Nothing going on here right?

FBI Agent Strzok fired from Mueller probe for sending anti-Trump texts to his lover interviewed Mike Flynn before his guilty plea AND Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills before Hillary was cleared

A top FBI official who was tossed from the Russia probe was behind FBI Director James Comey's use of the phrase 'extremely careless' about Hillary Clinton 

The phrase replaced Comey's 'grossly negligent' wording, which would have mirrored a criminal statute that Clinton was never prosecuted for violating

Peter Strzok, the partisan agent, was also involved in questioning Michael Flynn before he was prosecuted for lying to the Bureau

And Strzok also helped interrogate Hillary Clinton lawyer Cheryl Mills and top aide Huma Abedin, but that case produced no criminal charges 

Emails show Mills and Abedin referring to Clinton's server, but they told the FBI they were unaware it existed until it because public knowledge

President Trump has tweeted about the Strzok story, suggesting both the Flynn and Clinton investigations were tainted by bias

--------------------

This stinks about as blatantly as the tarmac meeting! So here we have an FBI agent leading an investigation of Trump, who hates Trump, and just so happens he is the agent who also investigated Clinton and her email scandal. What a fucking coincidence! Now you know why the Clinton team was granted immunity. Now you why Comey decided weeks before interviewing her he wasn't going to bring any charges... even after that blistering dissertation. Probably to relieve is own sense of shame. 

And finally Lynch's big lie "I will accept whatever recommendation the FBI and prosecutors make about charges in the inquiry over Hillary Clinton’s email server." Which dovetailed perfectly with the Comey 'recommendation' .

"Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

The fix was in.

------------------------

 Peter Strzok has been involved in both Trump and Clinton-focused probes - and texted his lover anti-Trump messages

The FBI agent who was dismissed from special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe for sending his lover anti-Trump text messages is turning into a Forrest Gump character who figured in a number of key moments in the Bureau's recent history.

Peter Strzok was reassigned to the FBI's human resources department after the text messages between him and FBI lawyer Lisa Page were uncovered. 

He was already known to be the agent who edited then-Director James Comey's reprimand of Hillary Clinton for using an unsecured private email server for classified messages. 

Strzok, among the top officials investigating Clinton, changed Comey's description of her conduct from 'grossly negligent' – language that mirrors the criminal code – to the softer words 'extremely careless.'

His photograph was revealed by Fox News. 

Now it can be revealed that Strzok was also part of the team that quizzed disgraced former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn before he pleaded guilty to lying during that interview. 

And he participated in the FBI's sit-down interviews with two Clinton insiders linked to her email scandal, both of whom got a free pass despite making statements to agents that were later challenged by other records.

Clinton aide Huma Abedin was interviewed by Strzok, but he didn't refer her for criminal charges despite proof she was not forthcoming about what they knew of the presidential candidate's classified email scandal

An FBI agent already under scrutiny for sending anti-Trump text messages was behind changing James Comey's description of Hillary Clinton's behavior in regards to her private email server then went to work for Mueller's Russia probe

The email probe included question-and-answer sessions with several senior Clinton aides including lawyer Cheryl Mills and chief of staff Huma Abedin.

And when those two friends-of-Hillary sat down for their third-degree sessions, Strzok – the partisan anti-Trump agent – was asking many of the questions.

Mills and Abedin both denied knowing of Clinton's unorthodox email server setup, according to summaries of their interviews that the Bureau released last year. 

'Mills did not learn Clinton was using a private server until after Clinton's [State Department] tenure. Mills stated she was not even sure she knew what a server was at the time,' one agent's interview notes read.

And Abedin told agents, they wrote, that she 'did not know that Clinton had a private server until about a year and a half ago when it became public knowledge.'

But in emails released by State, Mills and Abedin both referred to Clinton's server specifically, The Daily Caller reported Monday.

Then-FBI Director James Comey defended the Clinton aides' contradictory statements when he testified in a House Judiciary Committee hearing about six weeks before the 2016 election.

'Having done many investigations myself, there's always conflicting recollections of facts – some of which are central, some of which are peripheral,' Comey said then.

