Sonia Sotomayor

Sonia Sotomayor. You can't pronounce it S-O-T-O....M-A-Y-O-R. Like a Mayor of a city. No...you have to pronounce it with a certain Spanish inflection.... rolling the R. Thusly..... Soto-Mayorrrr.

Lindsey Grahamesty (Rush's name for him after he tried to pass the Shamesty Bill with McCain) tried to grill her but then added "he liked her". He also said, "unless there was a complete meltdown she was a shoe in to be confirmed". A real grill-master that one.

Republicans are in a war they can not win.Strategically, Obama really gave us the high hard one. For starters he could have appointed someone akin to Adolph Hitler and there is nothing the Republicans can do about it! But now, as the they oppose Soto-Mayorrr, they will be perceived in the spotlight as being against women and Hispanics.

Besides the "wise Latino" comment she made:

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life."

Imagine if a white guy said:

"I would hope that a wise Caucasian male with the richness of his experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion then a Black or Hispanic who hasn't lived that life"."

There would be no confirmation hearing because he would have been ridden out of town on a rail!

I think what sticks out is 8 out of 10 of the most important legal decisions she ever made were later overturned by a higher court. It is good in one way because the bad decisions she made were corrected. The killer is she was born June 25, 1954. She has a projected life expectancy of 27.1 years. Since Supreme Court Justices serve a life term (something that should be corrected) she has 27.1 years of making bad decisions.

In the future the fireman are revisited:

In 2010 the FRA (better know has the Fireman Reform Act) is passed by congress. It dictates that White fireman that take a test for a promotion and pass, while Black an Hispanic fireman take the same test and fail. The test then will be deemed invalid. Another law suit is filed and it goes to the Supreme Court. Soto-Mayorrr sides with congress.

In 2011 the FRA is amended by congress what is commonly called The Pelosi-Reid Amendment. It now is amended to read: If all White fireman take a test for promotion and fail, and all Black and Hispanic fireman pass the test, the test is deemed valid. A lawsuit is filed. Soto-Mayorrr sides with congress.

When asked how she came up with that decision she said, Hey.... What's fair is fair.

In 2012 you won't have to press one for English because that option will no longer be available. All boxes containing merchandise in Home Depot and Lowes, as with all retailers, will have Spanish on all four sides; thus avoiding the aggravating problem of turning the box around to find out what the hell it says in English. Once inside the box no more turning the directions up side down and inside out to read it in English because there won't be any.

Thank God that problem is resolved.

PS: I would like to extend my congratulations to Stuart Smalley on becoming a senator. From the fine state that also gave us Jesse Ventura.

Thanks Minnesota!

Sonia Sotomayor

This Proves What An Incompetent Asshole Barney Frank Is

This is a statement released 2 days ago from the WSJ.

By DEBORAH SOLOMON

The Treasury Department expects an initial payback from the nation's largest banks of at least $50 billion in bailout funds, according to people familiar with the matter, double the amount the government initially expected to recoup.

---

(In more ways then one)

Already Barney Frank has announced he intends to use this money to bailout foreclosed homeowners. Isn't that why we are in the trouble in the first place??? Does this fucking asshole ever read statistics!

(Should be his mug shot. Makes Madoff look like a rank amateur)

In general, the more loans you modify, the higher the percentage of redefaults: In the first quarter of 2008, 68,001 loans were modified, and 40,206, or 59 percent, of those have ended up 30 days late again, or worse. In the first quarter of 2009, 185,156 loan mods were done, and of those, 120,067, or 64 percent, ended up in trouble.

Our government is like a dog trying to catch its own tail. Giving money to a Democrat is like crack to a drug addict. Why not use the money to bring down the debt? Pure and simple. This is just a blatant attempt to buy votes with taxpayer money!

There is no Earthly reason why Frank should be re-elected. Yet it will happen. Kerry, Kennedy, and Frank. Provided by Massachusetts; a state noted for stupidity.

This Proves What An Incompetent Asshole Barney Frank Is

Cussing In Church

I couldn't resist this one.

A crusty old man walks into the local Baptist Church and says to the secretary, "I would like to join this damn church." The astonished woman replies, "I beg your pardon, sir. I must have misunderstood you. What did you say?" Listen up, damn it. I said I want to join this damn church!' 'I'm very sorry sir, but that kind of language is not tolerated in this church.

