The Hemingway Report

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

California Endowment ad espouses free health care for illegals

Before you read this... keep in mind WH tours are closed, some National Parks, Cleveland Air Show cancelled etc, because of sequestration. Meanwhile, Joe's in France drinking vintage (1957) Dom Pérignon.

They come here illegally, primarily from Mexico, and then have the f-ing gall to demand free healthcare!

When I first saw this video it pissed me off so much I almost kicked in my TV.

Video 24

In this video they call America "our country" although they freely admit they are undocumented which is liberalese for illegal.

The California Endowment is a private, California-focused health foundation. They are advocating "free" healthcare for illegals but in typical liberal fashion they're not paying for it. This calls to mind the definition of a liberal...

Someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off, with your money.

This is ethically, and legally wrong. Think about it. They come here illegally from Mexico, China, Russia, Bulgaria..Oh... I almost forgot about Barry's aunt and uncle from Kenya, and we're supposed to give them free healthcare?

1000 N Alameda St # 250, Los Angeles

(213) 628-1001

This coming from CA a state already $34 billion in outstanding debt.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Wearing your wrist watch on your ankle...

Would make more sense then this article.

Mark Kelly, the husband of former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, attempted to purchase an AR-15 style rifle and a 45-caliber handgun at Diamondback Police Supply in Tucson.

Mark Kelly and his wife became gun control advocates after his wife was shot in the head by a deranged lunatic using a handgun in a January 2011 shooting at a Tucson supermarket that wounded 13 people and left six others dead.

Kelly, a former astronaut, said he intended to eventually hand in the rifle to Tucson police but planned to keep the handgun.

So this means what?

In support of him and his wife's advocacy group Americans for Responsible Solutions, he is going to keep the handgun, putting aside the fact his wife was shot with one, and so were the victims of Newtown, but get rid of that vile assault rifle?

This just makes no sense to me.
With this kind of thinking I'm surprised he found his way back to Earth!

Before being shot with a handgun Gabrielle Giffords seemingly enjoyed firing an assault rifle.

Now they want the assault rifle banned?

Maybe they believe because the bullets are bigger in an assault rifle then they are in a handgun... therefore the handgun must be safer to own?

Mark Kelly is a law abiding citizen with no criminal record yet finds it remarkable he was allowed under his 2nd amendment rights to purchase a AR-15-style rifle and a 45.-caliber handgun.

What I find even more remarkable is John Doe could go to the same gun shop with no criminal record but has been seeing a psychiatrist for the past 12 years and is taking 9 prescriptions for Bipolar, Schizophrenia, and Multiple Personality Disorder and do the same thing.

On a side note. If Kelly wants to buy an assault rifle to give it to the Tucson PD I don't see where the owner of the gun shop has the authority to cancel the sale.

-----------------------------------------------

Gun store rescinds Mark Kelly's rifle purchase, questions his 'intent'

A Tucson gun store owner has decided to rescind the sale of a military-style rifle to Mark Kelly, the husband of former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, after Kelly said he had intended the purchase to make a political point about how easy it is to obtain the kind of firearms he's lobbying Congress to ban.

Kelly's March 5 purchase of an AR-15-style rifle and a 45.-caliber handgun at Diamondback Police Supply sparked a frenzy of reaction from both sides of the debate after he posted to Facebook a photo of himself shopping.

A background check took only a matter of minutes to complete, Kelly said in the Facebook post, adding that it's scary to think people can buy similar guns without background checks at gun shows or on the Internet.

But Kelly couldn't immediately take possession of the rifle because the shop had bought it from a customer. As a result, the store is required by a Tucson ordinance to hold the gun for 20 days to give the city enough time to make sure the weapon wasn't used in a crime.

Store owner Doug MacKinlay said Monday in a Facebook post of his own that he "determined that was in my company's best interest to terminate this transaction prior to his returning to my store."

"While I support and respect Mark Kelly's 2nd Amendment rights to purchase, possess, and use firearms in a safe and responsible manner, his recent statements to the media made it clear that his intent in purchasing the Sig Sauer M400 5.56mm rifle from us was for reasons other then for his personal use," MacKinlay said in the statement.

He added that the store will return Kelly's money, donate the rifle to the Arizona Tactical Officers Association to be raffled as a fundraiser and make an additional contribution of $1,295 -- the value of the rifle -- to the Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program.

Kelly's purchase of the guns sparked accusations of hypocrisy from gun-rights supporters, with many on Facebook focusing on his motivations and the rules for purchasing such guns. Kelly, a former astronaut, said he intended to eventually hand in the rifle to Tucson police but planned to keep the handgun.

Kelly and Giffords started a gun control advocacy group, Americans for Responsible Solutions, amid the wave of recent mass shootings. They have been touring the country in recent months in support of expanded background checks for gun purchases.

Giffords resigned from Congress last year as she continues to recover from her injuries.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Obamaville

Video 23

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood...

On a tip from Ed Kilbane

BEST SUMMATION OF BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA EVER

Mychal Massie is a respected writer and talk show host in Los Angeles.

The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture." The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.

I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. His arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?

Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.

I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.

I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.

And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel. His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.

I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.

Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.

I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.

As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood... Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed."