Visit Counter

Friday, May 11, 2018

Sarah Palin responds to McCain's regrets revealed in new book









U.S. Republican presidential nominee Senator John McCain, R-Ariz., and U.S. Republican vice-presidential nominee Alaska Governor Sarah Palin wave to the crowd at a campaign rally in Hershey, Penn., October 28, 2008. (REUTERS)



Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor and John McCain’s 2008 running mate, reportedly said she feels a “perpetual gut-punch” every time she hears about McCain’s regret in picking her for his team.

“That’s not what Sen. McCain has told me all these years, as he’s apologized to me repeatedly for the people who ran his campaign,” Palin told The Daily Mail. She said over the years, "I stop him all the time and say, 'Please don't apologize.'"

McCain wrote in his book, “The Restless Wave,” that he regretted not choosing his friend, Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman, as his running mate, calling it “another mistake that I made,” according to The New York Times. McCain reportedly wrote that his advisers warned him against picking her a vice-presidential candidate who caucused with Democrats.

--------------------


Lieberman, what does that tell you?

Want to talk about mistakes? Here's a doozy. Trump won Arizona's major counties right? 

Vote by countyTrumpClinton
Maricopa
747,361
702,907
Pima
167,428
224,661
Pinal
72,819
47,892
Yavapai
71,330
35,590
Mohave
58,282
17,455
Coconino
21,108
32,404
Yuma
25,165
24,605
Cochise
28,092
17,450
Navajo
20,577
16,459
Apache
8,240
17,083

 Yet these same people elected McCain and after his first term, it was clearly evident they elected a liberal masquerading as a Republican. They kept this idiotic, insane, streak going reelecting the traitor going all the way back to 1987! I just don't get it. If you're an AZ Republican why in the hell would you vote for McCain? 

Oh...10 to 1 he voted for Hillary.  

---------------------

His advisers picked Palin, the Alaska governor and Tea Party favorite.

“I attribute a lot of what we're hearing and reading regarding McCain's statements to his ghostwriter or ghostwriters,” Palin said. “I don't know unless I heard it from Sen. McCain myself.”






Share/Bookmark

Thursday, May 10, 2018

John McCain: Senate should reject Gina Haspel for CIA director





With his last dying breath...

Of course, had Trump nominated someone different he would have gotten McCain's full support. 




WASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain urged his Senate colleagues Wednesday night to reject Gina Haspel's nomination for CIA director, saying she failed to adequately answer questions about her role in the agency's torture program at a confirmation hearing earlier in the day.



On May 9th this story broke:


McCain did for the Republican party what Benedict Arnold did for the American Continental Army.

Another fine example:

Senator McCain reveals 'it was his duty' to give infamous golden showers dossier to the FBI and slams Trump for his 'reality show facsimile of toughness' in upcoming memoir



The Arizona senator is the second Republican to come out against Haspel's confirmation, meaning that GOP leaders may not have enough votes to confirm her. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has vowed to oppose Haspel because of her role in the agency's now-outlawed torture program.

Republicans hold a slim 51-49 majority in the Senate, and "no" votes by two Republicans could sink Haspel's nomination. So far, no Democrats have announced that they will support her.

McCain's opinion carries great weight because he is the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a former prisoner of war who was tortured by the Viet Cong in Hanoi during the Vietnam War. He has been an outspoken critic of the CIA's past use of torture, which was banned during the Obama administration.

McCain, who is undergoing cancer treatment in Arizona, could help defeat Haspel's nomination even if he is not well enough to fly to Washington, D.C., to vote. His absence also could deprive Republicans of the 51 votes they need to confirm Haspel.

"I believe Gina Haspel is a patriot who loves our country and has devoted her professional life to its service and defense," McCain said. "However, Ms. Haspel's role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans is disturbing. Her refusal to acknowledge torture's immorality is disqualifying. I believe the Senate should exercise its duty of advice and consent and reject this nomination."

Haspel testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday that, if confirmed, she would not restart the CIA's controversial interrogation. After the 9/11 attacks on America, the agency used waterboarding and other torture techniques to try to get information from suspected terrorists during the George W. Bush administration.

"Having served in that tumultuous time, I can offer you my personal commitment, clearly and without reservation, that under my leadership, on my watch, CIA will not restart such a detention and interrogation program," she told the senators. However, she stopped short of condemning the agency's past actions as immoral.

McCain said he doesn't believe Haspel went far enough in providing details about her CIA experience and her involvement in torture.

"Like many Americans, I understand the urgency that drove the decision to resort to so-called enhanced interrogation methods after our country was attacked," McCain said. "But as I have argued many times, the methods we employ to keep our nation safe must be as right and just as the values we aspire to live up to and promote in the world."

