Visit Counter

Monday, June 11, 2012

Holy Shiite!




Listen to this moron; then read the "startling revelation" below that everyone knew about aside from  Kucinich.


May 2012
Former Congressman... love the sound of that.. Dennis Kucinch.








Islamic world must have nuclear weapons, says Iran


Official Iranian media outlets published a commentary Sunday titled “The necessity for the Islamic world to have the atomic bomb,” laying the groundwork for Iran’s refusal to accept limits on its illicit nuclear program.

The essay’s author, Alireza Forghani, is the former governor of southern Iran’s Kish Province and an analyst and a strategy specialist in the camp of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“The fatwa from Imam Khomeini [the founder of Iran's Islamic revolution] said ‘all Islamic countries have Islamic blood,’” Forghani wrote. “Therefore the Islamic world should rise up and shout that a nuclear bomb is our right, and disrupt the dreams of America and Israel.”

“Having a nuclear bomb is our right,” he argued. “Israel would have been destroyed completely 30 years ago” but has survived because it has nuclear weapons.

In February, Forghani laid out the legal case for the annihilation of Israel and all Jewish people. That treatise, which ran in all the Iranian regime’s media outlets, openly called for a pre-emptive strike on Israel.

Among the state-run media carrying Forghani’s new piece — which argues that Iran should have an atomic bomb – is the major outlet Fars News Agency, which is run by the Revolutionary Guards and thus represents the views of the Islamic regime.

“The Islamic republic, after the victory of the 1979 revolution, faced a hard reality of its enemies trying to overthrow the only true Islamic republic in the world,” he wrote. “The enemies of the Islamic republic of Iran, headed by America with cooperation by its European allies and some in Asia — [and] using the tools such as the United Nations, other international organizations and NATO — have continuously pursued their goal of overthrowing the … government.”

America is the main enemy of Iran, Forghani argued, and is the only country that has used the atomic bomb and brags about its nuclear arsenal, creating fear in nations that might want to challenge it.

“Why is it that only those carrying water for America must have the bomb? Why is it that Pakistan can be the only Islamic country to have the bomb? Until when should the Islamic world remain afraid and obey America?” Forghani demanded to know.

Syrian and Lebanese Muslims have to constantly worry that if their governments do not cooperate with America or Israel, “NATO’s bastard soldiers will attack them,” he added.

“The Islamic republic is one country that is surely threatened by America. We have experienced their failed attacks before, and there is no doubt that it will attack Iran, which it calls the center of all evil,” Forghani wrote. “We might be able to confront America with asymmetrical warfare, but how far will that take Iran? There is no guarantee that if things heat up America will not use its nuclear arsenal against Iran just as it has done before [in Japan].”


Forghani recalled the Cold War’s “Mutual Assured Destruction” policy that kept the United States from bombing the Soviet Union. If Iran had nuclear weapons now, he reasoned, America could not do to Iran what it has done to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Negotiations between Iran and six world powers have so far failed. Iran refuses to suspend nuclear enrichment and won’t allow inspection of suspected sites, even as it insists that the only solution to the dilemma is for the West to accept a nuclear Iran. The Islamic regime continues, meanwhile, to warn that any foreign aggression will result in a devastating counterattack.

In a clear indication that Iran might either have a bomb or be close to developing it, Forghani wrote, “Imam Khamenei has stated that with whatever arms they attack us, we will respond similarly. The need for having the atomic bomb in order to respond to any aggression is now.”

Officials in the Islamic regime, including its supreme leader and military commanders, have promised the “full annihilation of Israel” and the demise of America. “We’re still on a hillside,” Khamenei said in a recent speech. “When the Iranian nation reaches the peak, all enmities [and] evils will end.”

In a separate blog article, Forghani quoted the Quran, An-Nisa 74: “Let those fight in the cause of Allah who sell the life of this world for the hereafter. To him who fights in the cause of Allah — whether he is slain or gets victory — soon shall we give him a reward of great value.”




Share/Bookmark

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Classic Barry



Was there a teleprompter malfunction forcing Barry to wing it?





Mr Doubletalk in action.

In the end he tries to make us look stupid for not believing his own bullshit!




Share/Bookmark

Saturday, June 9, 2012

This is an freaking joke




Assigning Holder to investigate Obama is like the Mafia investigating the whereabouts of Jimmy Hoffa.




