Visit Counter

Monday, January 29, 2018

Hillary Clinton makes Grammys cameo to mock Trump by reading 'Fire and Fury' quote





I never watch this crap but some people do. Her talent for speaking out like this is truly amazing. The hypocrisy is out of control. For instance, recently she came out against sexual predators. Why would she bring it to the forefront when her own husband, on that topic, is the 'King of the Jungle'?
 Oh...I forgot.
"That was in the past." 


Video 394



'He had a longtime fear of being poisoned - one reason why he liked to eat at McDonald's. No one knew he was coming and the food was safely pre-made,' Clinton read in a surprise appearance at the awards show.




Well then.. her husband must have been so fearful he had to PERSONALLY pick up his order!

















 Shorts a gift from Richard Simmons?



And this is her source which even the left criticizes: 












Share/Bookmark

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Woman Sues Walmart To End Policy Of Locking Up, 'Segregating' Black Beauty Products




Let's see if we can formulate some common sense here:  

Video 393

So Walmart did this in a show of racism?

They just did it to be mean?

Or did they feel the need to take this course of action as a prevention because of the recent history of shoplifting? I'm going with door number 3.

BTW...if Pelosi had a treacherous evil twin her name would be ambulance chaser, Gloria Allred. She's always there to lend a shoulder for the "abused" to cry on. Enough to make me puke.

PS: Wonder if the comb knew it was suffering from segregation?








Share/Bookmark

Friday, January 26, 2018

Soros calls Trump administration a 'danger to the world'





This coming from the guy known as...

"The man who broke the Bank of England."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros



Wonder if old George gets together with Klugman for dinner?


Paul Krugman called Donald Trump the "mother of all adverse effects."




They sure would have a lot to discuss!

(Check out the last paragraph. The end result of when liberal bias supplants rational thought.)

---------------------------------


George Soros called the Trump Administration a "danger to the world" while speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland this weekend. (AP Photo/Koji Sasahara)

Liberal billionaire George Soros told global leaders and economists at Davos Thursday night that President Trump is a "danger to the world," who has helped bring the planet to the brink of nuclear war.

Soros, the 87-year-old Hungarian-born financier, spoke at the World Economic Forum, harshly criticizing Trump, who was not present. He said the threat of nuclear war has grown as the U.S. and North Korea continue to antagonize each other.

"The situation has deteriorated," said Soros. "Not only the survival of open society but the survival of our entire civilization is at stake."


" ... the survival of our entire civilization is at stake."
- George Soros


"Both [Kim Jong-Un and Donald Trump] seem willing to risk a nuclear war in order to keep themselves in power.

"The United States is set on a course toward nuclear war by refusing to accept that North Korea has become a nuclear power," he continued.

Soros, whose dire predictions a year ago that President Trump would crash the U.S. economy have proven wildly wrong, also forecast a Democratic landslide in the 2018 midterm elections would push back the danger of the Trump administration. He said his Open Society Foundation is funding more institutions in the U.S. rather than the third world to ensure a Democratic victory in November.

Soros also referred to social media giants like Facebook and Google as a “menace” to society. Soros likened the businesses to gambling companies that “deliberately engineer addiction to the services they provide.”

"The fact that they are near-monopoly distributors makes them public utilities and should subject them to more stringent regulations, aimed at preserving competition, innovation, and fair and open universal access," he said.

During last year’s conference in Davos, Soros predicted negative prospects for the stock market under Trump. Since then, the S&P’s 500 Index rallied almost 30 percent, according to Bloomberg.







Share/Bookmark

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Have people gone mad?



The economy is humming sweeter than the purr of a V-12 Ferrari. Lowest unemployment in 18 years, stock market through the roof, over 250 companies increasing wages and paying bonuses left and right. In my lifetime I have never seen anything like it! 



So how in the hell do you explain WORSE 22%... SAME 34%?

Democrats on bath salts comes to mind.



3,000,000 and counting getting bonuses and Home Depot just announced today they will follow suit.


Had this happened when "The Messiah" was in office they would be screaming in adoration from the rafters.









Share/Bookmark

An Iranian protester removed her head scarf and waved it in public like a flag. She hasn't been seen since







One day late last month, a woman wearing black trousers and gray sneakers climbed atop a telephone utility box in Tehran’s crowded Enghelab Square.

In an act of defiance as quiet as it was striking, she removed her white headscarf, tied it to a stick and waved the garment back and forth like a flag in protest against modesty laws that require Iranian women to cover their hair.

