Visit Counter

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Desperation...





Boinking this to get out of jail.






Just as soon have stayed behind bars.












Share/Bookmark

Iran parliament votes to limit inspections vital to nuclear deal, with deadline looming







This was a joke from the get go. Anybody remember how those inspections in Iraq worked out when Saadam was calling the shots? The inspectors arrived on a Monday and told to come back Friday.


A better term for this 'deal' would be debacle. Let's hope Congress put's the kibosh on this once and for all.

I guess you've got to take a hammer to the head of this administration in order for them to get it. The De facto government in Iran are Muslim terrorists who are more closely aligned with al-qaeda then a legitimate government. 





Video 124



Iran Parliament votes to limit inspections and in the process chanting "Death to America" and the best we can come up with is... 'It's not helpful'???



Why doesn't Barry just come out and say... I'll cave on every issue, even the deadline, just show me where to sign. 

If this deal goes through or not Iran will build a nuclear bomb. The only way to stop them is to bomb them first. The sooner we all realize this the better off were going to be.

-------------------------------------------------------







Iran votes to ban inspectors with nuke deal deadline looming



Iran's parliament voted Sunday to oppose the inspections of government military sites as part of a pending, multi-nation agreement to curb the country’ nuclear program -- potentially complicating a final deal ahead of a June 30 deadline.



A State Department official told Fox News that the agency has seen reports about the parliament’s preliminary legislative steps to make its voice heard about the nuclear talks and any final deal. 



However, the official said the United States will allow Iranians to manage their own process and reiterated the world powers’ position remains that any final deal must include adequate access and transparency to the country’s nuclear-related facilities.



“We won’t agree to a deal without that,” the official also said. “We expect that there will be many voices and opinions on the difficult issues as we work towards a final deal. … But our team is focused on what is happening in the negotiating room.”

The bill would allow for international inspections of Iranian nuclear sites but forbid inspections of military facilities. And it demands the complete lifting of all sanctions against Iran as part of any final nuclear accord.

Negotiators from Iran and the six-nation group -- the U.S., Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany – are negotiating right now in Vienna ahead of their self-imposed June 30 deadline. The talks are focused on reaching a final accord that curbs Iran's nuclear program in return for the lifting of economic sanctions. They agreed in April to the framework of a final deal.

The six countries think Iran is using its uranium-enrichment program to create a nuclear weapon, an assumption Tehran denies.

The bill states in part: "The International Atomic Energy Agency, within the framework of the safeguard agreement, is allowed to carry out conventional inspections of nuclear sites."

However, it concludes that "access to military, security and sensitive non-nuclear sites, as well as documents and scientists, is forbidden."

It also would require Iran's foreign minister to report to parliament every six months on the process of implementing the accord.

Iran's nuclear negotiators say they already have agreed to grant United Nations inspectors "managed access" to military sites under strict control and specific circumstances. That right includes allowing inspectors to take environmental samples around military sites.

But Iranian officials, including Ayatollah Ali Khameni, have strongly rejected the idea of Iranian scientists being interviewed.







Share/Bookmark

Monday, June 22, 2015

White Supremacist Who Influenced Charleston Suspect Donated to 2016 G.O.P. Campaigns



From our friends at the NYT's.



This is along the same vein as this 6-8-2015 Daily Mail article.

Headline:

Pictured: 
The married woman prison worker, 51, suspected of helping ‘Shawshank' escapees break out after being lured by 'handsome, womanizing' double murderer and his cop killer friend




In this rather lengthly article they felt like they just had to include this:



Mitchell, a registered Republican, lives in a two-story gray home with a 'Don't Tread on Me' Gadsden Flag - made popular by the Tea Party movement - flying out front.



(Read it and you'll find it)



See the subliminal message here? A Republican helped 2 murderers escape. So the GOP is just no good. Can't be trusted.
  Don't vote Republican 2016.

But on the other hand if she was a registered Democrat displaying this


sign in her front yard, her vagina still smoldering from two Democrats, do you think they would have mentioned this? 



 The NYT's mission in the article below is to tie Dylann Roof, a murderer, a white supremacist, with the GOP. The Pontiff (aka Mr Climate Change) on the other hand is now more closely associated with the Democrats. The photo op missed by NYT's? Pelosi kneeling in her pew with a rosary her hand and a coat hanger in the other.  

They also have the Republican hopefuls scurrying around like rats in an effort to give back the money. You got to give the NYT's credit. They can twist and constrict a story so well that maybe the 'T' should stand for Tourniquet.

BTW...This is Barry's attempt as POTUS to bring the country together. Use the word nigger. After all, Charleston should have gone up in flames just like Baltimore and Ferguson right? It would have had SC not been a Christian red state and Nikki Haley, instead of dividing, sought to bring the community together. 



