"I was very moved to see Ghazala Khan stand bravely and with dignity in support of her son on Thursday night. And I was very moved to hear her speak last night, bravely and with dignity, about her son's life and the ultimate sacrifice he made for his country.

"This is a time for all Americans to stand with the Khans, and with all the families whose children have died in service to our country. And this is a time to honor the sacrifice of Captain Khan and all the fallen. Captain Khan and his family represent the best of America, and we salute them."

At a Clinton campaign appearance in Pennsylvania, lines about the Khan family were visible on a teleprompter, but she did not deliver them. Inquiries to the Clinton campaign about why went unanswered.

Still, a senior spokeswoman for the Clinton campaign, Karen Finney, took a sharper tone against Trump. 

"Trump is truly shameless to attack the family of an American hero. Many thanks to the Khan family for your sacrifice, we stand with you," tweeted Karen Finney, a senior spokeswoman for the Clinton campaign.

By Saturday afternoon Trump's comparison of his own sacrifices to Khan's had blown up to blew on Twitter into a hashtag, #TrumpSacrifices. Users wrote satirically that the candidate had, among other things, been subjected to such hardships as flying commercial, playing golf on a public course and staying at a three-star hotel.

Trump previously responded more obliquely to Khan's convention remarks, in a lightning-round interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd. 

"I'd like to hear his wife say something," Trump said. 
In a Friday evening interview on MSNBC, Ghazala Khan spoke briefly about her final interaction with her son, on Mother's Day 2004, wishing him safety while serving in Iraq.

In the New York Times interview, Trump also opined on a range of Democratic convention speakers. He was sharply critical of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an independent who threw his support behind Hillary Clinton and spoke to the Democratic convention. Trump called Bloomberg "a guy who didn't have the guts to run for president."

"He doesn't know anything about me," Trump said. "But he never had the guts to run. He probably wished he did but he didn't. He spent millions of dollars on polling but he was missing one thing: guts."

The two have been exchanging barbs this week after Bloomberg, who once considered entering the 2016 race as an independent, endorsed Clinton over Trump last weekend, then blasted Trump as a "dangerous demagogue" in Philadelphia.








Share/Bookmark

Thursday, March 17, 2016

WAPO editoral




To defend our democracy against Trump, the GOP must aim for a brokered convention


I prefer John Kasich myself. But wow...WAPO really hates Trump! According to them he's a Klan member, a fascist, and Nazi, all rolled into one. Of course they left out the part where some of these protesters are paid to disrupt his campaign rallys. 


Got to love this:

"A democrat disavows violence; a demagogue wields it as a threat."

You know, like… The 1968 Democratic National Convention 

---------------------------------------








DONALD TRUMP'S primary victories Tuesday present the Republican Party with a stark choice. Should leaders unite behind Mr. Trump, who has collected the most delegates but may reach the convention in July without a nominating majority? Or should they do everything they can to deny him the nomination? On a political level, this may be a dilemma. As a moral question, it is straightforward. The mission of any responsible Republican should be to block a Trump nomination and election.


We do not take this position because we believe Mr. Trump is perilously wrong on the issues, although he is. His proposed tariff on Chinese imports could spark a trade war and global depression. His proposed tax plan would bankrupt the government while enriching his fellow multimillionaires. But policy proposals, however ill-formed and destructive, are not the crux of the danger.


No, Mr. Trump must be stopped because he presents a threat to American democracy. Mr. Trump resembles other strongmen throughout history who have achieved power by manipulating democratic processes. Their playbook includes a casual embrace of violence; a willingness to wield government powers against personal enemies; contempt for a free press; demonization of anyone who is not white and Christian; intimations of dark conspiracies; and the propagation of sweeping, ugly lies. Mr. Trump has championed torture and the murder of innocent relatives of suspected terrorists. He has flirted with the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacists. He has libeled and stereotyped wide swaths of humanity, including Mexicans and Muslims. He considers himself exempt from the norms of democratic contests, such as the release of tax returns, policy papers, lists of advisers and other information that voters have a right to expect.


Does a respect for democracy require the Republican Party to anoint its leading vote-getter? Hardly. We are not advocating that rules be broken but that they be employed to maximum effect — to force a brokered convention and nominate a conservative candidate who respects the Constitution, or to defeat Mr. Trump in some other way. If Mr. Trump is attracting 40 percent of Republicans, who in turn represent about one-quarter of the country, that is a 10 percent slice of the population — hardly a mantle of legitimacy.


There are some Americans, Democrats in particular, who are happy to watch the Republican Party self-destruct with Mr. Trump at the helm. We cannot share in their equanimity. For one thing, though Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee, would be heavily favored, a Trump defeat is far from sure. For another, the country needs two healthy parties and, ideally, a contest of ideas and ideology — not a slugfest of insults and bigotry. Mr. Trump's emergence already has done grave damage to American civility at home and prestige abroad. The cost of a Trump nomination would be far higher.


On Wednesday, Mr. Trump offered what was meant as an argument for his nomination. If he reaches the convention with a lead short of an outright majority, and then fails to win, "I think you'd have riots," Mr. Trump said. "I think you'd have problems like you've never seen before. I think bad things would happen."


A democrat disavows violence; a demagogue wields it as a threat. The Republican Party should recognize the difference and act on it before it is too late.






Share/Bookmark

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Fat Bastard strikes again




No not this one. 



This one.





Michael Moore writes to Michigan governor, offers to house Syrian refugees

Does anyone really believe this? If/when they arrive I'll be the first to report how many are actually living in Fat Bastard's home. Guarantee it will be zero. If he is such a caring, philanthropic, human being why hasn't he extended this same invitation to a few of the Michigan homeless? Anyone suspect its because there is no political points to be gained from that?

If the vetting process is so meticulous and thorough, as we've been told, let the proponents who have full faith and trust in this scheme i.e. Barry, Pelosi, Clinton, Reid, Earnest, and Kerry have these refugees deposited in their neighborhood. 

You know damn well that's never gonna happen. It's "the righteous thing to do"...but only if they live next door to you. 

Oh...and speaking of idiots this guy's a classic.



He wholeheartedly supports Barry's plot to bring in 10,000 Syrian refugees. Because if we don't... under the new liberal rallying cry... "That's not who we are". 

This is the same guy who got fired from NPR (No Personal Remarks) when he said this:

 When I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous."

Now you know why his kids are Republicans.

------------------------------------------


Film director and Michigan resident Michael Moore posted an open letter to Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) criticizing his stance for putting a temporary hold on the placement of Syrian refugees in his state, and offering to put up a Syrian refugee couple himself.

"I just wanted to let you know that, contrary to your declaration of denying Syrian refugees a home in our state of Michigan, I myself am going to defy your ban and will offer MY home in Traverse City, Michigan, to those very Syrian refugees you've decided to keep out," Moore wrote. "I will contact the State Department to let them know I am happy to provide a safe haven to any Syrian refugee couple approved by the Obama administration's vetting procedures in which I have full faith and trust."

In response to Moore's letter, Snyder's press secretary Sara Wurfel told FOX411: "It’s unfortunate that Governor’s position is being misrepresented. Gov. Snyder has been a vocal advocate for continuing to make Michigan a home and welcoming state for immigrants, including refugees escaping violence and oppression from all corners of the world. He is just asking for a thorough review of security clearances and procedures to ensure that he can also fulfill a primary responsibility of keeping Michiganders safe."

In a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry sent on Nov. 16, Snyder said he wanted a "full review of security clearances and procedures for all refugees who have the potential to be placed in Michigan."

Snyder is not alone asking for the U.S. refugee program to be suspended. State leaders from New Mexico to Michigan have asked President Obama to suspend the refugee program — at least temporarily.









Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Muslims converting to Christianity in Germany to get asylum




800,000 Muslims pour into Germany that even the Arabs didn't want!

This is Germany's "Neville Chamberlain" moment.

-----------------------------------------






PHOTO: REUTERS 

Amidst heart-wrenching news of migrants trying to seek refuge in European countries, asylum-seeking Muslims in Germany are apparently being baptized and converting to Christianity for one rumored reason: It will increase their chance of staying in the stable European country.


Which is the last thing they need.


Mohammed Ali Zonoobi is one such Muslim. He bends his head as the priest pours water over his hair and says loudly in a prayer-like manner, "Will you break away from Islam?".

Zonoobi gives the answer in the affirmative, elevating his hope to stay in Germany as he would be able to say after converting that he can't go back to his homeland owing to discrimination. His first name is now Martin not Mohammed.

Zonoobi, a carpenter from Iran, arrived in Germany with his family around five months ago. He belongs to the many hundreds of mostly Iranian and Afghan asylum seekers who get converted to Christianity at the evangelical Trinity Church.


This coming from the Pope oblivious to the fact a Muslim would kill him in a heartbeat if given half a chance.

Pastor Gottfried Martens has been converting these Muslim men and women for quite some time now. He agrees that many convert so that they can stay in Germany but he argues that only 10% of the new converts abandon the church by not attending the mass after christening.

"I know there are — again and again — people coming here because they have some kind of hope regarding their asylum," Martens said. "I am inviting them to join us because I know that whoever comes here will not be left unchanged."

Although becoming Christian does not help the ex-Muslims much, there is a slim chance that Germany would deport them to their native countries since they can get punished by death for apostasy.

They're forgetting about this:


On a tip from Ed Kilbane


Raymond Ibrahim of The Middle East Forum

This, then, is the dilemma: Islamic law unambiguously splits the world into two perpetually warring halves—the Islamic world versus the non-Islamic—and holds it to be God's will for the former to subsume the latter. Yet if war with the infidel is a perpetual affair, if war is deceit, and if deeds are justified by intentions—any number of Muslims will naturally conclude that they have a divinely sanctioned right to deceive, so long as they believe their deception serves to aid Islam "until all chaos ceases, and all religion belongs to God." Such deception will further be seen as a means to an altruistic end. Muslim overtures for peace, dialogue, or even temporary truces must be seen in this light, evoking the practical observations of philosopher James Lorimer, uttered over a century ago: "So long as Islam endures, the reconciliation of its adherents, even with Jews and Christians, and still more with the rest of mankind, must continue to be an insoluble problem."

In closing, whereas it may be more appropriate to talk of "war and peace" as natural corollaries in a Western context, when discussing Islam, it is more accurate to talk of "war and deceit." For, from an Islamic point of view, times of peace—that is, whenever Islam is significantly weaker than its infidel rivals—are times of feigned peace and pretense, in a word, taqiyya.

The bottom line. Muslims are permitted to lie even disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection. Just about anything goes as long it benefits Islam.



If you could read his mind...There's a sucker born every minute.


Germany has been experiencing an unprecedented increase in asylum seekers this year, with migrants' number reaching up to 800,000 now, an around fourfold increase on last year.

Most of the asylum-seekers come from Muslim countries like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Lately, almost 40% to 50% from Syria and Afghanistan have been allowed to stay in Germany, albeit temporarily.

Germany's Federal Office for Migration and Refugees asserted that it did not influence on the reasons applicants make while applying for asylum, or they do not get accepted on the basis of their religion and persecution they might face if they return.

But, for Zonoobi and his wife Afsaneh the christening has actually marked a new beginning.

"Now we are free and can be ourselves," she said. "Most important, I am so happy that our children will have a good future here and can get a good education in Germany."

18 months from now...








Share/Bookmark