In cellphone videos captured by onlookers, her movements are slow, almost hypnotic, her dark hair flowing down to the middle of her back.

Weeks later, after Iran was shaken by the biggest anti-government protests in nearly a decade, the woman’s whereabouts are unknown. She has become the subject of a social media campaign labeled #Where_Is_She, and an anonymous symbol of opposition to what many Iranians view as the theocracy’s harsh laws against free expression.

Video 392



I would have sent them a check.



Questions over the woman’s fate deepened this week after Nasrin Sotoudeh, one of Iran’s most prominent human rights lawyers, posted on Facebook that she had learned the woman was arrested the day of her protest, Dec. 27, released shortly afterward and then rearrested.

Sotoudeh said the woman was 31 and mother to a 20-month-old child, but she did not know whether she had been tried. No family members or friends have come forward to identify her publicly, perhaps to protect themselves as dissidents come under added scrutiny after the unrest.

Shopkeepers near where the woman stood — a street corner with a confectionary and several sidewalk peddlers — said in interviews that her protest went on for more than an hour until she was arrested by two female police officers.

Peddlers who took video of her were arrested and later released, they said.

Her protest occurred on a Wednesday, a day when activists wear white in protest of the modesty laws that have been enforced with varying degrees of fervor since Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. Women must cover their hair with the headscarf, or hijab, and wear long, loose-fitting coats known as manteaus — or risk being stopped by so-called moral police.

The next day, protests over economic grievances and corruption broke out and quickly spread to dozens of cities. In the ensuing crackdown, more than 20 people were killed and thousands arrested, with some believed to have died in custody under circumstances that authorities have not fully explained.

All that has made the hijab-less woman a cause celebre on social media, her gesture forever linked to the anti-government demonstrations even though she was not actually a part of them.

“As the protests spread, many Iranian activists online were inspired by the nonviolent protest of the lone girl,” Masih Alinejad, an activist and founder of the My Stealthy Freedom campaign against enforced hijab, told Al-Monitor, a news site covering the Middle East.

“Her gesture was seen as a symbol of resistance. Her protest caught the imagination of Iranian women and men, feminists and non-feminists.”

Internet memes have sprung up showing the woman facing a firing squad, standing in place of the emblem in the Iranian flag and countering a police baton with her hijab.

“I hail what she has done,” Golnar Ramesh, a 28-year-old engineer in Tehran, said in an interview.

Ramesh said she often goes without a scarf while in public or driving, in defiance of the moral police, but “I don’t have her courage to stand in public near Tehran University for more than an hour.”

Ramesh said that the woman’s protest was impulsive, but that authorities probably would deal with her more harshly because of the broader crackdown against demonstrators.

“I think she has been punished for a protest that could have been done without as much risk at some other time,” she said.





Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Campaign Slogan... 2020







Ought to go over big.





Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Veterans Say the NFL Censored its Ad against the Players’ Kneeling Protests



Gotta love this.

The NFL didn't want them to make a 'political statement'.

WTF do you call this?




---------------------------------------------





By Mark Meckler


Image Details: Airmen from Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, hold the U.S. flag before the Miami Dolphins – Oakland Raiders football game in London on Sept. 28, 2014. The game was the first of three international NFL games that will be played this season at Wembley Stadium. As part of the pregame ceremony, the 48 Fighter Wing Airmen held U.S. and U.K. flags as a sign of the continued cooperation between U.S. visiting forces and their U.K. hosts. (U.S. Air Force photo by Col. Marc Vandeveer)




AMVETS officials reported the National Football League won’t run their ad during the Super Bowl, presumably because it encourages players to stand for the national anthem.

It would’ve cost them $30,000, but the organization thought it was worth the cost to send this message to a culture desperately in need of a little patriotism: #PleaseStand. The ads would feature veterans standing to salute the flag, along with info on how people can donate money to a Congressionally approved charity. Wow. That doesn’t sound very controversial, does it?

Yet, the NFL rejected the ad buy and didn’t say why, according to AMVETS National Commander Marion Polk. Here’s a post that Polk posted about the controversy:



.@AMVETSHQ will NOT tolerate the @NFL refusing #Veteran right to free speech. We fought for it! #PleaseStand#SuperBowlpic.twitter.com/NARbC5zKuE

— Marion Polk (@AMVETSNatlCmdr) January 22, 2018


The Army Times reports that the NFL didn’t want the ads to be political:


In a statement, NFL Vice President of Communications Brian McCarthy said the Super Bowl game program “is designed for fans to commemorate and celebrate the game, players, teams and the Super Bowl. It’s never been a place for advertising that could be considered by some as a political statement.”