Video 123

Maybe Barry should change his middle name from Hussein to Al. 


This is how they "demonstrate"
 in Charleston, SC. 

http://www.people.com/article/charleston-church-massacre-bridge-to-peace-walk




------------------------------------------------

The leader of a white supremacist group that apparently influenced Dylann Roof, the suspect in the killing of nine African-Americans in a Charleston, S.C., church last week, has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Republican campaigns, including those of 2016 presidential contenders such as Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum and Rand Paul, records show.

Mr. Cruz, a Texas senator, said Sunday night that he would be returning about $8,500 in donations that he had received from the Texas donor, Earl Holt III, who lists himself as president of the Council of Conservative Citizens.

“We just learned this evening that Mr. Holt had contributed to the campaign,” a spokesman for the Cruz campaign said in an email to The New York Times. “We will be immediately refunding all those donations.”

Mr. Paul’s campaign said it planned to send $2,250 received from Mr. Holt to a victims’ fund set up in the wake of the shooting.

“RandPAC is donating the funds to the Mother Emanuel Hope Fund to assist the victims families,” said Sergio Gor, a spokesman for the campaign. Mr. Holt made four separate donations to the Paul campaign last year, records show. The campaign could not confirm the total received but said that all the money it identified from the white supremacist leader would be donated to the fund.

The Guardian first reported on Mr. Holt’s donations to the Republican contenders.

A manifesto that appeared on a website registered to Mr. Roof said that the manifesto’s author had first learned of “brutal black-on-white murders” from the Council of Conservative Citizens’ website.

Dylann Roof, the suspect in the killing of nine black churchgoers in Charleston, S.C., last week, in an undated photo from a website linked to him.Credit Reuters 




Mr. Holt, in a statement posted online in his name, said he was not surprised to learn that Mr. Roof had found out about “black-on-white violent crime” from his group because, he said, it was one of the few that had the courage to disclose “the seemingly endless incidents involving black-on-white murder.” But he said his group does not advocate violence and should not be held responsible for the shootings.

The group is regarded by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a leading authority on hate crimes, as a white supremacist extremist organization that opposes “race mixing” as a religious affront and that vilifies blacks as an inferior race.

Spokesmen for Mr. Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator, and Mr. Paul, a senator from Kentucky, did not respond to requests for comment on the donations.

Mr. Holt, who identified himself in some donation records as a Texas “slumlord,” has also given money to a number of other current and former Republican members of Congress, including Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona, Senator Rob Portman of Ohio, former Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Representative Steve King of Iowa, and former Representative Todd Akin of Missouri.

The leader of a white supremacist group that apparently influenced Dylann Roof, the suspect in the killing of nine African-Americans in a Charleston, S.C., church last week, has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Republican campaigns, including those of 2016 presidential contenders such as Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum and Rand Paul, records show.

Mr. Cruz, a Texas senator, said Sunday night that he would be returning about $8,500 in donations that he had received from the Texas donor, Earl Holt III, who lists himself as president of the Council of Conservative Citizens.

“We just learned this evening that Mr. Holt had contributed to the campaign,” a spokesman for the Cruz campaign said in an email to The New York Times. “We will be immediately refunding all those donations.”

Mr. Paul’s campaign said it planned to send $2,250 received from Mr. Holt to a victims’ fund set up in the wake of the shooting.

“RandPAC is donating the funds to the Mother Emanuel Hope Fund to assist the victims families,” said Sergio Gor, a spokesman for the campaign. Mr. Holt made four separate donations to the Paul campaign last year, records show. The campaign could not confirm the total received but said that all the money it identified from the white supremacist leader would be donated to the fund.

The Guardian first reported on Mr. Holt’s donations to the Republican contenders.

A manifesto that appeared on a website registered to Mr. Roof said that the manifesto’s author had first learned of “brutal black-on-white murders” from the Council of Conservative Citizens’ website.

Photo

Dylann Roof, the suspect in the killing of nine black churchgoers in Charleston, S.C., last week, in an undated photo from a website linked to him.Credit Reuters 
Mr. Holt, in a statement posted online in his name, said he was not surprised to learn that Mr. Roof had found out about “black-on-white violent crime” from his group because, he said, it was one of the few that had the courage to disclose “the seemingly endless incidents involving black-on-white murder.” But he said his group does not advocate violence and should not be held responsible for the shootings.

The group is regarded by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a leading authority on hate crimes, as a white supremacist extremist organization that opposes “race mixing” as a religious affront and that vilifies blacks as an inferior race.

Spokesmen for Mr. Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator, and Mr. Paul, a senator from Kentucky, did not respond to requests for comment on the donations.

Mr. Holt, who identified himself in some donation records as a Texas “slumlord,” has also given money to a number of other current and former Republican members of Congress, including Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona, Senator Rob Portman of Ohio, former Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Representative Steve King of Iowa, and former Representative Todd Akin of Missouri.