The Intelligence Committee is expected to recommend Haspel's confirmation to the full Senate. Republicans make up eight of the 15 members of the panel, and they all indicated Wednesday that they would support Haspel when the committee votes in the next few weeks.


CIA director nominee Gina Haspel says she wouldn't allow the agency to undertake "immoral" activities, even at the request of President Donald Trump. USA TODAY, USA TODAY

The only GOP senator on the committee who had expressed serious reservations about Haspel — Sen. Susan Collins of Maine — announced after Wednesday's hearing that she would support her confirmation.

"At the hearing, I questioned Ms. Haspel regarding the enhanced interrogation program that was started after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks," Collins said in a statement. "I have long believed — and have consistently stated— that this program was completely unacceptable and that waterboarding is tantamount to torture."

However, Collins cited Haspel's testimony that she "played no role in the creation of the interrogation program and that she wasn't even aware of its existence until more a year after it began."

"Furthermore, she said that she supported the 2015 law changes and made clear that she does not believe that the CIA should be in the 'interrogation business,'" Collins said. "She testified that under her leadership, the CIA would follow the law and would not resume enhanced interrogations and that she would not seek to repeal the law."

Democratic committee members focused much of their questioning on Haspel's oversight in 2002 of a secret "black site" in Thailand where suspected terrorists were subjected to waterboarding and confined in coffin-shaped boxes for hours.

Haspel, who spent more than 30 years as a covert agent before becoming the CIA's deputy director last year, also faced questions about her involvement in the destruction of 92 videotapes that showed prisoners being waterboarded.

She testified that she drafted the order to destroy the tapes at the direction of her boss, who decided to issue the directive on his own.





Share/Bookmark

Sunday, May 6, 2018

Memes for Conservatives







Dick of the year award





































































Share/Bookmark

Saturday, May 5, 2018

Unbelieveable



John Kerry 'secretly met with top Iranian official in clandestine diplomatic push to undermine Trump and salvage nuclear deal'


---------------------------------------


Former Secretary of State John Kerry has reportedly engaged in clandestine diplomacy with a top Iranian official in an attempt to salvage the nuclear deal framework. 

Kerry, who brokered the Iran deal for the Obama administration, met with Foreign Minister Javad Zarif about two weeks ago at the United Nations in Manhattan, a person briefed on the meetings told the Boston Globe.

The meeting was their second in two weeks and came amid a whirlwind of meetings between Kerry and German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, European Union official Federica Mogherini, and French President Emmanuel Macron.

President Donald Trump has threatened to reimpose sanctions on Iran at the next deadline for certifying Iran's compliance with the deal, which comes on May 12.

 

Then-Secretary of State John Kerry (left) is seen with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in 2015. Kerry met with Zarif about two weeks ago for secret talks in New York



Kerry has also been meeting with German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier (top) and French President Emmanuel Macron (bottom) in attempts to salvage the Iran deal

Kerry's flurry of clandestine diplomacy highlights his desperation to save the Iran nuclear deal, which he sees as a signature achievement.

The deal, between Iran and the five permanent members of the US security council, plus Germany and the EU, saw Iran agree to halt its nuclear weapons program for a decade in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. 

Kerry's involvement in trying to preserve the deal after leaving office came as a surprise to foreign policy experts.

'It is unusual for a former secretary of state to engage in foreign policy like this, as an actual diplomat and quasi-negotiator,' Michael O'Hanlon, a foreign policy expert at the Brookings Institution, told the Globe. 

'Of course, former secretaries of state often remain quite engaged with foreign leaders, as they should, but it's rarely so issue-specific, especially when they have just left office.' 



Kerry and Zarif are seen together in 2016. Kerry brokered the Iran nuclear deal for the Obama administration and is desperate to see it salvaged in spite of Trump's threats


The shadowy diplomacy will raise questions of a violation of the Logan Act, which prohibits private citizens acting on behalf of the United States during a dispute with foreign governments.

But the obscure 18th-century law has never been used to prosecute anyone - although it was raised to criticize Mike Flynn for his discussions with the Russian ambassador after the 2016 election. 

Macron, whom Kerry met within New York and Paris, in meetings conducted in both English and French, has been actively lobbying Trump to remain in the Iran deal. 

The French president said this week that that leaving the deal could mean war.

Meanwhile, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu has been pushing Trump to take a more aggressive posture toward Iran, Israel's archenemy. 

This week Netanyahu gave a presentation claiming he had proof that Iran 'lied' about its past nuclear weapons program.

On Thursday, Zarif threated to withdraw from the nuclear deal, saying Iran will not 'renegotiate or add onto' the deal.