Holder names 2 prosecutors to lead leak investigation



WASHINGTON – Attorney General Eric Holder on Friday appointed two U.S. attorneys to lead a pair of criminal investigations into possible unauthorized disclosures of classified information, authorizing the two prosecutors to follow all appropriate investigative leads within the executive and legislative branches of government.

Ronald Machen, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, and Rod Rosenstein, the U.S. attorney for the District of Maryland, will direct separate probes that are currently being conducted by the FBI.

"These two highly respected and experienced prosecutors will be directing separate investigations," Holder said in a statement. "I have every confidence in their abilities to doggedly follow the facts and the evidence in pursuit of justice wherever it leads."

The attorney general said Machen and Rosenstein "are fully authorized to prosecute criminal violations discovered as a result of their investigations and matters related to those violations."

Currently, Machen is leading a high-profile political corruption probe of officials in the District of Columbia. The latest development in that investigation came this week when District of Columbia Council chairman Kwame Brown resigned after being charged with lying about his income on bank loan applications.

Before becoming U.S. attorney, Machen helped lead the white-collar and internal investigation practices at the prominent Washington law firm of WilmerHale. He served as an assistant U.S. attorney from 1997 to 2001.

Rosenstein was an associate independent counsel who worked for Whitewater prosecutor Ken Starr from 1995 to 1997. He was co-counsel in the fraud trial of Jim and Susan McDougal, the former real estate partners of Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton. Both of the McDougals were convicted in a trial that also resulted in the conviction of then-Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker.

The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said he hopes that the Justice Department brings "the full force of the law against these criminals."

"We need to send a clear message to anyone who considers leaking sensitive information and putting Americans at risk: If you leak classified information, you will face jail time," Smith said in a statement.








Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

This can only happen in the liberal mind.




Bloomberg wants to arrest you for drinking a 32oz Coke but wants to limit arrests for Marijuana.




Bloomberg Backs Plan to Limit Arrests for Marijuana


ALBANY — The New York Police Department, the mayor and the city's top prosecutors on Monday endorsed a proposal to decriminalize the open possession of small amounts of marijuana, giving an unexpected lift to an effort by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo to cut down on the number of people arrested as a result of police stops. 

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, whose Police Department made about 50,000 arrests last year for low-level marijuana possession, said the governor's proposal "strikes the right balance" in part because it would still allow the police to arrest people who smoke marijuana in public. 

The marijuana arrests are a byproduct of the Police Department's increasingly controversial stop-and-frisk practice. Mr. Bloomberg and police officials say the practice has made the city safer, but, because most of those stopped are black or Hispanic, the practice has been criticized as racially biased by advocates for minority communities. 

The support expressed by Mr. Bloomberg, prosecutors and police officials is likely to carry significant weight in the Republican-led State Senate, which is the key obstacle to passage of the bill in Albany during this year's legislative session. Mr. Cuomo has amassed a strong track record of winning passage of legislation he embraces, and the speaker of the Assembly, Sheldon Silver, joined him at his news conference Monday, indicating that the Democrat-controlled Assembly would back the measure. The Republican Senate leadership has traditionally opposed legislation it views as soft on criminals. 

Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, framed the issue as one of racial justice as well as common sense, saying that the police in New York City were wasting time, resources and good will making tens of thousands of unnecessary arrests. Possession of small amounts of marijuana is a crime only if the marijuana is in public view or if it is being smoked in public, but many of the marijuana possession arrests have been occurring when the police order someone stopped to empty his or her pockets, making the marijuana visible — a phenomenon the governor called an "aggravated complication" of the stop-and-frisk practice. 

"It becomes a question of balance," the governor said of the city's police stops. "Part of the balance is the relationship with the community. I think the N.Y.P.D. and the mayor are making efforts to work with the community." 

The governor's announcement was cheered by lawmakers from minority neighborhoods as well as by civil rights groups, who are increasingly looking to Albany and to Washington in an effort to rein in what they see as overly aggressive tactics on the part of the Bloomberg administration. 

Black leaders also cited the governor's proposal as a rare recognition of — and attempt to remedy — what they describe as a cultural and legal double standard: that young African-American men are being arrested in large numbers for an activity — using marijuana — that is prevalent, but with less frequent legal consequences, among whites of the same age. 

