FBI lovers' latest text messages: Obama 'wants to know everything'

How is Barry going to get away with it this time? 

"I heard it on the news reports" ain't going to cut it this time.

What gets me is Republicans own the WH and both Houses armed with a mountain of evidence and still can't nail these bastards!

---------------------------------------

Newly revealed text messages between FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page include an exchange about preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Obama, who wanted “to know everything we’re doing."

The message, from Page to Strzok, was among thousands of texts between the lovers reviewed by Fox News. The pair both worked at one point for Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Page wrote to Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016, about prepping Comey because "POTUS wants to know everything we're doing." Senate investigators told Fox News this text raises questions about Obama's personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.

In texts previously revealed, Strzok and Page have shown their disdain for Republicans in general, as well as Trump, calling him a "f---ing idiot," among other insults.

Among the newly disclosed texts, Strzok also calls Virginians who voted against then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's wife for a state Senate seat "ignorant hillbillies." (sic)

That text came from Strzok to Page on Nov. 4, 2015, the day after Jill McCabe lost a hotly contested Virginia state Senate election. Strzok said of the result, "Disappointing, but look at the district map. Loudon is being gentrified, but it's still largely ignorant hillbillies. Good for her for running, but curious if she's energized or never again."

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., along with majority staff from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, is releasing the texts, along with a report titled, “The Clinton Email Scandal and the FBI's Investigation of it.”

The newly uncovered texts reveal a bit more about the timing of the discovery of "hundreds of thousands" of emails on former congressman Anthony Weiner's laptop, ultimately leading to Comey's infamous letter to Congress just days before the 2016 presidential election.

On Sept. 28, 2016, Strzok wrote to Page, "Got called up to Andy's [McCabe] earlier.. hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner's Atty to sdny [Southern District of New York], includes a ton of material from spouse [Huma Abedin]. Sending team up tomorrow to review... this will never end." Senate investigators told Fox News this text message raises questions about when FBI officials learned of emails relevant to the Hillary Clinton email investigation on the laptop belonging to Weiner, the husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

It was a full month later, on Oct. 28, 2016, when Comey informed Congress that, "Due to recent developments," the FBI was reopening its Clinton email investigation.

"In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday..." Comey said at the time.

The question becomes why Comey was only informed by his investigative team on Oct. 27, if the Clinton emails on Weiner’s laptop were discovered by Sept. 28, at the latest. 

Other texts show more examples of the officials' opposition to Trump. 

On Election Day 2016, Page wrote, "OMG THIS IS F***ING TERRIFYING." Strzok replied, "Omg, I am so depressed." Later that month, on Nov. 13, 2016, Page wrote, "I bought all the president's men. Figure I need to brush up on Watergate." 

The next day, Nov. 14, 2016, Page wrote, “God, being here makes me angry. Lots of high fallutin’ national security talk. Meanwhile, we have OUR task ahead of us.”

Page’s meaning here is unclear, but Senate investigators say, coupled with Strzok’s Aug. 15 text about an “insurance policy,” further investigation is warranted to find out what actions the two may have taken.

The last text is from Page to Strzok, and comes on June 23, 2017, when she wrote, "Please don't ever text me again."

It's unclear whether she was mad at her friend, or if she suddenly became aware that they, and their thousands of texts, had been discovered.

FBI lovers' latest text messages: Obama 'wants to know everything'

McCain joins Democrats in slamming release of GOP memo as other Republicans defend it

Nothing surprises me about this guy anymore. Bet he voted for Clinton.

I can see it now. As their closing the lid on his coffin he'll raise his arm and say...'Wait a minute. I think I still have enough strength to stab Trump in the back one more time.'

McCain is one of the most worthless Republicans we ever had. They talk about Trump's mental health. After reading this article I really wonder about his! 

 Before he dies I hope McCain can be true to himself and officially join the Democratic party where he belongs.