President Trump railed against Strzok's actions on Sunday, as the Washington Post and New York Times reported that his text messages 'expressed anti-Trump sentiments and other comments that appeared to favor Clinton.'

ABC News had reported Strzok's departure from the Russia probe in August, but without offering a reason.

Now the controversy could taint not one, but two of the biggest federal investigations in the last year.

President Trump latched onto news reports that said FBI agent Peter Strzok was pulled off the Mueller probe after anti-Trump text messages were found. Strzok was also a lead investigator on the Hillary Clinton email probe, with Trump now suggesting bias 

'Tainted (no, very dishonest?) FBI "agent's role in Clinton probe under review,"' Trump tweeted Sunday morning. 'Led Clinton Email probe. @foxandfriend Clinton money going to wife of another FBI agent in charge.' 

The latter dig was meant for Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife took campaign donations from a Clinton ally, the outgoing Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe. 

The FBI has pointed out that McCabe had no role in the Clinton investigation until months after his wife's political campaign had concluded. 

But Page, the lawyer who exchanged anti-Trump texts with Strzok, was on McCabe's staff. 

Trump went after Strzok again by writing, 'Report: "ANTI-TRUMP FBI AGENT LED CLINTON EMAIL PROBE"'

'Now it all starts to make sense,' Trump said. 

Nothing going on here right?

Republicans...McCain's a traitor and Jeff is a Flake

Jeff Flake donates to Roy Moore's Democratic opponent 

Flake is too 'righteous' to be aligned with the Republican party.

 "Country over Party," he says. 

Translation:

With an 11% approval rating, I haven't got a snowball's chance in hell of getting reelected.

--------------------------------

Republican Sen. Jeff Flake donated $100 on Tuesday to the U.S. Senate campaign of a Democrat opposing GOP hopeful Roy Moore in Alabama.

Flake, who has sparred with President Donald Trump over the Moore campaign, tweeted a photo of his check written to Democrat Doug Jones. In the memo field, he scrawled: 'Country over Party.'

Earlier in the day, Flake and five other Republican senators sat with Trump in the Roosevelt Room of the White House to talk about hammering out differences between House and Senate versions of a tax reform bill.

The White House sat him next to Trump, with cameras and TV footage catching him looking very uncomfortable as the president endorsed Moore for the third time in less than a week.

Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake fidgeted in his chair next to Donald Trump at the White House on Tuesday as he listened to the president defend Roy Moore on Tuesday

Flake tweeted a photo of his check on Tuesday, with 'Country over Party' written in the memo field

Moore has been accused of fondling a 14-year old girl and dating sixteen-year-old decades ago when he was a prosecutor.

But Trump said Tuesday that 'he's going to do very well. We don't want to have a liberal Democrat in Alabama, believe me.'

'We want strong borders, we want to stop crime. We want to have the things that we represent, and we certainly don't want a liberal Democrat that's controlled by Nancy Pelosi and controlled by Chuck Schumer. We don't want to have that for Alabama.'

Flake could hardly contain his eye-rolling.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said Tuesday afternoon that the allegations against Moore are 'concerning' but Trump 'would rather have a person that supports his agenda versus somebody who opposes his agenda every step of the way.'

Moore 'should step aside' if his accusers are telling the truth, she added. 'But we don’t have a way to validate that, and that's something for the people of Alabama to decide.'

Flake and Trump have been at loggerheads over tax and Obamacare repeal legislation, and the president has lashed out at him in the past 

Trump blasted Flake last month, saying calling him 'Senator Jeff Flake(y)'

Trump blasted Flake on Twitter two weeks ago, calling his political career 'toast' after he was caught on a hot mic criticizing Moore and the president.

After a town hall event Flake hosted in Mesa, Arizona, he stepped off the stage without removing the microphone on his lapel – letting TV camera crews eavesdrop.

Speaking to Mesa Mayor John Giles, Flake said if the GOP becomes 'the party of Roy Moore and Donald Trump, we are toast.'

Republicans...McCain's a traitor and Jeff is a Flake

Great News!

Federal grand jury indicts Mexican man acquitted in Kate Steinle killing on new charges

Look at this through the eyes of common sense. If you came to this country illegally 5 times, committed 7 felonies, and you're responsible for the death of a young woman...there just has to be a crime in there somewhere right?