"Some of our police officers are making race-based discretionary decisions on who they're going to arrest for low-level marijuana possession," said Leroy Gadsden, the president of a branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in Jamaica, Queens, and the chairman of the criminal justice committee for the statewide N.A.A.C.P. "Therefore, of course, if you're a young, black male, even a female, you're going to feel that you're being targeted when you notice that your white counterparts are not being arrested for the same thing." 

The Rev. Al Sharpton praised Mr. Cuomo's proposal as "a step in the right direction" in curbing what he described as racial profiling by the Police Department. And Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries, a Brooklyn Democrat who has pushed legislation to end low-level marijuana arrests, said, "It cannot be criminal behavior for one group of people and socially acceptable behavior for another group of people, where the dividing line is race." 

A spokesman for Mr. Bloomberg rejected the notion that the Police Department acted with racial bias in arresting people for marijuana possession. 

Under Mr. Cuomo's proposal, the state would downgrade the possession of 25 grams or less of marijuana in public view from a misdemeanor to a violation, with a maximum fine of $100 for first-time drug offenders. It is already a violation to possess that amount without putting it into public view. 




In September, facing growing pressure over the marijuana arrests, Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly issued a memorandum clarifying that the police were not to arrest people who take small amounts of marijuana out of their pockets after being stopped. A city spokesman said that low-level marijuana arrests had fallen by nearly a quarter since then. 

Mr. Bloomberg, whose administration had previously defended low-level marijuana arrests as a means of deterring more serious crimes, said on Monday that Mr. Cuomo's proposal was consistent with Mr. Kelly's directive. Mr. Kelly made a rare trip to the Capitol to join Mr. Cuomo at the news conference as a way of demonstrating the city's support for the governor's proposal. 

"This law will make certain that the confusion in this situation will be eliminated," Mr. Kelly said, adding, "Quite frankly, it will make the application of this law much clearer." 

Mr. Cuomo said changing the law was a better approach in the long term, saying, "I think it puts the police in an awkward position to tell them, enforce some laws, don't enforce other laws." 

"This is nice and clean: change the law, period," the governor added. 

The five district attorneys in New York City also endorsed the change in the law on Monday. The Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., said that half of the 6,200 people who were charged with low-level marijuana possession last year in Manhattan had never been arrested before. 

"This simple and fair change will help us redirect significant resources to the most serious criminals and crime problems," Mr. Vance said. "And, frankly, it's the right thing to do." 

But one Republican, Senator Martin J. Golden of Brooklyn, expressed concerns. He said that the enthusiasm among some lawmakers and advocacy groups for Mr. Cuomo's proposal was "all about stop-and-frisk," and, citing several young people in his district who had died of prescription drug overdoses in recent months, questioned the message it would send to young people about drug use. 

Noting the 25-gram threshold for Mr. Cuomo's proposal, he said, "That's a lot of pot, my friend." 





Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Gray Davis he's not







Wisconsin has voted for a presidential candidate (Democrat) for the last two decades. If Walker wins this recall I believe the tide will change. This is a big, big election. At the very least it will be a vote not so much for Romney, but against Obama. Wisconsin will truly become a battleground state, not to mention the beginning of the end for the unions. When the MSM begins to downplay it that's a good sign for Walker.


On a side note, something I am concerned about, Wisconsin is ripe for voter fraud.




Share/Bookmark

Sunday, June 3, 2012

The Nanny









Share/Bookmark

Saturday, June 2, 2012

The Bloomberg Syndrome




Bloomberg collaborating with his fellow liberals have been all over the news lately with their Hitler like attack on pop, doughnuts, HappyMeals, salt, etc. 

They also have a propensity to be politically correct.

Meaning:

Description of the practice of using speech that conforms to liberal or radical opinion by avoiding language which might cause offence to or disadvantage social minorities.

(BTW... this keeps them up at night while we are 15.7 trillion in debt)

Remember the attack on the the Washington Redskins and the Cleveland Indians for their  "insensitivity towards American Indians"?


 But now they have gone to far. Even my candy is not safe from these "enlightened thinkers". Black Crows a candy I ate as a kid that has been around for over a century is now rebranded by dropping the Black and now goes by the new name... Crows. 



Why do you suppose they would change the name after 100 years? 

I guess it's not PC anymore. 



Watch out Aunt Jemima they'll be after you next.






Share/Bookmark

Friday, June 1, 2012

Edwards walks





The precedent so it seems has been set. So now when you send a politican money thinking you're helping with his campaign and he spends it on his mistress or Pampers for his love child that is perfectly legal. It's not a campaign contribution it "evolves" into a gift.