The five-minute video shows Zarif behind his desk, delivering his message on the deal. He offers background first about the deal before laying into Trump and criticizing Europe for offering 'the United States more concessions from our pocket.' 

'On 11 occasions since the U.N. nuclear watchdog has confirmed that Iran has implemented all of its obligations,' Zarif, who studied in the U.S., says in American-accented English. 'In contrast, the U.S. has consistently violated the agreement, especially by bullying others from doing business with Iran.'

(Looks like the 'U.N. nuclear watchdogs' are just dogs. Must have read at least 25 articles on how Iran has violated the agreement with various missile tests and providing arms to their fellow terrorists Hamas and Hezbollah)









Share/Bookmark

Thursday, May 3, 2018

A different take on Donald Trump: (a non-political agenda)





By Charles Krauthammer




Trump Is Not A Liberal or Conservative,
he's a "Pragmatist." 
(Definition: A pragmatist is someone
who is practical and
focused on reaching a goal.
A pragmatist usually has
a straightforward, matter-of-fact approach
and doesn't let emotion distract him or her.)

"We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner
with friends at the home of other friends.
The dinner conversation varied
from discussions about antique glass and China
to theology and politics.

At one point,
reference was made to Donald Trump
being a conservative,
to which I responded that
Trump is not a conservative.

I said that I neither view nor do I believe
that Trump views himself as a conservative.
I stated it was my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist.

He sees a problem
and understands it must be fixed.
He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative,
he sees it only as a problem.

That is a quality that should be admired and applauded,
not condemned.
But I get ahead of myself.

Viewing problems from a Liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government,
more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class
in all economic strata.

Viewing things according
to the so-called Republican conservative perspective
has brought continued spending and globalism
to the detriment of American interests and well being,
denial of what the real problems are,
weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership
that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff,
appeasement oriented
and afraid of its own shadow.

In brief, it has brought liberal ideology
with a pachyderm as a mascot
juxtaposed to the ass of the Democrat Party.

Immigration isn't a Republican problem,
it isn't a Liberal problem,
it is a problem that threatens
the very fabric and infrastructure of America.

It demands a pragmatic approach
not an approach that is
intended to appease one group or another.

The impending collapse of the economy
wasn't a Liberal or Conservative problem,
it is an American problem.

That said, 
until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach 
to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things 
and the longevity of their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect.

Successful businessmen like Donald Trump
find ways to make things work,
they do not promise to accommodate.

Trump uniquely understands that
China's manipulation of currency
is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem.
It is a problem that threatens our financial stability
and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it.

Here again, successful businessmen, like Trump,
who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality
understand what is necessary to make business work,
and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle,
know that if something doesn't work,
you don't continue trying to make it work
hoping that at some point it will.

As a pragmatist,
Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises
of a cell phone in every pocket,
free college tuition,
and a $ 15-hour minimum wage
for working the drive-through at Carl's Hamburgers.

I argue that America needs pragmatists
because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them.
They do not see a problem
and compound it by creating more problems.

You may not like Donald Trump,
but I suspect that the reason some people do not like him
is because:

(1) he is antithetical to the "good old boy" method
of brokering backroom deals
that fatten the coffers of politicians;

(2) they are unaccustomed
to hearing a president speak
who is unencumbered by the financial shackles
of those who he owes vis-a-vis donations;

(3) he is someone
who is free of idiomatic political ideology;

(4) he says what he is thinking,
is unapologetic for his outspoken thoughts,
speaks very straightforward
using everyday language
that can be understood by all
(and is offensive to some who dislike him anyway)
making him a great communicator,
for the most part,
does what he says he will do
and;

(5) he is someone
who understands that
it takes more than hollow promises
and political correctness
to make America great again.

Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
talk about fixing America
is like listening to two lunatics
trying to "out crazy" one another.

Jeb Bush, John Kasich, and Marco Rubio
are owned lock, stock, and barrel
by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors
funding their campaigns.

Bush can deny it, but common sense
tells anyone willing to face facts
is that people don't give tens of millions
without expecting something in return.

We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues
and what has it brought us?
Are we better off today or worse off?
Has it happened overnight or
has it been a steady decline
brought on by both parties?

I submit that a pragmatist is just what America needs right now.
People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as
arrogance, but that is common among those who have never accomplished anything in their lives (or politicians who never really solved a problem,
because it’s better to still have an "issue(s) to be solved,"
so re-elect me to solve it, (which never happens)
and those who have always played it safe (again, all politicians)
not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve success).

Donald Trump put his total financial empire at risk
in running for president
and certainly did not need
or possibly even want the job;
that says it all.
He wants success for the U.S.
and her citizens
because he loves his country.







Share/Bookmark