Wait, so football isn’t the place for a political statement? Isn’t that what patriotic Americans have been saying all along? McCarthy said AMVETS didn’t respond to a request for a content change fast enough and therefore missed the deadline.

Sounds suspicious to me.

This controversy, which began in 2016 when (then) San Francisco quarterback Colin Kaepernick decided to sit during the National Anthem, has been mishandled by the NFL all along. When President Donald Trump called any player doing this a “son of a bitch” and suggested they get fired for their actions, fuel was added to the cultural fire. Things have died down lately, which is probably how the NFL wants to keep it. But one thing’s for sure — the NFL has another public relations nightmare on their hands.

Can’t they ever get this issue right? Here’s a tip, I’ll give to you for free: err on the side of America and vets… not your spoiled, rich, entitled athletes.





Share/Bookmark

Another reason we need the wall...NOW






Mexico had over 29,000 murders in 2017



Wouldn't it make sense to keep them out of the country rather than pay to keep them in jail? How much does this cost the taxpayers per year? Couldn't that money be spent more wisely elsewhere?

Are we fools?

---------------------------------------


Mexico posted its highest homicide rate in decades, with the government reporting Sunday there were 29,168 murders in 2017.

The number is the highest since comparable records began being kept in 1997 and is also higher than the peak year of Mexico's drug war in 2011 when there were 27,213 murders.

The Interior Department, which posted the number, reported the country's homicide rate was 20.5 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2017, compared to 19.4 in 2011.

Mexico security analyst Alejandro Hope stated Mexico's murder rate is probably higher than the Interior Department statistics show, because the department does the per 100,000 count based on the number of murder investigations, not the number of victims, and a killing may result in more than one victim. Hope says the real homicide rate is probably around 24 per 100,000

While President Enrique Pena Nieto had campaigned on a pledge to end the violence that occurred during his predecessors' 2006-2012 offensive against drug cartels, there was only a temporary drop in killings between 2012 and 2014.

By 2015, killings began rising again, and 2017 was the bloodiest year, probably since the early 1990s.

This year promises to be even bloodier: During the first few days of 2018 in just the Gulf coast state of Veracruz, nine people were killed, dismembered and had their body parts stuffed into a van in the state capital of Xalapa.

The grisly scene — literally a jumbled pile of human limbs and torsos topped by a threatening note apparently signed by the Zetas drug gang — was reminiscent of the mass dumping of bodies in the state in 2011.

Earlier in the new year, five severed heads were found arranged on the hood of a taxi in the tourist town of Tlacotalpan, Veracruz, and four others found in another city in the same state.

Experts say drug violence and other factors, such as bloody turf battles sparked by the expansion of the Jalisco New Generation cartel, played a role in Mexico's rising murder rate.

But Hope says the problem is complex.

"The violence in Mexico has many causes. Drug trafficking is one of them, of course, but it is not the only one," said Hope. "There are social triggers, institutional ones, historical ones, issues of land rights. It is complex."

In fact, Hope argues, the period from 1997 to 2007 — when murder rates in Mexico plunged to as low as 9.3 murders per 100,000 — was in fact the exception.

"What we have seen in the last decade is regression to the mean" that prevailed throughout much of the 20th century, he said. "The anomaly is the decade before this one."





Share/Bookmark

Michigan man arrested after caller threatens to kill CNN employees




Check out the headline above...I'm shocked! It doesn't mention Trump in the entire article. CNN must be losing their touch.



That's better.

------------------------------------




The CNN Center is located in downtown Atlanta. 


(CNN)Authorities arrested a Michigan man last week after he allegedly called CNN several times, threatening to kill employees at the network's Atlanta, Georgia, headquarters, according to a federal affidavit. 

Brandon Griesemer made 22 calls to CNN on January 9 and January 10 and four calls, which were recorded, contained threats, according to the affidavit, which was unsealed Friday. 

Griesemer, whose age was not given, also made disparaging statements about Jewish people, African-Americans and the network in several calls, the affidavit said.

He was charged Friday in US District Court with transmitting interstate communications with the intent to extort and threat to injure. He was released Friday on $10,000 bond. 

A family member at Griesemer's home in Novi, Michigan, declined to comment late Monday.