------------------------------------

A federal grand jury has indicted a Mexican man on immigration and weapons charges after he was acquitted of murder in the 2015 shooting death of Kathryn Steinle, the Justice Department said Tuesday. 

Each of the the two new federal charges carries a maximum of 10 years in prison if Jose Ines Garcia Zarate is convicted, the government said. He was indicted on one count each of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition and being an illegally present alien in possession of a firearm and ammunition. 

The killing of Steinle became linked with the controversy over illegal immigration, and President Donald Trump referred to the case in pushing for stricter policies and in criticizing so-called "sanctuary cities." 

Garcia Zarate has been deported and had returned to the United States five times. A San Francisco jury found him not guilty of murder on Thursday but he was found guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The charge carries up to three years in prison, but he has been jailed for two years and could get credit for time served. 

Steinle, 32, was fatally shot on San Francisco’s Pier 14 on July 1, 2015. Defense attorneys argued that Garcia Zarate found the handgun and that it went off accidentally. 

The Justice Department said that the federal charges are the result of an investigation by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. 

Trump in a tweet called the not guilty verdict in the case "disgraceful" and said, "No wonder the people of our Country are so angry with Illegal Immigration."

 

In this July 7, 2015 file photo, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, right, is led into a courtroom by San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi, and Assistant District Attorney Diana Garciaor. Michael Macor / San Francisco Chronicle via AP/Pool file

Garcia Zarate, who had served a federal prison sentence for illegal re-entry to the United States, was transferred in March of 2015 to San Francisco’s jail to face a 20-year-old charge for selling marijuana. 

But when the district attorney dropped that charge, Garcia Zarate was released despite a request by federal immigration authorities to detain him for deportation. 

San Francisco prohibits city law enforcement officers from asking about immigration status or detaining people solely on the basis of civil immigration detainers after they are eligible for release. The city says the policy helps people report crimes without fear of immigration status. 

Lawyers for San Francisco have also argued that holding people on immigration detainers could expose the city to lawsuits over unconstitutional detention. 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Deputy Director Tom Homan said in a statement after the verdict that the agency would seek his removal from the United States, and blamed San Francisco’s policies for him even being on the street when Steinle was killed. 

Great News!

Conyers 'retiring early today' amid sexual allegations

Well, I'm certainly fooled by the suddenness of this 'early retirement'. It wouldn't have anything to do with keeping his hands off yet still another woman...in church of all places? Guess he's trying to preserve his legacy by affirming resigning is actually early retirement. In other words, he wants to change history, doesn't want a blemish on his record.

Let's check Wikipedia:

Oops...too late.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Conyers

Meanwhile back on the ranch:

--------------------------------------------------

Facing a surge of pressure from his fellow Democrats, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) stepped down from Congress on Tuesday over mounting allegations of sexual harassment, marking an extraordinary fall for the longest-serving member of Congress.

Speaking to a local radio station, the 88-year-old Conyers was defiant in both maintaining his innocence and defending a legacy he insisted “can’t be compromised or diminished.”

Translation:

I'm untouchable...Godlike because I walked with MLK.

“This too shall pass,” Conyers told radio host Mildred Gaddis. “And I want you to know that my legacy will continue through my children.” 

Sounds quite a bit like Kim Jung-il passing the baton to Kim Jung-un doesn't it? You know, he's right though. Because in his district you are measured by the color of your skin not the content of your character.

Aiming to help that process along, Conyers endorsed his son, John Conyers III, to replace him, setting up a potential Conyers-family showdown for the seat, as the lawmaker’s great-nephew, Ian Conyers, told The New York Times recently that he also plans to enter the race. 

Conyers’s remarks — at times rambling and ambiguous — led to some initial confusion about his immediate intentions. Prodded by Gaddis, he finally revealed that he’s “retiring today.” His office clarified that Conyers is vacating the seat, effective Tuesday, and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) went to the House floor Tuesday morning to read a letter from Conyers, in which he lamented "not being afforded the right of due process" while citing his declining health — but not the harassment charges — for why he is retiring.