The real reason for a mistrial. Stupidity or political affiliation?
Maybe both.


Combined IQ 110




The jurors who sensationally found disgraced politician John Edwards not guilty of illegally accepting campaign funds yesterday have said they do not think the case should have even gone to trial.

Speaking out for the first time since the verdict, the jurors said there was not enough evidence to find the former North Carolina senator guilty. The judge also ruled a mistrial on his five other counts.

One juror, Theresa Fuller, told Good Morning America: 'I felt like the evidence just wasn't there. It could have been more - a lot more - than what it was.'

When asked if the case should have even come to court, she responded: 'Honestly, no, I don't think they should have bought it.'

But another juror told the early-morning show that she would have liked to see the former senator take the stand, as some questions had remained unanswered.

'I would've liked to her more about the money,' she said. 'More about his intentions. That would have done it for me.'

But of the acquittal, she added: 'He didn't get the money, so I just didn't think he was guilty.'

Another juror, Denise Speight, spoke out for the first time about earlier reports she had flirted with John Edwards while in the court room.

'I just thought it was the most funny think I had ever heard,' she said, insisting she had been smiling about the media's reaction to the jurors' colour-coordinated outfits.

'[I had] no intention of flirting with John Edwards and I don't think he had any intention of blushing or flirting with me.'





The interview, in which the jurors described themselves as 'one big happy family', came after Edwards's tearful acknowledgment of his acquittal outside the courtroom on Thursday.

It also emerged he is unlikely to be tried again on the charges that were ruled a mistrial.

The Justice Department refused to comment on the outcome after spending millions of dollars of taxpayers money on the prosecution of the former U.S Senator, but an anonymous source familiar with the case said that a retrial was not expected.

Legal experts lined up to back up that opinion, with Jerry H. Goldfeder, a New York campaign finance lawyer saying in the LA Times, 'It would be very surprising if the government went back to the well to try him again. I think this prosecution is over. It failed and it is over.'




Share/Bookmark

Monday, May 28, 2012

No words are fitting...


This Memorial Day I received some very moving photos from fellow Vets.

None more so then this one.






Share/Bookmark

Sunday, May 27, 2012

New Shirt




On a tip from Ed Kilbane


Get yours today call  1-800-Bar-Obama!





Ineptocracy







Share/Bookmark

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Obama: 'I'm Not an Over-Spender'



I am sometimes astounded either how stupid this man is or how stupid he believes we all are. 

At a fundraiser for his re-election campaign in Denver last night, Barry set out to upend conventional Republican wisdom that his administration has been defined by excessive government spending.

"I'm running to pay down our debt in a way that's balanced and responsible. After inheriting a $1 trillion deficit, I signed $2 trillion of spending cuts into law," he told a crowd of donors at the Hyatt Regency. "My opponent won't admit it, but it's starting to appear in places, like real liberal outlets, like the Wall Street Journal: Since I've been president, federal spending has risen at the lowest pace in nearly 60 years. Think about that."


You know, everyone is entitled to their own opinion but not their own facts.

Click post title if it won't play

What's Carney going to say now? It was taken out of context?


When he took over, the debt "he inherited" as he likes to say, was $10.6 trillion. Bush doubled the debt in his 8 years as president. Nothing to brag about.

Now Barry comes along and states he will cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. Which means, as we approach November the deficit should be around $5.3 trillion. Lets say Barry missed his target but got it down to 6.3 even 7.3 trillion. I would be satisfied with that.  As usual Barry likes to say what people want to hear. The difference being it's all idle talk. Not only has he not cut the deficit in half, he did the opposite. He increased by 50%!!!!

As I write this the deficit is a whopping $15.7 trillion. Barry's gonna have a lot of work to do between now and November.

Think about it. Can you really spend your way out of being broke?





Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Shameless Bias by Omission




On a tip from Ed Kilbane.




By
Brent Bozell
5-23-2012


You'd think the largest legal action in American history in defense of religious liberty would be a major news story. But ABC, CBS and NBC don't judge news events by their inherent importance as relates to the future of our freedoms. They deliver the news according to a simple formula: Does it or doesn't it advance the re-election of Barack Obama?

If it doesn't, it isn't news.