"We take any threats to CNN employees or workplaces, around the world, extremely seriously. This one is no exception. We have been in touch with local and federal law enforcement throughout, and have taken all necessary measures to ensure the safety of our people," CNN said Monday in a statement.

Michigan authorities first crossed paths with Griesemer last fall. 

On September 19, a man -- later identified as Griesemer -- called an employee at an Islamic center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and made derogatory comments about the mosque and Muslims, an FBI agent said in the affidavit. 

Ann Arbor police used an online database to identify Griesemer's father as the phone's owner. 

Two days later, Ann Arbor police contacted Griesemer's mother at the family's home, where Griesemer lived. She told police her son had called the mosque, the affidavit said. Officers told her they wanted to talk to her son. 

In a call to Ann Arbor police that day, Griesemer admitted he called the mosque on September 19 "and that he was angry at the time of the call," the affidavit said.

CNN received the first threatening call around 3 p.m. on January 9. The call was made to a publicly listed phone number at the Atlanta headquarters from the same cell phone number used to call the Islamic center in Ann Arbor on September 19, the affidavit said. 

It was the first of three threatening calls that day to CNN from that number, according to the affidavit. 

"Fake news. I'm coming to gun you all down," said the caller, who cursed and used an expletive directed at African-Americans, the affidavit said. 

"I am on my way right now to gun the f****** CNN cast down .... I am coming to kill you," the caller said a second call to CNN, according to affidavit. 

On January 9, an investigator employed by CNN searched law enforcement databases for the phone number and discovered it was registered to Griesemer's father, the affidavit said. The investigator learned a second number was associated with the wireless account. 

The investigator called the second phone number and asked to speak to Griesemer's father. The man who picked up identified himself as Brandon, the affidavit said. 

The investigator recorded the conversation with Griesemer and compared the audio to the recorded audio of the threatening calls, the affidavit said.

The voices sounded like the same person, the affidavit said.

On January 10, CNN received the fourth call from the same cell phone number used to make the three prior threats, the affidavit said. 

The caller again threatened to come to the Atlanta headquarters to "gun every single last one of you," the affidavit said. 

The CNN investigator collected data from the cell phone used to make the threats. That phone had accessed a cellular tower in Novi, Michigan, the affidavit said.

Griesemer could face a fine or up to five years in prison if convicted.

CNN's Dave Alsup contributed to this report.

Share/Bookmark

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Government shut down




Now that the Democrats have shut down the government over DACA... The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (like the use of the word 'Arrivals' like they just fell out of the sky). They're 'immigrants', 'migrants', 'undocumented' everything but what they truly are... ILLEGAL. 

Trump GOT elected in part because he promised to build a wall. Now Democrats are showing their true colors by putting illegals before our own citizens. 


FF to the midterms. 





Share/Bookmark

Friday, January 19, 2018

Trump's approval rating is the lowest for any president one year into his term, NBC/WSJ poll says







Poll... did someone say poll? Oh, ye of fading memory. I remember every poll CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, ABC, CNBC leading up to and including the night of the election didn't give Trump a snowball's chance in hell of winning.

They were soooo WRONG!

Video 391

The article below is very telling. By that I mean if Trump's approval rating is only 39% that's a clear indication the other 61% don't own stock.


2,000,000 Americans and counting will receive Trump Tax Reform Bonuses

click to see list:


That's a lot of Americans receiving 'crumbs'.

Wonder who they're going to vote for in 2020?

--------------------------------







President scored a 39 percent approval rating in the new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll – the lowest approval rating in the survey's history for any modern president after his first year in office.


The poll was conducted Jan. 13 to 17, after the uproar began over , and while as Congress scrambled to reach a funding deal. Saturday is the first anniversary of Trump's inauguration. 


Fifty-one percent of respondents to the poll said they strongly disapproved of Trump's performance in the Oval Office, a record high for the president in the NBC/WSJ poll. Overall, 57 percent of people said they disapproved of the president's job.


In February 2017, just after Trump took office, 44 percent of respondents in the NBC/WSJ poll said they approved of the president's performance, while 48 percent disapproved.


Trump's administration has been beset by turmoil since the beginning, marked by unusually high amounts of senior staff turnover and a criminal investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin during the 2016 election.


More recently, Trump has been plagued by explosive revelations and assertions made by former campaign chief and fired White House chief strategist Steve Bannon in Michael Wolff's book "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House." Transcripts of congressional testimony from a co-founder of the firm behind an inflammatory dossier about Trump's purported connections to Russian businessmen and mobsters has also reignited speculation about the president's labyrinthine financial dealings.