"I recognize that in this present environment, due process will not be afforded to me," Jackson Lee read aloud. 

The rapid turn of events led to a semantical debate about whether Conyers’s exit should be deemed an early retirement or a resignation. 

“That’s resigning,” said a Democratic aide.

The decision marks a victory for Democratic Leaders, particularly House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who have been walking a fine line between fighting on behalf of the harassment accusers while also arguing the need to ensure due process for the accused. 

Publicly, Democratic leaders had maintained that Conyers’s fate should hinge on the outcome of an Ethics Committee investigation launched in the immediate wake of the allegations, and Pelosi had initially defended Conyers while casting doubt on his accusers. After heavy criticism, Pelosi changed her tune, and last Thursday she called publicly for his resignation.

“Zero tolerance means consequences — for everyone,” Pelosi said. “No matter how great the legacy, it’s no license to harass or discriminate.”

Pelosi’s announcement broke a dam of silence among a long list of Democrats who had also wanted Conyers out, but were nonetheless arguing publicly that he should be afforded rights of defense before the Ethics Committee.

A blizzard of statements followed Pelosi’s lead, with top Democrats including Reps. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.) and Ben Ray Lujan (N.M.) all joining Pelosi in urging Conyers to resign.

Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.), the third-ranking House Democrat and a senior member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), had privately urged Conyers to resign even before Pelosi’s announcement.

“I spoke to him, and I said to him — and I’m going to tell you like I said it to him — ’I do not think this thing is going to get any better. In fact, I think it’s going to get worse. And I think it’s in everybody’s best interest if you were to step aside,’” Clyburn told The Hill recently.

In the eyes of Conyers’s defenders, however, the calls for resignation employed a double standard, since most of his Democratic critics have declined to endorse the same punishment for Sen. Al Franken, a Minnesota Democrat facing his own string of sexual harassment allegations going back more than a decade.

By congressional standards, Conyers’s fall came swiftly. But in the eyes of the Democratic leaders scrambling to mitigate the political fallout and shift the discussion back to the Republicans’ tax bill, it was a tortuous 14 days of mixed messages and ever-growing desperation to push him out.

Allegations first emerged as part of a Nov. 20 BuzzFeed News report revealing that Conyers had paid out a $27,000, taxpayer-funded sexual harassment settlement in 2015 to a former staffer who said she was fired because she refused the congressman’s sexual advances.

Other former employees also alleged that Conyers made requests for sexual favors, inappropriately touched staffers and used congressional resources to transport women, with whom they believed Conyers was having affairs.

Attorney Lisa Bloom on Monday revealed the allegations of another accuser, Elisa Grubbs, who said in an affidavit that Conyers touched her inappropriately in a church while she was working for him. She also alleged that Conyers exposed himself to her in his home in a separate incident. Grubbs notes in the affidavit that she is the cousin of another John Conyers accuser, Marion Brown, and says she saw Conyers touch Brown inappropriately.

Conyers’s decision to bow out marks an ignominious end for the iconic Detroit lawmaker, a veteran of the Korean War who’s served under 10 different presidents and voted on some of the most significant legislation of the last century, including the creation of Medicare, the Civil Rights Act, the Clean Water Act and ObamaCare. Along the way, he helped found the Black Caucus, and rose to become chairman of the House Oversight Committee from 1989 to 2005, and later chaired the Judiciary Committee for two terms beginning in 2007.

Conyers’s’ exit leaves a vacancy for the top Democratic spot on the Judiciary panel, setting the stage for a fierce battle to fill the seat. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who sat just below Conyers on the panel, had assumed the role of acting ranking member. But Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), who’s next in line behind Nadler, told fellow Democrats last week that she intends to challenge Nadler for the post.

Lofgren might not be alone. Jackson Lee, who sits right behind Lofgren on the panel, said recently that she's not ruling out a bid in the event the seat is vacated.

“Stay tuned … for further opportunities,” she said before Conyer’s announcement.

Nadler on Tuesday praised Conyers' achievements in Congress, but called for zero tolerance when it comes to sexual misconduct.