-------------------------------

Sen. John McCain blasted President Donald Trump on Friday for approving the release of the highly controversial GOP-Nunes memo, saying "if we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin's job for him." 

McCain, who chairs the Senate Armed Forces Committee, called on Trump and other elected officials to stop looking at special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation through "the warped lens of politics."

"In 2016, the Russian government engaged in an elaborate plot to interfere in an American election and undermine our democracy," McCain said. "... While we have no evidence that these efforts affected the outcome of our election, I fear they succeeded in fueling political discord and dividing us from one another."

In a written statement released around the same time the memo was declassified, the Arizona Republican characterized the memo and its release as "partisan attacks" on the FBI and the Department of Justice. 

The so-called attacks "serve no American interests," he added -- "no party's, no president's, only Putin's."

"Our nation's elected officials, including the President, must stop looking at this investigation through the warped lens of politics and manufacturing partisan sideshows," McCain said. "If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin's job for him."

The release of the memo -- spearheaded by Devin Nunes, R-California, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee -- sent shockwaves through Washington on Friday as congressional Democrats and a smattering of Republicans decried it as a GOP-led effort to undermine the FBI's investigation into Trump and Russia. 

The memo alleges that the FBI abused its surveillance authority during an investigation into Carter Page, the President's former foreign policy adviser. 

Following the memo's release, congressional Democrats called on the House Intelligence Committee to release their own party's memo on the matter, which was produced by California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on that committee.

McCain joins Democrats in slamming release of GOP memo as other Republicans defend it

Some people call them the black caucus protesting against Trump

 Looks more like the delegation from Zimbabwe to me. 

Protests aside what you see here is one the splinter factions of the Democratic party who's reelection is ostensibly guaranteed. So since they are a lock why all the glum faces and lack of interest when Trump said black unemployment is the lowest in history? Isn't that a good thing?

The reason is this is all new to them. Hard to digest. Black unemployment is supposed to be high. That's how Democrats keep blacks in the fold or as Star Parker once said, "keeping them on the plantation" by making them dependent on the government.

So you see in their eyes a record low black unemployment rate is a bitter pill to swallow. Not to mention, under a Republican president many blacks will get a bonus check, pay raises, from their employer and higher take-home pay because of the tax bill.

This can't be good.

Some people call them the black caucus protesting against Trump

Pretend we never heard this before and Trump said it at the SOTU

And the Democratic reaction would have been...

 I'll leave you to your own thoughts.

Pretend we never heard this before and Trump said it at the SOTU

Ready For This?

ACLU Whines That Trump Saying 'America' Too Many Times During State of the Union Was 'Exclusionary'

Can't believe I just read this!!!

Wait a minute...isn't the first word in ACLU American?

By Chris Reeves

After last night’s State of the Union address, the American Civil Liberties Union was extremely upset at the fact that President Trump used the word “America” more than 80 times throughout the course of his speech. 

Faiz Shakir, the organization’s National Political Director, issued a statement expressing shock and dismay that Trump openly talked about putting American citizens first in matters of public policy.

Stop here:

Who is Faiz Shakir???

Maybe a little background information on this Muslim might prove enlightening.

https://www.aclu.org/bio/faiz-shakir

This is him in his younger years when he was PRESIDENT OF THE ISLAMIC "PEACE" CENTRE... before he joined the ACLU.

 I swear to God if the ACLU could resurrect Bin Laden they would find a place  for him in their fine organization.

Check out the opening line/lie from Wikipedia:

American Civil Liberties Union

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization[6][7] whose stated mission is "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States."

"nonpartisan"

No one in their right mind could possibly believe that! How many people at the ACLU vote Republican? 
Slim and none. 

--------------------------------------

“Tonight, President Trump said the word ‘America’ more than 80 times in his speech. Yet, after a divisive first year, we hear and feel how exclusionary that ‘America’ is, with policies that have harmed so many vulnerable American communities. The ACLU stands ready to protect these communities, both in the courts and at the polls.

