Visit Counter

Monday, September 24, 2018

Another one comes out of the woodwork



Kavanaugh buffeted by more uncorroborated charges as Dems seek to derail nomination




The bitch was so shit faced she couldn't remember what happened the next day... let alone 36 years ago!

But thanks to a miracle of miracles... Her memory kicks in just before Kavanaugh is to be confirmed...Talk about a coincidence!

"Ramirez spent six days "carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney" before telling the full version of her story."

Since they're getting mileage out of it I suspect these allegations are going to pop up faster than Cosby can open a quaalude bootle.

Bet this isn't far off...




---------------------------



Second woman accuses Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct in new report; Peter Doocy reports from Capitol Hill.

An uncorroborated, decades-old claim that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to a college classmate did not pass The New York Times' smell test, according to the White House.

The claim by Debbie Ramirez that the federal judge sexually harassed her during a Yale University party is the latest to rock the confirmation process. It was published by The New Yorker, despite the fact that none of the people Ramirez said could back her story did so.

“The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge," the Times wrote in a story that followed the New Yorker report. "Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.” 

The White House pointed to several other potential inconsistencies as it mounted an aggressive pushback to the latest Kavanaugh bombshell. As Kavanaugh himself denied the accusation, the White House noted the accuser admitted there were “gaps” in her memory as she had been drinking at the time, she spent six days “assessing her memories” in conversations with her attorney and the magazine acknowledged no other eyewitnesses backed up the account. 

The claim followed that of a California woman who alleges Kavanaugh held her down and tried to force himself on her while both were in high school. Like Ramirez's claim, that charge, by Christine Blasey Ford, has not been corroborated.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, late Sunday slammed Senate Democrats for withholding information from the committee regarding the new sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh.

The Iowa Republican said the committee will attempt to evaluate the new claims, but said in a statement “it appears that they [Democrats] are more interested in a political takedown" than “pursing allegations through a bipartisan and professional investigative process.”

Ramirez claimed Kavanaugh exposed himself to her while she was intoxicated during a drinking game in the 1983-84 academic year, when Kavanaugh was a freshman. She also claimed she inadvertently touched Kavanaugh's penis when she pushed him away and says the incident left her "embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated."

The report stated that the magazine had not corroborated that Kavanaugh was at the party in question. An anonymous male classmate said he was told that Kavanaugh had exposed himself to Ramirez within the following days.

Ramirez admitted to the magazine that she does not fully remember the alleged incident because she had been drinking at the time. 



The magazine also reported that Ramirez spent six days "carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney" before telling the full version of her story.

Kavanaugh says the event “did not happen” and that the allegation is “a smear, plain and simple.”

A White House spokeswoman adds in a second statement that the allegation is “designed to tear down a good man.”

Grassley’s office said the committee’s majority staff learned about the allegations in the magazine’s article. His statement read that Democratic staff were aware of the allegations, but did not inform Republican staffers.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., called the timing of the new allegations “very suspicious.”















Share/Bookmark

Democrats Protesting In California.....again




On a tip from Ed Kilbane










Share/Bookmark

Sunday, September 23, 2018

The Daily Mail...this is their M.O.



To twist the news to fit their agenda.


Two prime examples:

You remember these two?



A female cop shot Botham Jean mistakenly thinking he was in her apartment.

This was the headline including link. 



As you can see they presented this in the worse possible light.

The Daily Mail mission is to incite and inflame the dimwits in our society.

And they fall for it every time.







This is Wendy Martinez. Martinez (newly engaged) was senselessly stabbed to death while she was out for an evening run in Washington, D.C.







Anthony Crawford a black male murdered her. I would show you his mug shot but so far I haven't been able to find one???




This was the headline:



What's fair is fair right? The female cop at least had a plausible explanation. Crawford stabbed Martinez for no apparent reason. So what I want to know is where was this headline?


Police arrest black 23-year-old man in random fatal stabbing of newly-engaged white tech company executive, 35, who was attacked on a jog in DC

One other thing. If it wasn't for America The Daily Mail wouldn't have a website. They write about Trump sooo much (all negative) you wouldn't even know they had a Prime Minister.

Don't know what they like better. Hating Trump...or kissing the Royal Family's ass.








Share/Bookmark

A little reflection


















Share/Bookmark

Saturday, September 22, 2018

Beto O'Rourke denies fleeing scene of 1998 DUI crash, contradicting police report







 O’Rourke must be extremely naive. He didn't know lying about a DWI is only reserved for royalty like the Kennedy's?


---------------------------------



U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke, the Texas Democrat vying to replace U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, contradicted police reports Friday by denying he tried to flee the scene of a 1998 drunken car crash.

O'Rourke was asked about the incident during a debate against Cruz at Southern Methodist University.

“I did not try to leave the scene of the accident, though driving drunk, which I did, is a terrible mistake for which there is no excuse or justification or defense,” O’Rourke said. “I can only tell you that I was able to have a second chance in my life.”

But O’Rourke’s comments appear to contradict the police reports published by the Houston Chronicle last month that claimed O’Rourke “attempted to leave the scene” after he lost control of his car and hit another vehicle in 1998.

“The driver attempted to leave the accident but was stopped by the [witness],” a police officer wrote, according to the police report.

The officer went on to state that O’Rourke was visibly intoxicated and “unable to be understood due to slurred speech.”

O’Rourke recorded 0.136 and 0.134 blood alcohol levels on Breathalyzer tests, the records said. The state legal limit at the time was 0.10. 






Share/Bookmark