On May 21, 43 Catholic dioceses and organizations sued the Obama administration over its ridiculously narrow idea of how a "religious institution" can be defined under the Obamacare law. Never has the Catholic Church — or any order, for that matter — undertaken something of this magnitude. It's truly jaw-dropping that ABC and NBC completely ignored this action on their evening newscasts, while "CBS Evening News" devoted just 19 seconds to this historic event.

No, let's be blunt: They spiked the news.

This is the worst example of shameless bias by omission I have seen in the quarter-century history of the Media Research Center. We recall the Chinese Communists withholding from its citizenry for 20 years the news that the U.S. had landed on the moon because it reflected poorly on their government. Never, never would the U.S. "news" media behave thusly — they just did.

This is not an honest mistake. It was not an editorial oversight by the broadcast networks. It did not occur too late for the evening deadline. This was a deliberate and insidious withholding of national news to protect the "Chosen One" who ABC, CBS and NBC have worked so hard to elect and for whom they are now abusing their journalistic influence. Even when CBS mentioned the suit — ever so briefly — like so many others, they deliberately distorted the issue by framing it as a contraception lawsuit when it is a much broader religious freedom issue — and they know it.

This should be seen as a very dark cloud on Obama's political horizon. The Catholic Church, with 60 million Americans describing themselves as Catholic, has unleashed legal Armageddon on the administration, promising "we will not comply" with a health law that strips Catholics of their religious liberty. If this isn't "news," then there's no such thing as news.

This should be leading newscasts and the subject of special, in-depth reports. So what trumped this story? ABC led their evening broadcast and devoted an incredible 3 minutes and 30 seconds to the sentencing of the Rutgers student who spied on his gay roommate with a web camera.

NBC aired an entire story on a lunar eclipse. Both CBS and NBC devoted their first 3 minutes and 30 seconds to prostate-cancer screening.

Catholic taxpayers who help fund National Public Radio were also ignored on the evening newscast with that sad joke of a title — "All Things Considered."

If only some deceased priest had been accused of sexual improprieties in 1953 ... then Catholics would be seen as newsworthy. These "news" operations can't argue these are more important stories than the loss of religious freedom in America.

The print press isn't much better. For the Washington Post, there was a little one-column story buried on page A6. That fish wrap known as USA Today had a really tiny headline and 128-word item at the very bottom of A2. The New York Times had a perfunctory 419-word dispatch on page A17.

Two pages later, the Times defined as "news" what it prefers to report on Catholics: "2 Philadelphia Priests Punished in Sexual Abuse Cases." The paper noted one priest has been suspended from ministry for two years and the other had been placed on leave in December based on abuse that occurred about 40 years ago. This wasn't really "news" as a current matter, but this is always and everywhere the bigoted narrative the Times prefers to perpetuate.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, the head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops used the word "horror" to describe what Team Obama is mandating. On the only broadcast show to give him coverage, CBS "This Morning" anchor Charlie Rose asked Dolan if the White House misled him on this issue. Dolan began by saying he hesitated to question the president's sincerity — even though anyone who heard Obama's 2009 commencement speech at Notre Dame about "honoring the conscience" of his opponents on abortion has proven he is completely insincere.

The cardinal said, "I worry, Charlie, that members of his administration might not particularly understand our horror at the restrictive nature of this exemption that they're giving us, that for the first time that we can remember, a bureau of the federal government seems to be radically intruding into the internal definition of what a church is. We can't seem to get that across."

He's not finding much help getting anything across from those supposed "mediators" of the national press corps.











Share/Bookmark

The phone call



Before the phone call.






After the phone call from Team Barry.






He wants Romney to be "completely honest".

Just like Corey Booker.







Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Elizabeth Warren... Indian Love Call











Share/Bookmark

The 'jealous' First Lady





Michelle Obama orders women close to her husband to be watched in case he cheats on her like John F Kennedy did to his wife, a new book claims.

The First Lady is supposedly 'unusually jealous' and has so little trust in Barack Obama that she turns up unannounced during the day to see what he is doing.

She also objected to her husband's close relationship to U.S. chat show queen Oprah Winfrey - and shunned her because she 'hates fat people'.


Really? I don't see much difference myself.



Keeping up appearances: Because Oprah's say means a significant amount of votes, the Obamas put aside their growing frustrations and appeared on one of the host's final shows

The explosive claims are likely to feed the image of Mrs Obama as an 'angry black woman', a label she herself dismissed earlier this year.

They could also reopen questions about the Obama's marriage of 20 years as in the past they reportedly rowed a lot and came close to splitting up.