“In particular, the immigration plan put forth by Trump would hold Dreamers hostage to his demands for a harmful border wall and an even larger mass deportation force. We are at this crossroads because of the president’s deeply destructive ideas fomented by his nativist allies and divisive rhetoric. We will continue to stand up for these young immigrants and ensure they continue to contribute to our country. We cannot let America’s Dreamers be deported.”

The ACLU has been at the forefront of efforts to support illegal immigrants and pro-illegal alien activists in their fight against law enforcement and the rule of law over the past several years. Thus, it’s no surprise that they would be so emotionally triggered by a president refusing to grant unconditional amnesty to Obama’s DACA recipients, whom the ACLU has strenuously campaigned for recently. Last August, the ACLU set the tone for demands for a “clean” DACA bill by issuing a statement decrying the Trump administration for considering an immigration reform bill that would ask for restrictions on legal immigration, more funds for border security, and an E-verify system in return for shielding DACA recipients from deportation:

It is abhorrent for the Trump administration to treat the lives and futures of Dreamers, including 800,000 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients, as bargaining chips to further its racist agenda. For the past five years, Americans have benefited from the protections and opportunities, afforded by the DACA program, that make it possible for Dreamers to fully contribute to our communities. President Trump, who is currently considering ending DACA following an ultimatum issued by ten states, should commit to keeping the program on the books until Congress passes a clean legislative solution to address Dreamers’ status.

Bloggers for the ACLU’s official website have also repeatedly published Orwellian pieces of pro-illegal agitprop.

For example, ACLU Legislative Assistant Katie Egan wrote a blog post yesterday complaining about ICE agents arresting and deporting illegal aliens who openly engage in pro-amnesty protests while flouting their immigration status. Egan characterized these law enforcement actions as a dangerous attack on freedom of speech. She also labeled the arrests of violent anarcho-communist rioters at last year’s inauguration as another example of Trump’s supposed contempt for free speech and dissent, raising further questions about the ACLU’s respect for the actual civil rights of Americans not to have their cars set on fire, storefronts smashed, or heads bashed in with bricks and baseball bats.

Of course, as long as mainstream Democratic politicians continue to openly support undermining America’s sovereign right to borders and laud anarchist terrorism (which Rep. Keith Ellison did last year), groups like the ACLU will likely continue to flourish in the country whose name they cannot even stand to hear their own president say.

Ready For This?

China is building a laser 10 trillion times more intense than the Sun that could tear space apart

 ...And they are only going to use this laser to give scientists a new way to accelerate particles for advanced physics research?

 BTW...has anybody truly examined what would happen when space is torn apart?

---------------------------------------------

China is building a mega-laser that's so powerful it could literally tear space apart.

Physicists in Shanghai are constructing what they call a 'Station of Extreme Light', which could be operational as soon as 2023.

The end goal is to create a laser so powerful it can produce 100-petawatt laser pulses –that's 100 million billion watts.

For context, that's 10,000 times the power of all the world's electrical grids combined.

These ludicrously powerful pulses could be targeted at incredible precise spots measuring just three micrometers across – that's 2000 times less than the thickness of a standard pencil.

This means the researchers could achieve a laser intensity 10 trillion trillion times greater than the sunlight striking earth.

According to the Science journal, this laser would be so powerful it "could rip apart empty space".

The idea is to achieve a phenomenon known as "breaking the vacuum", whereby electrons are torn away from positrons (their antimatter counterparts) in the empty vacuum of space.

Right now, it's possible to convert matter into huge amounts of heat and light, as proved by nuclear weapons. But reversing the process is more difficult – although Chinese physicist Ruxin Li believes his laser could manage it.

"That would be very exciting. It would mean you could generate something from nothing," he explained.

The team has already created a less powerful version called the Shanghai Superintense Ultrafast Laser, which is capable of a 5.3-petawatt pulse.