"John has been a champion for justice his entire life, and there is no doubt that these allegations have taken a tremendous toll on him personally, as well as on his family and on everyone that knows him,” he said in a statement. 

“With that said, there can be no tolerance for behavior that subjects women to the kind of conduct that has been alleged.”

Conyers 'retiring early today' amid sexual allegations

WSJ Editorial Board Calls on Robert Mueller to Resign from Russia Probe

Imagine under a Trump presidency it came to light the IRS was targeting liberal groups the likes of Media Matters, the ALCU, the Huffington Post, Center for American Progress etc.

Think the outcome would have been the same as it was for Barry, Lerner, Koskinen, and the rest of the culprits?

Let alone the fact Trump hates Comey. Comey hates Trump. Now throw in Mueller and Comey are best buds. 

No conflict of interest there right?

----------------------------------

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board called Thursday for FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller to step down from his role in investigating alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election, saying that he lacks the “critical distance” to analyze recent revelations about the FBI’s role in the saga.

“It is no slur against Mr. Mueller’s integrity to say that he lacks the critical distance to conduct a credible probe of the bureau he ran for a dozen years,” the Journal’s editorial board wrote. “He could best serve the country by resigning to prevent further political turmoil over that conflict of interest.”

The board was writing in response to recent reports that suggest the FBI uncovered evidence of the Russian bribery and money laundering in the U.S. ahead of a 2010 decision by the Obama administration to greenlight the partial sale of the Canadian firm Uranium One to Russian energy giant Rosatom. The deal transferred control of 20 percent of U.S. uranium stocks to the Russians.

Government Accountability Institute (GAI) President and Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer broke the Uranium One scandal in his book Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich. He reported that Clinton’s State Department, along with other federal agencies, approved the transfer of 20 percent of all U.S. uranium to Russia and that nine foreign investors in the deal gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

But the controversy re-emerged last week after the Hill reported that the FBI uncovered “substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering” to expand Russia’s nuclear footprint in the U.S. as early as 2009, but the Justice Department did not inform Congress and the public, and did not act on the information until 2014, after the sale was completed. 

The FBI also reportedly found evidence that Russian officials routed “millions of dollars” to the U.S. to be funneled into the Clinton Foundation — at a time when Hillary Clinton was serving as secretary of state and served on the government body that approved the deal.

Additionally, the Washington Post reported this week that the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign funded Fusion GPS as it put together the so-called “Trump dossier,” a dossier of mostly uncorroborated accusations against Trump, many of which the Journal notes are based largely on Kremlin-connected sources. This raises the possibility that Democrats funded a Moscow-pushed misinformation campaign against Trump.

Both sets of revelations turn the Democrat-pushed accusations that Trump colluded with the Russians on their heads and raise questions about the Clinton campaign, DNC, and Obama administration’s dealings with the Russians instead.

The Journal’s editorial argues that the FBI’s role in such controversies now needs to be investigated. Mueller served as FBI Director between 2001 and 2013, so he led the FBI at the same time the Uranium One deal was being debated and approved. 

On the question of the dossier, the Journal argues:

The more troubling question is whether the FBI played a role, even if inadvertently, in assisting a Russian disinformation campaign. We know the agency possessed the dossier in 2016, and according to media reports, it debated paying Mr. Steele to continue his work in the run-up to the election. This occurred while former FBI Director James Comey was ramping up his probe into supposed ties between the Trump campaign and Russians.

Arguing that congressional investigators now need to focus on the FBI’s role, the Journal’s board argues that it now puts Mueller’s stewardship of the investigation into question:

All of this also raises questions about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. The Fusion news means the FBI’s role in Russia’s election interference must now be investigated—even as the FBI and Justice insist that Mr. Mueller’s probe prevents them from cooperating with Congressional investigators.

It is in this context that the Journal argues that Mueller, as a former FBI director and someone who has worked closely with Comey for years, should resign or else cause turmoil related to his conflict of interest.

“The American public deserves a full accounting of the scope and nature of Russian meddling in American democracy, and that means following the trail of the Steele dossier as much as it does the meetings of Trump campaign officials,” the Journal’s board argues.

WSJ Editorial Board Calls on Robert Mueller to Resign from Russia Probe