In 'The Amateur', American author Edward Klein's book about Mr Obama's first term, he claims that Mrs Obama's 'obsessive' behaviour is the talk of the White House.

Portions of the book that were released to The New York Post tells of quotes from a source close to Miss Winfrey as saying: 'Michelle is very jealous, I would say unusually so.

'Most people after years of marriage have trust and don't follow their husbands around and check on them.

'Michelle doesn't seem to trust Barack at all. She insists on knowing his every movement and drops in on him at all kinds of odd times.

Warring women: Though publicly close, inside sources report that Michelle feels threatened by Oprah, and has tried to distance herself and her husband from the former Queen of Daytime

Sidelined: Oprah campaigned with Mr Obama during the 2008 election and he is hoping she will do the same this year

'Michelle makes it clear to her inner circle...that she wants women around Barack watched and wants info about who he has an eye for and gets touchy with.

'The thing is, she knows, like everybody, about JFK's shenanigans, and she thinks, hey, JFK was young and good looking like my guy.'

By the time he was assassinated in 1963 Mr Kennedy had become as famous for his extra marital liaisons as he was for being President.

In her memoir former White House intern Mimi Alford recalled how Mr Kennedy eyed her up in the White House pool then had sex with her in the bedroom he shared with his wife.

Mr Kennedy also supposedly had sex with Marlene Dietrich in the Oval office and famously romanced Marilyn Monroe - amongst many others.

In 'The Amateur' Mr Klein claims that relations between Miss Winfrey and Mrs Obama took a nosedive over the chat show host's close relationship with Mr Obama.

Portrait: The new book was written by Edward Klein, the former editor-in-chief of the New York Times Magazine

The book claims that in the weeks after the 2008 U.S. election victory Mr Obama gave Miss Winfrey's advice 'priority over Michelle's'

Mr Klein writes: 'When she (Winfrey) phoned, he dropped everything and took her call. They huddled over strategy. Of all of Obama's unofficial White House advisers, Oprah had unparalleled access, input, influence, and power.'

Mr Klein quotes a White House insider who says that Mrs Obama was 'furious' about her husband's late night phone calls to Miss Winfrey and that he should be turning to her for advice instead.

Another sticking point was that Mrs Obama thought that Miss Winfrey had urged Hillary Clinton to run in the election against her husband.

When she grew sick of being rejected, specifically in her offer to help with Mrs Obama's campaign against obesity, Miss Winfrey is supposed to have screamed out to a friend: 'Michelle hates fat people and doesn't want me waddling around the White House!'

In extracts already made public Mr Klein's book also claims that former U.S. President Bill Clinton once branded Mr Obama 'an amateur' and too incompetent to hold office.

Mr Clinton has strongly denied the claims.

Nobody from the White House was available for comment.




Share/Bookmark

Friday, May 18, 2012

Here we go again



Check out this story on Breitbart. 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii





Say it was proven beyond a shadow of doubt Obama was born in Kenya and is fraud. What happens to him and all the legislation passed under him?




It would seem unrealistic to believe this promotional booklet was not read and or approved by Obama. If this was done in error why didn't he correct it? If the facts were wrong is there a corrected copy of this booklet?

Update: 

Miraculously in 2007 they noticed the "error" after only 16 years!


Getting rid of Anthony Weiner was peanuts compared to this.
I've had my hopes shot down before but if this report bears fruit and Obama is a fraud Breitbart News will have scooped the biggest blockbuster story of the 20th century.

The MSM is busy casting doubt on the report as "just more birther nonsense"


You ever wonder why it took the National Enquirer to break the Edwards story?

Now you know.







Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Political Quiz



On a tip from my brother Gary



This is a terrific and incredibly easy test. And it shows results in a number of ways. It clearly indicates that the majority of Americans don't have a clue about what's going on in the world. No wonder our politicians take such advantage of us. It's astonishing that so many people got less than half right. These results say that 80% of the (voting) public doesn't have a clue, and that's pretty scary.

There are no tricks here - just a simple test to see if you are current on your information. This is quite good and the results are shocking..

I believe it was Winston Churchill who opined that " . . . the biggest argument against democracy is a 5-minute conversation with the average voter . . ."

Test your knowledge with 13 questions, then be ready to shudder when you see how others did!


Quite frankly... I don't see how you can get any wrong.





Share/Bookmark