If the new laser eventually becomes operational, it could give scientists a new way to accelerate particles for advanced physics research.

China is building a laser 10 trillion times more intense than the Sun that could tear space apart

Democrat campaign poster... gearing up for the midterms

Via

https://earloftaint.com

Democrat campaign poster... gearing up for the midterms

Three out of four Americans APPROVE of Trump's State of the Union address, poll shows

This from the Daily Mail no less... not exactly a bastion of Trump lovers!

If liberals think they're going places with this motto:

***"We love illegals pouring into our country"***

They got another thought coming. This is not a motto but the death nail for Democrats in the upcoming elections.

Keep up the great work!!!

---------------------------------------

Three in four Americans said they approved of Tuesday night's State of the Union Address, according to a new poll. 

CBS News says that 75 percent of Americans approved of the speech - which was the first of the Trump presidency. Just a quarter of the people who tuned in and took the poll had a disapproving view.

And when broken down - the numbers look even more positive and optimistic for the president.

Three in four Americans said they approved of Tuesday night's State of the Union Address, according to a new poll

Additionally, two-thirds of poll-takers said the speech made them feel proud. However, only about one-third said the speech made them feel more safe than they felt before hearing it

CBS News says that 75 percent of Americans approved of the speech - which was the first of the Trump presidency. Just a quarter of the people who tuned in and took the poll had a disapproving view

Eight in 10 Americans who watched and took the poll said they felt the president was trying to unite the country with his message, according to CBS. 

Additionally, two-thirds of poll-takers said the speech made them feel proud. However, only about one-third said the speech made them feel more safe than they felt before hearing it.

Less than a quarter of the people who tuned in reported that the address made them feel scared or angry. 

But those numbers could be somewhat skewed to the rest of the population because most of the people who watched the speech identified as Republicans.

In the latest poll released earlier this month by CBS - 24 percent of Americans said they identify as Republicans. But tonight that number was up to 42 percent. 

In comparison, only 25 percent of the people who watched said they were Democrats, and 33 percent identified as Independents. 

And of the Democrats who watched, most did not like what they heard.

When broken down - the numbers look even more positive and optimistic for President Trump

Additionally, two-thirds of poll-takers said the speech made them feel proud. However, only about one-third said the speech made them feel more safe than they felt before hearing it

However, those numbers could be somewhat skewed to the rest of the population, as most of the people who watched the speech identified as republicans

Over half of the Democrats tuning in said the speech made them angry - which vastly differs to the 90 percent of Republicans who said it left them feeling proud. 

Independents who voted generally approved of Trump's message. Just under half of those said they would consider themselves Trump supporters.

Most poll takers also said the policies discussed tonight would help them personally - though the Democrats who voted said the opposite. 

In particular - the people who voted reacted most positively to President Trump's points about the nation's infrastructure, immigration, and national security. 

After hearing his speech - 54 percent of those who tuned in give him the majority of the credit for the country's economic prosperity. That number is up from 51 percent of people polled by CBS before they watched the State of the Union.

Most poll takers also said the policies discussed tonight would help them personally - though the Democrats who voted said the opposite. In particular - the people who voted reacted most positively to President Trump's points about the nation's infrastructure, immigration, and national security

And after hearing his speech - 54 percent of those who tuned in give him the majority of the credit for the country's economic prosperity. That number is up from 51 percent of people polled by CBS before they watched the State of the Union

Three out of four Americans APPROVE of Trump's State of the Union address, poll shows

Democrats show how they will protest Trump's SOTU

Guess the bitches are coming home to roost. Take it from the horse's mouth.

Video 395

The activist bitches will be out in full force tonight decked out in black!

 "Tammy Wynette" knows a thing or two about sexual predators.

Wait a minute I think I hear a song coming on. 

Stand by your man...

And:

Remember when Barry was president and all the Republicans wore red outfits in protest at the SOTU. Neither do I.

When the lib dogs pull this stunt off tonight conservatives will reap the reward. 