The secretary leaves her desk and goes into the pastor's study to inform him of her situation.

The pastor agrees that the secretary does not have to listen to that foul language. They both return to her office and the pastor asks the old geezer, 'Sir, what seems to be the problem here?' 'There is no damn problem,' the man says. 'I just won $200 million bucks in the damn lottery and I want to join this damn church to get rid of some of this damn money.'

"I see," said the pastor. "And is this bitch giving you a hard time?"

Cussing In Church

We The People Stimulus Package

We must be the biggest idiots God ever put on this Earth!

We The People Stimulus Package

What A Waste Of Time And Money

Story below


Point No. 1

Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, already incarcerated in a super max prison, (a terrorist, no matter what he calls himself) was brought to NY from Gitmo, and with the advice of his lawyer pleaded "not guilty."

Highlighted below in red he admits providing the explosives to blow up the US Embassy in Tanzania in 1998 killing more then 200 people. He offered up some lame excuse that he was the one who delivered the explosives; but he didn't know they would actually use it. Sounds like he is taking a cue from Pelosi.

We are at war folks! These guys are not your run of the mill criminals. They are POW's. They should be tried at Gitmo by a military tribunal and if found guilty they should receive whatever they deem necessary including the death penalty.

Point No 2.

Timothy McVey was a home grown terrorist. As you know he blew up the Murrah building killing 168 people. There was a day care center in the building. When asked how he felt about killing the
children his response was "collateral damage". He was rightfully put to death.

His sidekick Terry Nichols was somehow spared the death penalty. He was sentenced to 161 consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole. His trial cost 17 million dollars. There are about 250 POW's who are going to be brought here and tried individually. Do the math.


Didn't both Democrats and Republicans just vote against funding this?

from BBC News

Profile: Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani

Ghailani denies being a member of al-Qaeda.

Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani faces charges of war crimes over the US embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998, which killed more than 200 people.

Mr Ghailani, a Tanzanian, was arrested in Pakistan in July 2004 and handed over to the US at the beginning of 2005.

He was one of 14 detainees transferred in September 2006 from secret CIA prisons abroad to the Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba.

Charges brought by the Pentagon in March 2008 include murder, attacking civilians, conspiracy and providing material support to terrorism.

The Pentagon was reported at the time to be seeking the death penalty if the conviction is successful.

According to the transcript of a closed-door hearing in March 2007, Mr Ghailani admitted delivering explosives used to blow up the US embassy in Tanzania in 1998.

However, he said he did not know about the attack beforehand and apologized to the US government and the victims families, the transcript said.

'Scouting the embassy'

A short, squat man in his 30s, Mr Ghailani is said to have had dozens of aliases, including "Foopie" and "Ahmed the Tanzanian".

He was number eight on the FBI's most wanted list - his baby-faced photograph belying the severity of the charges on which he was indicted by New York authorities in 1998.

The Tanzania and Kenya bombings were almost simultaneous

The Tanzanian national is accused of buying the truck that carried the bomb used in the Dar es Salaam attack.

He and his accomplices are also accused of buying oxygen and acetylene tanks used to enhance the force of the explosion.

He is also said to have escorted the bomb maker between Dar Es Salaam and the Kenyan city of Mombasa after the bomb was made as well as scouting the US embassy with the suicide bomb driver.

The near-simultaneous bombings in August 1998 killed 213 people in Nairobi and 11 people in Dar Es Salaam as well as injuring thousands more.

'Significant arrest'

Mr Ghailani is thought to have been born on the Tanzanian island of Zanzibar in 1970 or 1974 - making him 39 or 35 years old. He is said to speak fluent Swahili and English.

Analysts described him as a very important figure, who was probably sent to east Africa at the time of the bombings by Osama Bin Laden's second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahiri.

It is suggested that Mr Ghailani fled to Afghanistan after being indicted in 1998.

According to the US transcript, he admitted visiting an al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan after the bombings. But he denied being a member of al-Qaeda.

Mr Ghailani was reported to have been in the Liberian capital, Monrovia, in 2001, with another suspect in the embassy bombings, a Kenyan man Fazul Abdullah Mohammed.

The UK's Observer newspaper reported in 2002 that the two men allegedly ran a lucrative al-Qaeda financing operation, trading illegal "blood diamonds" for cash.