Trump, in search of a major early legislative win, pushed for repeal of President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, but the effort fizzled on multiple occasions in 2017 before the president and the Republican-controlled Congress moved on to a sweeping tax-cut bill. Trump signed the measure into law in December. Polls have shown that voters are dubious of the tax bill's benefits, which slashed corporate tax rates and eliminated several popular individual deductions, but Trump has insisted people will see more money in their paychecks.


For the time being, however, voters are skeptical of the president, according to the NBC/WSJ poll. His approval ratings from some of his major constituent groups – whites, men and seniors – are below 50 percent, the latest findings show. (The percentages among those groups are 46 percent, 45 percent and 41 percent, respectively.)


Trump's approval rating among voters aged 18-34 was 35 percent, 33 percent among women, 26 percent among Latinos, and 8 percent of African Americans.


The pollsters also asked voters which words best described how they felt about Trump. Democratic pollster Peter Hart, who conducted the survey with Republican pollster Bill McInturff, told NBC News that voters used the word "hopeful" the most when Trump first took office. 


This time, "disgusted" was the most popular word, at 38 percent, followed by "scared" at 24 percent and "hopeful" at 23 percent.


The NBC/WSJ poll was conducted of 900 adults, nearly half reached by cell phone, and it has an overall margin of error of plus-minus 3.3 percentage points. The rest of the poll will be released later Friday.



Share/Bookmark

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Can't think of anyone more aptly named




His life story reads like a liberal. 

The Flake assumed office in January 2013 and sat through Barry's abuse of power and said nothing... and now he's outraged at Trump!

 People of AZ.

 

Why do
you
continually elect these dogs?

"Enemy of the people" describes the MSM to a tee. They absolutely do not report the news in an unbiased, apolitical, way. If they did Trump wouldn't have to use Twitter. Their 'preconceived polls' lied every step of the way leading to and including the night of the election. Bias... they don't even try to hide it anymore!. Just the other day it was clearly evident again when they peppered Trump's doctor looking, begging, digging, for any morsel of bad news about Trump's physical. The question was asked, "What are you hiding from us?"

Then the shock set in:

(Dear God please don't let Trump get a clean bill of health)

(Oh... no..no...he did!!!!!!!!)

And if you check the latest news reports the entire focus is on 239lbs.




Next step for the Flake... CNN?
I'd be surprised if it wasn't.

------------------------------------





"Republican"...Flake slams Trump for Stalin-like attacks on media



Arizona Republican Jeff Flake unleashed a diatribe against President Donald Trump, timed to coincide with the expected announcement of controversial "Fake News Awards" by Trump's administration



A maverick senator from Donald Trump's own Republican party launched a stinging attack on the president on Wednesday, accusing him of employing Stalinist language to attack and undermine the free press.

Arizona lawmaker Jeff Flake leveled the broadside in an address from the Senate floor, timed to coincide with the expected announcement of controversial "Fake News Awards" by Trump's administration.

Flake -- an outspoken critic of the president who is not seeking re-election this year -- hit out at what he called Trump's disregard for the truth, and his repeated designation of the news media as an "enemy."

"The 'enemy of the people' was how the president of the United States called the free press in 2017," Flake told lawmakers.

"Mr. President, it is a testament to the condition of our democracy that our own president uses words infamously spoken by Joseph Stalin to describe his enemies," he said.

"So fraught with malice was the phrase 'enemy of the people,' that even Nikita Khrushchev forbade its use."

Flake accused Trump's White House of a "daily assault" on the constitutionally protected right to free speech, calling it "as unprecedented as it is unwarranted."

And he accused Trump of committing "moral vandalism" against the truth, from his longtime questioning of Barack Obama's birth certificate to his dismissal of Russian meddling in the 2016 election as a "hoax" -- and warned he was emboldening authoritarian regimes around the world to persecute the press.

"2017 was a year which saw the truth -- objective, empirical, evidence-based truth more battered and abused than any time in the history of our country, at the hands of the biggest figure in our government," Flake said.

"Without truth and a principled fidelity to truth and to shared facts, Mr President, our democracy will not last," he warned.

Trump tweeted last week that he would be awarding "Fake News Awards" to the "most corrupt & biased of the Mainstream Media" this Wednesday -- but the White House has remained evasive on whether the controversial event, already once delayed, would take place.

Share/Bookmark