------------------------------------

 As I read the article this morning, their antics, while sipping a hot cup coffee hearing the distinct sound of the garbage truck going through its mechanical steps picking up the trash  of coffee  and reminded me, thinking what did I forget to throw out

Hours before the State of the Union address, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi gathered together her fellow Democratic women – and some men too – for a photo-op, as they showed off their black outfits for tonight. 

The lawmakers were taking a page from the women of Hollywood, who sported black gowns to the Golden Globes to pay homage to the 'Me Too' and 'Time's Up' movements. 

The Democrats followed the lead of Oprah Winfrey too, who had brought up the rape and subsequent activism of the late Recy Taylor. 

For the State of the Union, the lawmakers sported pink 'RECY' pins too. 

Pelosi, according to Politico, thought the wardrobe revolt was enough of a message, as she also instructed her members not to walk out of the speech or make a commotion. 

'Let the attention be on his slobbering self,' Pelosi said of President Trump, who delivers his first official State of the Union tonight. 'If you walk out, don't come in.'

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic women decided to wear black to President Trump's first State of the Union in honor of the 'Me Too' movement 

'Let the attention be on his slobbering self,' Nancy Pelosi reportedly told her colleagues, urging them not to cause a commotion in the chamber during President Trump's first State of the Union 

Rep. Lisa Blunt, a Democrat from Delaware, straightens her 'RECY' pin in advance of Tuesday night's State of the Union. The pins pay homage to the late Recy Taylor, a rape victim turned activist that talk show queen Oprah Winfrey paid homage to in her Golden Globes speech 

Rep. Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat from Connecticut, adjusts her 'Time Up' pin as she joins other House members for a photo-op showing many women lawmakers, and some men too, dressed in black for Tuesday night's State of the Union speech 

Democratic lawmakers, and some men too show off their ensembles for tonight's State of the Union speech as they show their support for the 'Me Too' movement. President Trump was previously accused of sexual assault 

Democratic lawmakers, dressed in all black to show support for the 'Me Too' and 'Time's Up' movements throw up a fist bump during a photo-op Tuesday before President Trump's State of the Union address

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi stands up among her peers as Democratic women show off their black attire, which they'll be wearing at tonight's State of the Union address 

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (left), an Illinois Democrat who is among the lawmakers boycotting tonight's speech, sat for the photo with the other women in black. She was seated beside Rep. Susan Davis (right), a Democrat from California 

A handful of Democratic members opted to do the latter with Rep. Frederica Wilson kicking off State of the Union eve yesterday by explaining why she wouldn't attend the affair. 

'I'm not going because to do would be to honor the president, and I don't think he deserves to be honored at this time,' the Florida Democrat said on CNN. 'After being so hateful toward black people and then black countries, Haiti and the whole continent of Africa, it hurts, it hurts, and he has brought the White House to the lowest, and I don't think he needs to be honored with my presence,' she went on. 

Wilson is not alone in making tomorrow night's State of the Union speech, Trump's first, into a political point. 

Earlier this months, on the heels of reports that said Trump referred to Haiti, El Salvador and the whole of Africa as 's***hole' countries, during a closed-door immigration meeting, Rep. John Lewis, a civil rights pioneer, announced that he would not go. 

'In good conscience, I can not and will not sit there and listen at him as he gives the State of the Union Address,' Lewis said then. 

That's when Wilson originally announced she would sit out, as did Democratic Reps. Maxine Waters, of California, and Pramila Jayapal, of Washington state. 

On Friday, they were joined by Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat, who said in a statement she was boycotting the address 'because I refuse to normalize President Donald Trump and his loathsome language and actions.' 

'With every day that passes, a new tweet, breaking news story, or leaked quote sheds new light on President Trump’s twisted and prejudiced mind,' she added. 