The paper said the operation ran into trouble in June 2001, when reports reached al-Qaeda that Mr Ghailani and Mr Mohammed were lavishing money on women, presents and alcohol.

In May 2003, the FBI named Mr Ghailani on a list of seven people it suspected of concocting a fresh al-Qaeda plot, and increased the bounty on his head to $5m.

On 25 July 2004 he was arrested in Pakistan along with his Uzbek wife.

Pakistani officials at the time said Mr Ghailani's arrest was the most significant since the detention in March 2003 of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the 11 September attacks on the US.

What A Waste Of Time And Money

545 vs 300,000,000 Revisited

1. I thought I would repost this. It is so simple and true, not to mention, the most popular post of all time. Naturally I didn't write it.

2. Liberals, please don't write me complaining how it chastises only Democrats. How you come up with that assertion is beyond me. But then again; you are a liberal.

By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red .

If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it.......... is up to you.

545 vs 300,000,000 Revisited

Laptops for detainees! Have we gone mad?

It is well documented Muslims have an affinity for cutting peoples heads off. For this vile (beyond what words can convey behavior) the United States government in a act of supreme retaliation are now giving Gitmo prisoners laptops.

First they were offered a colonoscopy for anyone 55 years of age or older. There are US citizens without health care who cannot afford a colonoscopy! Now we're giving them laptops!!!

Rumor has it they were issued HP's but the terrorists were upset with that choice so they were given Apples. Reportedly the HP's were then sent to Al-Qaeda to this address:

Osama Bin Laden

Cave No. 1

Quetta, Pakistan

Zip Code 666

The HP's were filled with uplifting quotes from the Bible in the hope it will rehabilitate them.

Some Guantánamo detainees to get laptops

To better prepare them for life in asylum, the U.S. military is setting up a virtual computer lab for some Guantánamo captives now cleared for release.

BY CAROL ROSENBERG

crosenberg@MiamiHerald.com

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVY BASE, Cuba -- These captives already get to order fast-food takeout from the base and have access to a phone booth for weekly calls. Now some 17 Uighur Muslims awaiting a nation to grant them asylum are about to go high-tech, with laptops and web training.

While awaiting details of President Barack Obama's order to close the prison camps by Jan. 22, commanders here have ordered 20 laptops for the captives of Camp Iguana.

''As you know, detainees are leaving this place,'' said Army Lt. Col. Miguel Mendez, who oversees detainee classes, a multilingual library and now-emerging virtual computer lab. "We're getting them computer classes to prepare for their return.''

A federal judge last year ordered that the men be set free after reviewing the American military's reasons for holding them in habeas corpus petitions that reached the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. by order of the Supreme Court.

But the Chinese citizens in exile have no place to go.

As devout Muslims, they fear religious persecution in their homeland, in part because of the stigma of having been held at Guantánamo for allegedly getting paramilitary training in Afghanistan before Sept. 11, 2001.

Attorney General Eric Holder said some could come to the United States for resettlement, triggering protests from members of Congress around Virginia, where other Uighurs live and have offered to settle them.

Nury Turkel, a Washington, D.C.-based Uighur rights activist, hailed the computer training development. Internet access could allow the men to listen to Uighur broadcasts of Radio Free Asia, he said.

Moreover, laptops would help the men ''be reintroduced into a modern society,'' said Turkel, who noted that after eight years in U.S. custody the computer training "also would give hope to the men that their freedom is nearing.''

Some Uighurs sent from Guantánamo to asylum in Albania several years ago now e-mail with Turkel regularly, he said.

Attorneys for the men did not respond to requests for comment.

Laptops for detainees! Have we gone mad?

One angry woman

This is a letter from a woman who lives in New Brunswick, Canada. I don't know who she is; but she damn sure makes sense.



Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001 and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan, across the Potomac from the nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency.

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan.

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

I'll care when the Canadian media stops pretending that their freedom of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a CANADIAN soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:

I don't care.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed 'special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it,

I don't care!!

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behaviour!

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country!





I wonder how she feels about closing Gitmo?

One angry woman

Chandra Levy Scandal Revisited

This story is not about Chandra Levy or Gary Condit. It goes far deeper then that. This is a story about the manipulative powers of the main stream media. Lets turn back the clock to May 2001:


This is Chandra Levy. She was found murdered
at Rock Creek Park in Washington, DC

She was having an affair with this guy. Gary Condit.
A married Democratic Congressman from California.