Share/Bookmark

Rick Perry Calls Charleston Church Shooting an 'Accident'







The Liberals pounced like greased lightening on this one. He meant to say 'incident' but it came out 'accident'. According to his press secretary he misspoke. I can buy that. Of course the MSM is going to make a big deal out of it. They tried to put it in the same context as their favorite presidential candidate who infamously claimed she was shot at by snipers in Bosnia and later said she misspoke. Little different don't you think? 



 Perry's right, Obama wasted no time blaming it on gun control. It's now all over Twitter… the "right wing" and the NRA are responsible for the shooting.



"On Your Head NRA," one person tweeted. "9 dead in shooting at Charleston African American church. Police chief calls it 'hate crime.'"

"The @NRA & the @GOP are 100 percent responsible for CHURCH SHOOTING IN SC," another person said on Twitter. So far, no evidence has been reportedly found that ties the shooter to either the NRA or the GOP.

(Raise your hand if you think the NRA endorses this?)


"This is indicative of the #nra-sponsored culture of white violence and #racism," a third person tweeted. "Let's see if that's how it's reported."

"I blame #NRA and the culture of violence propagated by the #GOP," said another Twitter user early Thursday morning. "Horrible. Just horrible."

"Congratulations to the @NRA on another successful mass shooting," added another Twitter user. "NRA will kill black people," one person claimed, citing no evidence whatsoever.




Using this logic... a fork is responsible for Michael Moore's morbid obesity. The AMA was the culprit when Helen Smith died on the operating table. Ford Motor Company is to blame for building the car which Pedro Rodriguez (here illegally... arrested and released 4 times) drove drunk killing a family of four in ahead-on collision.



 Liberals claimed the same crap in the Gifford shooting. Did you know the Colorado shooter (Holmes) great-grandfather was a Republican? I just made that up. But if I posted it somewhere liberals would line up to buy tickets. 


I read an article recently which claimed there are about 350 million guns in America. I'm not trying to minimize the tragedy in Charleston but when you look at that huge number those killed by guns is relatively small. For comparison every 2-hours, three people are killed in alcohol-related highway crashes.






Not to mention most people killed by guns are killed by someone in procession of a gun illegally. How will more restrictive gun laws be effective for those who don't follow the law? And of course we all know before the advent of the firearm no one died as a result of violence. Yet if it was up to Barry decreeing another Executive Order he would hunt down these guns and get rid of them. It would not be problem, but getting rid of 12 million illegals is an insurmountable task.


What I am saying here is this. Lets suppose Roof 2 hours before the service placed a pipe bomb underneath one of the pews setting it to go off  during the service. In the explosion 9 innocent people died. 
Would any of us feel any better now... whether you're a Republican or Democrat?



------------------------------------------------












Presidential candidate Rick Perry called this week's Charleston Church shooting an "accident" in a recent interview — an apparent slip of the tongue, his spokesman said later.


Perry entered the topic by calling President Obama's gun control message in the wake of the South Carolina tragedy, a "knee-jerk reaction," when prompted by a Newsmax reporter.


"This is the M.O. of this administration, anytime there is a accident like this," Perry told Steve Malzberg. "You know, the president's clear. He doesn't like for Americans to have guns, and so he uses every opportunity — this being another one — to basically go parrot that message."


Shortly after Perry's remark became a headline of its own, as well as a trending topic on social media, the politician's press secretary Travis Considine claimed the former governor misspoke. "From the context of his comments, it is clear Gov. Perry meant incident," Considine said in a statement.


Also Read: Racist Manifesto, White Supremacist Site Appears to Belong to Charleston Church Shooter Dylan Roof


Also on topic, Perry said that he wasn't sure if the shooting was an act of terror, but that it was indeed a "crime of hate."


He also suggested that confessed shooter, 21-year-old Dylann Roof, may have been "medicated." One of Perry's platforms is the issue of opioids he alleges are being handed out too easily to ex-military members.


"I know for a fact, being a substantial supporter of our military and our veterans, that the Veterans Administration, for instance, is handing out these opioids in massive amounts," Perry said. "And then people question, 'Well then why can't these young individuals get work?' or 'Why is the suicide rate so high?'"


This isn't the only time Perry has made a public political gaffe while running for the nation's highest office. During the 2012 debate, Perry was unable to remember the third federal agency that he planned to eliminate if elected president.


Roof is accused of killing the nine victims at the historic black Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston on Wednesday night.









Share/Bookmark

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Brain Williams speaks out





He must have called John Kerry for advice. 



Video 122




A good position for him at MSNBC would be co-anchor of Politics Nation. At least one of them could read a teleprompter.










Share/Bookmark