The congresswoman took particular offense to his 's***hole countries' comment, his reaction to the racial violence in Charlottesville, Virginia last summer, in which he said there were good people on 'both sides' of a clash between neo-Nazis, KKK members and white supremacists and counter-protesters, and for the roll-out of his 'Muslim ban' last year, which Schakowsky pointed out happened on Holocaust Remembrance Day. 

On Sunday, Rep. Gregory Meeks, a Democrat from New York, told MSNBC he would not be there. '

'I cannot give this man, who does not respect me, the respect to be in that audience,' Meeks said. 'I will not be there.' 

THE DEMOCRATS BOYCOTTING TRUMP'S 2018 STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS

Rep. Danny Davis - 7th district, Illinois 

Rep. Earl Blumenauer - 3rd district, Oregon

Rep. Frederica Wilson - 24th district, Florida

Rep. Rep. Jan Schakowsky - 9th district, Illinois 

Rep. John Lewis - 5th district, Georgia

Rep. Maxine Waters - 43rd district, California (Working the night shift at Motel 6) 

Rep. Gregory Meeks - 5th district, New York 

Rep. Pramila Jayapal - 7th district, Washington 

Rep. Bobby Rush - 1st district, Illinois 

Rep. Barbara Lee - 13th district, California 

Rep. Juan Vargas - 51st district, California 

Rep. Albio Sires - 8th district, New Jersey 

Meeks was joined by two other black House members, both from Illinois, on Monday as Reps Danny Davis and Bobby Rush, announced they would not attend. 

Rush called Trump's first year in office 'the most chaotic, divisive, and incompetent' and said he would not 'watch as Trump pretends that he's off to a successful start.' 

'He's not,' Rush said in a statement put out by his office. 

Late Monday, Rep. Juan Vargas, a Democrat from California, indicated that he would not attend. 

'President Trump continues to disrespect women, insult people of color, and attack our immigrant communities. I will not be attending the State of the Union—I stand in solidarity with all the people he has and continues to disrespect,' the congressman tweeted. 

While a majority of Democratic members boycotting were minorities, the first lawmaker to announce he would be playing hooky was a white guy, Rep. Earl Blumenauer from Oregon. 

Blumenauer later said he would be sending in his stead, a 'dreamer' to the speech, as Congress continues to debate what happens next with DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an Obama-era order that allowed undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children to gain legal status. 

Trump has since announced he was scrapping the program and tossed the problem to Congress. 

Other Democrats, too, are using their guests as mini-protests. 

Rep. Joe Kennedy, (still awaiting his first Kennedy DWI) the Massachusetts Democrat whose great-uncle was the late President John F. Kennedy, is bringing a transgender soldier – Staff Sgt. Patricia King – to the State of the Union, to protest the president's proposed transgender troops ban. 

The congressman's guest was first reported in the Boston Globe. 

Kennedy will also be giving the Democrats' official rebuttal after Trump leaves the dais. 

Later he will be giving a driving lesson on how to get on and off of Chappaquiddick Island without running off the bridge.
(He hopes) 

Rep. Ruben J. Kihuen, a Nevada Democrat, is bringing well-known 'Dreamer' Astrid Silva as his guest.

Democrats show how they will protest Trump's SOTU

Remember when Trump supposedly used the word "shithole"?

Well, there was no video of it (proof) but nonetheless, the MSM went (pardon the pun) apeshit over it.  Now, this video surfaces of Killary while she ran against Trump. 

Hillary Clinton: Thank You to Activist Bitches Supporting Bitches

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=ZfeHWDvjkiE&ab_channel=Maverick1001BG

1. Where was the MSM when it came to reporting this?

2. I had to give you the link because when I went to post the video I got the familiar "No video found" message. According to Google who owns YouTube this video doesn't exist. Which is a story onto itself.

Better click the link before it goes the way of Killary's emails. 

If the above doesn't work try this one.

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/videos/hillary-clinton-thanks-bitches-supporting-bitches/85566778/

Remember when Trump supposedly used the word "shithole"?