When Chandra Levy went missing Gary Condit had some explaining to do. He denied over and over that he was having an affair.

Finally he admitted it after he got caught trying to hide a
gift box for her in the dumpster. The media went crazy with speculation. It was front page news in the newspapers. It was the lead story on all the network news stations.

Did her kill? Did he pay someone to kill her? Why? Was she going to the press with the story to ruin his career? Where's the body? He had motive. He had to do it! The variety of stories was endless!

Fast forward to March 2009:

Enter this creep. Ingmar Guandique.


Now the real truth is revealed and the murderer arrested. Barely a whimper from the MSM. You would need the Hubbell telescope to find any coverage! Why is that I wondered?

The Huffington Post blog wrote this which is typical of most media outlets:

WASHINGTON — In the nearly eight years since intern Chandra Levy was attacked and killed in a Washington park, witnesses said a Salvadoran immigrant boasted in letters and jailhouse conversations that he picked out women randomly and stalked them. One witness said the man even bragged of maiming and killing people..



Salvadoran Immigrant? As you read the blog you get the connotation the guy is merely an immigrant who happens to be of Salvadoran decent. The plain and simple truth is; this guy is an outlaw. He is in this country illegally period. No spin no bullshit. Once the MSM found out he is here illegally they dropped the story quicker then John Edwards leaving a hotel room!

This is another fine example of spin journalism from Time Magazine. The title tries to equate our border with the Great wall of China or the Berlin Wall. Take your pick.

Check the caption!

The Great Wall of America

By David Von Drehle Thursday, Jun. 19, 2008

West of Naco, Arizona, some immigrants, including a 10-year-old boy, scale the new border fence in an effort to reach the States.

SPIN:

They like to substitute the word immigrants for what they actually are...illegals.What this really is, is a test of America's stupidity. The media wants to hold your hand. Just like your mother did, when you were young, crossing the street. Aren't they wonderful.

Chandra Levy Scandal Revisited

Obama calls Gitmo 'a misguided experiment'

I got to hand it to Obama. He is one smooth talking S.O.B. He stood in the National Archives building in Washington, DC.... just in front of The Declaration of Independence... and gave the most wonderful speech I ever heard.

The Messiah's words echoed through the halls, wrapped in the American flag, dripping with self-righteousness. Chris Matthews must have felt another tingle going up his leg.

Were there any out and out lies? Maybe not.... But lets just say he was less then forthcoming with the facts, starting with this quote.

Instead of giving Bush a pat on the back for keeping us safe since 911 he said this:

"There are no neat or easy answers here," Obama said in a speech in which he pledged anew to clean up what he said was "quite simply a mess, a misguided experiment" at Guantanamo that he had inherited from the Bush administration.

He went on to say:

"In the midst of all these challenges, however, my single most important responsibility as President is to keep the American people safe. It's the first thing that I think about when I wake up in the morning. It's the last thing that I think about when I go to sleep at night. "

I suggest that on the surface this may be true. But when you dig down he is trying to fulfill a campaign promise to far left organizations like Code Pink the left wing Cindy Sheehan's that got him elected. I also believe he cares more about world-wide opinion on Gitmo then he does about the true safety of Americans. Its funny. All the bleeding heart cry baby liberals around the world, including the US, want Gitmo closed; but no one wants the terrorists in their own back yard!

Another quote:

"As we make these decisions, bear in mind the following fact: Nobody has ever escaped from one of our federal, supermax prisons, which hold hundreds of convicted terrorists."

I guess as President of the United States no one informed him that Gitmo is registered as a supermax prison. Mr. Obama no one has ever escaped from Gitmo either; but some released detainee's went on to kill again!

Mr. Obama. As you know we are up to our eyeballs in dept. In large part due to the 787 billion dollar stimulus plan you signed into law that no one bothered to read(10,000 dead people got a check). I don't know if any one told you but Gitmo cost the American taxpayer 200 million dollars to build. It was built for the sole purpose of keeping these butchers where they belong. What do you suggest we do with this Gitmo facility the US taxpayer just paid 200 million dollars for? A low ball estimate of over 100 million dollars is what it is going to take to bring these dogs to the United States. Your own party voted against funding it for Christ's sake! Money is easy to spend when it's not yours... isn't it?

By the way Mr. Obama. 

 I'm sure you heard about the homegrown terror suspects arrested in NYC. They were going to blow up a temple and shoot down a military plane. All of these guys were in jail on a unrelated charges when they converted to radical Islam. What do you think is going to happen if you introduce 240 Gitmo dogs into our federal prison system??? I'll tell you what it will do. Our federal prisons become a breeding ground for terrorists!

One final note. I noticed you conveniently left out the welfare check any released detainee's will be receiving. Smart move. In this eloquent speech you gave, you blamed Bush for everything. Since your so slippery with the facts you failed to mention why we have not been attacked since 911. There is a reason. Which is it Mr. Obama.... an accident or just a coincidence or maybe waterboarding? 

Obama calls Gitmo 'a misguided experiment'

Now It Has Come To This!

Remember.....Press one for English........Press two for Spanish?

Now it has come to this!

If I was one of these Supervisor's I would file a multi-million dollar law suit.


A 36 second video. You won't believe what you hear

Now It Has Come To This!

Taliban's Alternative To Waterboarding

Warning:
This video gives new meaning to the word graphic!!!!
(No BS)

We all know Pelosi said she knew nothing about waterboarding. Liberals condemn it. However, no one has ever died from waterboarding.




Now it is time to look at what goes on..... on the other side of the fence.

How do you feel now? Do you feel like throwing up? I was so repulsed I turned it off.
Now image what's going to happen if Gitmo is closed down. Some of these butchers are going to be released into our American society. Your taxes are going to them in the form of a Welfare check!

As sickening as this video is it is a reminder of what animals they truly are.

How comfortable are you going to be with these butchers living next door?

Write your Congressman or Senator now and demand they not be released!

Taliban's Alternative To Waterboarding

Shocking.....Specter A Democrat!

The shock of a lifetime!!! .........Someone cut me some slack.

I was going to say he is a closet liberal but he is in the closet about as much as Barney Frank!

There are two constants in life:

1. The sun coming up in the morning.

2. Arlen Specter stabbing the Republican party in the back.

Every time the Republican Party needed his vote on a pivotal issue... The Bailout... Illegals getting Social Security... Abortion.... The Ted Kennedy inspired Shamnesty Bill.... to name a few, he always went the other way.

Unequivocally Arlen Specter has told us this....I have no value system. Screw America. I would run in the Nazi party as long as I was re-elected Senator!

I hope the people of PA see this for what it is. A con job!

He is one of the reasons I have been shouting for term limits.

Here is the problem as I see it with Specter on the next go around. Americans are basically stupid, becoming just another twig in the river of hope and change. We allow the "wind" of the media to influence are decisions and follow blindly whatever the "growing trend" is with no research of the candidate. We are so absorbed with are everyday lives that we expect nothing from are politicians. And that's exactly what we get! Why do I say that? Because I could almost guarantee you people like Pelosi, Specter, Frank, and Dodd (all incompetent lying bastards) are going to be re-elected.

A case in point.

Let's take the good people of Minnesota. First they elect Jesse (The Joke) Ventura a wrestler for governor. Now it appears Stewart Smalley (aka Al Franken) is going to be a Senator. Why? Because Donald Duck turned it down.

Oh....I almost forgot. They also elected Keith Ellison , a Minnesota Democrat and the first Muslim ever elected to Congress and sworn in on the Koran.

It gets even better. This woman is running for the Senate in Louisiana. Her name is Stormy Davis. What are her qualifications? She is a porn star! Larry Flint of Hustler magazine is going to be her campaign manager. Hey, I ain't making this stuff up. I'm just trying to keep you.... a breast.... of the situation.

Getting back to Specter. I hope the people of PA see him for what he really is. He's not a Republican or Democrat. He's a son-of-bitch!

Shocking.....Specter A Democrat!

READ THIS NOW!...In Case You Forgot

Security Before Politics

By Porter J. Goss
Saturday, April 25, 2009

Followed by an excellent commentary by Ed Kilbane

Since leaving my post as CIA director almost three years ago, I have
remained largely silent on the public stage. I am speaking out now because I
feel our government has crossed the red line between properly protecting our
national security and trying to gain partisan political advantage. We can't
have a secret intelligence service if we keep giving away all the secrets.
Americans have to decide now.

A disturbing epidemic of amnesia seems to be plaguing my former colleagues
on Capitol Hill. After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, members of the
committees charged with overseeing our nation's intelligence services had no
higher priority than stopping al-Qaeda. In the fall of 2002, while I was
chairman of the House intelligence committee, senior members of Congress were
briefed on the CIA's "High Value Terrorist Program," including the development
of "enhanced interrogation techniques" and what those techniques were. This
was not a one-time briefing but an ongoing subject with lots of back and
forth between those members and the briefers.

Today, I am slack-jawed to read that members claim to have not understood
that the techniques on which they were briefed were to actually be
employed; or that specific techniques such as "waterboarding" were never mentioned.
It must be hard for most Americans of common sense to imagine how a member
of Congress can forget being told about the interrogations of Sept. 11
mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed. In that case, though, perhaps it is not
amnesia but political expedience.

Let me be clear. It is my recollection that:

-- The chairs and the ranking minority members of the House and Senate
intelligence committees, known as the Gang of Four, were briefed that the CIA
was holding and interrogating high-value terrorists.

-- We understood what the CIA was doing.

-- We gave the CIA our bipartisan support.

-- We gave the CIA funding to carry out its activities.

-- On a bipartisan basis, we asked if the CIA needed more support from
Congress to carry out its mission against al-Qaeda.

I do not recall a single objection from my colleagues. They did not vote
to stop authorizing CIA funding. And for those who now reveal filed
"memorandums for the record" suggesting concern, real concern should have been
expressed immediately -- to the committee chairs, the briefers, the House
speaker or minority leader, the CIA director or the president's national
security adviser -- and not quietly filed away in case the day came when the
political winds shifted. And shifted they have.

Circuses are not new in Washington, and I can see preparations being made
for tents from the Capitol straight down Pennsylvania Avenue. The CIA has
been pulled into the center ring before. The result this time will be the
same: a hollowed-out service of diminished capabilities. After Sept. 11, the
general outcry was, "Why don't we have better overseas capabilities?" I
fear that in the years to come this refrain will be heard again: once a
threat -- or God forbid, another successful attack -- captures our attention and
sends the pendulum swinging back. There is only one person who can shut
down this dangerous show: President Obama.

Unfortunately, much of the damage to our capabilities has already been
done. It is certainly not trust that is fostered when intelligence officers
are told one day "I have your back" only to learn a day later that a knife is
being held to it. After the events of this week, morale at the CIA has
been shaken to its foundation.

We must not forget: Our intelligence allies overseas view our inability to
maintain secrecy as a reason to question our worthiness as a partner.
These allies have been vital in almost every capture of a terrorist.

The suggestion that we are safer now because information about
interrogation techniques is in the public domain conjures up images of unicorns and
fairy dust. We have given our enemy invaluable information about the rules by
which we operate. The terrorists captured by the CIA perfected the act of
beheading innocents using dull knives. Khalid Sheik Mohammed boasted of the
tactic of placing explosives high enough in a building to ensure that
innocents trapped above would die if they tried to escape through windows.
There is
simply no comparison between our professionalism and their brutality.

Our enemies do not subscribe to the rules of the Marquis of Queensbury.
"Name, rank and serial number" does not apply to non-state actors but is,
regrettably, the only question this administration wants us to ask. Instead of
taking risks, our intelligence officers will soon resort to wordsmithing
cables to headquarters while opportunities to neutralize brutal radicals
are lost.

The days of fortress America are gone. We are the world's superpower. We
can sit on our hands or we can become engaged to improve global human
conditions. The bottom line is that we cannot succeed unless we have good
intelligence. Trading security for partisan political popularity will ensure that
our secrets are not secret and that our intelligence is destined to fail
us.

The writer, a Republican, was director of the CIA from September 2004 to
May 2006 and was chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence from 1997 to 2004.

Please take the time to cut and paste this article and email it to your Senators and Congressman with your take on it. Here's mine.

We wholeheartedly agree with the premise of this article by Porter Goss. Please use your influence to put a stop to these political "gotcha games". Go back and look at the pictures of the trade towers, look at the poor people, jumping hand-in-hand from them to their death in order to escape the searing heat and end their misery. Look at the Berg and Pearl beheading video's. Enhanced interrogation techniques didn't cause this, they prevented more of it.

I guess you can't say it any better then that. Thanks Ed.

READ THIS NOW!...In Case You Forgot

The Crucifixon Of George W. Bush

Love him or hate him George Bush kept this country safe after 911. There was not one documented attack. This is irrefutable. I know of two he had thwarted. One at JFK and the other at Fort Dix.

There were others, but you have to look hard, because the media likes to bury it.

Now as a reward for keeping our country safe the Obama administration (with the inducement of Pelosi) wants to bring criminal charges against Bush and his advisers for using harsh interrogation techniques mainly water boarding.


"Were going to go to where the truth takes us" Obama said. Where was that same logic when Geithner and everyone of his appointee's got caught cheating on their taxes?


As I have stated before the Democrats preoccupation with the way these prisoners are treated never fails to fascinate me. Personally, as far as I'm concerned, you could take Khalid Sheik Mohammed and the rest of his cohorts, cut their balls off and shove them down their throats!

This was Pelosi's original statement in the Washington Post

Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used

By Paul Kane

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice, rejecting GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial tactics by late 2002.

Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that it was actually being used, according to Pelosi.

"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You lying f-ing bitch!

This is the Washington Post article that (to use her term) caught her... in a flat out lie.

In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.

Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

"The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough," said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange.

Congressional leaders from both parties would later seize on waterboarding as a symbol of the worst excesses of the Bush administration's counterterrorism effort. The CIA last week admitted that videotape of an interrogation of one of the waterboarded detainees was destroyed in 2005 against the advice of Justice Department and White House officials, provoking allegations that its actions were illegal and the destruction was a coverup.

Yet long before "waterboarding" entered the public discourse, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods, according to interviews with multiple U.S. officials with firsthand knowledge.

With one known exception, no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter. The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Pelosi and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan).

Individual lawmakers' recollections of the early briefings varied dramatically, but officials present during the meetings described the reaction as mostly quiet acquiescence, if not outright support. "Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing," said Goss, who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006. "And the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement."

Congressional officials say the groups' ability to challenge the practices was hampered by strict rules of secrecy that prohibited them from being able to take notes or consult legal experts or members of their own staffs. And while various officials have described the briefings as detailed and graphic, it is unclear precisely what members were told about waterboarding and how it is conducted. Several officials familiar with the briefings also recalled that the meetings were marked by an atmosphere of deep concern about the possibility of an imminent terrorist attack.

"In fairness, the environment was different then because we were closer to Sept. 11 and people were still in a panic," said one U.S. official present during the early briefings. "But there was no objecting, no hand-wringing. The attitude was, 'We don't care what you do to those guys as long as you get the information you need to protect the American people.' "

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After being given an hour long briefing in 2002 where she and three others were told of the waterboarding and given a tour of the detention facility she now states this.

“Well…But the CIA didn’t tell me they would really use it!"

Remember Clinton.... what does.... is mean? Now we have... what does.... know mean!

This has the same ring of truth and sincerity to it as a guy sitting in a church for 20 years, married by the worthless waste of skin pastor, having your children baptized by that pastor, listening to the sermons of that pastor of inaccurate lies of hate filled rants against America. Then have the balls to claim you knew nothing about it!!!


By the way, I seem to remember a president pointing his finger while lying to 300 million people on national television. Whatever happened to him? Oh..I remember now. He's the one whose wife ran for president after dodging bullets in Bosnia.



This is nothing more then a diversion to keep America's eyes off the real problem. America is broke. In more ways then one!

The Crucifixon Of George W. Bush

Hackers

The only reason for the existence of hackers is to make life miserable for everybody else. This is how this low life thrives. What they do is tantamount to someone like you or I going to a Wal-Mart parking lot and pouring sand into some one's gas tank that you don't even know.

If you are aware of these slimy bastards and know where they reside. Kill it.... before it breeds.

Hackers

Minnow Swallowing The Whale

Every time this happens it kills me. I'm talking about the Somali terrorists (the media likes to call "Pirates") taking over a US container ship. Since 2005 there have been dozens of ships from various countries hijacked by the Somali's. It is estimated they have made over $30 million in ransom.

This is the Maersk Alabama. The ship they captured. It is 508 ft long and weighs 30,662 tons. These ships can carry in excess of $100 million in cargo. It is so big you can't get the whole ship in the photo.

These are the five Somali's that hijacked the ship in what appears to be a 20ft runabout. The guy nearest the bow has a RPG straddling his shoulder. The guy in the middle is leaning back, having a beer, expounding on his sexual exploits. The one to his immediate right has a rifle maybe a machine gun. The guy to his right is wondering if the guy in the middle is talking about his girlfriend. The guy at the stern just came along for the ride and is now wondering if this was such a good idea.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Why does this happen? Because all of these ships are unarmed. Combine that with the fact Somalia is a lawless country with no government.To add frosting to the cake according to Wikipedia they get their weapons from Yemen whose population is 99% Muslim. Lets see.... Muslim, terrorists, and guns. Not exactly an unheard of combination!

So what is the world of shipping going to do? Take down the flag of their country of origin and hoist the white flag? Oh....wait a minute..they already did that!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------





The solution. To borrow an over worked line from Scarface. "Let me introduce you to my little friend."

I give you the Vulcan 20mm cannon. It fires 6,200 rounds per minute. A hail of bullets so fierce a mosquito couldn't get through at several thousand yards! Imagine a dozen of these placed around a cargo ship.





This is his big brother. Four of these wouldn't hurt either.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



This worked out so well for the Somali's I think I'm going to the store and buy a pea shooter and have Fort Knox surrender to me.

Bottom line. Blow these bastards into next week.

Minnow Swallowing The Whale

The Senator And The Congressman

I got to thinking the other day when Barney Frank, a homosexual, called Justice Scalia a homophobe. I started to think about the Larry Criag scandal.



Mug shot of Craig 2007


You remember Larry Craig? He was the Republican Senator from Idaho. I said (was) because he was forced to resign in disgrace after a sting operation in a bathroom incident in Minneoplis when his foot touched a police officer's foot in the stall next to him. There was no sexual act committed.


Craig pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct by signing and mailing a plea petition, dated August 1, 2007, to the Hennepin District Court in Minnesota. He paid $575, including fines and fees.

After the incident men were coming out of the woodwork claiming to have had sex with Craig. Late night talk shows had a field day. I'm not defending Craig. I think he's guilty.

BUT


Hold this thought a minute... He was forced to resign in disgrace...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Enter Congressman Barney Frank

Barney Frank Keynote Speaker at Gayla

By: The Corn

Barney Frank Threesome

Guess who gave the keynote speech at the People’s Inaugural LGBT Gayla, yup you guessed right Barney Frank. Wearing a tuxedo and spewing his normal mumble jumble non-sense Barney Frank the gay congressmen from Massachusetts talked about anal sex and prostate dildos. For those lucky enough to attend I am sure most enjoyed the thoughts of a naked Frank hovering behind them!

-------------------------------------------------

Barney Frank grabbing Mike Evans' ass at the Equality Forum in Philedelphia

---------------------------------------------------------------

(Barney Frank and another of his gay lovers.)

--------------------------------------------------------

In 1990, The House Ethics Committee recommended Frank be reprimanded because he "reflected discredit upon the House" by using his congressional office to fix 33 of Steve Gobie's parking tickets. Frank confirmed that he paid Gobie for sex, hired him with personal funds as an aide and wrote letters on congressional stationery on his behalf to Virginia probation officials, but Frank said he fired Gobie when he learned that prostitution clients were visiting the apartment.

The investigation into Gobie and Frank's interactions were prompted by Gobie's attempt to cash in on assertions that Frank knew and approved of Gobie's illegal activities in the Frank residence. "Two years [after Frank fired Gobie], Gobie tried unsuccessfully to sell his story to the Washington Post. He then gave the story to the Washington Times for nothing, in hopes of getting a book contract for the male version of "The Mayflower Madam."

-----------------------------------------------

Another of Barney Frank's Lovers Was An Executive with Fannie Mae

Herbert H Moses

This is probably why Frank was supporting Fannie and Freddie as they were swirling around about to go down the toilet!

-------------------------------------------------------------




This is his current live in boyfriend


-------------------------------------------------------

Bottom line. Craig (R) tried to cover up is sexuality and had to resign.

on the other hand

Frank (D) is openly gay. He is referred to as the "honorable" Barney Frank.

I don't know. Maybe it's me. But it seems there's
a double standard here.

You make the call.

The Senator And The Congressman